>
> Run testparm and tell us what your share definitions are...if any.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] david]# testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Processing section "[samba]"
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
[glob
On 5/23/08, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you ping the Samba Server by the Server name?
>
Pinging server name, From the server itself can ping.
However from winxp client cannot ping by server name, can only ping by
ip address.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] david]# ping -c3 antioch
PING antioch.mc (
HI,
This is my first mail to this mailing list.I want to block external usb
storage completly on my server running on centos 5 having confidiential
data.
For that i used udev and blocked the external usb storage by creating the
udev rule mentioning any usb storage will get mounted to /dev/nu
whoami i wrote:
HI,
This is my first mail to this mailing list.I want to block external
usb storage completly on my server running on centos 5 having
confidiential data.
For that i used udev and blocked the external usb storage by creating
the udev rule mentioning any usb storage will
david chong wrote:
On 5/23/08, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you ping the Samba Server by the Server name?
Pinging server name, From the server itself can ping.
Irrevelant to network problems FYI.
However from winxp client cannot ping by server name, can only ping by
ip address.
O
On 5/23/08, Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you have netbios over tcp/ip enabled on your windows xp box?
>
If I can ping to other windows xp boxes by name, does it mean I have
netbios over tcp/ip enabled?
C:\Documents and Settings\user>ping ws03
Pinging ws03 [192.168.0.33] wit
Warren Young wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
So, how does it perform with 6 discs for example? Say I have 3 HDD's
in RAID-0, and another 3 in RAID-0, then RAID-1 the 2 RAID-0 stripes.
There's actually two kinds of RAID-10. Some like to say RAID-01 or
RAID-1+0 or things like that to distinguish
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Anybody knows when CentOS 5.2 will be made available?
I wanted to unsubscribe the first person who asks that question from
this mailing list >:)
Do you have a good reason why I shouldn't do that to you? =:D
Okay, joking aside:
Answer: When it's ready.
Longer answer: Up t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone got kaffeine installed. When I do a
>
> #yum install kaffeine
>
> I get a transaction check error with kde-libs.
>
> Is this a known issue and is their a workaround?
If you don't tell us which error you got, we will not tell you about any
workarounds. Mostly b
Mag Gam wrote:
Thanks Jim. Since, 802.3ad requires switch settings does it perform better
than other modes? Does anyone have any benchmarks?
I haven't done any benchmarks - but as I've managed to get 200+Mbyte/s
read speeds using mode 6 with a dual link - I can't see it would be any
faster wi
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Christopher Chan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> And stick with md-raid 10 (also known as software raid) because it is
>> much more intelligently designed than any
>> closed-source-embedded-raid-controller.
>
> This was valid until...quite a few years ago.
Has hard
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Guy Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And stick with md-raid 10 (also known as software raid) because it is
>> much more intelligently designed than any
>> closed-source-embedded-raid-controller.
>
> "More intelligently designed" -> Could you please tell us mor
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 14:18 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Matt Hyclak wrote:
> >
> > For crying out loud, upstream has only released 5.2 less
> > than 24 hours ago.
>
> I was just curious, I was not "demanding it right now" or anything like
> that.
>
> Sorry if my inquiry seemed inconsiderate.
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
This CentOS wiki may help:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/IPTables
Akemi
Akemi,
That was helpful (I should have checked the wiki:>).
After reading that and the RH related links, I think I have what I need
but I am unclear about one aspect. What is the correlat
I've created a blog entry about the upcoming 5.2 release and when it
well be ready.
You can find it at http://planet.centos.org/.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming"
> > > Anybody knows when CentOS 5.2 will be made available?
> LOL, it's *almost* funny how quick people start asking when the next
> version will come out when after upstream has released a new version.
> Paul
What's so funny? I think it's a very relevant question. There are
preparations to mad
Hi folks.
I,m thinking of purchasing an ASUS mother board with this chip set in it.
NVIDIA® nForce® 430 MCP
Lan= NVIDIA® nForce® 430 MCP built-in Gigabit MAC with external Attansic PHY.
Any one know how well the chip set is supported. Any comments?
Thanks John
--
Guy Fawkes, the only man to ente
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:23 AM, James Pearson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mag Gam wrote:
>> Thanks Jim. Since, 802.3ad requires switch settings does it perform better
>> than other modes? Does anyone have any benchmarks?
>
> I haven't done any benchmarks - but as I've managed to get 200+Mbyte/s r
On Friday 23 May 2008 14:16:45 whoami i wrote:
> This is my first mail to this mailing list.I want to block external usb
> storage completly on my server running on centos 5 having confidiential
> data.
1. unplug any usb storage
2. rmmod ehci_hcd
3. add a line in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
blac
> The BIOS determines which disk (the first) will be chosen to boot from.
I have no problems configuring the boot order in the BIOS.
I must have the MBR on /dev/hdc (which is being removed).
The /boot partition is on /dev/sda (where I want to move MBR).
> To make a plain bootsector copy:
> dd if
Linux wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Guy Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"More intelligently designed" -> Could you please tell us more on this one?
Simple answer: Open Source (and for a long time) I guess you know what
it means. But I wander if source of Adaptec raid controller's
On Thursday 22 May 2008 22:30:29 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I have a dual homed server in an install for someone who is very cost
> sensitive. This server originally is being setup as an Asterisk server, but
> now the simplest thing for me to do is also set it up to provide internet
> access for the
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Answer: When it's ready.
Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere
I don't have time to look at the moment - I'll check when I get to
work, but by then I'll have forgotten this question aga
On Friday 23 May 2008 01:46:33 James B. Byrne wrote:
> Dealings with SELinux issues typically do not lend themselves to short
> answers. SELinux is like an onion, each each exception blocks access until
> resolved. Thus each policy change has to be made individually and then the
> process reteste
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:11:10AM -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Answer: When it's ready.
>
> Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere
> I don't have time to look at the moment - I'll check when
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Answer: When it's ready.
>
> Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere
> I don't have time to look at the moment - I'll ch
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > So, does anyone know, off the top of their heads, or where I can look this
> > up?
> >
>
> My RHEL 5.2 machines show Gnome 2.16.0 still.
Yes, but it will have a more current Evolution :)
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpABWbfryo4s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Not specific to CentOS but I know you guys would be really helpful
anyhow. Basically, I have a file which has been editted in the past
very similarly to the hosts file only now I want to use it as a hosts
file and need to run some fancy sed to massage the data into shape.
Currently, the data in th
On May 22, 2008, at 11:32 PM, Paul wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 15:42 -0400, Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:03:23PM -0700, Florin Andrei enlightened
us:
Anybody knows when CentOS 5.2 will be made available?
http://www.linux.com/feature/135980
When it's done. For crying out
I also do not see an CentOS 4.x x86_64 Live CD; only i386.
Is it not really going to matter, 64b vs 32b, when using that?
Thanks,
Scott
>
> Do I need to move the MBR, remove the old drive, and reboot from
> a LiveCD in order to have a reconfigure of grub correctly see which
> drive it should fin
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Scott McClanahan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not specific to CentOS but I know you guys would be really helpful anyhow.
> Basically, I have a file which has been editted in the past very similarly
> to the hosts file only now I want to use it as a hosts file and n
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:41:19AM -0700, Scott McClanahan wrote:
> Not specific to CentOS but I know you guys would be really helpful anyhow.
> Basically, I have a file which has been editted in the past very similarly to
> the hosts file only now I want to use it as a hosts file and need to run
Fajar,
I really appreciate all the detailed help here! I have some questions.
>Hi JLC,
>There are 2 ways to implement firewall: negative list and positive list. Looks
>like you want a very strict one that is positive list.
>
>Assuming eth0 is WAN, and eth1 is LAN (assuming 192.168.0.0/24)(please
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:02:29PM +0200, Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:41:19AM -0700, Scott McClanahan wrote:
> > 1.1.1.1foo
> > 10.10.10.10bar bar2
> > 100.100.100.100foobar foobar2 foobar3
> > == After ==
> > 1.1.1.1foo.contoso.com
> > 10.10.10.10ba
I do not have any ideas on this.
Where should I start.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] security]# date && time ssh -v 192.168.1.21 date
Fri May 23 11:43:53 EDT 2008
OpenSSH_3.9p1, OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003
debug1: Reading configuration data /root/.ssh/config
debug1: Applying options for 192.168.1.21
debug1: R
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:02:29PM +0200, Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:41:19AM -0700, Scott McClanahan wrote:
1.1.1.1foo
10.10.10.10bar bar2
100.100.100.100foobar foobar2 foobar3
== After ==
1.1.1.1
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Jason Pyeron wrote:
I do not have any ideas on this.
Where should I start. [... lots and lots of snippage ...]
When sshd looks to be the culprit, my troubleshooting begins by
launching it in foreground mode on a non-standard port on the server:
sshd -ddd -p
On
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Eon Strife <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks, I check those folders, and they are already empty.
> Now, I tried to remove the freenx by using yum, and then I removed the files
> it left behind manually in:
>
Pardon me, but would you please either stop top
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:59:24PM +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
> > sed 's/^\([^]*[ ]*[^]*\)\([ ]*.*\)$/\1.contoso.com\2/'
> >
> >(where there's a space *and* a TAB inside each of the [ ] )
> >
> The above version easier to read and "copy paste". Space
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:09 AM, david chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Pinging server name, From the server itself can ping.
> However from winxp client cannot ping by server name, can only ping by
> ip address.
>
This probably means that your Win XP hosts file doesn't have the name in it...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of david chong
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 3:21 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] samba question
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running Centos5.1, trying to configure samba now. I am
> quite new
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Heinlein
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 1:06 PM
>
>
> When sshd looks to be the culprit, my troubleshooting begins by
> launching it in foreground mode on a non-standard port on the server:
>
>
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Jason Pyeron wrote:
debug3: Normalising mapped IPv4 in IPv6 address
debug3: Trying to reverse map address 192.168.1.80.
paused 7 seconds
Here, obviously, is part of the problem. Your name service isn't
answering reverse lookups for your LAN addresses -- or it least it
i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Heinlein
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 2:17 PM
>
> On Fri, 23 May 2008, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> > debug3: Normalising mapped IPv4 in IPv6 address
> > debug3: Trying to reverse map address 192.168
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Matt Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd use awk. Put the lines in a file, then do this
>
> cat test.txt | awk '{ print $1 "\t" $2 ".centos.com\t" $3 "\t" $4 }'
>
Or just awk '{ print $1 "\t" $2 ".centos.com\t" $3 "\t" $4 }' test.txt
> newhostsfile
(The ca
on 5-22-2008 9:58 PM Bahadir Kiziltan spake the following:
You need at least 6 drives for RAID5. I don't know if Perc 4e/Di
allows configuring the RAID5.
Where did you get this bit of information? You can create a raid 5 with 3 or
more disks.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope every
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Jason Pyeron wrote:
debug3: Normalising mapped IPv4 in IPv6 address
debug3: Trying to reverse map address 192.168.1.80.
paused 7 seconds
Here, obviously, is part of the problem. Your name service isn't
answering reverse lookups for your LAN addresses -- or it least it
i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Heinlein
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 2:35 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: RE: [CentOS] how to debug ssh slow connection issues.
>
> On Fri, 23 May 2008, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> >>> debug
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:59:24PM +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
sed 's/^\([^]*[ ]*[^]*\)\([ ]*.*\)$/\1.contoso.com\2/'
(where there's a space *and* a TAB inside each of the [ ] )
The above version easier to read and "copy paste
I have a small annoying problem with Ati video driver, when Centos 5.1
starts and gets to the login screen the resolution is too high for my
monitor (better than out of range) and it's annoying can I have it start
in a lower resolution. Thanks...
___
Cen
I have not had any success building a more recent version of GDE than
2.16.0 on CentOS.
I tried jhbuild, and went line by line using the how-to web page for
jhbuild (http://www.gnome.org/~jamesh/jhbuild.html), and I get hung up
on dbus-glib-l (which does not appear to be in CentOS or available for
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:00:41PM -0700, MHR wrote:
> I have not had any success building a more recent version of GDE than
> 2.16.0 on CentOS.
>
> I tried jhbuild, and went line by line using the how-to web page for
> jhbuild (http://www.gnome.org/~jamesh/jhbuild.html), and I get hung up
> on db
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 2:42 PM
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Paul Heinlein
> > Sent: Friday, May 23, 200
on 5-23-2008 11:51 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:59:24PM +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
sed 's/^\([^]*[ ]*[^]*\)\([ ]*.*\)$/\1.contoso.com\2/'
(where there's a space *and* a TAB inside each of the [
Try to change this in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config:
If in CentOS 5, change:
AddressFamily any
to:
AddressFamily inet
If in CentOS 4, change:
ListenAddress ::
to:
ListenAddress
Uncomment those lines if needed.
Change:
GSSAPIAuthentication yes
to:
GSSAPIAuthentication no
Change:
UseDNS yes
to:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In terms of Cisco ACL's, how does
> iptables work, does it simply continue processing until it sees something
> explicitly
> denying if the default policy is ACCEPT, versus DROP, will it continue
> processing until
>
On Friday 23 May 2008 23:25:36 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >Assuming eth0 is WAN, and eth1 is LAN (assuming 192.168.0.0/24)(please
> > mind the word wrap): #Clear all rules and policies first:
> >iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
> >iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
> >iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
> >iptables -F
> >ipt
Scott Silva wrote:
sed 's/^\([^]*[ ]*[^]*\)\([ ]*.*\)$/\1.contoso.com\2/'
(where there's a space *and* a TAB inside each of the [ ] )
The above version easier to read and "copy paste". Space is space
and tabe is \t
sed 's/^\([^ \t]*[ \t]*[^ \t]*\)\([ \t]*.*\)$/\1.contos
I copied over the MBR from hdc to sda. I found a 4.4 LiveCD, but
apparently its damaged so it wouldn't boot. I attempted to put
everything back and when I rebooted it went into a GRUB screen instead
of a normal boot. I had no idea how to get it to boot from there, so
instead of taking the time t
--- "Juan C. Valido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have a small annoying problem with Ati video
> driver, when Centos 5.1
> starts and gets to the login screen the resolution
> is too high for my
> monitor (better than out of range) and it's annoying
> can I have it start
> in a lower resolution
On Friday 23 May 2008 21:31, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Actually I have written a small tutorial on iptables, but I haven't
> translated it into english. I'll let you know when it's done. Hopefully it
> will be useful for others.
Please have someone, or for that matter a few people, who have a good
Responding to a question posted earlier this month, Centos 5.1 includes
configuration files for enabling the read-only root filesystem.
Actually, all filesystems can be mounted read-only with particular files
and directories mounted on a read-write tmpfs (in RAM). This capability
comes directly fro
>iptables will process rules until a match. If the match is -j
>ACCEPT/REJECT/DROP, it will end processing there. If it's -j
>another_chain, it will jump to the other chain. If it matches a rule
>in the other chain with -j ACCEPT/REJECT/DROP, it will stop processing
>there. Otherwise, if no rules i
64 matches
Mail list logo
