Hi,
> > How to explain to fdisk that /dev/sda size changed? I
> > increased LUN on storage, reloaded iscsi, did echo 1 >
> > /sys//rescan. And I see in "dmesg" that kernel
> > found new size of the LUN. But when I type "fdisk /dev/sda"
> > it still shows old size. On /dev/sda1 sits LVM PV
Any ideas why this is happening? I dont have a firewall on the 10.54
address,
presumably, the windows machine is connected to the 'eth0' network
that the centos machines are connected to?
how exactly do you expect the packets to get from there to the other
network? the windows machine has
Im a dba not a network guy... :)
Well ok I know there are technical "reasons" why this doesn't seem
to "work"
But - why can I ping any other ip address ie Google
64.233.167.99
Ok I guess thats "resolvable" and not private. My thinking is ping
should try and "find" the address
Ma
Bob Metelsky wrote:
Hi Im a little perplexed by this situation
I have centos 4.5 installed on 2 pcs - each with 2 network cards
machine 1
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:2A:6B:C8:CC
inet addr:10.54.7.2 Bcast:10.54.7.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
eth1 Link encap:Eth
On Nov 17, 2007 1:25 AM, Bob Metelsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Im a little perplexed by this situation
>
> I have centos 4.5 installed on 2 pcs - each with 2 network cards
>
> machine 1
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:2A:6B:C8:CC
> inet addr:10.54.7.2 Bcast:10.54.7
on 11/16/2007 4:25 PM Bob Metelsky spake the following:
Hi Im a little perplexed by this situation
I have centos 4.5 installed on 2 pcs - each with 2 network cards
machine 1
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:2A:6B:C8:CC
inet addr:10.54.7.2 Bcast:10.54.7.255 Mask:255.255.25
Hi Im a little perplexed by this situation
I have centos 4.5 installed on 2 pcs - each with 2 network cards
machine 1
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:2A:6B:C8:CC
inet addr:10.54.7.2 Bcast:10.54.7.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:
On Nov 16, 2007 10:06 PM, Mindaugas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> How to explain to fdisk that /dev/sda size changed?
Try to send him an email [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
Please be polite :-)
or maybe try
# partprobe /dev/sda
>I increased LUN on storage, reloaded iscsi, did echo 1 >
/
> After today's samba update, Centos 3 boxes can not use samba to
> communicate with each other, although Windows and the Centos 3 boxes
> see each other correctly as do RHEL5 and the Centos3 boxes. The du
Upon further investigation, samba can only no longer use wildcards of any type
or do
th
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:47:38 -0800
"Mark Hull-Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same question myself - never been able to use the
> archive effectively without a date.
I think I have found it:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
It's the wrong page, it's the archive. The se
Mindaugas wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> How to explain to fdisk that /dev/sda size changed? I
> increased LUN on storage, reloaded iscsi, did echo 1 >
> /sys//rescan. And I see in "dmesg" that kernel
> found new size of the LUN. But when I type "fdisk /dev/sda"
> it still shows old size. On /d
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Tom wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since upgrading to perl 5.8.5-36.el4_5.2 I have had no end of problems,
>> starting with needing compress::zlib which I got from rpmforge, then I
>> had to reinstall scalar::util to get mailscanner working but now I can't
>> install or upgrade any
on 11/16/2007 1:01 PM Scott Silva spake the following:
on 11/16/2007 12:32 PM Scott Silva spake the following:
on 11/16/2007 12:21 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake the following:
Hi,
Is there a searchable mailing archive?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
I don't see a way of searching it.
After today's samba update, Centos 3 boxes can not use samba to
communicate with each other, although Windows and the Centos 3 boxes
see each other correctly as do RHEL5 and the Centos3 boxes. The du
command works well, but ls, cp, cat ,etc produces the error:
PANIC: push_ascii - dest_le
Hello,
How to explain to fdisk that /dev/sda size changed? I increased LUN on
storage, reloaded iscsi, did echo 1 > /sys//rescan. And I see in
"dmesg" that kernel found new size of the LUN. But when I type "fdisk /dev/sda"
it still shows old size. On /dev/sda1 sits LVM PV and I'd like to r
on 11/16/2007 12:32 PM Scott Silva spake the following:
on 11/16/2007 12:21 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake the following:
Hi,
Is there a searchable mailing archive?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
I don't see a way of searching it.
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.virus.mailscanner
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:00:57AM -0800, Ben Mohilef wrote:
> After today's samba update, Centos 3 boxes can not use samba to
> communicate with each other, although Windows and the Centos 3 boxes
> see each other correctly as do RHEL5 and the Centos3 boxes. The du
> command works well, but ls,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On the other hand, redistribution is permitted...
Yeah, but there's still that indemnification clause in the Distribution
License. The FAQ says that this really doesn't matter, the License says
otherwise. An
On Nov 16, 2007 12:32 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 11/16/2007 12:21 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
> the following:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a searchable mailing archive?
> >
> > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
> >
> > I don't see a way of searching it.
> >
> http://news.g
on 11/16/2007 12:21 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
the following:
Hi,
Is there a searchable mailing archive?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
I don't see a way of searching it.
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.virus.mailscanner
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody us
On Nov 16, 2007 12:25 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 12:21 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a searchable mailing archive?
> >
> > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
> >
> > I don't see a way of searching it.
>
> can always reso
On Nov 16, 2007 11:16 AM, James Olin Oden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/16/07, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 2007, at 9:55, Marc Wiatrowski wrote:
> >
> > > Being aware of the security implications, do you have
> > > perl-suidperl-X.rpm installed?
> >
> > I meant I
R P Herrold wrote:
Anyway - as long as the opennms guys have it, it doesn't matter.
Thre is plenty of trolling and people offering casual legal opinions at
24x7 in debian-legal for many years, and presently in fedora-adv for the
last couple days.
That still leaves the question unanswered
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 12:21 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a searchable mailing archive?
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
>
> I don't see a way of searching it.
can always resort to google and adding
+site:http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
Craig
_
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:21:27 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a searchable mailing archive?
You could always use google:
search terms here site:lists.centos.org
Example:
sendmail configuration site:lists.centos.org
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 15:19 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> >> Les Mikesell wrote:
> >>> On the other hand, redistribution is permitted...
>
> >> Yeah, but there's still that indemnification clause in the Distribution
> >> Licens
Hi,
Is there a searchable mailing archive?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
I don't see a way of searching it.
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to work
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On the other hand, redistribution is permitted...
Yeah, but there's still that indemnification clause in the Distribution
License. The FAQ says that this really doesn't matter, the License says
otherwise. And I tend to "believe" Licenses, because that
on 11/16/2007 7:56 AM Alfred von Campe spake the following:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 9:55, Marc Wiatrowski wrote:
Being aware of the security implications, do you have
perl-suidperl-X.rpm installed?
I meant I was aware of the implications of running setuid scripts. I
was not aware that CentOS' u
on 11/16/2007 1:07 AM Christian Nygaard spake the following:
How to you change the BIOS time settings in a Xen HVM fully virtualized
guest virtual machine? Right now the BIOS time setting seems to be 3007
as year instead of 2007 which leads to funny problems after the os boots.
Cheers,
Chris
Ben Mohilef wrote:
> PANIC: push_ascii - dest_len == -1
> in the server log and
> smb_trans2_request: result=-5, setting invalid
> in the client.
Can you file a bug at bugs.centos.org? Or even better at
bugzilla.redhat.com and provide us with the bug number there?
Thanks,
Ralph
pg
On Nov 16, 2007, at 9:55, Marc Wiatrowski wrote:
Being aware of the security implications, do you have
perl-suidperl-X.rpm installed?
I meant I was aware of the implications of running setuid scripts. I
was not aware that CentOS' upstream provider had packaged suidperl
separately. Instal
Hello,
I'am using a LSI 1068e OEM version from Super Micro (see lspci). I was
able to install a plain CentOS5 with the binary drivers I got from Super
Micro.
06:00.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic Unknown
device 0059 (rev 04)
Subsystem: Super Micro Computer Inc Unknown
Robert - elists wrote:
> I always thought cucipop was considered the best in it's day wasn't it?
Yeah, those were the days ...
And: cucipop isn't in any of the "known" repositories ...
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpj4ZQIZSf1U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
C
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On the other hand, redistribution is permitted...
Yeah, but there's still that indemnification clause in the Distribution
License. The FAQ says that this really doesn't matter, the License says
otherwise. And I tend to "believe" Licenses, because that's what you
have ...
Che
Miark wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:46:55 -0800, John wrote:
Miark wrote:
What's the best package for a plain-jane pop3 server?
IMHO, dovecot.
YMMV.
If I only need pop3, isn't dovecot overkill?
its what centos ships with, along with Cyrus.Dovecot is lightyears
How to you change the BIOS time settings in a Xen HVM fully virtualized
guest virtual machine? Right now the BIOS time setting seems to be 3007 as
year instead of 2007 which leads to funny problems after the os boots.
Cheers,
Chris
___
CentOS mailing lis
> Good suggestions. Also keep in mind that you don't always suid to
> root. You can also suid to another user (which seems to be the case
> here).
Sure. Just like login does.
Actually, want I would really like to see is the ability to mark
certain sections of code to be ran as another user, but
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
> Auftrag von Michael Mertel
> Gesendet: Freitag, 16. November 2007 17:17
> An: centos@centos.org
> Betreff: [CentOS] LSI 1068e (Super Micro OEM) - kernel update problem
>
> Hello,
>
> I'am using a LSI 1068e
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 17:19 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
I hope now that java is GPL that it is packaged/bundled to eliminate
this nonsense
The versions are using and adjunct components people want are
not GPLd
downer - thanks
On the other hand, redistribution is permi
On Nov 16, 2007 5:51 PM, Michael Mertel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Michael Mertel
> > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 5:28 PM
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: AW: [CentOS] LSI 1068e (Supe
On 11/16/07, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2007, at 9:55, Marc Wiatrowski wrote:
>
> > Being aware of the security implications, do you have
> > perl-suidperl-X.rpm installed?
>
> I meant I was aware of the implications of running setuid scripts. I
> was not aware that C
On 11/16/07, Marc Wiatrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 09:42 -0500, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> > I'm trying to create a setuid Perl script (yes, I am aware about the
> > security implications), but am getting this error:
> >
> >% cat testsetuid.pl
> >#!/usr/bin/per
I always thought cucipop was considered the best in it's day wasn't it?
- rh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael Mertel
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 5:28 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: AW: [CentOS] LSI 1068e (Super Micro OEM) - kernel update
> problem
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>
on 11/16/2007 7:46 AM Theo Band spake the following:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Tom wrote:
Hi all,
Since upgrading to perl 5.8.5-36.el4_5.2 I have had no end of problems,
starting with needing compress::zlib which I got from rpmforge, then I
had to reinstall scalar::util to get mailscanner working b
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:46:55 -0800, John wrote:
> Miark wrote:
> > What's the best package for a plain-jane pop3 server?
>
> IMHO, dovecot.
>
> YMMV.
If I only need pop3, isn't dovecot overkill?
Miark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://
Miark wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:29:24 +0530, Shibu wrote:
>
> > > > What's the best package for a plain-jane pop3 server?
> >
> > yum install cyrus-sasl cyrus-sasl-devel cyrus-sasl-gssapi
> > cyrus-sasl-md5 cyrus-sasl-plain postfix dovecot
>
> I dunno that this all qualifies as "plain j
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:29:24 +0530, Shibu wrote:
> > > What's the best package for a plain-jane pop3 server?
>
> yum install cyrus-sasl cyrus-sasl-devel cyrus-sasl-gssapi
> cyrus-sasl-md5 cyrus-sasl-plain postfix dovecot
I dunno that this all qualifies as "plain jane". But thanks for
the suggest
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 09:42 -0500, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> I'm trying to create a setuid Perl script (yes, I am aware about the
> security implications), but am getting this error:
>
>% cat testsetuid.pl
>#!/usr/bin/perl -UT
>print "My real user id is $< but my effective user id i
I'm trying to create a setuid Perl script (yes, I am aware about the
security implications), but am getting this error:
% cat testsetuid.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -UT
print "My real user id is $< but my effective user id is $>\n";
exit(0);
% ./testsetuid.pl
Can't do setuid (cannot exec spe
rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/samba-common-3.0.25b-1.c4.2.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/samba-swat-3.0.25b-1.c4.2.s390.rpm
s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/samba-3.0.25b-1.c4.2.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/samba-client-3.0.25b-1.c4.2.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/samba-common-3.0.25b-1.c4.2.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RP
> PATHS - everytime i have cron issues its a PATH problem. The cron env is
> not the same as the user when logged in
Thanks, that's probably the cause. rsnapshot resides in /usr/local/bin
I changed the PATH in /etc/crontab now. Silly that I didn't see it.
So jobs in /etc/crontab are executed wit
Andreas Kuntzagk wrote:
PATHS - everytime i have cron issues its a PATH problem. The cron env is
not the same as the user when logged in
Thanks, that's probably the cause. rsnapshot resides in /usr/local/bin
I changed the PATH in /etc/crontab now. Silly that I didn't see it.
So jobs in /
I'm having some problems with a script in /etc/cron.daily. It's quite
simple:
--
#!/bin/sh
touch /mnt/Backup/foo
rsnapshot daily
-
So the touch gets executed, but the rsnapshot not. If I run manually
run-parts /etc/cron.daily/
everything's fine. Also when I run rsnapshot f
Hi,
I'm having some problems with a script in /etc/cron.daily. It's quite
simple:
--
#!/bin/sh
touch /mnt/Backup/foo
rsnapshot daily
-
So the touch gets executed, but the rsnapshot not. If I run manually
> run-parts /etc/cron.daily/
everything's fine. Also when I run rsnapshot from ro
On 11/16/07, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been setting up a networked printer in a 100% Linux LAN, and
> there's only one small problem left: how do I localize the CUPS
> interface (e. g. the pages I see when opening http://localhost:631 in a
> browser)?
>
> My system is
Robert Spangler wrote:
Then test with the 32 bit aplay:
alsaunmute 0
/tmp/usr/bin/aplay /usr/share/system-config-soundcard/sound-sample.wav
No joy. it give the following output:
ALSA lib pcm_hw.c:549:(snd_pcm_hw_start) SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_START failed: Broken
pipe
and just sit there until I hi
On Nov 13, 2007 10:49 AM, Scott Moseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Normally udev dynamically makes the different /dev entries. So either
> > udev is screwing up or the iSCSI driver itself is doing something wrong
> > What version of CentOS is this and what iSCSI initiator are you using ?
>
>
59 matches
Mail list logo
