>> - At the moment, CellML doesn't explicitly support the rem element
>> (remainder function in MathML), even though CellML does allow its use (at
>> the risk of ending in a situation where a model may work fine in a given
>> CellML tool -- that supports the rem element --, but not in a nother -- t
Alan Garny wrote:
>> At the break-away session on the versioning strategy for CellML (which
>> followed the Auckland CellML meeting today) we discussed the future of
>> how we would version CellML, including whether we would put all elements
>> for the next version of CellML in a completely differe
Matt Halstead wrote:
>> Otherwise, Matt wrote:
>>
>>
>>> ... You might want to scan a document to see what
>>> "versions" the model conforms up to, but one of the nice things about
>>> pushing these new elements/attributes into new namespaces is that you
>>> can still treat a model as say 1.1
> Otherwise, Matt wrote:
>
> > ... You might want to scan a document to see what
> > "versions" the model conforms up to, but one of the nice things about
> > pushing these new elements/attributes into new namespaces is that you
> > can still treat a model as say 1.1 even if it contains 1.2 element
> At the break-away session on the versioning strategy for CellML (which
> followed the Auckland CellML meeting today) we discussed the future of
> how we would version CellML, including whether we would put all elements
> for the next version of CellML in a completely different namespace, or
> onl
On 9/19/07, Andrew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Halstead wrote:
> > "Andrew was opposed to the idea of changing all the namespaces, and
> > suggested changing the namespace of a particular element in only some
> > circumstances:"
> >
> > I agree very strongly with this. It would make wr
Matt Halstead wrote:
> "Andrew was opposed to the idea of changing all the namespaces, and
> suggested changing the namespace of a particular element in only some
> circumstances:"
>
> I agree very strongly with this. It would make writing out xpath
> expressions simpler since you know absolutely w
"Andrew was opposed to the idea of changing all the namespaces, and
suggested changing the namespace of a particular element in only some
circumstances:"
I agree very strongly with this. It would make writing out xpath
expressions simpler since you know absolutely what namespace for what
elements
Hi all,
At the break-away session on the versioning strategy for CellML (which
followed the Auckland CellML meeting today) we discussed the future of
how we would version CellML, including whether we would put all elements
for the next version of CellML in a completely different namespace, or
