[CentOS] How to setup both Transpaent Proxy and firewall on the same Machine.

2007-06-12 Thread Indunil Jayasooriya
Hi ALL, I want to setup Transpaent Proxy on the box running iptables Firewall. With iptables, I have given below rules. iptables -F INPUT iptables -F OUTPUT iptables -F FORWARD iptables -F -t nat iptables -F -t mangle #Enabling ip forwarding echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward #enable s

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread arnuld
On 6/12/07, DamianS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ROFL. You admit to being a noob and then trying to tell us Fedora is a buggy distro? Sorry dude, but you're just plain wrong - Fedora does NOT suck. i used Fedora 2,3,4, & 6. it is OT so i will keep it short: FC-2 - year 2005, my 1st *NIX distro

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread arnuld
On 6/12/07, Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: arnuld wrote: > i have used Fedora, the base of RHEL and CentOS. Fedora is the one of > the most buggy *NIX distro i have ever seen. since Fedora is the base > of RHEL which is the base of CentOS, i just want to know whether > CentOS is stable and

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread arnuld
On 6/12/07, Miguel Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You shoudn't have misplaced expectations about something and then say that it "sucks"... (By the way, that expression "sucks"!) OK. i apologize if my sentence had hurt your feelings.from next time i will say "but i found Fedora unsta

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread arnuld
On 6/12/07, Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, I use FC6 as my primary desktop. It's quite stable. I wouldn't > use it for a server however -- too fast of a moving target. Why not? Fedora as a server is not a problem... Fedora as a desktop however...I don't know...the few times I have

Re: [CentOS] Re: is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread arnuld
On 6/12/07, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you are working on a project to be released in the future, you might want to develop on fedora to have a head start on the next version of RHEL/Centos. Les, WOW, i just never thought of that... thanks for that tip -- http://arnuld.bl

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread arnuld
On 6/12/07, Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yeah...but it leaves a rather lasting impression when it happens in the Linux class you are teaching and the only recourse was to reboot the stupid box and you have a completely identical boxes that do not share the same phenomenon. DITTO -- h

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread Feizhou
arnuld wrote: On 6/12/07, Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: arnuld wrote: > i have used Fedora, the base of RHEL and CentOS. Fedora is the one of > the most buggy *NIX distro i have ever seen. since Fedora is the base > of RHEL which is the base of CentOS, i just want to know whether > CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Re: is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread arnuld
On 6/12/07, Tom Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Welcome to the world of computers! Do you really think this type of problem is limited to Fedora? NO, i have seen this problems in 2 distros: Fedora and Arch... and both are bleeding edge. I have seen this type of behavior on various operat

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread Feizhou
arnuld wrote: On 6/12/07, Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, I use FC6 as my primary desktop. It's quite stable. I wouldn't > use it for a server however -- too fast of a moving target. Why not? Fedora as a server is not a problem... Fedora as a desktop however...I don't know...the f

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread Steve Searle
Around 09:21am on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 (UK time), Feizhou scrawled: > Well, desktop related problems aside, Fedora can be very useful in a > server environment. Weird that others find Fedora great on the desktop > but would never touch it with a ten foot pole for a server :P. Although I find

Re: [CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread Feizhou
Steve Searle wrote: Around 09:21am on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 (UK time), Feizhou scrawled: Well, desktop related problems aside, Fedora can be very useful in a server environment. Weird that others find Fedora great on the desktop but would never touch it with a ten foot pole for a server :P.

[CentOS] NFSv4 hangs on file open

2007-06-12 Thread Pawel Salek
Hi, I have a relatively loaded CentOS5 server (64-bit, dual core) and a mixed bag of Fedora 6/CentOS4, 32-, and 64-bit clients. NFSv3 works without problem. References over NFSv4 hang occasionally, in particular on file opening. I wonder whether there is anybody here who can help to trace i

Re: [CentOS] Re: is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread Warren Young
Feizhou wrote: If you understand 'automated deployment' to mean just merely clobbering an installation with another Linux distro then I cannot help you. You're right, we are not using the same terms. I understand "automated deployment" to include things like yum. one does not leave out s

[CentOS] ip_conntrack table filling up, dropping packets

2007-06-12 Thread yossarian1
Hi, my ip_conntrack table is filling up and now my server is dropping packets. I'm running CentOS release 4.4 (Final) on a fairly busy webserver. The table is full of various connections, including a lot of "ESTABLISHED" tcp connections from my webserver (the src is my webserver ip), and some oth

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 28, Issue 9

2007-06-12 Thread centos-announce-request
/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20070612/e7c41e77/atta

Re: [CentOS] ARP Problem ???

2007-06-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Craig Van Ham wrote: Does any one know if this is normal operating of ARP… Or where to start looking… I am seeing a lot of ARP requests for my router IP from the same IP within seconds. 21:04:41.112929 arp who-has IP tell MY ROUTERS IP Get us the MAC address that is asking. This will giv

Re: [CentOS] ARP Problem ???

2007-06-12 Thread Bob Chiodini
Robert Moskowitz wrote: Craig Van Ham wrote: Does any one know if this is normal operating of ARP… Or where to start looking… I am seeing a lot of ARP requests for my router IP from the same IP within seconds. 21:04:41.112929 arp who-has IP tell MY ROUTERS IP Get us the MAC address th

Re: [CentOS] ARP Problem ???

2007-06-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Bob Chiodini wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: Craig Van Ham wrote: Does any one know if this is normal operating of ARP… Or where to start looking… I am seeing a lot of ARP requests for my router IP from the same IP within seconds. 21:04:41.112929 arp who-has IP tell MY ROUTERS IP Get

RE: [CentOS] ARP Problem ???

2007-06-12 Thread Craig Van Ham
My router is 139.142.16.1. It does this to a couple IP's 8:18:08.684747 arp who-has 139.142.16.57 tell 139.142.16.1 08:18:08.713629 arp who-has 139.142.16.57 tell 139.142.16.1 08:18:08.713994 arp who-has 139.142.16.57 tell 139.142.16.1 08:18:08.714001 arp who-has 139.142.16.57 tell 139.142.16.1

RE: [CentOS] ARP Problem ???

2007-06-12 Thread Craig Van Ham
It's multiple IPs of clients on the network. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8:19 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] ARP Problem ??? Bob Chiodini wrote: > > > Robert Moskowitz wro

Re: [CentOS] ARP Problem ???

2007-06-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Craig Van Ham wrote: It's multiple IPs of clients on the network. Can you look at the ARP table in your router? In your pervious note you only had one client address, but I believe you in your statement about multiple addresses. If the ARP requests match what is in the ARP table then perhap

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation/pointers please - Need to brush up on CentOS/Linux command line tools

2007-06-12 Thread Rob Lines
I can recommend the book A Practical Guide to Linux Commands, Editors and Shell Programming. http://www.amazon.com/Practical-Guide-Commands-Editors-Programming/dp/0131478230/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-4412880-2983136?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1181662084&sr=8-1 It can be had for $30 and it is a big book. It

[CentOS] conga, ricci and luci updates missing?

2007-06-12 Thread Dave Augustus
According to this link, https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0331.html conga, ricci and luci have updates available. I can't find these updates on the mirrors I checked. They are in: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/x86_64/CentOS/ but not in: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/x86

Re: [CentOS] conga, ricci and luci updates missing?

2007-06-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
Dave Augustus wrote: According to this link, https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0331.html conga, ricci and luci have updates available. I can't find these updates on the mirrors I checked. They are in: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/x86_64/CentOS/ but not in: http://mirror.centos.o

[CentOS] conga, ricci and luci updates missing?

2007-06-12 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Dave Augustus wrote: According to this link, https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0331.html conga, ricci and luci have updates available. Well, not exactly, or at least not generally. This is in an advisory for product "RHEL Clustering (v. 5 server)": Fromt eh ad

[CentOS] conga, ricci and luci updates missing?

2007-06-12 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, R P Herrold wrote: I think you may wish to consider asking that the sources be released on upstream products. dang it -- I was reading too fast. Yup this is a problem that stuff is dropping into the mirrors without advisories being seen by centos team members on non mai

[CentOS] Re: kernel-smp not upgrading

2007-06-12 Thread Scott Silva
Ugo Bellavance spake the following on 6/11/2007 9:44 PM: > Hi, > > Box is a dual-dual core opteron. Centos4. Just upgraded t the > latest kernel (2.6.9-55). > > The UP kernel installed fine, but the smp kernel didn't install. > What should I do? Is that normal? Original kernel was a s

[CentOS] ext3 and acls

2007-06-12 Thread Dave
Hello, I've got a centos5 box with raided ext3 partitions mp* devices. I'm wondering if ext3 supports acls out of the box or if there's something i have to do to enable them? Thanks. Dave. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cen

Re: [CentOS] conga, ricci and luci updates missing?

2007-06-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
R P Herrold wrote: Yup this is a problem that stuff is dropping into the mirrors without advisories being seen by centos team members on non mainline products; I assume we'll have to move to some sort of daily backstol diff on mirroring with a 'find -type f' process, to pick these up. Actual

Re: [CentOS] ext3 and acls

2007-06-12 Thread Mogens Kjaer
Dave wrote: Hello, I've got a centos5 box with raided ext3 partitions mp* devices. I'm wondering if ext3 supports acls out of the box or if there's something i have to do to enable them? You could try to add ",acl" to options in your /etc/fstab for the partitions you want to run acl on. O

Re: [CentOS] ext3 and acls

2007-06-12 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Dave wrote: I've got a centos5 box with raided ext3 partitions mp* devices. I'm wondering if ext3 supports acls out of the box or if there's something i have to do to enable them? Yes, CentOS/ext3 supports ACLs by default. Make sure the acl package in installed, then t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and Java

2007-06-12 Thread Antonio da Silva Martins Junior
- "Daniel de Kok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 16:32 -0300, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior > wrote: > > sun.misc.InvalidJarIndexException: Invalid index > > at > sun.misc.URLClassPath$JarLoader.getResource(URLClassPath.java:854) > [snip] > > Someone had an i

[CentOS] PGP On Centos

2007-06-12 Thread Karl R. Balsmeier
Hey I need to run some pgp commands, -what's the name of the package supported by Centos that will allow me to work with pgp? I need to run pgp --fingerprint key.name or it's equivalent. Pro question. Google searches didn't show much, tried to search for pgp, gnupg, openpgp, pgp on centos, o

Re: [CentOS] PGP On Centos

2007-06-12 Thread René Standfest
Karl R. Balsmeier schrieb am 12.06.2007 20:28: > Hey I need to run some pgp commands, -what's the name of the package > supported by Centos that will allow me to work with pgp? > > I need to run pgp --fingerprint key.name > > or it's equivalent. > > Pro question. Google searches didn't show much,

Re: [CentOS] PGP On Centos

2007-06-12 Thread Luciano Rocha
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Karl R. Balsmeier wrote: > Hey I need to run some pgp commands, -what's the name of the package > supported by Centos that will allow me to work with pgp? > > I need to run pgp --fingerprint key.name gnupg, and the command is gpg. It should be already

Re: [CentOS] PGP On Centos + fixed/understood

2007-06-12 Thread Karl R. Balsmeier
Thanks for that, I was now able to man gpg and: paste the contents of a public key my co-worker had stored in a web screen with vi, called public.key and do: gpg --import public.key [to get it onto the keyring of the centos server I was using] gpg --fingerprint [listed all the fingerprint

[CentOS] Re: kernel-smp not upgrading

2007-06-12 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Scott Silva wrote: Ugo Bellavance spake the following on 6/11/2007 9:44 PM: Hi, Box is a dual-dual core opteron. Centos4. Just upgraded t the latest kernel (2.6.9-55). The UP kernel installed fine, but the smp kernel didn't install. What should I do? Is that normal? Original kernel

RE: [CentOS] Selinux custom policy issue - Centos 5

2007-06-12 Thread Miskell, Craig
> On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:24 +1200, Miskell, Craig wrote: > > Where file_upload_store_t is one of my custom types. My > local.fc looks > > like this: > > /data/spool/blastreq(/.*)?system_u:object_r:blast_req_t > > /data/spool/blastres(/.*)?system_u:object_r:blast_res_t >

[CentOS] Dual boot in CentOS 4.4

2007-06-12 Thread Andrew Allen
I've recently upgraded from RedHat 9 to CentOS 4.4. With RH9 I had a dual boot system with Windows XP (RH9 as the default of course!), which was automatically set up when I installed RH9 in the remaining partition after I'd installed XP. However, I appear to have lost my dual boot with CentOS 4.4 (

Re: [CentOS] Centos openssl-devel

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
Well, it does the trick for openssl-devel.. But there are other packages which still require openssl i386. What should i do? It really depends if you need 32 bit compatibility. I tend to do "yum remove glibc.i686" to get rid of it entirely. I did that and yet it getting the same error. Transa

[CentOS] Centos 5, X dies, I cry

2007-06-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I just installed Centos 5 for my notebook (HP compaq nc4010) on a separate drive (than this one that has Centos 4.5). When I first booted after all the setup, X did not start. hmm. Rebooted, and X came up fine. I did a bunch of customizing and upgraded the kernel Rebooted, X did not start.

Re: [CentOS] Dual boot in CentOS 4.4

2007-06-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On 6/12/07, Andrew Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've recently upgraded from RedHat 9 to CentOS 4.4. With RH9 I had a dual boot system with Windows XP (RH9 as the default of course!), which was automatically set up when I installed RH9 in the remaining partition after I'd installed XP. However

[CentOS] SSH remote port forward

2007-06-12 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Hi, I'm trying to do a remote port forward, and the remote hosts only listens to 127.0.0.1 on the forwarded port. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ netstat -ln Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State tcp0 0 127.0.0

[CentOS] Re: SSH remote port forward

2007-06-12 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to do a remote port forward, and the remote hosts only > listens to 127.0.0.1 on the forwarded port. You can't control that from the client end, as it could be a security risk for the remote inst

[CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
Hi, I applied a set of iptables rules and started iptables without any trouble. But after i edited the rules and restarting it, it gives me "Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 35 failed". I looked into /etc/sysconfig/ for the mentioned file and it was not found. I did a q

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread Steven Haigh
On 13/06/2007, at 8:59 AM, CentOS List wrote: I applied a set of iptables rules and started iptables without any trouble. But after i edited the rules and restarting it, it gives me "Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 35 failed". I looked into /etc/sysconfig/ for the me

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread Steve Searle
Around 11:59pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 (UK time), CentOS List scrawled: > Hi, > > I applied a set of iptables rules and started iptables without any trouble. > But after i edited the rules and restarting it, it gives me "Applying > iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 35 failed". I

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
I applied a set of iptables rules and started iptables without any trouble. But after i edited the rules and restarting it, it gives me "Applying iptables firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 35 failed". I looked into /etc/sysconfig/ for the mentioned file and it was not found. I did a qu

[CentOS] centos 5 GFS/Cluster - configure fence using NIC?

2007-06-12 Thread Karl R. Balsmeier
How does one configure a fence device in the form of a NIC card in centos 5? Is the gnbd item relevant to this? I have posted the question to linux-cluster also, but they are much less active overall, -so if you have info, massively appreciated... -karl

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread Steve Searle
Around 12:22am on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 (UK time), CentOS List scrawled: > Line 35 > COMMIT What are the few lines before that? Steve -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting a bad thing? 00:39:16 up 26 min, 0 users, load average:

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
Line 35 COMMIT What are the few lines before that? -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 -m state --dport 139 --state NEW -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m udp -i eth0 -m state --dport 139 --state NEW -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -i eth1 -m state --dport 139

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 GFS/Cluster - configure fence using NIC?

2007-06-12 Thread John R Pierce
Karl R. Balsmeier wrote: How does one configure a fence device in the form of a NIC card in centos 5? Is the gnbd item relevant to this? I'm not sure what 'a fence device in the form of a NIC card' is. the fence devices I'm familiar with include SCSI fence switches, fiberchannel SAN switch

[CentOS] Centos 5

2007-06-12 Thread Craig Van Ham
Why isn't there a server ISO for Centos 5.0 Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 GFS/Cluster - configure fence using NIC?

2007-06-12 Thread Karl R. Balsmeier
John R Pierce wrote: Karl R. Balsmeier wrote: How does one configure a fence device in the form of a NIC card in centos 5? Is the gnbd item relevant to this? I'm not sure what 'a fence device in the form of a NIC card' is. the fence devices I'm familiar with include SCSI fence switches, f

[CentOS] lvm

2007-06-12 Thread Shawn
Hello, I have a physical volume with no volume group. # /sbin/pvscan -n WARNING: only considering physical volumes in no volume group PV /dev/sdg2 lvm2 [148.95 GB] Total: 1 [148.95 GB] / in use: 0 [0 ] / in no VG: 1 [148.95 GB] Can I just create a volume group -- for example: # v

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5

2007-06-12 Thread Dave Augustus
> Why isn’t there a server ISO for Centos 5.0 > > > > Craig > The ISO contains all the software needed for workstation or a server. *You* determine what the end result of your installation of Centos is by what software you install on the computer. Dave _

[CentOS] SMART errors Hardware_ECC_Recovered and Raw_Read_Error_Rate

2007-06-12 Thread MrKiwi
Hi All, Im seeing these errors (below) between 2 and 40 times a day, for the last year (or more if i had the older logs) in /var/log/messages. The values consistently toggle between 4 or so values, drifting up and down but never outside the mean +-2 /dev/hda sits around 21 to 38 degrees (acco

[CentOS] BIND Help

2007-06-12 Thread Thom Paine
I just installed CentOS5 on my server and I have to get everything working on it. I chose to clean load it upgrading from RHEL3 to CentOS5. I'm having trouble understanding the way bind works now and was wondering if anyone has a bit of time to help me with it. I am starting from scratch and I o

Re: [CentOS] BIND Help

2007-06-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Thom Paine wrote: I just installed CentOS5 on my server and I have to get everything working on it. I chose to clean load it upgrading from RHEL3 to CentOS5. IMNSHO they really 'altered' BIND setup from 4.x. After much kicking around, I actually reinstalled Centos 5 and started anew. I'm havin

Re: [CentOS] Re: is CentOS stable enough ?

2007-06-12 Thread Feizhou
Warren Young wrote: Feizhou wrote: If you understand 'automated deployment' to mean just merely clobbering an installation with another Linux distro then I cannot help you. You're right, we are not using the same terms. I understand "automated deployment" to include things like yum. yu

[CentOS] Pinging Static IPs on Lan

2007-06-12 Thread Thom Paine
For some reason I can't ping or communicate with two of my machines that have static IP's on my lan. My mythbe and mythfe are both set to have static ip's in the event of some sort of power problem the wife can stillwatch tv. After installing CentOS5, I can't communicate with those two machines.

[CentOS] Re: SSH remote port forward

2007-06-12 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Tony Mountifield wrote: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm trying to do a remote port forward, and the remote hosts only listens to 127.0.0.1 on the forwarded port. You can't control that from the client end, as it could be a security risk for

Re: [CentOS] Pinging Static IPs on Lan

2007-06-12 Thread Matt Shields
Is iptables running? -matt On 6/12/07, Thom Paine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For some reason I can't ping or communicate with two of my machines that have static IP's on my lan. My mythbe and mythfe are both set to have static ip's in the event of some sort of power problem the wife can stillw

Re: [CentOS] lvm

2007-06-12 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Shawn wrote: > Hello, > > I have a physical volume with no volume group. > > # /sbin/pvscan -n > WARNING: only considering physical volumes in no volume group > PV /dev/sdg2 lvm2 [148.95 GB] > Total: 1 [148.95 GB] / in use: 0 [0 ] / in no VG: 1 [148.95 GB]

Re: [CentOS] centos 5 iptables

2007-06-12 Thread CentOS List
Around 12:22am on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 (UK time), CentOS List scrawled: Line 35 COMMIT What are the few lines before that? Thanks, I saw the error on my iptables and fixed it up. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cento

[CentOS] gcc 4.x on centOS 5

2007-06-12 Thread arnuld
i did Google and also searched CentOS web-site and CentOS 5 Release Notes but i did not find what GCC CentOS 5 uses. i need GCC 4.x for my C++ based project work. what GCC version CentOS 5 uses as default ? -- http://arnuld.blogspot.com/ ___ CentOS ma

Re: [CentOS] gcc 4.x on centOS 5

2007-06-12 Thread Wojtek.Pilorz
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, arnuld wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:59:13 +0530 > From: arnuld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: CentOS mailing list > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] gcc 4.x on centOS 5 > > i did Google and also searched CentOS web-site and CentOS 5 Release > Notes but i d

Re: [CentOS] gcc 4.x on centOS 5

2007-06-12 Thread Vincent Knecht
> i did Google and also searched CentOS web-site and CentOS 5 Release > Notes but i did not find what GCC CentOS 5 uses. i need GCC 4.x for my > C++ based project work. what GCC version CentOS 5 uses as default ? Distrowatch is a good site to find a distribution main component's versions: http://d