Hello Ray,
Appears to be listening how I expected it to be, unless I'm not reading
this right.
Running 'dig www.swhi.net @64.135.16.15'
; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> www.swhi.net @64.135.16.15
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Robert
Hello,
Does anyone know of an rpm for tovid for centos5? I'm trying to author
some dvds and would like to use it.
Thanks.
Dave.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks Matt!
And there are specs at http://www.lavalink.com/index.php?id=707
How did it cost you/your company?
We're education, but at the time (last April) I paid < $90 US for it. Looks
like it normally goes for about $120.
Nice. Too bad I cannot get it in Hong Kong...
Matt
P.S.
Binary drivers from Dell?
The HBA that connects to the MD3000 is just an mptsas driver which
is part of the stock kernel, but you can download the latest
version from Dell's website as a dkms source package.
Thank you Ross for the information.
___
Mag Gam wrote:
No, not trolling Tom. I am faily new to Linux, and was wondering how
can I verify if my Linux host is connected to a SAN? I want to know if
my disks (sfdisk -l) are local or attached to external storage (ie,
SAN). Also, how would I figure out parent and children relationships
be
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 18:55 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> How do I customize what I see when I right click on the desktop?
>
> jerry
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
nautilus-actions, outside
Simon Jolle wrote:
> 2007/8/22, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Does the ftp daemon respond properly if you issue:
>>
>> /usr/sbin/setenforce 0
>>
>>
>
> Hi Ray
>
> Yes by disabling SElinux everything works as expected. I think I need
> some introductions docs about selinux ;-)
>
>
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:31 -0700, Liam Kirsher wrote:
> Well, that's concise. Thanks.
>
> Scott Moseman wrote:
> > On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel.
> >> Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next b
No, not trolling Tom. I am faily new to Linux, and was wondering how can I
verify if my Linux host is connected to a SAN? I want to know if my disks
(sfdisk -l) are local or attached to external storage (ie, SAN). Also, how
would I figure out parent and children relationships between devices,
espec
>>
> Do a netstat -na|grep 53
>
> Lets be really sure.
>
>
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the reply.
as requested:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ray]# netstat -na|grep 53
tcp0 0 64.135.16.15:53
0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:53
0.0.0.0:*
How do I customize what I see when I right click on the desktop?
jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
Zfs on solaris/opensolaris has them.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/6n7ht6qs9?a=view
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@c
Well, that's concise. Thanks.
Scott Moseman wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel.
>> Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative?
>>
>>
>
> # uname -srmpio
> Linux 2.6.9-55.0.2.
On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel.
> Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative?
>
# uname -srmpio
Linux 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# nxserver --status
NX> 100 NXSERVER -
It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel.
Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative?
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>>> I don't know about a minimum X install, but I've been very happy
>>> with freenx on centos 5, connecting as easily f
How do I get kudzu to still look for new equipment but stop checking to
see if some devices are present or not?
For example. I have an ATEN USB keyboard/mouse adapter. Sometimes at
boot, it is not ready? or something and then kudzu asks if I want that
in or not. Of course I want it in!!!
On 8/22/07, CentOS List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In a situation like this, it will be helpful to see the arch of
> > package names. Add this line:
> >
> > %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
> >
> > to either ~/.rpmmacros or /etc/rpm/macros (system wide).
>
> Add to?
Ray Leventhal wrote:
Hi all,
My CentOS 5 nameserver is seemingly unable to be queried by anything but
itself (localhost, 127.0.0.1). From any other machine, including the
primary which *does* transfer zone files correctly to this machine
(which is secondary), requests time out.
I've put SELinu
>Agreed.
>
>http://www.equallogic.com/products/view.aspx?id=1791
>
>10.5 TB raw capasity, and can be expanded online by adding new arrays to
the group.
>
>Linear scalability for both capasity and performance.. with automatic load
balancing. just add arrays. really nice.
>
>-- Pasi
>
I believe they
Howdy,
If ever somebody here might have encountered this, the rpm -qa commands just
stuck for ages on my box ( honestly this is rhel 3 box).
I done rebuilding already the /var/lib/rpm/__db* as per KB article but to no
avail.
Any additional hints what's to look for?
One thing I notice w/c I think
2007/8/22, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does the ftp daemon respond properly if you issue:
>
> /usr/sbin/setenforce 0
>
Hi Ray
Yes by disabling SElinux everything works as expected. I think I need
some introductions docs about selinux ;-)
--
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:01:53PM -0500, Scott Moseman wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
> >
>
> Try EqualLogic. I'm pretty sure they do snapshots.
>
Yep, Equallogic supports snapshots, replication
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:21:19AM -0400, Andrew Cotter wrote:
> We have been looking at iSCSI SANs lately and with the names you mentioned,
> I would recommend also looking at Equallogic. The PS400E I think gets you
> to about the right level of storage.
>
Agreed.
http://www.equallogic.com/p
Ray Leventhal wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> first, if you turn query logging on you'll likely get some more hints.
>>
>>
> Rick, I did miss that comment before I posted. I'll do that and
> query...will report the log here this evening.
>
> Kind regards,
> ~Ray
> ___
> While yumming some packages, I keep getting the errors below. How to
> overcome it?
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/man/man1/asn1parse.1ssl.gz from install of
> openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5 conflicts with file from package
> openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5
try a 'yum remove openssl.i386' th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> first, if you turn query logging on you'll likely get some more hints.
>
Rick, I did miss that comment before I posted. I'll do that and
query...will report the log here this evening.
Kind regards,
~Ray
___
CentOS mailing l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> first, if you turn query logging on you'll likely get some more hints.
>
> do you have a:
>
>allow-query {
> localhost;
> ;
> };
>
> directive in the top options section? i think the server defaults to
> "all" if you don't have one, but i
On 8/22/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:18 PM
> > Subject: [CentOS] x86_64 openssl conflict
> > While yumming some packages, I keep getting the errors below. How to
> > overcome it?
> >
> > Transaction Check Erro
On 8/22/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > iptables can do this
>
> Not sure it can do it per-user, it can lump types of
> connections together, or hosts together, but to do it
> per-user I think you may need squid.
iptables has a --uid-owner option, so you can throttle by user
thank you
As i know, squid is only applying computer behind
squid
Can squid do inside the computer?
Thank you
--- "Ross S. W. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jim Perrin
> > Sent: Wednes
Ray Leventhal wrote:
Hi all,
My CentOS 5 nameserver is seemingly unable to be queried by anything but
itself (localhost, 127.0.0.1). From any other machine, including the
primary which *does* transfer zone files correctly to this machine
(which is secondary), requests time out.
I've put SELinu
/dev/hda is being controlled by a controller that mimics an IDE
drive and is being accessed through the kernel's ide layer. /dev/
sda is being controlled by a libata-supported controller and is
being accessed through the kernel's scsi stack with libata.
As far as I know, all drives (2 hard
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:39 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] limit users to use resource
>
> On 8/22/07, ann kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > thank you
> >
On 8/22/07, ann kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thank you
>
> ls any way to limit the bandwidth per user?
iptables can do this
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
___
CentOS mailing list
Hi all,
My CentOS 5 nameserver is seemingly unable to be queried by anything but
itself (localhost, 127.0.0.1). From any other machine, including the
primary which *does* transfer zone files correctly to this machine
(which is secondary), requests time out.
I've put SELinux into permissive mode,
thank you
ls any way to limit the bandwidth per user?
thank you again
--- Matt Hyclak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:25:40AM -0700, ann kok
> enlightened us:
> > Can centos have way to limit users to use resouce
> in
> > the computer?
> >
>
> /etc/security/limits.conf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CentOS List
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:18 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] x86_64 openssl conflict
>
>
> Hi,
>
> While yumming some packages, I keep getting the errors below
Simon Jolle wrote:
> Hi Ray
>
> 2007/8/22, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Is SELinux running? if so, what mode?
>>
>
> SELinux is running in enforcing mode.
>
>
>> I recall having to construct an setsebool statement to get vsftpd opened
>> up correctly. I'll look back at my no
Hi Ray
2007/8/22, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is SELinux running? if so, what mode?
SELinux is running in enforcing mode.
> I recall having to construct an setsebool statement to get vsftpd opened
> up correctly. I'll look back at my notes and will repost this evening
> if it hasn't a
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Just built a Centos 5 system last night that will be a NAS server.
I have a bunch of notebook drives with information I want to populate the
NAS with.
I am logged in as root. I plug in the USB notebook drive device and
nothing.
My noteboo
Simon Jolle wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I just installed vsftpd and started it (CentOS 5). Then put some files
> in /var/ftp/pub (for testing purposes with rights 777) and try to
> connect with local user to download those files.
>
> $ lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Password:
> lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls
> ls
Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
On 8/22/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
Roll your own:
http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/
http://www.dirvish.org/
those aren't even close to the same thing, more like
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:18:29 -0400, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/22/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:25:07 -0400, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <[EMAIL
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:25:40AM -0700, ann kok enlightened us:
> Can centos have way to limit users to use resouce in
> the computer?
>
/etc/security/limits.conf
Matt
--
Matt Hyclak
Department of Mathematics
Department of Social Work
Ohio University
(740) 593-1263
_
Hi all
Can centos have way to limit users to use resouce in
the computer?
thank you
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http:
Hi,
While yumming some packages, I keep getting the errors below. How to
overcome it?
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/asn1parse.1ssl.gz from install of
openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5 conflicts with file from package
openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5
file /usr/share/man/man1/nseq.1ssl.gz fr
The problem was permissions on /home/user not /home/user/public_html
I have not spent the time looking into details, but I booted up the old
server (fortunately I had not blown away the drive content yet), and
looked at all the directory tree.
The permissions for /home/user was drwx--x--x
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Just built a Centos 5 system last night that will be a NAS server.
>
> I have a bunch of notebook drives with information I want to populate the
> NAS with.
>
> I am logged in as root. I plug in the USB notebook drive device and
> nothing.
>
> My notebook has no trouble
Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
>>
>
> Roll your own:
>
> http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/
> http://www.dirvish.org/
Hourly, daily & weekly scripts available at:
http:
On 8/22/07, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Count Of Dracula wrote:
> > There are couple of excellent patches available from
> > http://www.ssi.bg/~ja for advance routing,load balancing,link-failover
> > etc.
> >
> > Any idea why these patches are not yet integrated into the upstream ke
On 8/22/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
>
Roll your own:
http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/
http://www.dirvish.org/
--
Jiann-Ming Su
"I have to decide between two equally frightening options.
If I wante
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Scott Ehrlich
>Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
EMC supports several levels of snaps with their SnapView layered product. See
their product page at http://www.emc.com/products/software/snapview2.jsp
We didn't buy it, but that's
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
it can be done at two levels, file system or block.
many SAN (block level) devices have snapshots, including most of the LSI
Logic Engenio stuff (resold by IBM, Sun, others), EMC, Intransa,
Equalogic, etc.
NA
Hi list
I just installed vsftpd and started it (CentOS 5). Then put some files
in /var/ftp/pub (for testing purposes with rights 777) and try to
connect with local user to download those files.
$ lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password:
lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls
ls: Login failed: 500 OOPS: cannot chan
On 8/22/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
>
Try EqualLogic. I'm pretty sure they do snapshots.
Thanks,
Scott
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/m
Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
Thanks.
Scott
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Peter Arremann
>On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Peter Arremann wrote:
>> > On the other hand, data reliability is another issue.
>> Why do you say that SATA arrays are less reliable?
>Not all drive support cache flushes and handle them correctly - even with NCQ.
>Same
Just built a Centos 5 system last night that will be a NAS server.
I have a bunch of notebook drives with information I want to populate
the NAS with.
I am logged in as root. I plug in the USB notebook drive device and
nothing.
My notebook has no trouble with this device. Obliviously I mi
On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Peter Arremann wrote:
> > On the other hand, data reliability is another issue. We have tons of
> > sata based disk arrays and have had no issues yet (because our systems
> > are all on UPS and multiple circuits) but if you don't have
> > infrastru
From: Alfred von Campe
>> As to device naming, use LABEL= to fix that. SCSI device naming on
>> Linux
>> stinks.
>Quick question regarding the naming issue (and sorry for hijacking
>this thread). My CentOS 4.5 desktop system has two SATA drives: the
>boot drive is /dev/hda1 and the second
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Feizhou
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:54 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS
>
>
> Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS
> drives, 2
may I ask what kind of problem you had with IBM storages ?
Tomasz Napiera?a wrote:
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 15:56:12 Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I'm looking for RAID options for at least 10 TB to attach to a Dell
PowerEdge 2950 running RHEL 5 64-bit Server.
The system will act as a single sign
As to device naming, use LABEL= to fix that. SCSI device naming on
Linux
stinks.
Quick question regarding the naming issue (and sorry for hijacking
this thread). My CentOS 4.5 desktop system has two SATA drives: the
boot drive is /dev/hda1 and the second drive is /dev/sda1. Is this
th
How can I verify if I am using SAN for my Linux Server? Also, how do I
find WWNs of HBAs?
errr what? Is that a serious question or trolling? If you have a SAN and
you need to ask if you are using it i'd worry, or perhaps i just dont
understand the wording of your question.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:57:39PM +0800, Feizhou enlightened us:
> Matt Hyclak wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:51:21PM +0800, Feizhou enlightened us:
> >>Has anybody got Centos to work with multi-port serial cards? Or does
> >>anybody have multi-port serial or fax cards to recommend?
> >>
>
On 8/22/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:25:07 -0400, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't see anything that would indicate it
How did it cost you/your company?
How much, how much...sigh, fingers don't listen to brain properly anymore...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:25:07 -0400, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I didn't see anything that would indicate it (the patch) would work with
> kernel 2.6.9. I was hoping I did
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:51:21PM +0800, Feizhou enlightened us:
Has anybody got Centos to work with multi-port serial cards? Or does
anybody have multi-port serial or fax cards to recommend?
I've got a 4 port card that works nicely. It's a Lava Quattro PCI/LP (I
needed a
Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS
drives, 2GB ram and standard other features.
If going down this road, why not look into getting one of
those fancy new storage enclosures where the RAID is built
into the enclosure and can allow 2 servers to simultaneously
access the arr
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Feizhou wrote:
Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS
drives, 2GB ram and standard other features.
If going down this road, why not look into getting one of
those fancy new storage enclosures where the RAID is built
into the enclosure and can allow 2 server
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:23 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have recently installed CentOS 5 and is workin perfect
>
> i recently download n installed poppassd daemon ver 1.6a so as to let the
> users to change their password
> but when i try to change password i get the folling
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:25:07 -0400, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings CentOS users,
I have run into a hardware issue with the Intel 965 chipset. It appears
that the latest kernel doesn't support the Marvell PATA controller. I
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 15:56:12 Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I'm looking for RAID options for at least 10 TB to attach to a Dell
> PowerEdge 2950 running RHEL 5 64-bit Server.
>
> The system will act as a single sign-on server for XP and Linux, thus
> storing user's data from mounted home directorie
Dear All,
I have recently installed CentOS 5 and is workin perfect
i recently download n installed poppassd daemon ver 1.6a so as to let the
users to change their password
but when i try to change password i get the folling error
500 'BAD PASSWORD: it is based on a dictionary word'
i tried goo
On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings CentOS users,
>
> I have run into a hardware issue with the Intel 965 chipset. It appears
> that the latest kernel doesn't support the Marvell PATA controller. I can
> kickstart the computer, but after the OS is installed the DVD dr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Feizhou
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:54 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS
>
>
> >> Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS
> >> drives, 2GB ra
We have been looking at iSCSI SANs lately and with the names you mentioned,
I would recommend also looking at Equallogic. The PS400E I think gets you
to about the right level of storage.
DAS/NAS is a different ballgame. We are looking at SAN for virtualization
purposes.
Andrew
-Original
Feizhou wrote:
> > > Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS
> > > drives, 2GB ram and standard other features.
> >
> > If going down this road, why not look into getting one of
> > those fancy new storage enclosures where the RAID is built
> > into the enclosure and can allow 2 s
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:51:21PM +0800, Feizhou enlightened us:
> Has anybody got Centos to work with multi-port serial cards? Or does
> anybody have multi-port serial or fax cards to recommend?
>
I've got a 4 port card that works nicely. It's a Lava Quattro PCI/LP (I
needed a low profile card
Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> Recovery from
> the failures seems to be more a matter of the raid implementation than
> the interface type.
>
My 'day job' is with a data recovery firm. I cannot agree more
fervently with Bowie's comment above.
~Ray
___
Ce
On 8/21/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > FAQ, http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX
> >
> > I looked on that page and I see that it integrates with SSH and can use
> > SSL natively. Does NX have any advantages beyond that over VNC?
>
> FreeNX - it's awesome
>
I finally took the ti
Peter Arremann wrote:
>
> On the other hand, data reliability is another issue. We have tons of
> sata based disk arrays and have had no issues yet (because our systems
> are all on UPS and multiple circuits) but if you don't have
> infrastructure like that, you are more likely to lose data on a s
I'm looking for RAID options for at least 10 TB to attach to a Dell
PowerEdge 2950 running RHEL 5 64-bit Server.
The system will act as a single sign-on server for XP and Linux, thus
storing user's data from mounted home directories exported from the server
to various workstations. It may als
Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS
drives, 2GB ram and standard other features.
If going down this road, why not look into getting one of
those fancy new storage enclosures where the RAID is built
into the enclosure and can allow 2 servers to simultaneously
access the ar
Hello,
Has anybody got Centos to work with multi-port serial cards? Or does
anybody have multi-port serial or fax cards to recommend?
Thanks.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 8/22/07, Count Of Dracula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea why these patches are not yet integrated into the upstream kernel?
Much as it would be nice, upstream doesn't clear their decisions
through us..
YET
/too egotistical?
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the tru
On 8/21/07, Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > proxy=http://hostname.domain.com/
> > proxy_username=domain\myusername
> > proxy_password=mypassword
>
> Oh, sure, the moment I sent the email, it started working... LOL
>
And this morning it stopped working again. Either yum is flaky whe
Dogsbody wrote:
> Danm, looks like that isn't in 4 :-(
Then set _RUN_QUOTACHECK to 1 in that script, reboot and change it back
...
Cheers,
Ralph
pgp0dCtfJexYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cento
Greetings CentOS users,
I have run into a hardware issue with the Intel 965 chipset. It appears
that the latest kernel doesn't support the Marvell PATA controller. I can
kickstart the computer, but after the OS is installed the DVD drive can't
be accessed.
There are patches against 2.6.1
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rajeev R Veedu
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:52 AM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS
>
> I have 8 WD SATA HDD with raid ready (3mbps) hard disks on a
> 8 port 3ware c
Scott Silva wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:42:34 -0700:
> compression
VNC has had compression since long. But it's weak on encryption, you
either have to use a VPN or SSH tunnel or a server and client that fit
together. I found that you don't need a VNC server on CentOS 5 to make use
of VNC. The
Alvin Chang wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:27:04 +0100:
> NX is event-based; VNC is session-based in real-time.
Can you explain that a bit? AFAIK VNC updates the screen when it finds
that portions of it have been updated, you can specify those portions a
bit (only detect changes in foreground win
Jeremy Gray wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:59:57 -0400:
> vnc clients seemed to vary a lot across platforms
Definitely, for Windows there are even several of them and they deliver
different
experience even on the same server. At the moment I find that UltraVNC provides
the best experience (after u
Count Of Dracula wrote:
There are couple of excellent patches available from
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja for advance routing,load balancing,link-failover
etc.
Any idea why these patches are not yet integrated into the upstream kernel?
why dont you ask upstream :)
- KB
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> Why it suggest me to "Use a PAE enabled kernel."?
Because using a PAE enabled kernel makes it possible
to use all your RAM.
yum install kernel-PAE
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45
I have a centos 5 server running on olidata tegeo server with 2 opteron 1800
and 8GB ram.
I installed centos 32bit so I should be able to use 4GB. My system on boot
recognize 4GB ram but allocate only 2GB.
Extract from dmesg:
Warning only 4GB will be used.
Use a PAE enabled kernel.
3200MB HIGHME
I was trying to find a way to force the system to do a full `quotacheck
-cvuga` on a reboot but on looking in rc.sysinit it seems it will only
force a quotacheck on boot when fsck finds problems with the disk.
Which CentOS?
Sorry, CentOS 4.x
In /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit of CentOS 5 it seems to
There are couple of excellent patches available from
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja for advance routing,load balancing,link-failover
etc.
Any idea why these patches are not yet integrated into the upstream kernel?
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I want to share my DNS experience.
htt-consult.com
labs.htt-consult.com
and a couple test sub zones, are being served from this box.
I installed EVERYTHING that bespoke of BIND, well almost everything. I
wanted to make sure I had any file I might need.
[log]#grep bind rpmpkgs
bind-9.3.3-9.0
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
