cellml-discussion-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Miller
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 March 2008 3:11 p.m.
> To: CellML Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] Call for community input: final
> decisions on anumber of specification related issues
>
> David Nic
David Nickerson wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> While I agree that the listed proposals all seem to have reached
> consensus and that final decisions need to be made in order for the
> development of CellML 1.2 to progress, this seems a rather arbitrary
> manner in which to be declaring the proposal han
Hi Andrew,
While I agree that the listed proposals all seem to have reached
consensus and that final decisions need to be made in order for the
development of CellML 1.2 to progress, this seems a rather arbitrary
manner in which to be declaring the proposal handling method. Especially
as the d
