Re: [cellml-discussion] Call for community input: final decisionson anumber of specification related issues

2008-03-04 Thread Randall Britten
Hi > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cellml-discussion- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Nickerson ... > Currently I am getting the impression that any discussion of tracker > items is superfluous and decisions will always be made by the Auckland > meeting. We

Re: [cellml-discussion] Call for community input: final decisionson anumber of specification related issues

2008-03-04 Thread David Nickerson
> I think this creates a bit of a 'catch-22' situation because we need a > decision process to decide on a decision process. I think that until we > have such a process, we need to stick to the status quo, which has > generally been that we discuss things with the community, and if there > is d

Re: [cellml-discussion] Call for community input: final decisions on anumber of specification related issues

2008-03-04 Thread Randall Britten
Hi I have summarised the decision as a comment on the Proposal handling tracker item (https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347) This currently only applies for the CellML specification work. Regards, Randall > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cellml-di

Re: [cellml-discussion] Call for community input: final decisions on anumber of specification related issues

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Miller
David Nickerson wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > While I agree that the listed proposals all seem to have reached > consensus and that final decisions need to be made in order for the > development of CellML 1.2 to progress, this seems a rather arbitrary > manner in which to be declaring the proposal han

Re: [cellml-discussion] Call for community input: final decisions on anumber of specification related issues

2008-03-04 Thread David Nickerson
Hi Andrew, While I agree that the listed proposals all seem to have reached consensus and that final decisions need to be made in order for the development of CellML 1.2 to progress, this seems a rather arbitrary manner in which to be declaring the proposal handling method. Especially as the d

[cellml-discussion] Call for community input: final decisions on a number of specification related issues

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi all, There are a number of items in the CellML tracker regarding decisions about the next version of the CellML specification, which have been discussed in the past and around which consensus seems to have been reached, but on which we have yet to declare a final decision. By making a final

[cellml-discussion] Proposed CellML 1.2 change: removing group and replacing it with an encapsulation element

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Miller
Hi all, As has been previously discussed on this mailing list, grouping in the general sense can be used to represent information such as containment which would more appropriately be treated as metadata and represented in RDF/XML. The overall process of moving this information out into metada