Thanks guys for the info. I understand that the secondary machine needs a /var
too while in standby, and since it can't also mount it as part of the DRBD
array, then it has to be a vanilla partition on both machines. Thanks for
clearing that up.
On Saturday 31 May 2008 09:28, Filipe Brandenburg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:45:21 -0600
Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:37:43 +0300
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any workaround against that?
Use chattr to set it as an immutable file.
Ah.. yes, I forgot about tha
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:45:21 -0600
Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:37:43 +0300
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there any workaround against that?
>
> Use chattr to set it as an immutable file.
>
Ah.. yes, I forgot about that. Chattr is n
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 5:20 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> """If you logged on from the Windows Guest Account then you know it is
> authenticating by the guest or nobody account that's on the Samba Server.
> The previous config file I that I stuck in the mail for you will work on a
> Windows
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:37:43 +0300
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any workaround against that?
Use chattr to set it as an immutable file.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS maili
Hello there,
I have the following problem. I need a user not to be able to delete
(rm -rf) a dir inside his home directory (a dir which is owned by him).
The sticky bit is supposed to do just that... and it does, in every part
of the file system but in his home.
Same goes for acls (setfacl -m u:use
NSA guides on hardening RHEL5. Should be applicable to CentOS5 as well.
http://www.nsa.gov/snac/downloads_redhat.cfm?MenuID=scg10.3.1.1
I read about this on /. some weeks ago, but I just skimmed through it,
so I can't say how effective I think it is. I thought it would be
useful to point to it on
Rogelio wrote:
Can anyone recommend a hardened CentOS distro?
CentOS /is/ a distro, there is only one centos 'distribution'.
centos configured with selinux enabled, appropriate firewall rules, and
the minimum number of services required for your application should be
fairly 'hardened'
Can anyone recommend a hardened CentOS distro?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MHR
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 4:01 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:55 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think your reading the wrong
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MHR
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 5:40 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question
I just found something interesting. I brought up my XP guest, and it had no
trouble at all connect
Hi Folks
I have a number of external USB enclosures with hard drives in. Some are IDE
and others are SATA drives. I'm running CentOS 5 + all updates. Recently when
I plug in an external drive I get the message "Invalid filesystem type. I
have install the NTFS-3G bits stuff and reformatted the ha
I just found something interesting. I brought up my XP guest, and it
had no trouble at all connecting to the shares, but it couldn't open
the workgroup at all and the printer had become disconnected. I could
not reconnect through the workgroup (duh), but if I just input the
network name, the prin
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:55 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think your reading the wrong guide, try this one and this has traversed on
> long enough. Almost Two weeks now.
1) This has been going on, on and off, for a lot longer than two weeks.
2) I was hoping that it would be considered
14 matches
Mail list logo
