On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it feasible to write protect the /etc/sysconfig/iptables file so nothing
> can overwrite it, such that at least the config is persistent through a
> reboot? If not, is there a better way to accomplish this?
chmod a=r
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jerry Geis
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 1:43 PM
To: CentOS ML
Subject: [CentOS] USB modem on centos
I am playing with a USR (us robotics) USB modem model 5637.
in the past I used internal modems and had no i
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wondered if I could include the "external" view in the first view,
> or I suppose I can simply copy the details from the second view
> into the first, but that forces me to keep it updated in two places...
Use includ
Thanks.I have resolve it by using your method.
在2008-05-27，noro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道：
hi,
i installed mod_security2.5.4
i installed lua and liblua from epel repo
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/repoview/L.group.html
name of file is not: /usr/lib/liblua5.1.so
but:
lib
Ruslan Sivak wrote:
Thanks to Tru, kernel-vm is all up-to-date and you can find it here:
http://people.centos.org/tru/kernel-vm/
and yes, using the clocksource=pit option should not be an issue with
these kernels.
Akemi
So if I understand this correctly, one should not be using a stoc
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 17:19 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Can I use one out of the Fedora's repos? If so, which repo?
> >
>
> You can just pull down the latest version from mozilla.org - they're
> pretty good about compat
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:23 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I've started liking roundcube a bit more than squirrelmail. but
> roundcube is very basic. SquirrelMail has a *LOT* of plugins and can be
> made to do almost anything these days. And the community around
> squirrelmail is much larger tha
Is it feasible to write protect the /etc/sysconfig/iptables file so nothing can
overwrite it, such that at least the config is persistent through a reboot? If
not, is there a better way to accomplish this?
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cen
Thanks much, I have in the past compiled my own but thought I would check.
A big THANKS to whoever provides them...
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, so I need to bring up a new v
sbeam wrote:
Interested in this discussion too, for reasons recently discussed...
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 09:07, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
For a starter, there is a very simple tool for this.
It's http://www.inlab.de/balance.html
2. RedHat Cluster Suite dan Piranha (http://www.redhat.c
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can I use one out of the Fedora's repos? If so, which repo?
>
You can just pull down the latest version from mozilla.org - they're
pretty good about compatibility. I'd try it out in a different
install directory, tho
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Christopher Chan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try adding 'guest ok = yes' to the printer share configuration.
>
I will - thanks.
> ...I think you need to pick a bit more on Windows networking...more reading
> of the books/documentation provided with samba should
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 19:31, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Robert Spangler
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0
> > for Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 version has been placed in the
>
MHR wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Christopher Chan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do they should up if you run the command below in the Linux host?
smbclient -L //localhost
I'm guessing you meant "show up" and yes, everything looks normal, but
only if I use a -U option with a known user
on 5-27-2008 4:22 PM Robert Spangler spake the following:
Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0 for
Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 version has been placed in the repos and
I think it should be time for an upgrade.
If I'm looking in the wrong place let me
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Robert Spangler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0 for
> Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 version has been placed in the repos and
> I think it should be time for an upgrade.
>
> If I'm looking in
Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0 for
Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 version has been placed in the repos and
I think it should be time for an upgrade.
If I'm looking in the wrong place let me know also. Thnx.
--
Regards
Robert
Smile... it increas
Thanks. I'll try the acpi thing.
Regarding the Bios, I've got the last version.
Kubuntu has no problems either to see the 4 cores...
I'll see what I can do tomorrow.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:29 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:41 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm
>>> kernels for centos. I have read this
>>> htt
I have been playing around with Citrix XenServer Express. It seems
pretty cool, and mostly meets my needs, except that the Express (Free)
version only supports up to 4GB of RAM. I have 8GB on my machines.
Since XenServer is based on Xen, I should be able to just install a base
install of Cent
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm
kernels for centos. I have read this http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189
about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the b
Scott Moseman wrote:
I copied over the MBR from hdc to sda. I found a 4.4 LiveCD, but
apparently its damaged so it wouldn't boot. I attempted to put
everything back and when I rebooted it went into a GRUB screen instead
of a normal boot. I had no idea how to get it to boot from there, so
inste
Scott Moseman wrote:
The BIOS determines which disk (the first) will be chosen to boot from.
I have no problems configuring the boot order in the BIOS.
I must have the MBR on /dev/hdc (which is being removed).
The /boot partition is on /dev/sda (where I want to move MBR).
To make a plain boo
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 14:24 -0400, sbeam wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2008 13:16, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> > Some Tyan boards are known as being very picky with RAM. If you want to
> > avoid problems, you should really stick to the types listed in Tyan's
> > memory compatibility list.
>
> hmm. well t
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:41 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julian Echave wrote:
>>
>> Sure, find below, I add other stuff as well. Note that there is some bug
>> in the Bios. This does not prevent Centos to boot, and, since Windows sees
>> all four processors, I reckon it shouldn't
Julian Echave wrote:
Sure, find below, I add other stuff as well. Note that there is some
bug in the Bios. This does not prevent Centos to boot, and, since
Windows sees all four processors, I reckon it shouldn't be the problem...?
yeah, looks like its probably broken ACPI data in the BIOS. s
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm
> kernels for centos. I have read this http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189
> about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the best step forward i
OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm
kernels for centos. I have read this
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189about the tick divider but it
wasn't clear what the best step forward is for
centos 5.1 was, i usually ran with the clocksource=pit option and it loo
Sure, find below, I add other stuff as well. Note that there is some bug in
the Bios. This does not prevent Centos to boot, and, since Windows sees all
four processors, I reckon it shouldn't be the problem...?
uname -a
*
Julian Echave wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Centos 5.1 on an Intel Quad 2 Core with four Q6600 processors.
Despite Centos 5 supporting multiple cores (SPM), it doesn't seem to
work for me:
1) a dmesg shows that only one processor is seen:
"SPM alternatives: switching to UP code", etc.
2) file /
Hi,
I'm running Centos 5.1 on an Intel Quad 2 Core with four Q6600 processors.
Despite Centos 5 supporting multiple cores (SPM), it doesn't seem to work
for me:
1) a dmesg shows that only one processor is seen:
"SPM alternatives: switching to UP code", etc.
2) file /proc/cpuinfo shows only on
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Ramon Nieto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Are you using nss_ldap on that server? have you modified /etc/nsswitch.conf?
> If that's the case try adding the following line to /etc/ldap.conf
>
> nss_initgroups_ignoreusers root,ldap
Thanks, that solved all the pr
on 5-27-2008 11:24 AM sbeam spake the following:
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 13:16, Miguel Medalha wrote:
Some Tyan boards are known as being very picky with RAM. If you want to
avoid problems, you should really stick to the types listed in Tyan's
memory compatibility list.
hmm. well the spec sheet
Interested in this discussion too, for reasons recently discussed...
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 09:07, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> For a starter, there is a very simple tool for this.
> It's http://www.inlab.de/balance.html
> 2. RedHat Cluster Suite dan Piranha (http://www.redhat.com)
> 3. Linux Virtual
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 13:16, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> Some Tyan boards are known as being very picky with RAM. If you want to
> avoid problems, you should really stick to the types listed in Tyan's
> memory compatibility list.
hmm. well the spec sheet just says "unbuffered DDR 266/200" and that is
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-27-2008 10:16 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
> > sbeam wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27 May 2008 11:39, Scott Silva wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Running memtest for 24 hours should be enough to test the ram.
> > > > A 3ware 7006 is a fairly old card. Does it have th
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Christopher Chan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do they should up if you run the command below in the Linux host?
>
> smbclient -L //localhost
>
I'm guessing you meant "show up" and yes, everything looks normal, but
only if I use a -U option with a known user. Is t
Hi
Are you using nss_ldap on that server? have you modified /etc/nsswitch.conf? If
that's the case try adding the following line to /etc/ldap.conf
nss_initgroups_ignoreusers root,ldap
Best.
--- El mar 27-may-08, Stjepan Gros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
De:: Stjepan Gros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
It would be great if there were a simple machine that you could plug
a bunch of dimms of varying types into and it will perform high-speed
tests on them continuously and flag ones that show an error.
Then you could test all memory modules thoroughly before putting them
i
I am playing with a USR (us robotics) USB modem model 5637.
in the past I used internal modems and had no issues.
One this unit I plugged it in, dmesg says its recogized.
I did "ln -s /dev/ttyACM0 /dev/ttyS4" this works.
I then did "cu -l /dev/ttyS4" type "AT" and I get OK... looking good.
When I
this is a production server, so running an extended memtest not going to
happen. But I can swap it out and put it in a backup system to do the test.
It's beginning to look a lot like a RAM issue as I have now seen a couple
segfaults from programs that have always run fine. Every kernel panic m
sbeam wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2008 11:39, Scott Silva wrote:
> > Running memtest for 24 hours should be enough to test the ram.
> > A 3ware 7006 is a fairly old card. Does it have the latest bios available
> > from 3ware?
> > You could always eliminate the 3ware controller by installing a drive
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 11:39, Scott Silva wrote:
> Running memtest for 24 hours should be enough to test the ram.
> A 3ware 7006 is a fairly old card. Does it have the latest bios available
> from 3ware?
> You could always eliminate the 3ware controller by installing a drive on
> whatever built in
43 matches
Mail list logo
