Re: [CentOS] Re: Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

Scott Silva wrote: ... I have never gotten grub to install to a linux device name. It always wants a defined drive in the device.map. I always thought I was doing something wrong, and resolved myself to always check the device.map first. I have a spare machine with the same RAID controller;

[CentOS] Outdated packages on 5.1

Hi, A package verification on recently CentOS 5.1 reveals that some packages is outdated comparing with the 5.0. Here are some examples: 5.0 5.1 tzdata-2007h-1.el5tzdata-2007d-1.el5 libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_0.1 libpng-1.2.10-7.0.2 perl-5

Re: [CentOS] 5.1 - kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.centos.plus.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download

On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 19:35 -0800, John Thomas wrote: > Thank you for the great CentOS. > > When trying to update from 5.0 to 5.1, I get an error regarding the > centos.plus kernel and headers, "[Errno -1] Package does not match > intended download". > > What'd I do? > > The end of the yum upd

[CentOS] 5.1 - kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.centos.plus.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download

Thank you for the great CentOS. When trying to update from 5.0 to 5.1, I get an error regarding the centos.plus kernel and headers, "[Errno -1] Package does not match intended download". What'd I do? The end of the yum update results below: Transaction Summary

Re: [CentOS] Can't build CentOS 5.1 kernel from source

On Dec 3, 2007 9:18 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PS: I know I could build that as a module, but that shouldn't make the > kernel build fail Are you using an otherwise clean build environment? Does rebuilding the src.rpm (without unpacking, just providing the target) work? -- During

[CentOS] Can't build CentOS 5.1 kernel from source

I pulled down the kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.src.rpm source to build my usual custom kernel (adds NTFS wwrite support) and it does not build. Whether I include the NTFS or just build from the source with no changes (other than make oldconfig and adding the # x86_64 line), I get this error every time:

Re: [CentOS] Announcing the CentOS on Laptops initiative

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Alfredo Perez wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:02:40PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Johnny Tan wrote: > > > Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > > > > I'm actually using CentOS on 2 laptops, and I have really few issues: > > > > on the newer one (a Lenovo) the only

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1]

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Everyone, Looks like my Centos 5.0 mail server upgraded automatically last night to 5.1. It appears to have worked normally until about 16:00 CST when dovecot began to fail. I have rebooted the system to be able to use the 5.1 kernel, but dovecot still continues to fail

Re: [CentOS] dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1

On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 11:44 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Mauritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 11:30:04 AM (GMT+1000) > Australia/Brisbane > Subject: Re: [CentOS] dovecot errors after upgrade t

[CentOS] [Fwd: dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1]

Everyone, Looks like my Centos 5.0 mail server upgraded automatically last night to 5.1. It appears to have worked normally until about 16:00 CST when dovecot began to fail. I have rebooted the system to be able to use the 5.1 kernel, but dovecot still continues to fail. Has anyone else made t

Re: [CentOS] dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1

- Original Message - From: "Chris Mauritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 11:30:04 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: Re: [CentOS] dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > Looks like my Cento

Re: [CentOS] Silly question about 5.1

On Dec 3, 2007 7:33 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IT'S ON PURPOSE, IT'S A FEATURE, NOT A BUG :-) Yes, I know, I've read it. I didn't add "report" to that statment. My bad. :) -- Curt Micol "Fear is winning, refuse to be terrorized, people." -- Bruce Schneier ___

Re: [CentOS] dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Everyone, Looks like my Centos 5.0 mail server upgraded automatically last night to 5.1. It appears to have worked normally until about 16:00 CST when dovecot began to fail. I have rebooted the system to be able to use the 5.1 kernel, but dovecot still continues to fail

[CentOS] dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1

Everyone, Looks like my Centos 5.0 mail server upgraded automatically last night to 5.1. It appears to have worked normally until about 16:00 CST when dovecot began to fail. I have rebooted the system to be able to use the 5.1 kernel, but dovecot still continues to fail. Has anyone else made th

Re: [CentOS] Scary memory requirements for 5.1 graphic install

On Dec 3, 2007 6:03 PM, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I would say that those systems may not be good candidates for future > > EL versions. The memory requirements for the Enterprise editions are > > going up with moore's law as more things get added to

Re: [CentOS] Scary memory requirements for 5.1 graphic install

Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I would say that those systems may not be good candidates for future EL versions. The memory requirements for the Enterprise editions are going up with moore's law as more things get added to the wishbin 'of what everyone wants'. I say this as I look at my 256 MB serve

Re: [CentOS] Scary memory requirements for 5.1 graphic install

Johnny Hughes wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: It is listed as a known issue, but I have a lot of 256Mb systems where I have used the graphic installer OUCH! And when this is fixed (I really hope), it will mean some new ISOs to download? It is not broken ... you really need 512mb R

Re: [CentOS] Scary memory requirements for 5.1 graphic install

On Dec 3, 2007 11:26 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is listed as a known issue, but I have a lot of 256Mb systems where I > have used the graphic installer > > OUCH! > > And when this is fixed (I really hope), it will mean some new ISOs to > download? > I would say that t

Re: [CentOS] Silly question about 5.1

Curt Micol wrote: > Hello, > > Yes, there is a bug open for this, listed here: > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2481 IT'S ON PURPOSE, IT'S A FEATURE, NOT A BUG :-) > > On Dec 3, 2007 2:30 PM, David G. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I just rebooted my desktop system to pick up the 5.1

Re: [CentOS] Scary memory requirements for 5.1 graphic install

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > It is listed as a known issue, but I have a lot of 256Mb systems where I > have used the graphic installer > > OUCH! > > And when this is fixed (I really hope), it will mean some new ISOs to > download? It is not broken ... you really need 512mb RAM to use the insta

Re: [CentOS] Missing samba security update

Marc Deslauriers wrote: > Hi, > > In November, upstream released RHSA-2007:1016-4 containing critical > samba updates for v4. I see the CentOS released packages and > announcement for ia64, but none for i386 or x86_64. > > Were they overlooked? Am I not looking right? > > Thanks! > > Marc. The

RE: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

On Monday, December 03, 2007 11:22 AM -0800 Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's not real difficult. This seems to be a good starting place: Check that out and start a new thread on the centos-devel list with any ques

Re: [CentOS] Local repository via createrepo assumes apache?

> It seems that I need to run apache on the repository server. But I can > basically run with defaults? You can use any web server supported by the operating system that hosts the files. As long as the web server software has read access to the files. Believe it or not, my local CentOS repository

Re: [CentOS] pcre vs. regexp for Postfix checks

Miark wrote: > What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and > mime_checks in Postfix? > > I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see > almost no difference other than the available flags. whenever you can, use pcre. it has a "better" syntax. it's also fas

Re: [CentOS] pcre vs. regexp for Postfix checks

On Dec 3, 2007 4:11 PM, Miark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and > mime_checks in Postfix? > > I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see > almost no difference other than the available flags. It's been a while since I'

Re: [CentOS] pcre vs. regexp for Postfix checks

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007, Miark wrote: >What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and >mime_checks in Postfix? > >I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see >almost no difference other than the available flags. The main difference is that pcre uses the same regu

[CentOS] Local repository via createrepo assumes apache?

I am looking at the howtos for using createrepo to make a local repository. Like the one at: http://jazzz1s.blogspot.com/2007/10/creating-local-yum-repository-centos.html It seems that I need to run apache on the repository server. But I can basically run with defaults? All the howtos I ha

[CentOS] pcre vs. regexp for Postfix checks

What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and mime_checks in Postfix? I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see almost no difference other than the available flags. Miark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Does Redhat have a list of changed packages in 5.1?

mups.cp wrote: They have: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/release-notes/RELEASE-NOTES-U1-x86-en.html So nothing on updates for other packages. On Dec 3, 2007 4:34 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The information at: http://wiki.centos.org/Man

[CentOS] Missing samba security update

Hi, In November, upstream released RHSA-2007:1016-4 containing critical samba updates for v4. I see the CentOS released packages and announcement for ia64, but none for i386 or x86_64. Were they overlooked? Am I not looking right? Thanks! Marc. __

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network on 5.1

On Dec 3, 2007 2:27 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like there are NO command line options on system-config-network. > > Like -d eth0 > or -d eth1 > > I used those alot when 2 network cards are in a box. > > Can netconfig be brought back to life? > Can I just install the one from

Re: [CentOS] Silly question about 5.1

Hello, Yes, there is a bug open for this, listed here: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2481 On Dec 3, 2007 2:30 PM, David G. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just rebooted my desktop system to pick up the 5.1 kernel, etc. One > oddity I noticed is that the contents of /etc/redhat-release

[CentOS] Silly question about 5.1

I just rebooted my desktop system to pick up the 5.1 kernel, etc. One oddity I noticed is that the contents of /etc/redhat-release still says: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5 (Final) but: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/redhat-release centos

[CentOS] system-config-network on 5.1

Looks like there are NO command line options on system-config-network. Like -d eth0 or -d eth1 I used those alot when 2 network cards are in a box. Can netconfig be brought back to life? Can I just install the one from 5.0 on new boxes?\ Jerry ___ Ce

[CentOS] what happened to netconfig in 5.1

>/ />/ I am doing a yum install netconfig on the new 5.1 />/ and nothing gets installed. Was it removed? replaced with something else? />/ />/ yum provides netconfig does not show a "bin" command just false matches. />/ />/ Is there a new command? />/ />/ Thanks, />/ />/ Jerry / Looks like syste

RE: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

--On Sunday, December 02, 2007 3:11 PM -0700 "Joseph L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I assume when you use the package manager to install an application it takes care of creating users for services and all other related requirements, or is just a matter of tracking the installed programs

RE: [CentOS] what happened to netconfig in 5.1

I also noticed that minicom isn't installed, although not a big deal it was nice to know it was there in a pinch and it couldn't have been very heavy weight... -Drew -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis Sent: Monday, December 03,

[CentOS] what happened to netconfig in 5.1

I am doing a yum install netconfig on the new 5.1 and nothing gets installed. Was it removed? replaced with something else? yum provides netconfig does not show a "bin" command just false matches. Is there a new command? Thanks, Jerry Looks like system-config-network has replaced it. AHHH!

Re: [CentOS] what happened to netconfig in 5.1

On Dec 3, 2007 11:10 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am doing a yum install netconfig on the new 5.1 > and nothing gets installed. Was it removed? replaced with something else? As it happens, I *just* read this in the RHEL5.1 release notes a few moments ago: * pump is deprecated in

Re: [CentOS] what happened to netconfig in 5.1

Hello, >From http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1/ it looks like that it has been removed. I haven't had time to look for an alternative yet. On Dec 3, 2007 2:10 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am doing a yum install netconfig on the new 5.1 > and nothing gets inst

[CentOS] what happened to netconfig in 5.1

I am doing a yum install netconfig on the new 5.1 and nothing gets installed. Was it removed? replaced with something else? yum provides netconfig does not show a "bin" command just false matches. Is there a new command? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mail

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:04:30 -0700, Joseph wrote: > >No --- Don't --- Install another MTA before you try to remove > >sendmail. Warned you have been! > > Well, unless you install postfix first, then > system-switch-mail, then execute switch-mail, how does the > stuff that needs sendmail know what

Re: [CentOS] Does Redhat have a list of changed packages in 5.1?

They have: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/release-notes/RELEASE-NOTES-U1-x86-en.html On Dec 3, 2007 4:34 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The information at: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1 > > is great. > > Does RH have someth

Re: [CentOS] Scary memory requirements for 5.1 graphic install

Eso es muy importante, es que más me atrevo a decir que es 50% y 50% de importante ___ Orlando Rubino Gala Administración UONet Email = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax = 1(360) 351 - 0681 Phone = 632138 ___

[CentOS] Does Redhat have a list of changed packages in 5.1?

The information at: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1 is great. Does RH have something that shows what has changed with them from 5.0 to 5.1? So far I have only found: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-5.1-Manual/manual/doc000.html Like what release of Firef

[CentOS] Re: Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

on 12/3/2007 8:40 AM Mogens Kjaer spake the following: Karanbir Singh wrote: Mogens Kjaer wrote: Mogens Kjaer wrote: ... chroot /mnt/sysimage grub-install /dev/cciss/c0d0 I got it to boot by doing a: grub-install '(hd0)' the /boot/grub/device.map must point grub to the right location for h

[CentOS] Scary memory requirements for 5.1 graphic install

It is listed as a known issue, but I have a lot of 256Mb systems where I have used the graphic installer OUCH! And when this is fixed (I really hope), it will mean some new ISOs to download? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lis

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 /etc/redhat-release file

Hello, It looks like there is a bug report already for it: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2481 On Dec 3, 2007 1:00 PM, Greg Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just noticed on a freshly updated CentOS 5.1 system: > > # cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 5 (Final) > > # rpm -qi centos-re

[CentOS] CentOS 5.1 /etc/redhat-release file

Just noticed on a freshly updated CentOS 5.1 system: # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5 (Final) # rpm -qi centos-release Name: centos-release Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 5 Vendor: CentOS Release : 1.0.el5.centos.1

Re: [CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.1 i386 and x86_64

Scott Silva wrote: But a single CD install takes digging through menus and de-selecting a bunch of stuff. It wouldn't be so bad, but I remember a "select all" button but not a "de-select all" one. Maybe a server cd could be made that by default does what takes digging through menus to do now. O

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:04:30AM -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Well, unless you install postfix first, then system-switch-mail, then > execute switch-mail, how does the stuff that needs sendmail know what to use? This is the "alternatives" system at work. /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symlink to /

Re: [CentOS] Difficulty with 5.0 - 5.1 upgrade: sysreport vs. sos

On Dec 3, 2007 9:24 AM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 01:14 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > I got file conflicts between the sysreport and sos packages on the > > file /usr/sbin/sysreport. I unchecked sysreport in the package > > updater UI and the rest of the upd

Re: [CentOS] Difficulty with 5.0 - 5.1 upgrade: sysreport vs. sos

On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 01:14 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > I got file conflicts between the sysreport and sos packages on the > file /usr/sbin/sysreport. I unchecked sysreport in the package > updater UI and the rest of the update is proceedng. I also received the same error. Bug in pup? Shouldn't

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

Joseph L. Casale wrote: No --- Don't --- Install another MTA before you try to remove sendmail. Warned you have been! Well, unless you install postfix first, then system-switch-mail, then execute switch-mail, how does the stuff that needs sendmail know what to use? If you take out sendmail fi

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

Christian Volker wrote: Yohoo! # rpm -e sendmail error: Failed dependencies: rpm -e sendmail --nodeps No --- Don't --- Install another MTA before you try to remove sendmail. Where's the difference? Using --nodeps can break stuff. Instead to: yum install postfix then, yum remo

RE: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

>No --- Don't --- Install another MTA before you try to remove sendmail. >Warned you have been! Well, unless you install postfix first, then system-switch-mail, then execute switch-mail, how does the stuff that needs sendmail know what to use? If you take out sendmail first, it removes other dep

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

On Dec 3, 2007 11:50 AM, Christian Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yohoo! > > >>> # rpm -e sendmail > >>> error: Failed dependencies: > >> rpm -e sendmail --nodeps > >No --- Don't --- Install another MTA before you try to remove sendmail. > > Where's the difference? > > Christian Volker

RE: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

Yohoo! >>> # rpm -e sendmail >>> error: Failed dependencies: >> rpm -e sendmail --nodeps >No --- Don't --- Install another MTA before you try to remove sendmail. Where's the difference? Christian Volker Technical Support Engineer Ballincollig, C

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

Karanbir Singh wrote: Mogens Kjaer wrote: Mogens Kjaer wrote: ... chroot /mnt/sysimage grub-install /dev/cciss/c0d0 I got it to boot by doing a: grub-install '(hd0)' the /boot/grub/device.map must point grub to the right location for hd0, check that once. Also, grub has not been updated in

Re: [CentOS] Announcing the CentOS on Laptops initiative

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:02:40PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Johnny Tan wrote: > > > Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > > > I'm actually using CentOS on 2 laptops, and I have really few issues: > > > on the newer one (a Lenovo) the only thing that doesn't work is sound (I > > > know t

[CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.1 i386 and x86_64

on 12/2/2007 11:20 PM Johnny Hughes spake the following: Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote: On 03/12/2007, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: This is the first release where we are also publishing a special netinstall iso that can be used to start

[CentOS] Re: x86_64 versus i386

on 12/2/2007 9:14 PM Manish Kathuria spake the following: On 12/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Original Message - From: "Manish Kathuria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello, On the Intel Core 2 Duo processor based systems, we have the option of installing either x86_64

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5 and removing sendmail

on 12/2/2007 6:29 PM Indunil Jayasooriya spake the following: # rpm -e sendmail error: Failed dependencies: /usr/sbin/sendmail is needed by (installed) redhat-lsb-3.1-12.2.EL.el5.centos.i386 smtpdaemon is needed by (installed) mutt-1.4.2.2-3.el5.i386

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

Mogens Kjaer wrote: > Mogens Kjaer wrote: > ... > chroot /mnt/sysimage > grub-install /dev/cciss/c0d0 > > I got it to boot by doing a: > > grub-install '(hd0)' the /boot/grub/device.map must point grub to the right location for hd0, check that once. Also, grub has not been updated in 5.1

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

Christopher Chan wrote: Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote: Hi, A draft with results of my benchmark based on fsbench is available in http://www.htiweb.inf.br/benchmark/fsbench.htm. The methodology and the conclusion i will publish later, however

Re: [CentOS] x86_64 versus i386

Manish Kathuria wrote: How significant are the performance benefits gained by using the x86_64 linux instead of i386 on the same system ? that depends on the software you'll be running I have a medium-small C project (~20 KLOC), where the x86_64 binary runs close to twice as fast as the i386

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

Mogens Kjaer wrote: ... chroot /mnt/sysimage grub-install /dev/cciss/c0d0 I got it to boot by doing a: grub-install '(hd0)' Strange... Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

Alain Spineux wrote: > On Dec 3, 2007 2:55 PM, Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Dec 3, 2007 2:40 PM, Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> My local centos mirror (ftp.crc.dk) failed to boot >>> after having upgraded from centos 5.0 to 5.1 (i386). >>> >>> It just displays >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

On Dec 3, 2007 2:55 PM, Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 3, 2007 2:40 PM, Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My local centos mirror (ftp.crc.dk) failed to boot > > after having upgraded from centos 5.0 to 5.1 (i386). > > > > It just displays > > > > GRUB > > > > The cursor

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

Alain Spineux wrote: > On Dec 3, 2007 2:40 PM, Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My local centos mirror (ftp.crc.dk) failed to boot >> after having upgraded from centos 5.0 to 5.1 (i386). >> >> It just displays >> >> GRUB >> >> The cursor is positioned to the right of a space after >> GRUB

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

On Dec 3, 2007 2:40 PM, Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My local centos mirror (ftp.crc.dk) failed to boot > after having upgraded from centos 5.0 to 5.1 (i386). > > It just displays > > GRUB > > The cursor is positioned to the right of a space after > GRUB, and no input is accepted. > >

[CentOS] Cannot boot after upgrading to Centos 5.1

My local centos mirror (ftp.crc.dk) failed to boot after having upgraded from centos 5.0 to 5.1 (i386). It just displays GRUB The cursor is positioned to the right of a space after GRUB, and no input is accepted. I've tried booting in rescue mode and run: chroot /mnt/sysimage grub-install /dev

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 34, Issue 3

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] how to get the source for installed RPM (CUPS)

Monday 03 December 2007 11:09:02 Ulrik S. Kofod napisał(a): > I would like to change a few things in CUPS, but I would prefer to use the > source for the version of CUPS that I already have installed using yum. > Mostly because I'm quite happy with the way it works except a few details. > > Is ther

[CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

Hi, Is the horde from RPMForge repository equal to horde server or horde-webmail? Thanks, junji aisalen.wordpress.com Linux Registered User #253162 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Difficulty with 5.0 - 5.1 upgrade: sysreport vs. sos

On Dec 3, 2007 2:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bart Schaefer pisze: > > I got file conflicts between the sysreport and sos packages on the > > file /usr/sbin/sysreport. I unchecked sysreport in the package > > updater UI and the rest of the update is proceedng. > > > Strang

Re: [CentOS] Difficulty with 5.0 - 5.1 upgrade: sysreport vs. sos

Bart Schaefer pisze: I got file conflicts between the sysreport and sos packages on the file /usr/sbin/sysreport. I unchecked sysreport in the package updater UI and the rest of the update is proceedng. Strange. I ran yum update -y from shell and this is resolved correctly by yum itslef. sos

[CentOS] how to get the source for installed RPM (CUPS)

I would like to change a few things in CUPS, but I would prefer to use the source for the version of CUPS that I already have installed using yum. Mostly because I'm quite happy with the way it works except a few details. Is there a way to get the source using yum or should I go to http://www.c

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

Does anyone have any stats on the relative performance of Scalix / Zimbra / OpenXchange? I switched to Scalix from cyrus a while back to get the extra functionality but it seems to cause our server to run very slow at times and hogs RAM like it's going out of fashion. It's not a small box eit

Re: [CentOS] Difficulty with 5.0 - 5.1 upgrade: sysreport vs. sos

On 12/3/07, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got file conflicts between the sysreport and sos packages on the > file /usr/sbin/sysreport. I unchecked sysreport in the package > updater UI and the rest of the update is proceedng. > ___ Sosrep

Re: [CentOS] how to Load balancing

On 11/22/07, D. Bettancourt M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > I need informmation about this Topic: Load balancing,, > > > > I have 2 nic to internet, 1 nic to DMZ, and 1 nic to LAN, but I don,t know > how do that. > > Where I can found information ?? > If you haven't found a

[CentOS] Difficulty with 5.0 - 5.1 upgrade: sysreport vs. sos

I got file conflicts between the sysreport and sos packages on the file /usr/sbin/sysreport. I unchecked sysreport in the package updater UI and the rest of the update is proceedng. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailma

Re: [CentOS] Archive search + xen

Try googling with site:lists.centos.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Archive search + xen

Hi: I'm new to Centos mailing list. Please excuse the simple questions. The only archive I can find for this list appears to be unsearchable. Is there another archive somewhere, where one can search? Am I in the right list to discuss problems with Centos5 xen distro? I'm having a problem with