Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Yes, though slammed hardware RAID a bit. Software RAID has it's place
don't
get me wrong, it's just knowing when and where.
Now the problem I have with your approach under the OP's
requirements is the only way to fit that kinda storage over that long a
period is with
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:48 -0700, MHR wrote:
>
>
> > As root, go to the directory where the rpms are located (you can use
> > 'find' for this if you don't alreayd know) and run:
> >
> > rpm -ivh kernel-headers-2.6.18-53
Yes, though slammed hardware RAID a bit. Software RAID has it's place don't
get me wrong, it's just knowing when and where.
Now the problem I have with your approach under the OP's
requirements is the only way to fit that kinda storage over that long a
period is with external enclosures and there
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:48 -0700, MHR wrote:
> As root, go to the directory where the rpms are located (you can use
> 'find' for this if you don't alreayd know) and run:
>
> rpm -ivh kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
Mark: Syntax for the find comm
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:41 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-6-2008 2:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the
> following:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa kernel*
> > kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
> > kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
> > kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
> > Linux c
The point was, acceptable performance can be had without purchasing a
hardware controller. And for archival purposes on a tight budget $500 bucks
means one controller for 3 more drives.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:17 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
>
> >
> > T
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Take these benchmarks with a grain of salt.
and, more importantly, for the thread at hand, this guy wants an ARCHIVE
server, where performance is quite secondary, reliablity and data
retention are more important.
If he had the budget, I'd be suggesting looking at
I used postfixadmin and it has been fine. (CentOS 5)
I suggest redirecting (in the http server) all postfixadmin access to
https for security.
I found the db schema satisfactory for my needs.
The point with postfixadmin is the PHP interface to the database.
You /could/ just create whatever tabl
Take these benchmarks with a grain of salt.
We don't know how these hardware controllers were setup and by the numbers
posted, not very well, or they are not very good.
A SATA and a SAS drive will have roughly the same sequential io performance.
Where SAS shines is in random io. So if it's arc
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa kernel*
> kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
>
> How can I correct this, so the box
> will boot the latest kernel? TIA! Lanny
As root, go to the dire
on 5-6-2008 2:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the
following:
On 5/6/08, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the original one), please let me know
On 5/6/08, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
> > her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
> > the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks much! Lanny
>
> rpm -qa ke
I just posted this on my website, oddly enough. While you need to
really understand your storage requirements to make an informed choice
between hardware or software RAID, with quad core CPUs being as cheap as
they are it's hard to not make the argument for software.
This is just hdparm over an a
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Ed Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Situation:
> My current storage needs are approximately 1.5 TB annually. This will
> increase to about 3.5 TB annually over the next 5 years (rough est.). This
> box will just be a data archive and once it is full it will o
Ed Morrison wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have
> the $ to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking
> trunning CentOS 5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at
> and concerned about.
>
> Situation:
> My current s
I just purchased an equallogic SAN with 16 1TB drives for 52k at work.
Love it, scheduled snapshots, thin provisioning, iscsi only but fairly
swift at 16 spindles in a RAID 50.
Jason
www.cyborgworkshop.org
John R Pierce wrote:
> Ed Morrison wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> I need advice on implementing a sto
John R Pierce wrote:
infrastructure to support lots of SATA drives isn't real cheap
regardless. you really don't want to just bolt a bunch of drives up
inside a jumbo desktop tower and call it a server. 5 years at that
run rate is going to be something like 12TB total storage, which usi
Ed Morrison wrote:
I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have
the $ to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking
trunning CentOS 5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at
and concerned about.
Situation:
My current storage needs are appro
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> ext4 is being previewed in Fedora 9 this month, so add one more to
> the list.
btrfs looks interesting too, though I expect it will be some time before it
is stable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs
--
Jeremy Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www-xray.ast.cam.ac.
I can't think of a better word for this than "weird."
I went back and reread most of the emails on the original thread, and
both Ross and Bill suggested that something about "misc" might be off.
So, I created a new mount point called "other," pointed fstab at it,
modified my scripts and symlinks
Scott Thistle wrote:
Actually, I am on rh436 course now. Why not set up centos51 as iscsi
target itself?
that just pushes the file management issues off to another system, where
you still have to solve them
he wants an archive server, which is more of a NAS device then a SAN.
iSCSI add
Ed Morrison wrote:
Hi:
I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have
the $ to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking
trunning CentOS 5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at
and concerned about.
Situation:
My current storage needs are a
Actually, I am on rh436 course now. Why not set up centos51 as iscsi
target itself?
On 5/6/08, Matt Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Ed Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Ed Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have the $
> to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking trunning CentOS
> 5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at and con
On Tue, 6 May 2008 at 12:11pm, Ed Morrison wrote
Situation:
My current storage needs are approximately 1.5 TB annually. This will
increase to about 3.5 TB annually over the next 5 years (rough est.). This
box will just be a data archive and once it is full it will only be used very
infreque
Hi:
I need advice on implementing a storage server. I really do not have
the $ to spend for a Dell iSCSI storage divice and I am thinking
trunning CentOS 5.x with ftp or FreeNAS. Here is what I am looking at
and concerned about.
Situation:
My current storage needs are approximately 1.5 TB
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 11:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 23:49:11 -0500:
>
> > Its actually very useful to access backend hosts on private networks or
> > to transparently spread the load across several machines.
>
> If you proxy it, not with a Redirect, y
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 09:25 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 16:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > > If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
> > > her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
> >
Hi all,
I'm trying to add some milters (particularly spamass-milter and
clamav-milter, which I acquired through rpmforge) to my postfix
configuration on Centos5 with the targeted SELinux policy..
I'm running into difficulty getting postfix to communicate through the
unix domain sockets creat
Andrew @ ATM Logic wrote:
>
> Can someone tell me what, and where the file that contains
> the port forwarding info is on a standard install? I had a
> server fail, I have mounted the drive and need to get this info back.
/etc/sysconfig/iptables and /etc/sysconfig/ip6tables
-Ross
___
Can someone tell me what, and where the file that contains the port
forwarding info is on a standard install? I had a server fail, I have
mounted the drive and need to get this info back.
Thanks.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.c
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 16:11 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
> > her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
> > the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks muc
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
> her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
> the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks much! Lanny
rpm -qa kernel*
And: pup is a frontend to yum is a fron
On 03 May 2008, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>Message: 9
?Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 16:31:50 +0200
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 3 May 2008 07:28:10 -0500:
> Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5
>Ok. I just asked because you never mentioned you had actually checked.
>Just a
David Williams wrote:
James Fidell wrote:
Is there a PHP 5.2 build for CentOS5.1 anywhere? Unfortunately I
need a
fix for a SOAP bug that is present in the current 5.1.6 release.
Tske a look at Jason Litka's site:
http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/
That's what I'm using at the mom
> > > James Fidell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is there a PHP 5.2 build for CentOS5.1 anywhere? Unfortunately I
> > > > > need a
> > > > > fix for a SOAP bug that is present in the current 5.1.6 release.
> > > > >
> > > > Tske a look at Jason Litka's site:
http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 03:48:01PM +0200, Geert Batsleer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday I upgraded a centos 4.6 box via yum and now it seems that
> certain pages, especially swf files stopped working.
>
> Does anyone know if ImageMagick got broken on x64? I don't see any
> other package wich could h
Hi,
yesterday I upgraded a centos 4.6 box via yum and now it seems that certain
pages, especially swf files stopped working.
Does anyone know if ImageMagick got broken on x64? I don't see any other
package wich could have caused this problem.
kind regards,
Geert
PS Below is the output of my y
Hi,
I have a freeradius server that is working well in university. We use
EAP-TTLS and PAP protocols. Users from Windows can use Securew2. Users
from Linux and Mac OS X luckily have native support for EAP-TTLS and
PAP. (if you think is Off Topic, keep reading on). On Ubuntu I can use
the nm-applet
James Fidell wrote:
It will definitely be a part of the centosplus repo ( to ensure we get
some upgrade path sanity from centos-4 ), however it might also be
available as a separate repo itself.
What's the status of this now? I don't see it in the centosplus repo
yet.
there are a few things
Karanbir Singh wrote:
James Fidell wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
James Fidell wrote:
Is there a PHP 5.2 build for CentOS5.1 anywhere? Unfortunately I
need a
fix for a SOAP bug that is present in the current 5.1.6 release.
Not yet, but we are working on it - there should be something there i
Les Mikesell wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 23:49:11 -0500:
> Its actually very useful to access backend hosts on private networks or
> to transparently spread the load across several machines.
If you proxy it, not with a Redirect, yes. It seemed he wanted just a
redirect.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Ber
Craig White wrote on Mon, 05 May 2008 16:38:00 -0700:
> that's what I ended up doing...you took the first message in the thread
I see. That message wasn't here when I wrote that.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
__
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 22:31 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm toying around with Postfix and MySQL on a CentOS 4 server (no longer
> using stock postfix and mysql rpms, obviously). I've read several
> "How-TOs", and it all looks fairly easy to do.
>
> The one thing that puzzl
44 matches
Mail list logo
