[cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files

Hi folks, I'm just fishing for some comments on how to handle cases where there are models which describe, for example, the properties of multiple cell types. Bondarenko et al. 2004 is a good example of this: In the Bondarenko et al. 2004 publication described here, the authors develop a

Re: [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files

Addendum: The model in the repository describes the apex cells only. James Lawson wrote: Hi folks, I'm just fishing for some comments on how to handle cases where there are models which describe, for example, the properties of multiple cell types. Bondarenko et al. 2004 is a good example

Re: [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files

This scratches a couple of important pending issues: 1) I feel the term 'variant' is odd (even though I originally suggested it). It was intended to mean that the model labelled as a variant is a variation of the one it is a variant of. However, this isn't really a very applicable definition,

Re: [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files

Matt wrote: This scratches a couple of important pending issues: 1) I feel the term 'variant' is odd (even though I originally suggested it). It was intended to mean that the model labelled as a variant is a variation of the one it is a variant of. However, this isn't really a very

Re: [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files

Matt wrote: This scratches a couple of important pending issues: 1) I feel the term 'variant' is odd (even though I originally suggested it). It was intended to mean that the model labelled as a variant is a variation of the one it is a variant of. However, this isn't really a very

Re: [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files

On 4/12/07, James Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt wrote: This scratches a couple of important pending issues: 1) I feel the term 'variant' is odd (even though I originally suggested it). It was intended to mean that the model labelled as a variant is a variation of the one it is a