Hi all
I need to disable / stop X from running on a remote server, to which I
only have SSH access, and I have never done this before. So, can someone
please tell me how todo it?
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other
technical s
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I need to disable / stop X from running on a remote server, to which I
only have SSH access, and I have never done this before. So, can
someone please tell me how todo it?
telinit 3
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I need to disable / stop X from running on a remote server, to which
I only have SSH access, and I have never done this before. So, can
someone please tell me how todo it?
telinit 3
And forgot to mention that, to disable it when the next time
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I need to disable / stop X from running on a remote server, to which
I only have SSH access, and I have never done this before. So, can
someone please tell me how todo it?
telinit 3
And forgot to mention that, to disable
I need to disable / stop X from running on a remote server, to which I
only have SSH access, and I have never done this before. So, can
someone please tell me how todo it?
telinit 3
If you need the server to stay at runlevel 3 after a reboot
change id:5:initdefault: to id:3:initdefault: in /
On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I need to disable / stop X from running on a remote server, to which I
> > only have SSH access, and I have never done this before. So, can
> > someone please tell me how todo it?
>
> telinit 3
This will cause t
Ned Slider wrote:
[snip]
I don't think anyone is suggesting running SSH on a non-standard port as
a sole means of defence, but rather as part of a layered approach where
it is very effective in what it is designed to do - namely to vastly
reduce the number of random brute-forcing attempts and
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I need to disable / stop X from running on a remote server, to which I
only have SSH access, and I have never done this before. So, can
someone please tell me how todo it?
telinit 3
Hi,
I'm trying to install K12LTSP based on CentOS 5.0-el 32bits kernel
2.6.18-8 on a server with 3ware 9650SE raid controller. Does anybody
know where I can find a driver diskette for the raid controller as this
is only supported from kernel 2.6.19.
Thanks for any help
Gert
_
Hi Gert,
The 3Ware drivers for EL50/ CentOS5 can be downloaded from:
http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=15203
But I have red somewhere that the (in kernel 2.6.19 vanilla) 9650SE driver
is backported to 2.6.18 EL in the 5.1 or 5.2 kernel series. If not, 3Ware
also provide drivers for those
Gopinath Achari wrote:
hi,
i just installed the vnc and vncserver package.
i started the server with command vncserver :2
when i connected to vncserver using vncviewer 192.168.1.101:5902
i prompted for the password then it display i windows with a terminal
but when gui is enabled by
On Sunday 22 June 2008 09:42:31 Anne Wilson wrote:
> My daughter has a BT account, with a BT supplied single-port router. I'd
> like to replace it with a standard router, but the settings appear to be
> totally hidden. If anyone reading uses BT, could you please tell me where
> to find the info?
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Was it ever a part of Centos?
Supposedly I need it and my colleague is providing me with an rpm, but
he implies that 'seems to have been removed from Centos'?
tla was never in CentOS.
It was in KBS extras (3rd Party repo) for centos-4, it is not in there
for centos-5
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Was it ever a part of Centos?
>>
>> Supposedly I need it and my colleague is providing me with an rpm, but
>> he implies that 'seems to have been removed from Centos'?
>
> tla was never in CentOS.
>
> It was in KBS extras (3rd Party repo) for cent
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> Was it ever a part of Centos?
>>>
>>> Supposedly I need it and my colleague is providing me with an rpm, but
>>> he implies that 'seems to have been removed from Centos'
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Was it ever a part of Centos?
Supposedly I need it and my colleague is providing me with an rpm, but
> >>> he implies that 'seems to have be
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 10:43:51 John Bowden wrote:
> On Sunday 22 June 2008 09:42:31 Anne Wilson wrote:
> > My daughter has a BT account, with a BT supplied single-port router. I'd
> > like to replace it with a standard router, but the settings appear to be
> > totally hidden. If anyone readin
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Gert Vandenreyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install K12LTSP based on CentOS 5.0-el 32bits kernel 2.6.18-8
> on a server with 3ware 9650SE raid controller. Does anybody know where I can
> find a driver diskette for the raid controller as this
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 04:43:11PM -0400, Bo Lynch wrote:
> just wanted to get some feedback from the community. Over the last few
> days I have noticed my web server and email box have attempted to ssh'd to
> using weird names like admin,appuser,nobody,etc None of these are
> valid users. I kn
I want to try out fail2ban and notice that both, kbs-CentOS-Testing and
ATrpms, have shorewall as a dependency. I do not use shorewall and have
never used it. I have my own iptables/firewall script and am happy with
it. Can I install shorewall without any ill effects to my current sue of
iptabl
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 13:45:31 Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I want to try out fail2ban and notice that both, kbs-CentOS-Testing and
> ATrpms, have shorewall as a dependency. I do not use shorewall and have
> never used it. I have my own iptables/firewall script and am happy with
> it. Can I install sh
Can anyone help make sense of this? This is an ext3 partition. It's
only showing 403GB out of 426GB used, but then it says only 632MB
available? Where'd the extra ~25GB go?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] df -H /disks/vrac5
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb2 426G
Sean Carolan wrote:
> Can anyone help make sense of this? This is an ext3 partition. It's
> only showing 403GB out of 426GB used, but then it says only 632MB
> available? Where'd the extra ~25GB go?
Those are the ~ 5% which are automatically reserved for root ...
man tune2fs
Ralph
pgpsumvgx
HI All,
i installed Cent OS 5.1 on a INtel P4 PC.
it got installed successfully. Upto the login prompt the mouse cursor
appears on the screen. then cursor disappers. i we move the mouse. the
cursor movement is felt when it is on a icon or when right click is done
bu
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 15:09 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Sean Carolan wrote:
> > Can anyone help make sense of this? This is an ext3 partition. It's
> > only showing 403GB out of 426GB used, but then it says only 632MB
> > available? Where'd the extra ~25GB go?
>
> Those are the ~ 5% which
Il giorno gio, 03/07/2008 alle 11.04 -0700, Scott Silva ha scritto:
> on 7-2-2008 8:01 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
> > Scott Silva wrote:
> >> I'm having a problem with a fairly new server.
> >> Running yum upgrade I get the following:
> >>
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >>
Tony Molloy wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:53:49 +0100:
> I installed fail2ban from rpmforge and it has no dependencies.
Ah, thanks, I thought I had installed an rpm earlier that didn't have
dependencies, but I couldn't find the machine I did it on. I disabled the kbs
repo and I'm now getting it.
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 14:31:11 Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Tony Molloy wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:53:49 +0100:
> > I installed fail2ban from rpmforge and it has no dependencies.
>
> Ah, thanks, I thought I had installed an rpm earlier that didn't have
> dependencies, but I couldn't find the machine
On Tue, July 22, 2008 16:45, Les Bell wrote:
> Moving sshd to a non-standard port is one of the worst examples of relying
> on security by obscurity. Its only advantage is that it cuts out some
> noise
> in the logs, but proper precautions do that as well, without lulling you
> into a false sense
i installed Cent OS 5.1 on a INtel P4 PC.
it got installed successfully. Upto the login prompt the mouse cursor
appears on the screen. then cursor disappers. i we move the mouse. the
cursor movement is felt when it is on a icon or when right click is done
but the cursor is transpar
William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:26:21 -0400:
> Also, when making the file system, reducing the amount reserved for root
> is usually safe on today's larger drives, especially on a relatively
> stable system/user base/file/system usage.
I gather this can't be done after creation?
K
> > Also, when making the file system, reducing the amount reserved for
> > root is usually safe on today's larger drives, especially on a
> > relatively stable system/user base/file/system usage.
> I gather this can't be done after creation?
> Kai
Remember: You can tune a file system, but you
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 16:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:26:21 -0400:
>
> > Also, when making the file system, reducing the amount reserved for root
> > is usually safe on today's larger drives, especially on a relatively
> > stable system/user base/
John Hinton wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
John Hinton wrote:
OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what
we're supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53
is no longer enough.
how do you mean?
opening port 53 in is still enough ... the outbound port is w
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 16:38 +0200, Jens Larsson wrote:
> > > Also, when making the file system, reducing the amount reserved for
> > > root is usually safe on today's larger drives, especially on a
> > > relatively stable system/user base/file/system usage.
>
> > I gather this can't be done aft
Tony Molloy wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:53:05 +0100:
> you can specify noarch on the install
> line.
that's what I did, I was just curious.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
"nate" wrote:
> Security is pretty important for me too. For this, and other reasons
> I never point yum to 3rd party repositories. I only run CentOS/RHEL
> on servers. I run Debian on desktops(due to larger package selection
> and still long release cycles for stable). And usually Ubuntu on
> lapt
John Hinton wrote:
> Do I just ask really hard questions or are my questions just not clear?
> There has to be others on this list that are running nameservers via
> CentOS. This seems to be a nasty issue that we who are running bind need
> to get right.
And the fix is really stupid for those runn
William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:59:05 -0400:
> Yes it can be adjusted. But since I used to do so much of this sort of
> thing, it became second nature to do it at file creation time. "Man
> tune2fs" has the details for adjusting by percentage or block count.
Great, thanks. Just in
Manuel Reimer wrote:
> Debian? Didn't they have a *pretty* dangerous hold in their SSL packages
> just some weeks ago?
Yeah, fortunately I wasn't really affected, my systems weren't upgraded
to the affected packages. (I didn't upgrade to the latest stable until
fairly recently). Shit happens, nobo
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:26:21 -0400:
>
> > Also, when making the file system, reducing the amount reserved for root
> > is usually safe on today's larger drives, especially on a relatively
> > stable system/user base/file/system usage.
>
> I gather thi
On Tue, July 22, 2008 18:39, MJT wrote:
> Ok, I don't have the origional post in my email so I am replying via a
> reply
> cutting and pasting from the archives list web page.
Thank you!
>> Looks like just starting the nfs service turns on V2, 3, and 4 (based on
> reading the script, reading the
nate wrote:
John Hinton wrote:
Do I just ask really hard questions or are my questions just not clear?
There has to be others on this list that are running nameservers via
CentOS. This seems to be a nasty issue that we who are running bind need
to get right.
And the fix is really stupi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've used denyhosts.
If you do have an issue with fail2ban, it does pretty much the same thing.
Andy
- Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:08:07 +0200
From: Kai Schaetzl <[EMAI
Correct me if I'm wrong but from my understanding doesn't the new BIND
randomize outgoing source ports only? - If so then if you have your firewall
to allow established connections you should be all set.
P.A > -Original Message-
P.A > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
P.
Paul A wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong but from my understanding doesn't the new BIND
> randomize outgoing source ports only? - If so then if you have your firewall
> to allow established connections you should be all set.
That's a good point, just tested it out on my firewall, removed
the port 5
Paul A wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but from my understanding doesn't the new BIND
randomize outgoing source ports only? - If so then if you have your firewall
to allow established connections you should be all set.
Maybe I'm just missing something... I have
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:40:42 -0400, John Hinton wrote
> I'm running caching nameservers on almost all of my systems and then
> also three nameservers. All are available publicly. I too had hard
> coded bind to port 53. I also had specifically opened port 53
> through the firewall. But now, it ap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
> Maybe I'm just missing something... I have
>
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state --dport 53 --state NEW -j
> ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m udp -m state --dport 53 --state NEW -j
> ACCEPT
> -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m sta
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:16:44AM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> On Tue, July 22, 2008 09:34, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> > By changing the ports on all our servers to a high (above 1024) port, we
> > have eliminated SSH scans altogether - been running like that for a few
> > years now without any
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Manuel Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm searching for a distribution for several *months* now and so far I
> couldn't find something that fits my needs...
>
> CentOS seems to be pretty well done, but the amount of packages that is
> delivered with it defi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Scott Mazur
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:19 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Bind Firewall Rules
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:40:42 -0400, John Hinton wrote
> > I'm running cach
On Wed, July 23, 2008 12:25, Nifty Cluster Mitch wrote:
> I like 'denyhosts' as a tool to limit these attacks, other good solutions
> also exist. Most distros now have 'denyhosts' as a prebuilt RPM which
> is a plus IMO (+). As others remarked disable root logins. Manage the
> 'su, sudo' list
Is there a way I can prevent processes from taking up all the ram then swap
until the box crashes/freezes?
I'm using IEs4Linux and the wineserver seems to start taking up RAM until my
box dies, it happens slowly.
I am able to kill the sucker now, but I'd like to not have to worry about
that.
sar
> Well, I definitely understand a couple of things better than when we
> started. Thank you very much!
>
> It is not, however, working. Is that likely to be the "domain=" setting,
> given what I said above?
The "domain" in NFSv4-speak has nothing to do with DNS. It _can_ be you
DNS-domainname
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 02:36:11PM -0400, Ed Donahue wrote:
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Is there a way I can prevent processes from taking up all the ram then
>swap until the box crashes/freezes?
>I'm using IEs4Linux and the wineserver seems to start taking up RAM
>until my box
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 14:36 -0400, Ed Donahue wrote:
> Is there a way I can prevent processes from taking up all the ram then
> swap until the box crashes/freezes?
If the process is started from bash, whther by hand or script, I would
think that bash's "ulimit" builtin would give what you need? "
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 9:55:57 am David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> > change which versions of NFS get mounted. I haven't had to change
> > anything else in that file.
>
> I don't believe SECURE_NFS does anything; at least, it's not mentioned in
> /etc/init.d/nfs anywhere, and it's not in the nfsd man
on 7-23-2008 6:27 AM kOoLiNuS - Nicola Losito spake the following:
Il giorno gio, 03/07/2008 alle 11.04 -0700, Scott Silva ha scritto:
on 7-2-2008 8:01 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
I'm having a problem with a fairly new server.
Running yum upgrade I get the followi
Andylockran wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:43:45 +0100:
> If you do have an issue with fail2ban, it does pretty much the same thing.
fail2ban from rpmforge works fine. It's missing the filter for dovecot,
though, and got wrong filters for many other services.
Here are some that I just figured out
Hi,
I'm looking for a good e-SATA card, preferrently one that is supported
by Linux with built-in drivers (no need to compile the modules from
the vendor), or at least that the vendor's drivers are packaged with
dkms or something similar that makes it easy on kernel upgrades.
It's essential that
Manuel Reimer wrote:
"nate" wrote:
Security is pretty important for me too. For this, and other reasons
I never point yum to 3rd party repositories. I only run CentOS/RHEL
on servers. I run Debian on desktops(due to larger package selection
and still long release cycles for stable). And usually
On Wed, July 23, 2008 14:03, Jens Larsson wrote:
>> Well, I definitely understand a couple of things better than when we
>> started. Thank you very much!
>>
>> It is not, however, working. Is that likely to be the "domain="
>> setting,
>> given what I said above?
>
> The "domain" in NFSv4-speak
On Wed, July 23, 2008 14:17, MJT wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 July 2008 9:55:57 am David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> > change which versions of NFS get mounted. I haven't had to change
>> > anything else in that file.
>>
>> I don't believe SECURE_NFS does anything; at least, it's not mentioned
>> in
>> /etc
No method is perfect, but something that seems to work ok in practice is
to just move ssh to a different TCP port, and -j DROP the unused ports.
Failproof? No, but it reduces the noise tremendously.
If the script kiddies learn the new port (unlikely), either move it to
another port, or apply o
Bowie Bailey wrote:
I know it's "security through obscurity"
That's not necessarily a bad thing.
It is bad if it's the _only_ protection.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:28 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/MultimediaOnCentOS
>>
>> I think everything on that page is 32 bit and I think I have read in
>> this ML that it is b
on 7-23-2008 5:00 AM Jim Perrin spake the following:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Gert Vandenreyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install K12LTSP based on CentOS 5.0-el 32bits kernel 2.6.18-8
on a server with 3ware 9650SE raid controller. Does anybody know where I can
find a dr
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >
> > I know it's "security through obscurity"
>
> That's not necessarily a bad thing.
>
> It is bad if it's the _only_ protection.
Right. I was just trying to head off the inevitable objections.
Not that it worked... :)
--
Bowie
___
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Possibly use 32 bit Firefox,
> when you are paying bills or placing an online order or dealing with
> the IRS?
Isn't that what the Anonymizer is for?
;^)
mhr
___
CentOS mailin
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:41 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Possibly use 32 bit Firefox,
>> when you are paying bills or placing an online order or dealing with
>> the IRS?
>
> Isn't that what the Anonymizer is for?
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM, John Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
> supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer
> enough.
Consider using djbdns instead of BIND. It sounds like an excellent
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 17:37 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM, John Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
> > supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer
> > enough.
>
> C
Anybody using these? Pros? Cons? Drivers for CentOS 5? Config /
management utility?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 17:37 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM, John Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
>> > supposed to be
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 17:37 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM, John Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
> > supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer
> > enough.
>
>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:37 AM, John Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> John Hinton wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
>>> supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer
>>> enough.
>>>
>>
>> h
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM, John Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
>> supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer
>> enough.
>
>Consider using djbd
--On Friday, July 04, 2008 9:21 AM +1000 Ben
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1 x86_64
however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
What RPM are you using for BackupPC?
_
Dear All,
I'm running linux CentOS 4.4. Everything was working fine, then one day
I tried to log in, and my computer "hung"
Upon reboot I got this error message after the GRUB Bootloader screen:
/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit: line 126: 442 Segmentation fault /bin/dmesg -n
$LOGLEVEL
Initialization hardw
I'm running linux CentOS 4.4. Everything was working fine, then one day I
tried to log in, and my computer "hung"
.
I would boot off the install disc .. go into rescue mode .. and do an "rpm
-V initscripts" and if necessary .. reinstall the initscripts rpm .. you
could also do an "rpm -Va
Hi People
I just updated a CentOS 5.2 Server that is a Guest inside VMware ESX
3.50 Server using "yum update". As far as I can tell the only three
packages were updated
Jul 24 16:37:49 Updated: php-common - 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386
Jul 24 16:37:50 Updated: php-cli - 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386
Jul 2
82 matches
Mail list logo
