Re: [CentOS] LVM: how do I change the UUID of a LV?

Timothy Selivanow wrote: > I know how to change the UUID of Physical Volumes and Volume Groups, but > when I try to do the same for a Logical Volume, lvchange complains that > "--uuid" is not an option. Here is how I've been changing the others > (note that "--uuid" does not appear in the man page

Re: [CentOS] Overwrite target of ln

On 05/03/2008, Michael D. Kralka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote: > > On 05/03/2008, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 05/03/2008, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I have just tried using a ta

[CentOS] LVM: how do I change the UUID of a LV?

I know how to change the UUID of Physical Volumes and Volume Groups, but when I try to do the same for a Logical Volume, lvchange complains that "--uuid" is not an option. Here is how I've been changing the others (note that "--uuid" does not appear in the man pages for pvchange and vgchange for l

[CentOS] Dag RPM Repo "error"

I apologize if this was the wrong place to inquire, but thank you very much for your suggestions. - Joseph ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Overwrite target of ln

Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote: On 05/03/2008, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 05/03/2008, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have just tried using a target as a file and it does seem to work with the -f option. It's only when the ta

Re: [CentOS] Overwrite target of ln

On 05/03/2008, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/03/2008, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:20:50AM +0800, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing > Lists) alleged: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Sorry if this seems too

Re: [CentOS] Overwrite target of ln

On 05/03/2008, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:20:50AM +0800, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing > Lists) alleged: > > > Hi all, > > > > Sorry if this seems too basic. > > > > But is there a way to overwrite the target of a symbolic link without > > first

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

Tim Alberts wrote: John that is perfect, exactly what I was looking for. Thank you and thanks to everyone that contributed. I guess it's apparent I don't read man pages very well. Does any 'man'? I normally start to get really worried about myself when I actually understand one on the first r

Re: [CentOS] Overwrite target of ln

On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:20:50AM +0800, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) alleged: > Hi all, > > Sorry if this seems too basic. > > But is there a way to overwrite the target of a symbolic link without > first deleting the symlink itself? > > For example, if I have this: > > public_html

Re: [CentOS] procmailrc

Milton Calnek wrote: it looks in user home dir (as defined in /etc/passwd). Make sure the user has read/execute privilege in his homedir. Yup, the home directory is listed properly in /etc/passwd and the user owns the directory which is perms 755. I think this might have happened a few years a

[CentOS] Overwrite target of ln

Hi all, Sorry if this seems too basic. But is there a way to overwrite the target of a symbolic link without first deleting the symlink itself? For example, if I have this: public_html -> releases/b2b-20080228 ... and there's a new update, I can then just do the following: $ ln releases/site-

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

John that is perfect, exactly what I was looking for. Thank you and thanks to everyone that contributed. I guess it's apparent I don't read man pages very well. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] procmailrc

it looks in user home dir (as defined in /etc/passwd). Make sure the user has read/execute privilege in his homedir. John Hinton wrote: I have one box, a 3.x box, that has a problem finding procmailrc files. For instance, if I have a .procmailrc file in /var/www/user/homes/username it finds

Re: [CentOS] VMWare error: Use of uninitialized value in string eq

Ralph Angenendt wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] vmware-mui-distrib]# vmware-cmd -l Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/VMware/VmPerl.pm line 114. *WHAT* is on line 114 of VmPerl.pm? #Force version compa

Re: [CentOS] Dag RPM Repo "error"

On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:27:51PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm getting the error below when I try to do a yum update on my server. > It seems that it is looking for an update for my boot loader - > syslinux-3.62-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm, but can't find it via the normal path. > I've tried lookin

Re: [CentOS] VMWare error: Use of uninitialized value in string eq

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > I hope anyone can help me with this. I'm trying to get vmware to play > along nicely on CentOS 5.1 x64, but I get errors when I try and start a > vmx image, or list them. This the the error: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED

[CentOS] procmailrc

I have one box, a 3.x box, that has a problem finding procmailrc files. For instance, if I have a .procmailrc file in /var/www/user/homes/username it finds it and it works. If I have a .procmailrc file under /var/www/user it doesn't. Where the heck is the setting for where procmail looks for

Re: [CentOS] VMWare error: Use of uninitialized value in string eq

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] vmware-mui-distrib]# vmware-cmd -l > Use of uninitialized value in string eq at > /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/VMware/VmPerl.pm > line 114. *WHAT* is on line 114 of VmPerl.pm? On the other hand: Which build are you using?

[CentOS] Re: dovecot & bandwidth limit

on 3-4-2008 1:53 PM Gregory P. Ennis spake the following: On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 16:41 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Thanks for taking the time to answer. I am familiar with the technique in fact I use a burst rate for port 22 connections. If I can not find a POP3 server to do to limit bandwi

Re: [CentOS] Dag RPM Repo "error"

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Any info or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your help! Heanet.ie is acting up again. But this is *completely* the wrong list for this, try [EMAIL PROTECTED] next time. Ralph pgpNxAOVUIJh8.pgp Description: PGP signature _

[CentOS] Re: Rejecting spam

on 3-4-2008 1:03 PM Tim Alberts spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: on 3-4-2008 12:32 PM Tim Alberts spake the following: That's exactly what I don't want to do. I don't want the mail being delivered to my system. That's why I'm using the milter. However the milter is doing the exact sa

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

John Hinton wrote: Tim Alberts wrote: John Hinton wrote: There are milters for SpamAssassin. You can set them to reject mail at a particular score level. So, if for instance you felt comfortable with rejecting mail at a score of 10, which is pretty reliable, you can also do that at smtp lev

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

Tim Alberts wrote: John Hinton wrote: There are milters for SpamAssassin. You can set them to reject mail at a particular score level. So, if for instance you felt comfortable with rejecting mail at a score of 10, which is pretty reliable, you can also do that at smtp level. BINGO That's ex

RE: [CentOS] dovecot & bandwidth limit

On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 16:41 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > > Thanks for taking the time to answer. I am familiar with the technique > > > > in fact I use a burst rate for port 22 connections. If I can not find a > > > > POP3 server to do to limit bandwidth, I'll use iptables. > > > > > >

[CentOS] No value for $TERM and no -T specified

I just customized my prompt with a PS1= variable. Since updating my .bashrc this way, when I try to run commands remotely with ssh I get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ ssh server pwd No value for $TERM and no -T specified/home/scarolan No value for $TERM and

RE: [CentOS] dovecot & bandwidth limit

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 13:24 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:56 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Everyone, > > > > > > > > > > I am having some bandwidth problems

Re: [CentOS] vlan support

John R Pierce wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: Is vlan 1 always native (untagged) or can you specify that? I remember having some problem with Intel NICs on windows not liking native packets at all if any were tagged but I don't know if that was a hardware or software issue. its my understand

RE: [CentOS] dovecot & bandwidth limit

On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 13:24 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:56 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > > > > > > Everyone, > > > > > > > > I am having some bandwidth problems caused by large e-mail files with > > >

Re: [CentOS] Re: Rejecting spam

Scott Silva wrote: on 3-4-2008 12:32 PM Tim Alberts spake the following: That's exactly what I don't want to do. I don't want the mail being delivered to my system. That's why I'm using the milter. However the milter is doing the exact same thing as delivering it when it is marked as spam.

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

John Hinton wrote: There are milters for SpamAssassin. You can set them to reject mail at a particular score level. So, if for instance you felt comfortable with rejecting mail at a score of 10, which is pretty reliable, you can also do that at smtp level. BINGO That's exactly what I'm tryin

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

Dan Carl wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Glenn Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 2:00 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam At 02:35 PM 3/4/2008, you wrote: Sorry, not a direct CentOS question, but I k

Re: [CentOS] vlan support

Les Mikesell wrote: Is vlan 1 always native (untagged) or can you specify that? I remember having some problem with Intel NICs on windows not liking native packets at all if any were tagged but I don't know if that was a hardware or software issue. its my understanding that if you're usi

[CentOS] Re: Rejecting spam

on 3-4-2008 12:32 PM Tim Alberts spake the following: Glenn wrote: At 02:35 PM 3/4/2008, you wrote: Sorry, not a direct CentOS question, but I know there's a lot of experienced users on this list...I'm using CentOS with sendmail and spamassassin. I've got it configured with spamass-milter and

[CentOS] VMWare error: Use of uninitialized value in string eq

Hi all I hope anyone can help me with this. I'm trying to get vmware to play along nicely on CentOS 5.1 x64, but I get errors when I try and start a vmx image, or list them. This the the error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] vmware-mui-distrib]# vmware-cmd -l Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /u

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

Tim Alberts wrote: Glenn wrote: At 02:35 PM 3/4/2008, you wrote: Sorry, not a direct CentOS question, but I know there's a lot of experienced users on this list...I'm using CentOS with sendmail and spamassassin. I've got it configured with spamass-milter and it is working correctly. However

Re: [CentOS] /var/www/html group & owner

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:18:56 -0800 (PST) Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: > hi again, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -all /var/www/ > total 64 > drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Mar 3 11:44 . > drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Mar 3 11:44 .. > drwxr-xr-x 2 roo

RE: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Glenn > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 2:00 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam > > > At 02:35 PM 3/4/2008, you wrote: > > >Sorry, not a direct CentOS question, but I know t

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

Hiep Nguyen wrote: thanks. i may well do that b/c i'm behind firewall anyway. also, i'm not ready to tackle iptables at this time. you can configure the simple default firewall with the GUI system-config-securitylevel, or the command line version, system-config-securitylevel-tui (uses curses

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

Milton Calnek wrote: Glenn wrote: I use MailScanner with SpamAssassin and swear by it! http://mailscanner.info/ Happy (mostly), very vital list group. The author is very actively answering questions and requests. Can't get much better support! mailscanner +1 Also, I have: FEATURE(`dnsb

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

Glenn wrote: At 02:35 PM 3/4/2008, you wrote: Sorry, not a direct CentOS question, but I know there's a lot of experienced users on this list...I'm using CentOS with sendmail and spamassassin. I've got it configured with spamass-milter and it is working correctly. However, I was expecting to

RE: [CentOS] vlan support

> few questions also > > 1/ what is different between vconfig and your configure to > set it up the vlan? Using the scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts will use vconfig for you. > 2/ what is the different vlan and vlan trunking? I'm not sure I understand the question, but I'll try and ex

RE: [CentOS] vlan support

> Miskell, Craig wrote: > >> > >> ls centos supporting vlan setup? > > If by that you mean 802.1q trunking, then yes. > > > >> ls it reliable? > > Seems to be in my experience, but that's only limited so far. > > > >> how can I do it? > > Create multiple ifcfg files in > /etc/sysconfig/network-

[CentOS] /var/www/html group & owner

hi again, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -all /var/www/ total 64 drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Mar 3 11:44 . drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Mar 3 11:44 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 15 20:36 cgi-bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 3 11:43 error drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

Milton Calnek wrote: I use MailScanner with SpamAssassin and swear by it! http://mailscanner.info/ Happy (mostly), very vital list group. The author is very actively answering questions and requests. Can't get much better support! mailscanner +1 MimeDefang is good too, and perhaps a li

RE: [CentOS] vlan support

thank you so much few questions also 1/ what is different between vconfig and your configure to set it up the vlan? 2/ what is the different vlan and vlan trunking? thank you again "Miskell, Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > ls centos supporting vlan setup? If by that you mean

Re: [CentOS] vlan support

Miskell, Craig wrote: ls centos supporting vlan setup? If by that you mean 802.1q trunking, then yes. ls it reliable? Seems to be in my experience, but that's only limited so far. how can I do it? Create multiple ifcfg files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, e.g. for multiple VLANs on et

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

Glenn wrote: I use MailScanner with SpamAssassin and swear by it! http://mailscanner.info/ Happy (mostly), very vital list group. The author is very actively answering questions and requests. Can't get much better support! mailscanner +1 Also, I have: FEATURE(`dnsbl', `sbl-xbl.spamhaus.

Re: [CentOS] Rejecting spam

At 02:35 PM 3/4/2008, you wrote: Sorry, not a direct CentOS question, but I know there's a lot of experienced users on this list...I'm using CentOS with sendmail and spamassassin. I've got it configured with spamass-milter and it is working correctly. However, I was expecting to be able to re

RE: [CentOS] vlan support

> Hi all > > ls centos supporting vlan setup? If by that you mean 802.1q trunking, then yes. > ls it reliable? Seems to be in my experience, but that's only limited so far. > how can I do it? Create multiple ifcfg files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, e.g. for multiple VLANs on eth0: ifcfg-e

[CentOS] Rejecting spam

Sorry, not a direct CentOS question, but I know there's a lot of experienced users on this list...I'm using CentOS with sendmail and spamassassin. I've got it configured with spamass-milter and it is working correctly. However, I was expecting to be able to reject mail that is marked as spam,

Re: [CentOS] Dag RPM Repo "error"

> http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en/i386/dag/RPMS/syslinux-3.62-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm: > [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found > > Trying other mirror. > > Error: failure: RPMS/syslinux-3.62-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm from dag: [Errno 256] No > more mirrors to try. Looks like your mirror is no longer valid or te

Re: [CentOS] How to install hp lasejet 1018?

Heiko Adams wrote: Hello, does anyone have an idea how to use an hp lasejet 1018 with CentOS 5? I didn't find any driver for this printer on CentOS 5. If nobody has specific information, you might find this useful: http://www.openprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=HP-LaserJet_1018 _

RE: [CentOS] disable SELinux

thanks. i may well do that b/c i'm behind firewall anyway. also, i'm not ready to tackle iptables at this time. t. hiep Hiep Nguyen wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Alex White wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Hiep Nguyen wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Tom Brown wrote: > > with minimal ins

[CentOS] Dag RPM Repo "error"

I'm getting the error below when I try to do a yum update on my server. It seems that it is looking for an update for my boot loader - syslinux-3.62-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm, but can't find it via the normal path. I've tried looking further up the directory tree on apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en. I've found a p

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:11:22 -0800 (PST) Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Dan Carl wrote: > > > > > > >> > >> for testing, i need to disable selinux, but something still > >> not working right. > >> > >> i'm trying to figure out why i can't

Re: [CentOS] Re: looking for kernel sources

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now off of the soap box and back to work... I have a headache!! ;-P > Well, yeah, you're biting your tongue ;^) mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.c

RE: [CentOS] disable SELinux

Hiep Nguyen wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Alex White wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Hiep Nguyen wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Tom Brown wrote: > > with minimal installation on centos 5, selinux also included. > how do i remove selinux or disable it at least? > >>> > >>> cat /etc/sys

RE: [CentOS] disable SELinux

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Dan Carl wrote: for testing, i need to disable selinux, but something still not working right. i'm trying to figure out why i can't access http://10.0.0.160 from the same network (10.0.0.x). on 10.0.0.160 box, i can access http://localhost, or http://10.0.0.160, but fro

[CentOS] How to install hp lasejet 1018?

Hello, does anyone have an idea how to use an hp lasejet 1018 with CentOS 5? I didn't find any driver for this printer on CentOS 5. -- Heiko Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:51:57AM -0800, Hiep Nguyen enlightened us: > >On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 09:29:34 -0800 (PST) > Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: > > > >>On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Tom Brown wrote: > >> > >>> > > > with minimal installation on centos 5, selinu

RE: [CentOS] disable SELinux

> > for testing, i need to disable selinux, but something still not working > right. > > i'm trying to figure out why i can't access http://10.0.0.160 from the > same network (10.0.0.x). > > on 10.0.0.160 box, i can access http://localhost, or http://10.0.0.160, > but from any other compute

Re: [CentOS] RESTORING THUNDERBIRD FILES

Karanbir Singh wrote: Chris Geldenhuis wrote: This morning I wanted to check my mail, but when I opened Thunderbird, it asked me to set up a mail account. are you sure you didnt install a thunderbird / firefox from outside the yum repo's ? I saved the contents of the previous .th

[CentOS] vlan support

Hi all ls centos supporting vlan setup? ls it reliable? how can I do it? Thank you - Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail ___ CentOS ma

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Alex White wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 09:29:34 -0800 (PST) Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Tom Brown wrote: with minimal installation on centos 5, selinux also included. how do i remove selinux or disable it at le

Re: [CentOS] some help on mrepo please

Dag Wieers wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Rudi Ahlers wrote: I have got CentOS 5.0 i386 & x86_64 DVD's, and CentOS 5.1 i386 & x86_64 CD1, where do I copy these? I have setup /etc/mrepo.conf.d/centos5.conf with both i386 & x86_64 arch, but how will mrepo know that CentOS 5.0 & CentOS 5.1 are diffe

Re: [CentOS] Re: some help on mrepo please

Scott Silva wrote: on 3-3-2008 11:40 PM Rudi Ahlers spake the following: I have downloaded & installed mrepo on my SME 7.3 (CentOS 4.6) server, which is our main file & email server, and internet gateway. I have got CentOS 5.0 i386 & x86_64 DVD's, and CentOS 5.1 i386 & x86_64 CD1, where do I

RE: [CentOS] LVM and kickstarts ?

Michael Gale wrote: > Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > Michael Gale wrote: > >> Hey, > >> > >>So I have created another kickstart that I believe > >> should be correct > >> and it fails the same way with the same problems: > >> > >> --snip-- > >> zerombr yes > >> clearpart --all --initlabel > >>

RE: [CentOS] dovecot & bandwidth limit

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:56 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > > > > Everyone, > > > > > > I am having some bandwidth problems caused by large e-mail files with > > > dovecot. From my research into dovecot it appears that there is no way >

Re: [CentOS] LVM and kickstarts ?

Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Michael Gale wrote: Hey, So I have created another kickstart that I believe should be correct and it fails the same way with the same problems: --snip-- zerombr yes clearpart --all --initlabel part /boot --fstype ext3 --size=100 part swap --size=1000 part pv.os -

Re: [CentOS] some help on mrepo please

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Rudi Ahlers wrote: I have got CentOS 5.0 i386 & x86_64 DVD's, and CentOS 5.1 i386 & x86_64 CD1, where do I copy these? I have setup /etc/mrepo.conf.d/centos5.conf with both i386 & x86_64 arch, but how will mrepo know that CentOS 5.0 & CentOS 5.1 are different? Wrong maili

RE: [CentOS] dovecot & bandwidth limit

On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:56 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > > Everyone, > > > > I am having some bandwidth problems caused by large e-mail files with > > dovecot. From my research into dovecot it appears that there is no way > > to limit the use of bandwidth durin

Re: [CentOS] Requests for inclusion in CentOS Extras [Was Re: Gnumeric]

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:40:26 + Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wrong distro! No. He said that he thought he saw it in F8, meaning that he was unsure if it was actually there or not. I confirmed that it is, indeed, available in F8. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://w

RE: [CentOS] dovecot & bandwidth limit

Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > Everyone, > > I am having some bandwidth problems caused by large e-mail files with > dovecot. From my research into dovecot it appears that there is no way > to limit the use of bandwidth during POP3 deliveries. > > What recommendations might some of you have for

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 09:29:34 -0800 (PST) Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Tom Brown wrote: > > > > >> > >> > >> with minimal installation on centos 5, selinux also included. > >> how do i remove selinux or disable it at least? > >> > > >

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

Hiep Nguyen wrote: > what command i can issue to enforce the change w/o reboot the box. Disabling is impossible without reboot. You can put it into permissive mode with "setenforce 0". But normally you shouldn't need to turn off SELinux at all. Ralph pgpXiSRd0l6Gs.pgp Description: PGP signatu

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Tom Brown wrote: > >> with minimal installation on centos 5, selinux also included. how do i > >> remove selinux or disable it at least? > > > > cat /etc/sysconfig/selinux > > > > you'll figure it out from

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

Hiep Nguyen wrote: what command i can issue to enforce the change w/o reboot the box. If your selinux fs is on /selinux then: echo "0" > /selinux/enforce Regards, Phil. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailm

Re: [CentOS] Requests for inclusion in CentOS Extras [Was Re: Gnumeric]

Frank Cox wrote: Available Packages Name : gnucash Arch : x86_64 Version: 2.2.3 Release: 1.fc8 Size : 5.9 M Repo : updates Wrong distro! -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] dovecot & bandwidth limit

Everyone, I am having some bandwidth problems caused by large e-mail files with dovecot. From my research into dovecot it appears that there is no way to limit the use of bandwidth during POP3 deliveries. What recommendations might some of you have for a different POP3 server that can limit it

Re: [CentOS] Requests for inclusion in CentOS Extras [Was Re: Gnumeric]

Bob Taylor wrote: Changed thread subject to (hopefully) put requests under the same thread. Unless I have missed a replacement package, I would like to see gnucash included. I *think* I found it in FC8. My buildmachine no longer has the Belgian horde wrecking havoc all over it :D which means

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Tom Brown wrote: with minimal installation on centos 5, selinux also included. how do i remove selinux or disable it at least? cat /etc/sysconfig/selinux you'll figure it out from there! what command i can issue to enforce the change w/o reboot the box. thanks

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Tom Brown wrote: with minimal installation on centos 5, selinux also included. how do i remove selinux or disable it at least? cat /etc/sysconfig/selinux you'll figure it out from there! super. thanks. t. hiep ___ Cent

Re: [CentOS] disable SELinux

with minimal installation on centos 5, selinux also included. how do i remove selinux or disable it at least? cat /etc/sysconfig/selinux you'll figure it out from there! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailm

[CentOS] Re: looking for kernel sources

on 3-4-2008 2:50 AM Rudi Ahlers spake the following: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Besides, VMWare & Virtualbox needs it to install properly on the system, what do you tell them? We won't support you, so your programs won't work on our system? VMware and Virtualbox both w

[CentOS] disable SELinux

hi all, with minimal installation on centos 5, selinux also included. how do i remove selinux or disable it at least? t. hiep ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: crypto, readline and zlib libraries - Postgres install

Scott Silva wrote: ("User" installations on FreeBSD gets you standard development libraires and the C compiler. I am beginning to understand that CentOS looks at this more like Windows - the "base load" is in fact just a runtime with NOTHING development-related in it) But it isn't alw

[CentOS] Re: looking for kernel sources

VirtualBox' error log said "can't find kernel source" - that's the wording they used, so I just used what it said :) And your comparison to cars is not completely correct. It is not buying a car and changing the tires. Replacing a kernel is like replacing the engine of a car. And I don't see

[CentOS] Re: crypto, readline and zlib libraries - Postgres install

on 3-3-2008 8:39 PM Karl Denninger spake the following: Stephen Harris wrote: On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:22:20PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: Allegedly openssl (which is loaded) provides this, but... ./configure --with-openssl And have you installed openssl-devel? (well, clearly t

[CentOS] Re: some help on mrepo please

on 3-3-2008 11:40 PM Rudi Ahlers spake the following: I have downloaded & installed mrepo on my SME 7.3 (CentOS 4.6) server, which is our main file & email server, and internet gateway. I have got CentOS 5.0 i386 & x86_64 DVD's, and CentOS 5.1 i386 & x86_64 CD1, where do I copy these? I have s

[CentOS] Re: install LAMP

on 3-4-2008 5:04 AM Hiep Nguyen spake the following: On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Matt Hyclak wrote: On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:54:03AM -0800, Hiep Nguyen enlightened us: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i'm not an expert on linux/centos, but i play with it and hav

RE: [CentOS] LVM and kickstarts ?

Michael Gale wrote: > > Hey, > > So I have created another kickstart that I believe > should be correct > and it fails the same way with the same problems: > > --snip-- > zerombr yes > clearpart --all --initlabel > part /boot --fstype ext3 --size=100 > part swap --size=1000 > part pv.os

Re: [CentOS] LVM and kickstarts ?

Hey, So I have created another kickstart that I believe should be correct and it fails the same way with the same problems: --snip-- zerombr yes clearpart --all --initlabel part /boot --fstype ext3 --size=100 part swap --size=1000 part pv.os --size=8000 --grow --maxsize=8000 --asprimary volgr

Re: [CentOS] Send in your favorite CentOS slogan today

CentOS : Ready for Enterprise Deployment, Have A Try (R.E.D. H.A.T. ;) Red hat without red hat ;) Emmanuel Borlet Ps: if someone find any things better for HAT : Have A Try ... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailm

Re: [CentOS] Send in your favorite CentOS slogan today

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Matt Shields wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Dan Carl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Heard someone mention free beer, had to participate. CentOS, we find RedHat's bugs CentOS, the OS that makes sense. I know that everyone seems to think any mention of RH is cute an

Re: [CentOS] Send in your favorite CentOS slogan today

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Daniel de Kok wrote: On 3/3/08, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 10:36 -0600, Dan Carl wrote: > Heard someone mention free beer, had to participate. > > CentOS, we find RedHat's bugs > > CentOS, the OS that makes sense. Consistently Excell

Re: [CentOS] Send in your favorite CentOS slogan today

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Emmanuel Borlet wrote: Emmanuel Borlet Le 03/03/08 17:36, « Dan Carl » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Heard someone mention free beer, had to participate. CentOS, we find RedHat's bugs CentOS, the OS that makes sense. Why not ? CentOS, we FIX RedHat's bugs Because we

Re: [CentOS] install LAMP

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Matt Hyclak wrote: On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:54:03AM -0800, Hiep Nguyen enlightened us: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i'm not an expert on linux/centos, but i play with it and have a general idea. it's time for me to setup a centos

Re: [CentOS] looking for kernel sources

Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all I'm looking for the linux source files for CentOS 5.1 2.6.18-53.el5. To [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ll /usr/src/kernels/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Mar 4 10:57 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5-x86_64 kernel-devel is OK but you have the wrong

Re: [CentOS] looking for kernel sources

Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all I'm looking for the linux source files for CentOS 5.1 2.6.18-53.el5. To [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ll /usr/src/kernels/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Mar 4 10:57 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5-x86_64 kernel-devel is OK but you have the wrong kernel running install 2.6.1

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 37, Issue 2

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

  1   2   >