Re: [CentOS] Upstream vendor's diskless vs LTSP

Fajar Priyanto wrote: I still have problem with user cannot logon from the diskless because the home directory is read-only. It seems that I have to state that /home/user/ must be writable in files.custom, still bumped though. Maybe my v4.2 has bugs on it. What makes me frustated is that se

Re: [CentOS] ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Masry Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was trying to do what the article at > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables > suggested > My iptables rules are > > #that's w

Re: [CentOS] Not able to run kernel-xen with megasr module :/

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Tomasz Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've managed to install CentOS 5.1 on S5000PAL > with fakeraid Intel Embedded Raid Technology II > Raid1 (LSI chipset) with some help of kickstart > declaration 'driverdisk --source=http://.../driver.img' > > Then I've h

Re: [CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

On Saturday 19 April 2008 03:35:52 Paul Heinlein wrote: > The syntax for auth stuff changed between Apache 2.0 and 2.2 (which is > used in CentOS 5). In particular, you'll need a AuthBasicProvider > declaration: > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_auth_basic.html#authbasicprovider Than

Re: [CentOS] Upstream vendor's diskless vs LTSP

On Friday 18 April 2008 21:06:34 Karanbir Singh wrote: > Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > What makes me frustated is that searching 'diskless' in the vendor > > knowledge base only returns 5 entries. Can you believe it? > > Sounds, to me, like a good opportunity to fill that hole with a doc on > the wiki.

[CentOS] Not able to run kernel-xen with megasr module :/

I've managed to install CentOS 5.1 on S5000PAL with fakeraid Intel Embedded Raid Technology II Raid1 (LSI chipset) with some help of kickstart declaration 'driverdisk --source=http://.../driver.img' Then I've had some problems with yum update - new kernel didn't know about megasr.ko. I've solved

[CentOS] jabber server

I'm looking to set up a Jabber server and autocreate the user lists from Active Directory. Does anyone have any pointers? I'm hitting google, but haven't found anything good (i.e. something simple to follow for n00bs) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

Re: [CentOS] ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.

On Friday 18 April 2008 12:23, Masry Alex wrote: > #that's what the mentioned article suggested..I'm not sure it's working! > *raw > -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j NOTRACK Do you have a chain called NOTRACK? What is setup under it? > COMMIT > *filter > -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT

Re: [CentOS] Closest Fedora to CentOS 4?

Tony Mountifield wrote: Hi, I want to take a SRPM that is available for various versions of Fedora and rebuild it on a CentOS 4 system. what package are you looking for ? Its possible that its already there in one of the repos built for centos ( re: http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories ) --

[CentOS] Re: Closest Fedora to CentOS 4?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philip R. Schaffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 17:05 +, Tony Mountifield wrote: > > Hi, I want to take a SRPM that is available for various versions of Fedora > > and rebuild it on a CentOS 4 system. > > > > Which release of Fedora is the

RE: [CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

> The syntax for auth stuff changed between Apache 2.0 and 2.2 (which is > used in CentOS 5). In particular, you'll need a AuthBasicProvider > declaration: > >http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_auth_basic.html#authbasicprovider Hi, Thanks much, I read the URL, it is a bit too crypti

Re: [CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Pam Astor wrote: Hi, I'm trying to password protect one of my web accessable directories and I can't get .htaccess to work in a Centos 5.1 box Here's what I did I created an .htaccess file with the contents: AuthName "Restricted Area" AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /home/my

Re: [CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

Pam Astor wrote: When I reload, apache will not reload. What am I doing wrong? I suspect your only fault is not checking the logs.. Right after you issue service httpd start, go look at /var/log/messages and /var/log/httpd/* -- Cheers, Morten :wq __

[CentOS] Can't get .htaccess to work

Hi, I'm trying to password protect one of my web accessable directories and I can't get .htaccess to work in a Centos 5.1 box Here's what I did I created an .htaccess file with the contents: AuthName "Restricted Area" AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /home/mysite/.htpasswd AuthGroupFile /dev/nul

Re: [CentOS] Closest Fedora to CentOS 4?

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 17:05 +, Tony Mountifield wrote: > Hi, I want to take a SRPM that is available for various versions of Fedora > and rebuild it on a CentOS 4 system. > > Which release of Fedora is the closest to CentOS 4? In other words, which > would be the best FC to take the SRPM for?

Re: [CentOS] howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to put this on my desktop that is running 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5. Is > there a way or do I just wave to use 2.6.24 or 25. yum install kmod-kvm should do the trick, because KVM is in extras. I am currently working on KVM-

Re: [CentOS] ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.

John R Pierce wrote: Masry Alex wrote: is there a way to completely disable ip_conntrack ? without connection tracking, NAT simply won't work. With recent kernels, it is possible to do 1:1 NAT (mapping one private address to exactly one public IP alias on the external interface) without ne

Re: [CentOS] Closest Fedora to CentOS 4?

On Apr 18, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: Hi, I want to take a SRPM that is available for various versions of Fedora and rebuild it on a CentOS 4 system. I read from somewhere that RHEL 4 is based on Fedora Core 3, but can't find the article now. Somebody will correct me though

[CentOS] Closest Fedora to CentOS 4?

Hi, I want to take a SRPM that is available for various versions of Fedora and rebuild it on a CentOS 4 system. Which release of Fedora is the closest to CentOS 4? In other words, which would be the best FC to take the SRPM for? Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://ww

Re: [CentOS] ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.

Masry Alex wrote: is there a way to completely disable ip_conntrack ? without connection tracking, NAT simply won't work. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] create raid /dev/md2

I just figured out , mdadm --auto=yes , will autocreate /dev/md2 if does not exists. Regards, D. On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:10 PM, S.Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Hlácik" wrote on Friday, April 18, 2008 11:40 AM: > > > > > Hi , currently i have 2 raid devices /dev/md0 and /dev/md1 ,

Re: [CentOS] create raid /dev/md2

S.Tindall wrote: David Hlácik" wrote on Friday, April 18, 2008 11:40 AM: Hi , currently i have 2 raid devices /dev/md0 and /dev/md1 , i have added 2 new disks, fdisked , created 2 primary partitions with type fd (linux raid autodetect) Now i want to create raid from them [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#

[CentOS] ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.

I was trying to do what the article at http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables suggested My iptables rules are -

Re: [CentOS] create raid /dev/md2

David Hlácik" wrote on Friday, April 18, 2008 11:40 AM: Hi , currently i have 2 raid devices /dev/md0 and /dev/md1 , i have added 2 new disks, fdisked , created 2 primary partitions with type fd (linux raid autodetect) Now i want to create raid from them [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mdadm --create --

[CentOS] Re: Upstream vendor's diskless vs LTSP

on 4-18-2008 1:38 AM Fajar Priyanto spake the following: Hello all, I have a customer that insists of using upstream vendor's diskless (system-config-netboot) rather than LTSP. The reason is that he wants to use a 100% packages from the vendor, not from LTSP or any other party. I try the vend

Re: [CentOS] create raid /dev/md2

David Hlácik" wrote on Friday, April 18, 2008 11:40 AM: Hi , currently i have 2 raid devices /dev/md0 and /dev/md1 , i have added 2 new disks, fdisked , created 2 primary partitions with type fd (linux raid autodetect) Now i want to create raid from them [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mdadm --create --v

[CentOS] Re: PPP server on Centos

on 4-18-2008 3:22 AM gopinath spake the following: how to configure PPP server on Linux Please Help me out . Regards, Gopinath M Signal Networks Pvt. Ltd. Smile... it increases your face value! Did you try Google? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ppp+server+linux&btnG=Google+Searc

Re: [CentOS] Simulate RJ 45 Port

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Jeff Larsen wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:18 AM, gopinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: how to simulate a RJ 45 port to act as serial port any option in Centos 5.1. Please help me out on this. Are you perhaps looking for a serial over ethernet device such as the ones

[CentOS] create raid /dev/md2

Hi , currently i have 2 raid devices /dev/md0 and /dev/md1 , i have added 2 new disks, fdisked , created 2 primary partitions with type fd (linux raid autodetect) Now i want to create raid from them [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md2 --level=1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 mdadm: error

Re: [CentOS] howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to use kvm-amd on centos 5.1? > > I dont want to mess with XEN. I want the hardware virtualization that is on > my AMD chip. > > I played with putting 2.6.24 and centos 5.1 on my AMD laptop, got kvm-amd > and

Re: [CentOS] Simulate RJ 45 Port

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:18 AM, gopinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > how to simulate a RJ 45 port to act as serial port any option in Centos 5.1. > Please help me out on this. > Are you perhaps looking for a serial over ethernet device such as the ones made by Moxa (www.moxa.com)? I'm sure

Re: [OFFLIST ]Re: [CentOS] Diskless Environment

On 18/04/2008, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > oops, not really OFFList is it ? > > sorry, ignore my last email to the list 8-) yeah yeah and all that -- Regards, Sudev Barar Read http://blog.sudev.in for topics ranging from here to there. __

Re: [OFFLIST ]Re: [CentOS] Diskless Environment

Karanbir Singh wrote: Hi John, John wrote: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/DisklessClients . The only other option you have if you have to run CentOS 5 and > is to use Cobbler. Why is that the only option ? it takes 6 seconds to write the /tftpboot/ specs. Given a set of decent docs, anyone

[OFFLIST ]Re: [CentOS] Diskless Environment

Hi John, John wrote: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/DisklessClients . The only other option you have if you have to run CentOS 5 and > is to use Cobbler. Why is that the only option ? it takes 6 seconds to write the /tftpboot/ specs. Given a set of decent docs, anyone can just do that. Co

Re: [CentOS] Upstream vendor's diskless vs LTSP

Fajar Priyanto wrote: What makes me frustated is that searching 'diskless' in the vendor knowledge base only returns 5 entries. Can you believe it? Sounds, to me, like a good opportunity to fill that hole with a doc on the wiki.centos.org site, and get some attention around that. btw, I am

Re: [CentOS] howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1

Jerry Geis wrote: Is there a way to use kvm-amd on centos 5.1? I dont want to mess with XEN. I want the hardware virtualization that is on my AMD chip. what effort did you make to research this first ? What did you try ? What specific problems did you run into ? -- Karanbir Singh : http:

[CentOS] howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1

Is there a way to use kvm-amd on centos 5.1? I dont want to mess with XEN. I want the hardware virtualization that is on my AMD chip. I played with putting 2.6.24 and centos 5.1 on my AMD laptop, got kvm-amd and that works. However I want to put this on my desktop that is running 2.6.18-53.1.

RE: [CentOS] Firewall/router

>Why not install vmware-server in your Centos? Then you can install pfsense in >it. But, I think it's bad practice to install pfsense in a vm. >CMIIW. vmware and xen on some box? Its a lab/ POC environment anyway... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.

Re: [CentOS] Upstream vendor's diskless vs LTSP

On Friday 18 April 2008 17:12:02 John wrote: > The netboot package for version 5 of CentOS/Red Hat is not included in > either distro, because it is broken. Attempts to get to a working known > state are not looking to good. If using it on CentOS/Red Hat version 4, > it will work. Luckily he still

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 38, Issue 7

581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080418/7b2a1655/attachment-0001.bin --

Re: [CentOS] PPP server on Centos

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 16:26 +0530, gopinath wrote: > I need to how to set up a PPP server which accepts ppp request from PPP > clients OK try searching the Linux Documentation Project for that. http://tldp.org/HOWTO/PPP-HOWTO/ Look at the bottom of the page. If you would just make an effort to s

Re: [CentOS] PPP server on Centos

I need to how to set up a PPP server which accepts ppp request from PPP clients - Original Message - From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 3:53 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] PPP server on Centos > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 15:52 +0530, gopinath

Re: [CentOS] count of active tcp sockets?

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, J Potter wrote: Is there an easy way to get a count of the number of active socket connections, or even better, number of socket connections in the time_wait state? (Something lightweight... under /proc/sys/net/ipv4/? I'd like to avoid the impact of listing out all the con

Re: [CentOS] PPP server on Centos

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 15:52 +0530, gopinath wrote: > how to configure PPP server on Linux > > Please Help me out . Give a little more information about what you want to do. Do you want to setup a Dial Up Connection to the Internet? If so run 'system-config-network' or 'system-config-network-tui

Re: [CentOS] Simulate RJ 45 Port

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 11:54 +0200, Morten Nilsen wrote: > On 4/18/2008, "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 23:10 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > >> John wrote: > >> > Attachment Unit Interface? (AUI) RJ46 to Serial DB9 or RJ45 to LPT ? > >> > >> AUI connectors were DB15, and

Re: [CentOS] Upstream vendor's diskless vs LTSP

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 15:38 +0700, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Hello all, > I have a customer that insists of using upstream vendor's diskless > (system-config-netboot) rather than LTSP. The reason is that he wants to use > a 100% packages from the vendor, not from LTSP or any other party. I to have

[CentOS] PPP server on Centos

how to configure PPP server on Linux Please Help me out . Regards, Gopinath M Signal Networks Pvt. Ltd. Smile... it increases your face value! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] stunnel

On Thursday 17 April 2008 19:45:26 Jim Perrin wrote: > Well, just stunnel by itself doesn't mean there's a breach, unless you > never configured anything to use stunnel. You might want to do a > little more digging on the system to confirm or disprove your > suspicions. Have a look in places like /

Re: [CentOS] Simulate RJ 45 Port

On 4/18/2008, "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 23:10 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: >> John wrote: >> > Attachment Unit Interface? (AUI) RJ46 to Serial DB9 or RJ45 to LPT ? >> >> AUI connectors were DB15, and also aren't 'serial ports', they are >> ethernet without the PHY la

Re: [CentOS] Simulate RJ 45 Port

On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 23:10 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > John wrote: > > Attachment Unit Interface? (AUI) RJ46 to Serial DB9 or RJ45 to LPT ? > > > > AUI connectors were DB15, and also aren't 'serial ports', they are > ethernet without the PHY layer transcievers. I thought it was a DB9. I h

Re: [CentOS] Firewall/router

On Friday 18 April 2008 02:21:01 Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I was using pfSense in a vm under esx but I want to move to Xen and prefer > something that can run as a pv guest. Anyone got any reco's of what can run > on top of CentOS to perform a similar role as pfSense (perform nat/pat and > firewall

[CentOS] Upstream vendor's diskless vs LTSP

Hello all, I have a customer that insists of using upstream vendor's diskless (system-config-netboot) rather than LTSP. The reason is that he wants to use a 100% packages from the vendor, not from LTSP or any other party. I try the vendor's diskless system, and although it's very simple to setup