On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:03 PM, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 00:25 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
John wrote:
I could do the nvidia install it is pretty simple. I'm just not clear on
the Updating deal the guy on the regular list was talking about this
week.
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:03 PM, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 00:25 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
John wrote:
Sure we could do that no problem. OK I think maybe what I am thinking of
is writing it in text. Then we can collaberate on it then add the
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 17:41 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:03 PM, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 00:25 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
John wrote:
An
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 02:11 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
Hi List,
I've just drafted a FAQ/mini-HOWTO on becoming root as this is a topic I
see come up time and time again.
Perhaps someone with a reasonable understanding could check it for
technical correctness, and if anyone would like to
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0206
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0206.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.52.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.52.ia64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0206
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0206.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.c4.6.ia64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0206
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0206.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.52.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.52.s390.rpm
Glad it helped!
d
On 3-Apr-08, at 11:47 PM, Mail Administrator wrote:
Thanks DNK,
u r absolutely right
the cat /etc/redhat-release does not reflect the version correctly
but the rpm -q centos-release does it perfectly
thnksss n really apprecite
cheers
regards
simon
I seem to
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
snip
Probably because rpm -e {package name} and yum remove {package name}
does different things.
I'd suggest run yum remove openoffice.org-core yum clean all
They don't really do different things to the rpm database.
yum erase/remove will ALSO solve for and remove
Greg Bailey wrote:
Mail Administrator wrote:
Thanks guys for the quick reply
btw cat /etc/redhat-release gives me
CentOS release 5 (Final)
so as per the FAQ guess its uptodate
thnks again
regards
simon
Interesting that this seems to deviate from upstream. Checking an
updated Red
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I thought yum had a different cache / database of what is installed?
Yum keeps a cache and database of what's in the repositories, so it
can search more easily when you're looking to install something from
the
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I thought yum had a different cache / database of what is installed?
Yum keeps a cache and database of what's in the repositories, so it
can search more easily when you're looking to install
: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080405/03e4eb53/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 10:51:53 +0300
From: Pasi Pirhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but then Fred's machine shouldn't have tried to update openoffice?
Nope. This is the problem with using 'epoch' values in rpm.
He's installed version 2.whatever via rpm from openoffice.org. CentOS
contains openoffice
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 16:49 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
John wrote:
Alan,
I knew of the Dell article, as I have all of those saved for reference.
[1] I was just wondering if you knew of any that were for someone knew
to Linux. You know the Microsoft type tutorials that have screenshot
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Travis Fraser wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 08:57 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
If I read correctly - the 5.2 release will have xen 3.0
Does that mean I will be able to run vista as guest operating system?
I seem to remember reading that vista could be run under xen 3.0
On Saturday 05 April 2008 18:18:47 John wrote:
Ned, do I hear someone volunteering to write a new Wiki section? (I
don't think a *separate* Wiki for the new users, be they M$ Windoze
departees or not, is a good idea.) Perhaps this discussion should be
continued on the CentOS-docs list?
Anyone on the list using an ATI Radeon 2600HD on a x86_64 machine? I
have 3 new Dell Precision T3400 workstations with them in it and the
moment it tries to fire up X using the proprietory driver it completely
deadlocks. I'm looking for help from the community to track this problem.
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 19:17 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 05 April 2008 18:18:47 John wrote:
Ned, do I hear someone volunteering to write a new Wiki section? (I
don't think a *separate* Wiki for the new users, be they M$ Windoze
departees or not, is a good idea.) Perhaps this
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 20:02 +0100, Alan Bartlett wrote:
On 05/04/2008, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the command line, if you saved the commands - or got them
from an instructional listing in the first place, you just
paste the same set of commands into a
Michael A. Peters wrote:
If I read correctly - the 5.2 release will have xen 3.0
Does that mean I will be able to run vista as guest operating system?
I seem to remember reading that vista could be run under xen 3.0
I have found instructions for installing XP under xen 3.0 in Debian,
so I'm
Alan Bartlett wrote:
(2) We must not loose sight of what CentOS basically is. CentOS == RHEL less
RH. A stable, server orientated OS. On the fora, we often see evidence that
CentOS is believed to be similar to *other* distros (that are more suitable
for laptops home use) and that it, CentOS,
John wrote:
One things GUIs can do is present a bunch of pre-set defaults or pick up
the current settings so you only have to change a few particular items,
and they can check the ranges and syntax of the entries before trying to
apply them. Webmin does a fair job on this considering the
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 14:54 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Alan Bartlett wrote:
(2) We must not loose sight of what CentOS basically is. CentOS == RHEL less
RH. A stable, server orientated OS. On the fora, we often see evidence that
CentOS is believed to be similar to *other* distros (that
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 14:54 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Alan Bartlett wrote:
(2) We must not loose sight of what CentOS basically is. CentOS == RHEL less
RH. A stable, server orientated OS. On the fora, we often see evidence that
CentOS is believed to be similar to *other* distros (that
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 15:12 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
John wrote:
One things GUIs can do is present a bunch of pre-set defaults or pick up
the current settings so you only have to change a few particular items,
and they can check the ranges and syntax of the entries before trying to
26 matches
Mail list logo
