Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms

2007-06-14 Thread Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
> Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing > improved here and wait for 3.0? Sorry to jump in, but where is that you saw Red Hat saying "there is nothing _improved_ in FF2"?! I suppose RHEL5 doesn't have FF2 because "it's too new", but here is what I terribly miss while using FF1.5: -- saving th

Re: [CentOS] BQ/CentOs port forwarding

2007-06-14 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thu June 14 2007 18:06, Richard Veale wrote: > Just bought a new BQ/CentOS box with full NuOnce load (Linux > 2.6.9-55.ELsmp, gcc 3.4.6, Red Hat 3.4.6-8, Apache 2.0.52, BQ 5102r), to > replace my old Qube 3 pro, I have NAT setup (eth0 = inside, eth1 = outside) > but need to get port forwarding

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Feizhou
Farkas Levente wrote: Petr "Qaxi" Klíma wrote: Farkas Levente napsal(a): hi, we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create it in a redundant way ie: - if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms

2007-06-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Jim Perrin wrote: On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new

[CentOS] Trying to understand Suspend 2

2007-06-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I am trying to understand Suspend 2 and what I have to do to get it working in Centos 5. There is quite a bit for it at ATrpms: http://www.atrpms.net/dist/el5/hibernate-suspend2/ http://www.atrpms.net/dist/el5/kernel-suspend2/ The later is the kernel patches that they refer to at the Suspend2

Re: [CentOS] Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms

2007-06-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)? Actually, Fire

[CentOS] Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms

2007-06-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build. So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)? I have the

[CentOS] BQ/CentOs port forwarding

2007-06-14 Thread Richard Veale
Just bought a new BQ/CentOS box with full NuOnce load (Linux 2.6.9-55.ELsmp, gcc 3.4.6, Red Hat 3.4.6-8, Apache 2.0.52, BQ 5102r), to replace my old Qube 3 pro, I have NAT setup (eth0 = inside, eth1 = outside) but need to get port forwarding going. What is the best way? Thanks in advance Ri

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Luciano Rocha
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:35:30PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > afaik ocsf2 is not redundant:-( It isn't redundant per se, but it allows you to access a shared storage (hardware that supports it or network raid as I explained in my other mail) simultaneously in multiple servers. Thus, you can ha

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Luciano Rocha
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:39:12PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > Luciano Rocha wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:43:22PM +0200, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: > >> On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: > >>> Hi Farkas, > >>> > >>> I think a start is to look on PVFS2 (www

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Farkas Levente
Petr "Qaxi" Klíma wrote: > Farkas Levente napsal(a): >> hi, >> we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create >> one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create >> it in a redundant way ie: >> - if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole fi

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Farkas Levente
Luciano Rocha wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:43:22PM +0200, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: >> On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: >>> Hi Farkas, >>> >>> I think a start is to look on PVFS2 (www.pvfs.org). >>> >>> Or maybe using nbd and softwareraid ??? >> Neither wil

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Farkas Levente
Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: > - "Farkas Levente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: >> we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to >> create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to >> create it in a redundant way ie: >> - if one (or more) of th

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Farkas Levente
afaik ocsf2 is not redundant:-( [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Well, you can take a look around at Oracle Cluster File System. > I've been using it, for a while, and so far so good. > It's free, runs on top of Linux, and despite it's name , it's not a file > system only for Oracle apps, and

Re: Crazy - Re: [CentOS] Centos 5, X dies, I cry

2007-06-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Lanny Marcus wrote: Message: 11 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:34:13 -0400 From: "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < I tried to change it and although I am told the update to I will give that a try, switching drives here shortly... Not a good idea to log in as root! Best to use su

Re: Solved: Re: Crazy - Re: [CentOS] Centos 5, X dies, I cry

2007-06-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Bart Schaefer wrote: On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well sort of. Looks like I have to hold down for a handful or so seconds and there is X. Guess the other times I tried this I was too impatient. Incidentally, the cntrl key shouldn't be necessary to switch among te

RE: Crazy - Re: [CentOS] Centos 5, X dies, I cry

2007-06-14 Thread Lanny Marcus
>Message: 11 >Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:34:13 -0400 >From: "Robert Moskowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < I tried to change it and although I am told the update to http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] help me

2007-06-14 Thread Jay Leafey
qsm wrote: hi guys... somebody can tell me how to export data from access to mysql. thnaks Depending on the version of Access database files you are trying to read, the MDB Tools project might be of interest. See http://mdbtools.sourceforge.net/ for more information. -- Jay Leafey - Memp

Re: [CentOS] help me

2007-06-14 Thread qsm
yes. i know, but i only have an access mdb files, i don't have access instaled on any pc, that's my problem thank you... On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:00:41 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote > On 6/14/07, qsm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >  hi guys... > > > > somebody can tell me how to e

[CentOS] Re: help me

2007-06-14 Thread Scott Silva
qsm spake the following on 6/14/2007 8:48 AM: > hi guys... > > somebody can tell me how to export data from access to mysql. > > thnaks > http://www.kitebird.com/articles/access-migrate.html looks like it has a lot of help. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and

Re: [CentOS] help me

2007-06-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On 6/14/07, qsm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi guys... somebody can tell me how to export data from access to mysql. Off hand I'd guess that the easiest way would be via comma separated export from access. then import that into mysql via a structure you created there to match the access junk.

[CentOS] help me

2007-06-14 Thread qsm
hi guys... somebody can tell me how to export data from access to mysql. thnaks -- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org h

Re: [CentOS] OT - Password Management and Distribution System

2007-06-14 Thread Nick
Matt Shields wrote: Use http://keepass.info/ and put the file on a network share -matt Thanks for that. Looks good... The only drama is it doesn't deal with different levels of access... so i presume you just make different Passwd DBs for various levels of Access and only give those users who

Re: [CentOS] OT - Password Management and Distribution System

2007-06-14 Thread Matt Shields
Use http://keepass.info/ and put the file on a network share -matt On 6/14/07, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Sorry this is OT. I was wondering if anyone had any tips or advice on a password management and distribution system for systems admin type purposes? We're just a small team of en

Re: Solved: Re: Crazy - Re: [CentOS] Centos 5, X dies, I cry

2007-06-14 Thread Bart Schaefer
On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well sort of. Looks like I have to hold down for a handful or so seconds and there is X. Guess the other times I tried this I was too impatient. Incidentally, the cntrl key shouldn't be necessary to switch among text-mode virtual consol

[CentOS] OT - Password Management and Distribution System

2007-06-14 Thread Nick
Hi, Sorry this is OT. I was wondering if anyone had any tips or advice on a password management and distribution system for systems admin type purposes? We're just a small team of engineers currently using GPG/PGP to distribute passwords securely now. However it's already becoming an admin p

Re: [CentOS] About brother MFC-3340CN

2007-06-14 Thread w.arkwolf
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 15:39, devel wrote: > You configure it as jetdirect on port 9001 ? > > >I have a couple of MFC-5440CN units on my lan. I used the drivers from > > the brother website http://solutions.brother.com/linux/en_us/index.html > > to access the printers from Fedora Core 4 and

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Petr \"Qaxi\" Klíma
Farkas Levente napsal(a): hi, we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create it in a redundant way ie: - if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole filesystem still usable and consistent. -

[CentOS] kmod vs kernel-module-xfs , The naming issue

2007-06-14 Thread Fung
Hi All, In CentOS 4 the kernel module is called kernel-module-xfs. In CentOS 5 , it is called kmod-xfs-PAE May I know are they any difference between two module beside the naming method ( and version)? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 28, Issue 11

2007-06-14 Thread centos-announce-request
-- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20070614/bcaaa7d2/attachment-0001.bin -- Messag

Re: [CentOS] dell 2950 servers and centos 4 or 5

2007-06-14 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Robert - eLists wrote: > Greetings > > Part of this may be OT There is a Dell server linux ml. at: http://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge > Anyone running CentOS 4 or 5 with the newer Dell 2950 servers? Yes, we have sucessfully installed both 4.4, 4.

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Luciano Rocha
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:43:22PM +0200, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: > On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: > > Hi Farkas, > > > > I think a start is to look on PVFS2 (www.pvfs.org). > > > > Or maybe using nbd and softwareraid ??? > > Neither will eliminate servers an

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread bruno . sousa
Hi, Well, you can take a look around at Oracle Cluster File System. I've been using it, for a while, and so far so good. It's free, runs on top of Linux, and despite it's name , it's not a file system only for Oracle apps, and it's part of the kernel since version 2.6.16 . Check it at http://oss

Re: [CentOS] network raid file system/server

2007-06-14 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: > - "Farkas Levente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to > > create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to > > create it in a redundant way i

Solved: Re: Crazy - Re: [CentOS] Centos 5, X dies, I cry

2007-06-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Well sort of. Looks like I have to hold down for a handful or so seconds and there is X. Guess the other times I tried this I was too impatient. Some sort of timing problem that I end up in the wrong display Robert Moskowitz wrote: Bart Schaefer wrote: On 6/13/07, Robert Moskowitz <[E

RE: [CentOS] PGP On Centos

2007-06-14 Thread Lanny Marcus
>Message: 19 >Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:28:37 -0700 >From: "Karl R. Balsmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [CentOS] PGP On Centos To: centos@centos.org Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >Hey I need to run some pgp commands, -what's the na