CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0980
seamonkey security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0980.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0980
seamonkey security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0980.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0980
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0980.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-6.el4.centos.s390.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0813
openssl security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0813.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/openssl-0.9.7a-33.24.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0813
openssl security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0813.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/openssl-0.9.7a-33.24.i686.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0813
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0813.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/openssl-0.9.7a-33.24.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/openssl-devel-0.9.7a-33.24.ia64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0981
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0981.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-0.5.el4.centos.s390.rpm
s390x:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0813
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0813.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/openssl-0.9.7a-33.24.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/openssl-devel-0.9.7a-33.24.s390.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0975
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0975.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/flac-1.1.0-7.c4.2.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/flac-devel-1.1.0-7.c4.2.s390.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0975
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0975.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/flac-1.1.0-7.c4.2.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/flac-devel-1.1.0-7.c4.2.ia64.rpm
Hola
Aquí hay un how to de proftpd con quotas de disco.
http://www.castaglia.org/proftpd/modules/mod_quotatab.html
Saludos
_
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Freddy Angulo
Enviado el: domingo, 21 de octubre de 2007 17:38
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Gino Francisco Alania Hurtado wrote:
Comunicarse por el privado aquellas personas que cumplan con los requisitos,
adjuntando su CV
slds
hola Gino y todos
Para los offtopics de ofertas laborales hemos llegado a un consenso los
administradores de las listas de CentOS y es que:
1- la oferta
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using another mirror helps.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using another mirror helps.
Mogens
Mogens,
thank you for your reply, but I did this already before sending an email to the
umair shakil wrote:
Salam,
Squid actually Proxy will do the trick
Nope. Not if they are installed on those PCs.
Regards,
Umair Shakil
ETD
On 10/19/07, *Arne Pelka* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have two pc using centos 4, these machines need
Joachim Backes wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using another mirror helps.
thank you for your reply, but I did this already before sending an
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using another mirror helps.
thank you for your reply, but I did this already
Andrew Allen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 17:56 -0700, Steven Vishoot wrote:
--- Andrew Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install Skype on a CentOS 4.4 system
and I've followed the
instructions on the Skype website at
http://www.skype.com/download/skype/linux/repositories.html
Jake Grimmett napsal(a):
Hi David,
I'm having problems posting this to the message board, hence sending this
email directly to you:
***snip**
Just thought I'd say thanks to David - his image works with the new Dell
Optiplex 755's in ATA mode (the normal kernel
Joachim Backes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using another mirror helps.
thank you for your reply,
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using another mirror helps.
thank you
Hi,
Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to bind
bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a security hole. So I downloaded
bind-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5.src.rpm from Centos5 repo and tried to built RPM out of
it. But, I failed to do it.
I got bellow errors.
./dbus_service.c: In function
Bobby wrote:
On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:11:15 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Can you look with tcpdump what happens on the network?
tcpdump -i any arp
should do that.
That's what I've been doing for a couple of days. The requests goes
unanswered. I'm monitoring all the NICs and can follow it
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Hi,
Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to bind
bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a security hole.
Which one which isn't fixed in bind-9.2.4-27.0.1.el4?
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpbnPlkYx1B7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Hi,
Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to
bind
bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a security hole.
Which one which isn't fixed in bind-9.2.4-27.0.1.el4?
Thanks
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Hi,
Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to
bind
bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a security hole.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q --changelog bind-libs|grep CVE
- fixed cryptographically weak query id generator (CVE-2007-2926)
So that has been fixed, as you have been told on Jul 25th. Why bring
that up again?
Really sorry.
I also checked. pls see below.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] named]# rpm -q
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:33:16PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Hi,
Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to bind
Make yourself a favor and 'yum update' instead of trying to break
your CentOS-4 by adding CentOS-5 packages.
Current CentOS-4 is 4.5 with
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q --changelog bind-libs|grep CVE
- fixed cryptographically weak query id generator (CVE-2007-2926)
So that has been fixed, as you have been told on Jul 25th. Why bring
that up again?
Really sorry.
I also
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Hi,
Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to
bind
bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a security hole.
Which
On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q --changelog bind-libs|grep CVE
- fixed cryptographically weak query id generator (CVE-2007-2926)
So that has been fixed, as you have been told on Jul 25th. Why
On 10/22/07, Dag Wieers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Indunil,
The correct solution to deal with this security issue is to update to the
latest bind of CentOS 4, which already provided a backported fix for this
problem in CentOS 4.
Thanks. I got
Joachim Backes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So which version of bind is that?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] named]# rpm -qa |grep bind
bind-utils-9.2.4-24.EL4
bind-libs-9.2.4-24.EL4
bind-9.2.4-24.EL4
bind-chroot-9.2.4-24.EL4
Did you
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else
Hi
The installer way is not the only one to upgrade your system!
Especially if it fail to detect your disk/partitions.
You should be able to to make the upgrade using yum upgrade/update
Google on the web about centos upgrade for more info.
Regards.
On 10/21/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/19/07, Johnny Massengill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My company is using Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Suite 7.0
for linux. This setup uses Postfix as a mail gateway for MS Exchange.
The problem I'm having is ever so often Postfix 2.2.11 will lose the
Transport mapping lookup
/attachments/20071022/866950fd/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:25:42 +1000
From: John Newbigin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0980-01: Critical CentOS 2 i386
seamonkey security update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Right ... that one connection is the X0 (local) connection, that is
your normal local desktop shared.
You will normally not be able to connect to that, and it can be ignored.
(Unless you are logged in and have set vino to share your :0 desktop)
I thought the current
Thank you for the reply, Alain.
Since CentOS doesn't have a recommended on-line upgrade path (why?!), I
figured I'd go with the recommended path of using the installer. To
that end, I was wondering if I was missing something (boot option,
perhaps?) that would tell anaconda to bypass the
Johnny Hughes said the following on 10/21/2007 06:52 AM:
There are new RPMS released for nx and freenx in the CentOS-4 and
CentOS-5 Extras repository.
Anybody know the main difference(s) between theses and the free ones at
nomachine.com?
Johnny, thanks for these.
--
Sincerely,
John Thomas
On 22/10/2007, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
great thanks - On Dell they call it Open Manage so do you mind telling
me the name that HP use for their tools please? Or even a download link ??
HP SIM.
--
Alvin Chang Yu-Ming
___
CentOS mailing list
Right ... that one connection is the X0 (local) connection, that is
your normal local desktop shared.
is there any way to get rid of this session? it keeps confusing my
colleagues, so it would be very nice if it could be convinced to
disappear.
best regards
jan
Jan Falkenhagen wrote:
Right ... that one connection is the X0 (local) connection, that is
your normal local desktop shared.
is there any way to get rid of this session? it keeps confusing my
colleagues, so it would be very nice if it could be convinced to
disappear.
You can turn it off by
Hello All.
Anyone know what the cause of this error is in Centos 4?
$ system-config-printer
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/sbin/system-config-printer, line 9, in ?
import queueTree
File /usr/share/printconf/util/queueTree.py, line 1236, in ?
queueTree()
File
on 10/22/2007 7:32 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:05:09 -0700:
As long as the partitions were raid-autostart (fd I believe) it should pick it
up.
Yeah, it wasn't a problem at all.
Having a CDrom on a channel shouldn't be a problem as long as
I tried to boot from two different CentOS 5 DVDs, both pass the checksum
test, and both give me the same error on a Dell laptop from either GUI or
text install modes:
invalid compressed format (err=2)
VFS: Cannot open root device NULL or unknown-block(253,0)
Please append a correct root= boot
Florin Andrei wrote:
Let's say I want to use a much newer kernel - even one from the future,
such as the upcoming 2.6.24. :-) What would y'all smart folks do in this
case, in order to avoid any possible nasty consequences?
Would you import the config file from the original CentOS5 kernel into
Florin Andrei wrote:
Apply this patch to the scripts/package/mkspec file (careful, at least
one line is wrapped by the Gmane mail archive, so unwrap manually):
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/593172
Or just use the patch file attached to this message if the mail archive
doesn't
While I do not normally recommend using statically compiled binaries or
installing programs that are not RPMS, in this case there is no real
choice, other than breaking your system by upgrading qt ... which I
would never recommend.
I can not make a Redistributable RPM, as Skype is not GPL
I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of
problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does
anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has
support for these chipsets be available on any on a
Centos mirror?
Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum
yet?
Here
On 10/22/07, Michael Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of
problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does
anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has
support for these chipsets be available on any on a
Centos mirror?
Has the
Andrew Allen wrote:
While I do not normally recommend using statically compiled binaries or
installing programs that are not RPMS, in this case there is no real
choice, other than breaking your system by upgrading qt ... which I
would never recommend.
I can not make a Redistributable RPM, as
Something happened over the weekend power-related on my VMware test
server, and when I came back and restarted my VMware server box
(running CentOS), I got the following message:
VMware Server is installed, but it has not been (correctly) configured
for the running kernel. To (re-)configure it,
Is this someting VMware related? CentOS 4 related? Or possibly some
misconfiguration on my part? This box has been working fine for months
(and has been rebooted many times), so I'm not sure what changed
(certainly nothing on the host OS level).
VMWare does this whenever you get a new
You might want to check out these threads:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flattopic_id=9585forum=39
and
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flattopic_id=9667forum=39
Akemi
I do see the DVD image on David Hrbáè's website which
I believe is
on 10/22/2007 11:35 AM Michael Rock spake the following:
You might want to check out these threads:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flattopic_id=9585forum=39
and
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flattopic_id=9667forum=39
Akemi
I do see
Hi all,
I'm building this site about email servers - http://www.qmailrules.com
It intends to be the *most extensive and comprehensive* site about qmail.
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
It is not yet complete, but
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:13 -0400, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I tried to boot from two different CentOS 5 DVDs, both pass the checksum
test, and both give me the same error on a Dell laptop from either GUI or
text install modes:
invalid compressed format (err=2)
VFS: Cannot open root device
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:13 -0400, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I tried to boot from two different CentOS 5 DVDs, both pass the checksum
test, and both give me the same error on a Dell laptop from either GUI or
text install modes:
invalid compressed format
on 10/22/2007 12:09 PM Mário Gamito spake the following:
Hi all,
I'm building this site about email servers - http://www.qmailrules.com
It intends to be the *most extensive and comprehensive* site about qmail.
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Scott Silva wrote on Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:10:58 -0700:
If your swap is on LVM, and LVM is on a raid 1 array, then effectively your
swap is on raid, so no worries.
Yeah, it just works fine.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Remove the max_bonds=2 from /etc/modprobe.conf
Yup, doing that removed the mystery bond1 under /proc/net/bonding -
thanks!
best,
Jeff
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'm building a Linux box to act as Proxy/Router/Firewall.
I'm using CentOS 4.5, with an old motherboard (Asus A8V-X), and two
Ethernet NIC, based on a realtek chip, that's widely supported under
2.4 and later kernel (the cards were functioning excellent in another
PC whit Fedora Core 1).
CentOS
Quoting Linux Man [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm building a Linux box to act as Proxy/Router/Firewall.
I'm using CentOS 4.5, with an old motherboard (Asus A8V-X), and two
Ethernet NIC, based on a realtek chip, that's widely supported under
2.4 and later kernel (the cards were functioning excellent in
No, it doesn't use that.
The unusual things that I use is Nat (S and D), and mark to support TC.
2007/10/22, Barry Brimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Linux Man [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm building a Linux box to act as Proxy/Router/Firewall.
I'm using CentOS 4.5, with an old motherboard (Asus
Squid actually Proxy will do the trick
Nope. Not if they are installed on those PCs.
Just block outgoing connections to all webservers but those that are
allowed.
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -d allowedip -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -d centosmirror -j
I am forwarding this exchange from the BIND 9 list (I posted the question)
because it seems relevant. any comment on this? Is it for the North
American Linux Distributor to fix, or is it something the CentOS folks can
do?
When my 64-bit Centos5 machine boots up, I see the following messages:
John R Pierce wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them all : Exim!
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/
Michael Rock wrote:
So the update is not on any mirror or anywhere else
besides Dave's site on DVD?
In otherwords to fix this there is no choice but to
reinstall from DVD or CD through his ISO?
David does great work, but CentOS is about being a clone of tested
enterprise software.
We
Does anyone know where I can find good ol' fashion gv? It seems the
only ghostview is kghostview or evince.
--
James A. Peltier
Technical Director, RHCE
SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone : 778-782-3610
Fax : 778-782-3045
Mobile : 778-840-6434
E-Mail :
Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them all : Exim!
Where do we join
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through the flames and
really learn how qmail works than let them loose with a list of
instructions.
Just tell
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through the flames and
really learn how qmail works than let them loose with a list of
Look in your fedora fc1 or knoppix witch module was loaded for your two nic.
Then try a
# modprobe your_module_name_here
then
# dmesg
to look if both nics where recognized.
If so you have to update your modprobe.conf
Alain
Regards
On 10/22/07, Linux Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm building
I'm trying to install Gnumeric using the kbsingh RPMs. Has anyone been
able to use these with CentOS 5?
Loading installonlyn plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
kbs-Extras-i386 100% |=| 951 B00:00
kbs-Misc-i386 100%
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:30:06 -0700
James A. Peltier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install Gnumeric using the kbsingh RPMs. Has anyone been
able to use these with CentOS 5?
I just downloaded the FC6 src.rpm and compiled it on Centos 5. It works fine.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville
78 matches
Mail list logo
