Jason Pyeron wrote:
> I was just about to ask the same, but for packages I just rolled.
>
> Is there a cmd line swith or env var?
Why not sign packages you roll? It really isn't that hard. RPM does have
issues with large keys, though - Key on the top1000 list aren't usable
:) - I think 64kb is th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:55 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: YUM, RPM and PGP keys
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > I was just about to ask the same, but for pac
On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one volume
> group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more, there's also a graphical
> frontend for LVM in your desktop).
>
> >From your grub.conf we know that it thinks it's installed on (hd0,2),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> > hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one volume
> > group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more, there's also a graphical
> > frontend for LVM in your desktop).
> >
> > From your grub.conf we know
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 04:16:23PM -0400, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've just started trying gnome-terminal (instead of xterm) because of
> its "tabbing" facility. However, I note that with it backslashes appear
> something like a W with a horizontal line through it. Any known
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Rcpt-To:
wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500:
> > Mount it and have a look at that partition, does it contain the same stuff
> > as
> > your /boot partition?
And this question?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Rcpt-To:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 10:52:16 -0400:
> The proper location of the grub.conf is:
>
> /mnt/hda8/grub/grub.conf
right, if that is the boot partition, there won't be a boot directory.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conac
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Rcpt-To:
wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
> 10696956 4597688 5547128 46% /
> /dev/hda3 102486
I got half way through an installation of CentOS on a box that has
Window$ 98 in the first partition and Window$ XP in the second, where
CentOS was designated for partitions 3 (/boot - 128MB) and 4 (/) and
had some strange results.
During the install, I changed the default OS to boot to Window$
(b
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got half way through an installation of CentOS on a box that has
> Window$ 98 in the first partition and Window$ XP in the second, where
> CentOS was designated for partitions 3 (/boot - 128MB) and 4 (/) and
> had some strange r
As far as i am searching over internet, i am finding only dead links for
CentOS Live CD project (http://wiki.centos.org/Projects) .
Where can i find and download it please?
thanks !
D.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
Quoting David Hláèik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As far as i am searching over internet, i am finding only dead links for
> CentOS Live CD project (http://wiki.centos.org/Projects) .
> Where can i find and download it please?
>
> thanks !
>
> D.
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/centos/5.1/isos/i386/CentOS-5.
Thanks i firured it out , sorry for stupid silly question, but why project
pages are not working?
D.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Barry Brimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting David Hláèik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > As far as i am searching over internet, i am finding only dead links fo
Hi,
I have uptodate x86_64 CentOS 5 with official repositories.
mdadm version is v2.5.4 - 13 October 2006
This version is known to have problems with raid10 configurations.
Sadly, I have a 4 disk raid10 on this system.
I tried adding Dag's repository but system complains about some
packages whic
I have question - why you need live CD for server distribution such as
CentOS? For desktop distributions such as Fedora or Ubuntu this is natural,
but for server?
Thank you for answer ;)
2008/5/12 David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks i firured it out , sorry for stupid silly question, but
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:41:59PM +0200, happymaster23 enlightened us:
> I have question - why you need live CD for server distribution such as
> CentOS? For desktop distributions such as Fedora or Ubuntu this is natural,
> but for server?
>
> Thank you for answer ;)
>
First thing that comes to
This is the 2nd time this has happened to me. There was a kernel
release over the weekend to .67.0.15, yet, they did not release the
updated GFS to go along with it, so when the machine rebooted, there was
no gfs file system in the new running kernel which in turn wreaked havoc
on my cluster. I t
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did you tell grub to write to the MBR, or to the partition where you
> installed CentOS?
>
I looked at that screen and took the default, which, IIRC, was to
write to the MBR. (I couldn't see the point of writing to the
Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS...
I did a "yum update" and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola...
Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct module and
hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from lost+found.
I am using CentO
> This is the 2nd time this has happened to me. There was a kernel
> release over the weekend to .67.0.15, yet, they did not release the
> updated GFS to go along with it, so when the machine
> rebooted, there was
> no gfs file system in the new running kernel which in turn
> wreaked havoc
> on
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote:
> Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS...
>
> I did a "yum update" and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola...
You seem to enjoy living dangerously ? Don't you ever use a testing machine
before rolling the updates on a prod
Tru,
I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test
environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated
at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded
with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled
against particula
David Hláčik wrote:
Thanks i firured it out , sorry for stupid silly question, but why
project pages are not working?
D.
David, the machines that host projects.centos.org were moved a few days
back, and were not totally back into production as yet.
It should all be sorted now ( https://pro
I have 2 machines in a cluster using GFS, that many client mount up via
nfs. We use quotas extensively here, is there a way from a client
machine to check a users quota? Standard quota command on client
machines do not work like they do when checking a non-gfs nfs mounted
file system. The quotas
Karanbir Singh wrote:
David Hláčik wrote:
Thanks i firured it out , sorry for stupid silly question, but why
project pages are not working?
D.
David, the machines that host projects.centos.org were moved a few days
back, and were not totally back into production as yet.
It should all be s
Ned Slider wrote:
I'm sure you're aware, but the certs don't match for
https://projects.centos.org/ giving a warning. The cert is for
w2.centos.org.
I did see it, but did not fix it yet. Will get it done soon.
SSL does not seem to like me today :/
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
Upstream updates cluster packages about a week after OS patches. I found
that out when putting in a new cluster and 4.6 came out. The cluster
packages lagged behind a week deliberately for stability's sake.
Scott
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tru,
>
>
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:20:46PM -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
> Tru,
>
Hi Doug,
> I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test
> environments :).
Sure, but they could probably understand if it's 'critical' ;)
> Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated
> at the sam
Use gfs_quota command.
man gfs_quota
*gfs_quota* [*OPTION]*
**
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 2 machines in a cluster using GFS, that many client mount up via
> nfs. We use quotas extensively here, is there a way from a client
> machine to ch
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote:
> > Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS...
> >
> > I did a "yum update" and after updating many packages I rebooted and
> viola...
> You seem to enjoy living
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:40:22AM +0300, Linux wrote:
> What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well,
> show me a way to prove.
/var/log/messages ?
> This log is after update & reboot:
> "May 11 16:06:03 x kernel: XFS: failed to read root inode"
nothing more?
> Apr 02 2
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:40:22AM +0300, Linux wrote:
> > What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well,
> > show me a way to prove.
> /var/log/messages ?
Only a small part of it.
> > This log is afte
on 5-12-2008 5:54 AM Jason Pyeron spake the following:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:55 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: YUM, RPM and PGP keys
Jason Pyeron wrote:
I was j
on 5-11-2008 2:56 AM happymaster23 spake the following:
Hi all,
sometimes I�m checking status of my server with phpSysInfo, always is
all right, but at May 8 I was experienced a "big deviation". My machine
was online for 12 days, but net statistics are reseted. I was checked
/proc/net/dev an
on 5-12-2008 10:17 AM MHR spake the following:
I got half way through an installation of CentOS on a box that has
Window$ 98 in the first partition and Window$ XP in the second, where
CentOS was designated for partitions 3 (/boot - 128MB) and 4 (/) and
had some strange results.
During the instal
on 5-12-2008 2:20 PM Doug Tucker spake the following:
Tru,
I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test
environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated
at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded
with no GFS so it went bye-bye.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 5-12-2008 10:17 AM MHR spake the following:
>
> It might not have finished the install, and something made it reboot before
> it had written the grub records.
>
I figure I'll just start over and sit there to watch while
All I can see with google is sfdnwin.exe for Window$ only
Thanks.
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 5-12-2008 3:47 PM Linux spake the following:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:40:22AM +0300, Linux wrote:
> What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well,
> show me a way to prove.
/var/log/messages ?
Onl
>on 5-12-2008 5:54 AM Jason Pyeron spake the following:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt
>>>
>>> Jason Pyeron wrote:
I was just about to ask the same, but for packages I just rolled.
Is there a cmd line swith or env var?
>>> Why not sign packages you roll?
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:49 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All I can see with google is sfdnwin.exe for Window$ only
>
Okay, I found dfutool - does anyone know if that is as generic as it
sounds and can, in fact, update a DVD burner's firmware?
Thanks.
mhr
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:21 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:49 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All I can see with google is sfdnwin.exe for Window$ only
> >
>
> Okay, I found dfutool - does anyone know if that is as generic as it
> sounds and can, in f
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 04:20:46 Doug Tucker wrote:
> Tru,
>
> I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test
> environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated
> at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded
> with no GFS so it went by
Hi,
I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to
monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying
to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For
example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs from
network switches, I
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to
monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying
to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For
example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs f
2008/5/12 Ross Cavanagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to
> > monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying
> > to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to
monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying
to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For
example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs f
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 18:27 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:21 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:49 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > All I can see with google is sfdnwin.exe for Window$ only
> > >
> >
> > Okay, I found dfu
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 23:21 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 18:27 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:21 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:49 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> NB: This also seem to apply
how to configure samba server to only authenticate the users. Means all the
users profiles should be stored on the local PC itself. It should not be stored
on the server.
i am a beginner to linux
i have installed Centos 5.1
Please help me out. i searched in google its no use.
Regards,
Gopina
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 12:44:11 gopinath wrote:
> how to configure samba server to only authenticate the users. Means all the
> users profiles should be stored on the local PC itself. It should not be
> stored on the server.
>
> i am a beginner to linux
> i have installed Centos 5.1
>
> Please help
51 matches
Mail list logo
