-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Anne Wilson
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 10:39 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2
On Friday 18 July 2008 15:10:11 John wrote:
> Original Message-
> Fro
Robert - elists wrote:
GET http://scifi.pages.at/myproxies/azenv.php HTTP/1.1 with response code(s)
404 1 responses
I installed fail2ban from rpmforge and created a filter that bans these
type of things.
Here is my novice attempt at the failregex =
- - \[.*\] \"GET .*(azenv\.php|adxmlrpc\.p
On Friday 18 July 2008 15:42:31 Miguel A. Velasco wrote:
> Hi all, I´d like to know what may I configure to send emails from my
> server with mailx please.
> I need to send mails to my email adress ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with logs
> and I am not able to do.
>
> Best regards and thanks for your time,
>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Robert - elists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Semi Off Topic
>
> My searching hasn't found what I consider superior info, and we are
> wondering from others experience on this list...
>
> In the logwatch results we all see the info below on almost a daily basis
>
> I
Hi,
I have been able to successfully use crash to examine a crash dump of
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 using the following command:
crash /boot/System.map-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE
/usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE/vmlinux ./vmcore
I then installed the package kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Scott Silva wrote:
That is why Bill Gates is a billionaire, and Linus Torvalds isn't.
And who is the happier, I wonder?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That is why Bill Gates is a billionaire, and Linus Torvalds isn't.
>
I would argue that BG is a billionaire because he is a salesman,
whereas Linus is a dedicated professional software engineer.
Which is also why most of
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm glad you feel that way because I have been having this pain in my
> shoulder ;-P
>
Scott, I thought you /were/ that pain in the shoulder
;^)
mhr
___
CentOS mailin
on 7-18-2008 4:24 AM Dr R L Oswald spake the following:
What we would like to do on a server running CENTOS 4.6 is to restrict
max cpu time for most interactive users but ensure that processes for
system users such as root & special userids that provide services are
kept as unlimited.
The doc
Then one could probably say that if you get support for Linux, it could
be as expansive as Winblows (hourly based) and that's true. But i
always return to the root of the difference and illustrate the
"techniques" used by Redmond to modify standards, to get clients
captive, etc. I still hav
on 7-18-2008 8:11 AM Rainer Duffner spake the following:
Guy Boisvert schrieb:
A discussion about slowliness or not of Winblows SP3 is *SURELY* off
topic in the CentOS list! I still don't know how the original poster
came with all this in the CentOS list. I mean, for Winblows stuff,
i'd po
on 7-17-2008 3:46 PM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
And then, how do I setup the partitioning? Do I setup /boot on a
separate RAID "partition"? If so, what happens if I want to replace
the 1st 2
On Friday 18 July 2008 12:56:30 pm Sam Drinkard wrote:
> I've apparently gotten myself into somewhat of a bind. I've been trying
> to exclude various packages from the different repos, and while I
> *think* I've gotten a working configuration again, it it still pulling
> stuff in that I have exclu
Using Centos 5.2 upgraded from 5.0 using yum on a couple of old Dells in a lab
environment. I don't think hardware is part of the problem, just need
configuration help.
1: I can boot the diskless client and it come up, but when I do a "mount"
command on the client, the output is indistinguisha
I've apparently gotten myself into somewhat of a bind. I've been trying
to exclude various packages from the different repos, and while I
*think* I've gotten a working configuration again, it it still pulling
stuff in that I have excluded I think in the right repos, but things I
have no use fo
I've apparently gotten myself into somewhat of a bind. I've been trying
to exclude various packages from the different repos, and while I
*think* I've gotten a working configuration again, it it still pulling
stuff in that I have excluded I think in the right repos, but things I
have no use fo
I've apparently gotten myself into somewhat of a bind. I've been trying
to exclude various packages from the different repos, and while I
*think* I've gotten a working configuration again, it it still pulling
stuff in that I have excluded I think in the right repos, but things I
have no use fo
On Friday 18 July 2008 17:57:13 Guy Boisvert wrote:
> Majority of little companies choose Winblows by "default" thinking that
> you just put a server into a closet and forget about it.
The majority of little companies don't even know that there is an option.
The one good thing that has come out
Hi all,
I was just wondering if there was a way to re-initialize a luci database
installation. I am trying to setup a 2 node cluster and keep getting
"error retrieving batch xxx information" Also noticed a
"Configuration Version" error so I wanted to recreate the luci database
and start
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Guy Boisvert wrote:
A discussion about slowliness or not of Winblows SP3 is *SURELY* off
topic in the CentOS list! I still don't know how the original poster
came with all this in the CentOS list. I mean, for Winblows stuff,
i'd post to a Winblows
We've been seeing the same type of entries in our Web server logs for at
least a couple months now and not just a few entires. It isn't just
`azenv.php', but references to other PHP files that do not exist on our
systems. They've hit some of our servers so hard I figured it must be some
kind
Semi Off Topic
My searching hasn't found what I consider superior info, and we are
wondering from others experience on this list...
In the logwatch results we all see the info below on almost a daily basis
I have taken the liberty of combining logwatch results from centos 4 and 5
machines for ex
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
> >
> > Which is the "safest" setup for priorities?
> >
> > base, update and extras: priority=1
> > ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base package): priority=10
> > rpmforge (which could have some base packag
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 17:19 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Rainer Duffner wrote:
> > Guy Boisvert schrieb:
> >>
> > This list is not too busy - it's still a bearable volume. But I admit
> > I don't read everything.
> >
> I actually got kicked off a local Linux list for asking something
> similar,
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
William L. Maltby ha scritto:
And look at using the yum priorities plugin so you can safely mix repos.
I have one question about this:
Which is the "safest" setup for priorities?
base, update and extras: priority=1
ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base package
Hello,
if trying to print
http://www.test.de/themen/versicherung-vorsorge/test/-Unfallversicherung/1260901/1260901/1262782/1262783/
by button "Seite drucken" firefox-3.0.1-1.el5.centos ends in
error '(Gecko:4820): Gtk-WARNING **: Unknown paper size A4' and wants
to print in "Letter". This also hap
Hello Drew
Oh.., tank you :-)
--
With best regards,
Fabrice La Farina
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of drew einhorn
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 3:12 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Difference between system-config-*
andsystem-config-*-tu
William L. Maltby ha scritto:
And look at using the yum priorities plugin so you can safely mix repos.
I have one question about this:
Which is the "safest" setup for priorities?
base, update and extras: priority=1
ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base package): priority=10
rpmforge (
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Guy Boisvert schrieb:
A discussion about slowliness or not of Winblows SP3 is *SURELY* off
topic in the CentOS list! I still don't know how the original poster
came with all this in the CentOS list. I mean, for Winblows stuff,
i'd post to a Winblows list first!
Beca
Guy Boisvert schrieb:
A discussion about slowliness or not of Winblows SP3 is *SURELY* off
topic in the CentOS list! I still don't know how the original poster
came with all this in the CentOS list. I mean, for Winblows stuff,
i'd post to a Winblows list first!
Because the idiot-density i
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 09:17 -0500, Jeff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output
> > was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I
>
Jeff wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output
was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I
currently don't even have the clamav server installe
Martyn Hare wrote:
This is so barely on topic it's just plain _wrong_, but it's the only
thing I can give useful input on based on [bad] experience. That said
it's not _that_ offtopic given Xen can run Windows and CentOS includes
Xen technology ;-)
Then this list could become the list of ab
On Friday 18 July 2008 15:10:11 John wrote:
> Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Anne Wilson
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 4:14 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2
>
> On Friday 18 July 200
Just for the record I'm about 98.7% sure that the root problem here was
that the LVM stuff (pvcreate, vgcreate, lvcreate) was done when booted
from systemrescuecd and had nothing to do with replacing a failed drive.
The ouptut from 'pvcreate --version' on the systemrescuecd is:
LVM version:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Hywel Richards wrote:
I've just set up a new mailserver using Centos5.2
(sendmail+clamav-milter+spamass-milter).
I'm using the spamass-milter package from rpmforge
(spamass-milter-0.3.1-1.el5.rf).
I notice that the default setup is to run it as root. I set up my
previo
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:15 AM, David Mackintosh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To get back to the OP: I've done a RAID-10 under CentOS, and the
> problem I encountered was that the kernel wasn't smart enough to
> assemble the RAID without a properly populated /etc/mdadm.conf file.
Well, I have man
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output
> was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I
> currently don't even have the clamav server installed, but
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Anne Wilson
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 4:14 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2
On Friday 18 July 2008 00:48:17 Donald Buchan wrote:
> Yes on both counts. That
2008/7/18 mcclnx mcc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thank you for answer. CENTOS 5.2 does not have "rawdevices" services and
> also NO "/etc/udev/permissions.d" file any more.
OK, so I'm still on CentOS 4 which has /etc/udev/permissions.d. CentOS
5 has /etc/udev with different subdirectory structure, bu
Greetings.
When I "pull" data from server A to server B, with nfs, server B reports
a high load when viewed via uptime. The load is upwards of 6.x. Server
A's load remains light. When I "push" the data, server A's and B's
loads are relatively light.
When I change the mount point from nfs
Hi all, I´d like to know what may I configure to send emails from my
server with mailx please.
I need to send mails to my email adress ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with logs
and I am not able to do.
Best regards and thanks for your time,
Miguel
___
CentOS mail
tui = text user interface
runs in an terminal don't need X windows.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Fabrice La Farina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I have a little question. What is the difference between
> the system-config-* and system-config-*-tui ?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Fabrice
Hi all,
I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the
output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts
left off. I currently don't even have the clamav server installed, but
am using the 0.93 version of clamav-milter.
I've never seen yum throw in so
Hello List,
I have a little question. What is the difference between
the system-config-* and system-config-*-tui ?
Thank you.
Fabrice
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since I'm not ready to upgrade to the CentOS 5 line anytime soon, Can
> someone tell me when support for the 4 line will come?
> Many thanks...
There's http://centos.org/product.html which lays it all out for you,
specs i
On Friday 18 July 2008, Sam Drinkard wrote:
> Since I'm not ready to upgrade to the CentOS 5 line anytime soon, Can
> someone tell me when support for the 4 line will come?
Not very surprisingly available at the obvious place on www.centos.org:
http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid
Since I'm not ready to upgrade to the CentOS 5 line anytime soon, Can
someone tell me when support for the 4 line will come?
Many thanks...
Sam
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Since CENTOS 5 does not have "rawdevices" service any more. Raw device can not
automatic mount on boot time.
Does there has way to work around?
--- 08/7/17 (星期四)，nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 寫道：
寄件者: nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
主旨: Re: [CentOS] Raw device gone after reboot (Centos 5.2)!!!
收件者: cent
> I have other wireless devices using the same AP with no problems, and
> the same laptop performs well when booted into Windows, so this
> appears to be a problem with the bcm43xx drivers. I keep hoping that
> each kernel update will improve the situation, but so far in vain.
b43 is great with t
Thank you for answer. CENTOS 5.2 does not have "rawdevices" services and also
NO "/etc/udev/permissions.d" file any more.
--- 08/7/17 (星期四)，Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 寫道：
寄件者: Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
主旨: Re: [CentOS] Raw device gone after reboot (Centos 5.2)!!!
收件者: "CentOS mailing list"
日期:
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
What we would like to do on a
server running CENTOS 4.6 is to restrict max cpu time for most
interactive users but ensure that processes for system users such as
root & special userids that provide services are kept as unlimited.
The documentation for limits.conf is not very extensive but I th
I've just set up a new mailserver using Centos5.2
(sendmail+clamav-milter+spamass-milter).
I'm using the spamass-milter package from rpmforge
(spamass-milter-0.3.1-1.el5.rf).
I notice that the default setup is to run it as root. I set up my
previous mailserver on Centos4, and I can't remembe
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 03:34:56PM -0500, Victor Padro wrote:
> Does anyone has implemented this sucessfully?
Yes and no. :/
> I am asking this because we are implementing Xen on our test lab machines,
> which they hold up to three 3com and intel Nics 10/100mbps based.
>
> These servers are mean
On Friday 18 July 2008 00:48:17 Donald Buchan wrote:
> Yes on both counts. That's where I was dealing with the parts about the
> one-dependancy-mentionned-at-a-time part. No luck, hence the reason for
> uninstalling it and reverting to the yum repository.
>
Please don't top-post, Donald. It make
56 matches
Mail list logo
