On 10/7/07, Dag Wieers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
...
http://wiki.centos.org/es?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=wiki-structure-1-en.png
Since we are discussing using the wiki as the website, we probably have to
move the Documentation one level
Hi!
I have a really weird problem with some of my servers, namely all the
ones running Centos5
When I try to download a file from the server to a machine outside our
Cisco 6500 router/firewall, the download hangs about half the times
(15 out of 40) when less than half a megabyte into the
Steve Rigler schrieb:
It has a lot to do with user root if you use rootbinddn in
/etc/ldap.conf and put the password into /etc/ldap.secret which
should only be readable by root.
You are right but I even set the permissions on ldap.secret to 0644 to be sure
that there are no acl problems. I
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
I have a really weird problem with some of my servers, namely all the
ones running Centos5
When I try to download a file from the server to a machine outside our
Cisco 6500 router/firewall, the download hangs about half the times
(15 out of 40) when less than half a megabyte into the transfer
Manish Kathuria wrote:
Are the RPMs for the latest GFS kernel module
GFS-kernel-2.6.9-72.2.0.8 to be used with the version 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL
available ? I tried to compile the Source RPMs available from the Red
Hat site but the modules can't be loaded because of invalid module
format arising
Hi,
As others have pointed out, as long as you're patched up, the fixes are
backported.
Checkbox security is lame. I strongly recommend setting
ServerToken ProductOnly
See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/core.html#servertokens for more.
It's more secure, because a script kiddie looking
The one and only partition on your device (sdb1) has the old size. That is,
there's free space on sdb. You have to either 1) create a partition sdb2 (and
then a pv on it etc.) or 2) resize the partition sdb1 (then resize the pv
etc.).
I'd pick #1. remember to reread the partition table
I have a really weird problem with some of my servers, namely all the
ones running Centos5
When I try to download a file from the server to a machine outside our
Cisco 6500 router/firewall, the download hangs about half the times
(15 out of 40) when less than half a megabyte into the
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Thomas Antony wrote:
The one and only partition on your device (sdb1) has the old size. That
is, there's free space on sdb. You have to either 1) create a partition
sdb2 (and then a pv on it etc.) or 2) resize the partition sdb1 (then
resize the pv etc.).
I'd
Miskell, Craig wrote:
I have a really weird problem with some of my servers, namely all the
ones running Centos5
When I try to download a file from the server to a machine outside our
Cisco 6500 router/firewall, the download hangs about half the times
(15 out of 40) when less than half a
# mdadm -Q /dev/sda
/dev/sda: is not an md array
/dev/sda: No md super block found, not an md component.
# mdadm -Q /dev/sda1
/dev/sda1: is not an md array
/dev/sda1: No md super block found, not an md component.
# mdadm -Q /dev/sda2
/dev/sda2: is not an md array
So it looks like all info is
CentOS release 4.5
Hi All:
First of all I will admit to being spoiled by my MegaRAID SCSI RAID
controllers. When a drive fails on one of them I just replace the
drive and carry on with out having to do anything else.
I now find myself in the situation where I have a failed drive on a
Note that I suggested that you _dont_ resize partitions but create a new one
(new partition with a new pv on it etc.).
pvresize resizes the pv _if_ the containing block device or partition has
already been grown.
parted seems to want to resize the file system also and i think this
would
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Normally with software mirroring you would mirror partitions, not
drives. What does cat /proc/mdstat say about them?
You are correct. I keep falling back to thinking the MegaRAID way
where I have the drives mirrored at the controller level and then
partitioned at
Scott Silva wrote:
on 10/7/2007 2:41 PM Theo Band spake the following:
# mdadm -Q /dev/sda
/dev/sda: is not an md array
/dev/sda: No md super block found, not an md component.
# mdadm -Q /dev/sda1
/dev/sda1: is not an md array
/dev/sda1: No md super block found, not an md component.
#
16 matches
Mail list logo
