Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

On 7/2/07, Richard Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My theory is that the user "root" is a "trusted user" and is allowed to override outgoing email addresses. I think this is overriding the masquerading. I suspect that the masquerading will work for non-trusted users. You are correct. Root is

[CentOS] CentOS on iPhone ?

Anyone get CentOS up and installed in a virt on their iPhone yet? :-) - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update?

On 7/2/07, Richard Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was interested to see that Firefox java and flash plugins aren't available in x86_64. Does this explain why flash and/or java plugins aren't working on my Centos 5 x86_64 installation. If I go to (say) you-tube - it tells me I don't have the

Re: [CentOS] Pam Stuff (was: Centos 5 32-bit vs 64-bit question)

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Jim Perrin wrote: On 7/2/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, onto PAM - /etc/pam.d/blah.conf claims in the header comments that the file is autogenerated and any edits will be lost. So what is the proper way to make changes that WILL stick? What changes ar

Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

Hi Jeff I am wrestling with the same problem. However I set the masquerading - it just wont do it. My theory is that the user "root" is a "trusted user" and is allowed to override outgoing email addresses. I think this is overriding the masquerading. I suspect that the masquerading will work

Re: [CentOS] PHP question on CentOS

On 7/2/07, Rogelio Bastardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # chown nagios.www /usr/local/nagios/var/rw/nagios.cmd Replace www with apache, and the /usr/local/foo with path to nagios.cmd # chmod 660 /usr/local/nagios/var/rw/nagios.cmd I do a "locate nagios.cmd", and it turns up nothing. I wasn'

Re: [CentOS] PHP question on CentOS

On 7/2/07, Rogelio Bastardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the files/directories should be readable by the user that your apache > process is running as, but not owned or writable by it. Okay, that's reasonable. So, does that mean (something like) the following? chmod 600 /var/www/html/nagiosQ

Re: [CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update?

I was interested to see that Firefox java and flash plugins aren't available in x86_64. Does this explain why flash and/or java plugins aren't working on my Centos 5 x86_64 installation. If I go to (say) you-tube - it tells me I don't have the latest flash player - or don't have java enabled. If

Re: [CentOS] PHP question on CentOS

You'll need to make sure that apache can read (and possibly write) depending on what your needs are, to those files. chown and chmod are your friends here, yes. In the NagiosQL documentation, it says to do the following: # chown nagios.www /usr/local/nagios/var/rw/nagios.cmd # chmod 660 /usr

Re: [CentOS] Kernel build warning

On 7/2/07, Mark Hull-Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What does this mean: WARNING: "autofs_kill_sb" [fs/autofs/autofs.ko] undefined! WARNING: /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.nx-root/lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.nx/kernel/fs/autofs/autofs.ko needs unknown symbol autofs_kill_sb It causes

Re: [CentOS] PHP question on CentOS

the files/directories should be readable by the user that your apache process is running as, but not owned or writable by it. So, does that mean (something like) the following? chmod 600 /var/www/html/nagiosQL (where the index.php file is located) also, have you added "index.php" to the app

Re: [CentOS] PHP question on CentOS

I actually posted several of these details, but for whatever reason, they didn't show up in the email when it hit the listserv. 1. Do you have php installed? 2. Do you have php-mysql and the other likely php packages which may be required, installed. (rpm -qa php\*) [EMAIL PROTECTED] init.d

Re: [CentOS] PHP question on CentOS

On 7/2/07, Rogelio Bastardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Wed Jun 27 13:58:30 2007] [error] [client 10.200.200.54] File does not exist: /var/www/html/nagiosql [Wed Jun 27 14:04:51 2007] [error] [client 10.200.200.54] File does not exist: /var/www/html/nagiosql This is your problem right here. Si

Re: [CentOS] where to find Single Server CD edition?

Rogelio Bastardo wrote: probably nto built yet for 4.5, you can find them for 4.4... http://mirror.stanford.edu/yum /pub/centos/4.4/isos/i386/ Very cool, thank you. For whatever reason, none of the mirrors I was using had that. I suspect that a si

Re: [CentOS] where to find Single Server CD edition?

actually just yum update Rogelio Bastardo wrote: probably nto built yet for 4.5, you can find them for 4.4... http://mirror.stanford.edu/yum /pub/centos/4.4/isos/i386/ Very cool, thank you. For whatever reason, none of the mirrors I was using had th

Re: [CentOS] where to find Single Server CD edition?

probably nto built yet for 4.5, you can find them for 4.4... http://mirror.stanford.edu/yum/pub/centos/4.4/isos/i386/ Very cool, thank you. For whatever reason, none of the mirrors I was using had that. I suspect that a simple "yum install update && yum install upgrade" fixes the 4.4 -> 4.5 i

Re: [CentOS] where to find Single Server CD edition?

Rogelio Bastardo wrote: I'm looking for the "Single Server CD" mentioned in this Linux article (http://www.linux.com/articles/60825), but can seem to find it in the CentOS link provided there in the article. http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/4/isos/i386/ All of the places serving the image

[CentOS] where to find Single Server CD edition?

I'm looking for the "Single Server CD" mentioned in this Linux article ( http://www.linux.com/articles/60825), but can seem to find it in the CentOS link provided there in the article. http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/4/isos/i386/ All of the places serving the images have either, (a) all of t

Re: [CentOS] PHP question on CentOS

On 7/2/07, Rogelio Bastardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm installing NagiosQL, and it's not displaying the http://mybox.com/nagiosql/index.php page, so I suspect that PHP isn't working correctly. Okay. Let's start small then. 1. Do you have php installed? 2. Do you have php-mysql and the othe

[CentOS] PHP question on CentOS

I'm installing NagiosQL, and it's not displaying the http://mybox.com/nagiosql/index.php page, so I suspect that PHP isn't working correctly. " ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] apache user & and list chown properties questions

(a) /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf - should be apache as user and as group (b) for the content of the current directory: ls -la Perfect, thank you! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SSL accelerators anyone?

I used the Redline's at my last job. They were really good. Besides ssl acceleration, they also did load balancing. -matt On 7/2/07, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anybody using hardware SSL accelerators on CentOS? The architecture that I'm looking at is CentOS 4 32 bit and Tomcat,

Re: [CentOS] Pam Stuff (was: Centos 5 32-bit vs 64-bit question)

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Jim Perrin wrote: On 7/2/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, onto PAM - /etc/pam.d/blah.conf claims in the header comments that the file is autogenerated and any edits will be lost. So what is the proper way to make changes that WILL stick? What changes ar

[CentOS] Pam Stuff (was: Centos 5 32-bit vs 64-bit question)

On 7/2/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, onto PAM - /etc/pam.d/blah.conf claims in the header comments that the file is autogenerated and any edits will be lost. So what is the proper way to make changes that WILL stick? What changes are you looking to make? Most times the pa

[CentOS] SSL accelerators anyone?

Anybody using hardware SSL accelerators on CentOS? The architecture that I'm looking at is CentOS 4 32 bit and Tomcat, and the motherboards can accept PCI Express cards. But I'm interested in any observations at all, even on different software and hardware versions - what works for you, what to

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 32-bit vs 64-bit question

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Jim Perrin wrote: On 7/2/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nothing, so far, is producing a custom banner prior to login. Is this an issue with CentOS 5, an issue with the 64-bit version, or something else I need to learn? Depends on where you want the banner.

Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname? SOLVED

Are you talking about what appears on the "from" header line. If so, these instuctions: http://www.stevesearle.com/tech/centos5.0.svr.html#sendmail explain how Ah. One needs to comment out the "EXPOSED_USER" variable -- i.e., make it look like: dnl # EXPOSED_USER(`root')dnl Th

Re: [CentOS] apache user & and list chown properties questions

> I am trying to chown certain directories and binaries for the Apache user. > How can I (a) find out the user Apache is using, and (b) the current owner > on a given (or group of) folder(s) / file(s)? (a) /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf - should be apache as user and as group (b) for the content of t

[CentOS] Kernel build warning

What does this mean: WARNING: "autofs_kill_sb" [fs/autofs/autofs.ko] undefined! WARNING: /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.nx-root/lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.nx/kernel/fs/autofs/autofs.ko needs unknown symbol autofs_kill_sb It causes a similar warning when I install the kernel. The only chang

[CentOS] apache user & and list chown properties questions

I am trying to chown certain directories and binaries for the Apache user. How can I (a) find out the user Apache is using, and (b) the current owner on a given (or group of) folder(s) / file(s)? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://

Re: [CentOS] CentOS version of /srv/www/htdocs ?

FWIW, I put Nagios in /home/nagios/html, and use an apache VirtualHost directive in a conf file in /etc/httpd/conf.d Interesting. I don't know much about these virtual hosts, and will look more into it. I assume this is where I need to look? http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/ and ht

Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

Around 09:59pm on Monday, July 02, 2007 (UK time), Jeff Potter scrawled: > Yup -- that's what I'm trying to get sendmail to use, but it's > insisting on using the internal hostname, inclusive of the machine > name. I.e., "betsy.example.com" is the actual hostname, at 10.x.x.x; > all the 10.x

Re: [CentOS] CentOS version of /srv/www/htdocs ?

Rogelio Bastardo wrote: I'm installing NagiosQL on CentOS 4.5 and am trying to follow these instructions http://www.nagiosql.org/wiki/Documentation "decompress the nagiosql-*.tar.gz to a directory accessible by your webserver (e.g. /srv/www/h

Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

Since you are using NAT, the important IP address and host name associated with it is the one the outside world sees. Does that IP address have a host name the world sees and does that name then resolve to the same IP address? Yup -- that's what I'm trying to get sendmail to use, b

Re: [CentOS] Linux for zVM

Around 07:42pm on Monday, July 02, 2007 (UK time), Shahin.Suleiman scrawled: > I hope I am not on the wrong list. I think you are. > I am looking to install Linux under zVM 5.1 and I can barely spell > LinUX. > > How should I go about it and what Linux distributions can be used under > zVM? ht

Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

On Jul 2, 2007, at 12:43 PM, Jeff Potter wrote: The problem is the hostnames of these machines don't exist in real DNS anywhere, so when they try to send mail to the outside world, other mail servers are seeing an invalid domain in the from address and summarily rejecting the messages (whi

Re: [CentOS] Linux for zVM

http://www.linuxvm.org has lots of details on Linux on s390. On the left side of the page, under "Community", click on "Linux-S390 Listserv" and sign up for the Linux on S390 mailing list (sign-up form is all the way at the bottom). Those are 2 excellent resources for getting started with

RE: [CentOS] good resources for making RPMs

> Could anyone recommend some good resources I might go to for > making an RPM? http://www.rpm.org is good, particularly http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ section II " RPM and Developers". Also try looking at some existing spec files to get a handle on the variety of things you can/should be doing. H

Re: [CentOS] custom SELinux?

On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 12:16 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: > So, I need to tell SELinux "hey, this stuff under > /home/foobar/spool/cyrus is just like /var/spool/cyrus, don't relabel it > to something else". How do I achieve that? Add it to the local file contexts for your policy. The "semanage" to

Re: [CentOS] good resources for making RPMs

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:19:43AM +1200, Miskell, Craig wrote: > > > Could anyone recommend some good resources I might go to for > > making an RPM? > http://www.rpm.org is good, particularly http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ > section II " RPM and Developers". > > Also try looking at some existing s

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 32-bit vs 64-bit question

On 7/2/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nothing, so far, is producing a custom banner prior to login. Is this an issue with CentOS 5, an issue with the 64-bit version, or something else I need to learn? Depends on where you want the banner. For display before anyone enters any inf

Re: [CentOS] custom SELinux?

On 7/2/07, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So, I need to tell SELinux "hey, this stuff under /home/foobar/spool/cyrus is just like /var/spool/cyrus, don't relabel it to something else". How do I achieve that? Re-write the policies. keeping this stuff in /home is bad. leave it in /var

[CentOS] Centos 5 32-bit vs 64-bit question

I'm trying to install a custom greeter into a newly installed 64-bit Centos 5 system. I originally tried to modify Xsession to include xpop /path/to/text_to_dispay as the first executable line, but that didn't work. Then I read about gdmconfig which led to gdmsetup which led to custom.conf.

[CentOS] custom SELinux?

I need to upgrade a server running an old Fedora version. The new OS will be CentOS 5 64bit. I want to put /var/lib/cyrus and /var/spool/cyrus (all the variable files for the Cyrus IMAP server) on the same partition like /home - this way, all the "user-related stuff", home pages and email, sta

[CentOS] Linux for zVM

Hello folks, I hope I am not on the wrong list. I am looking to install Linux under zVM 5.1 and I can barely spell LinUX. How should I go about it and what Linux distributions can be used under zVM? Thanks. Suleiman Shahin Systems Programmer Palm Coast Data (386) 447 25

Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

Since you are using NAT, the important IP address and host name associated with it is the one the outside world sees. Does that IP address have a host name the world sees and does that name then resolve to the same IP address? -- Brent L. Bates (UNIX Sys. Admin.) M.S. 912

Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

Thanks, Brent -- I tried this, but still no dice. I didn't copy all of your directives, since there's no relay involved in our case, but I did make sure that the following 3 were enabled... FEATURE(`allmasquerade')dnl FEATURE(`masquerade_entire_domain')dnl FEATURE(`m

Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

On 7/2/07, Brent L. Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On our servers here are some sendmail.mc lines referring to our domain. May be they will help. These are from our main server: define(`confDOMAIN_NAME',vigyan.com)dnl CLIENT_OPTIONS(`Family=inet,Addr=vigyan.com')dnl define(`SMART_HOST',

Re: [CentOS] CentOS version of /srv/www/htdocs ?

The equivalent directory would be /var/www/html on CentOS. Perfect, thank you very much, Matt. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update?

On 7/2/07, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can add this to your .rpmmacros (create it if it does not exist in your home directory): %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch} And if you want this to be systemwide, add the line to /etc/rpm/macros (create it if it do

Re: [CentOS] CentOS version of /srv/www/htdocs ?

On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:04:32AM -0700, Rogelio Bastardo enlightened us: > I'm installing NagiosQL on CentOS 4.5 and am trying to follow these > instructions > http://www.nagiosql.org/wiki/Documentation > > "decompress the nagiosql-*.tar.gz to a directory accessible by your > webserver (e.g.

[CentOS] CentOS version of /srv/www/htdocs ?

I'm installing NagiosQL on CentOS 4.5 and am trying to follow these instructions http://www.nagiosql.org/wiki/Documentation "decompress the nagiosql-*.tar.gz to a directory accessible by your webserver (e.g. /srv/www/htdocs)" But since there is now /srv/www/htdocs folder on my installation,

Re: [CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

On our servers here are some sendmail.mc lines referring to our domain. May be they will help. These are from our main server: define(`confDOMAIN_NAME',vigyan.com)dnl CLIENT_OPTIONS(`Family=inet,Addr=vigyan.com')dnl define(`SMART_HOST',`vigyan.com')dnl FEATURE(`smart_host_domain',`vigyan.co

[CentOS] dumb sendmail question -- how to get outbound messages to use "example.com" instead of hostname?

Hi List, I have a dumb sendmail question, and I'm wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction (besides "sendmail list is two doors down on the left" ;-). One of our clients has a bunch of servers -- CentOS 5 -- that are on only a private network that's NATted to the outside w

Re: [CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update?

Alexx wrote: > During last update packets pidgin and libpurple were updated while "yum > update"-ing > > Is it a common and normal thing that both x86_64 and i386 arch rpms are > installed during update? This not the first time. Sort of ... If the i386 items were installed before, then yes, they

Re: [CentOS] Bacula in CentOS 5

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: Hi all, I'm planning to use Bacula in production environment. I've seen the Bacula packages are not provided neither by any official repo nor any third popular repo (as rpmforge). ¿Anyone use bacula in CentOS 5? Yeah, I back up a handful of

[CentOS] good resources for making RPMs

Could anyone recommend some good resources I might go to for making an RPM? (Ultimately, I'd like to make a dpkg. I hear alien is a good way to do that, but am open to any other ways of doing so.) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists

[CentOS] Both archs version rpm are installed during update?

During last update packets pidgin and libpurple were updated while "yum update"-ing Is it a common and normal thing that both x86_64 and i386 arch rpms are installed during update? This not the first time. -- Cheers, Alexx mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[CentOS] howto X11 set verbositly level in xorg.conf file

All, I am looking for how to set the verbosity level "IN" the xorg.conf file??? I have found how to do it when starting X11 on the command line. However, the machine is remote. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/

[CentOS] Re: Bacula in CentOS 5

Jordi Espasa Clofent escribió: > Hi all, > > I'm planning to use Bacula in production environment. I've seen the > Bacula packages are not provided neither by any official repo nor any > third popular repo (as rpmforge). > > ¿Anyone use bacula in CentOS 5? There are contributed packages for rhel

Re: [CentOS] Is BIND In CentOS 5.0 Broken?

Jim Perrin wrote: > On 7/1/07, Eduardo Dela Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks for the quick reply, Jim; much appreciated :) > > No problem. This one has been getting asked quite a bit as you can imagine. Added that one as an FAQ: Cheers, Ralph pg

[CentOS] Re: Bacula in CentOS 5

Hi Jordi, why don't compile for your self? We did it using redhat 4. Works fine ;) Jordi Espasa Clofent schrieb: Hi all, I'm planning to use Bacula in production environment. I've seen the Bacula packages are not provided neither by any official repo nor any third popular repo (as rpmforge).

[CentOS] Bacula in CentOS 5

Hi all, I'm planning to use Bacula in production environment. I've seen the Bacula packages are not provided neither by any official repo nor any third popular repo (as rpmforge). ¿Anyone use bacula in CentOS 5? -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent ___