On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:46 PM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> to describe my scenario
>
> i have 4 VLANS on my switch, each VLAN is different subject. I have one
> DHCP server for 3 VLANS + second one DHCP server for 1 VLAN - named VLAN 7 .
>
> Problem is , this start
Hi
Does anyone have a sample configuration file to setup a repository for
Ubuntu, to use with mrepo?
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other
technical stuff
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg
YES. I forgot to mention that we have the OS on a separate 20GB RAID'ed
partition. The remaining disk space is allocated to the big GPT RAID'ed
partition.
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not an option at my university :-(
Then you can try the patched kernel offered by Johnny Hughes:
http://people.centos.org/~hughesjr/kernel/5/bz32/
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
C
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 at 2:17pm, Scott Silva wrote
on 7-25-2008 6:26 AM Marcelo Roccasalva spake the following:
You can't install centos (or redhat) over a gpt partition (unless
itanium platform) and there is a big chance your bios won't boot such
installation. I came with 2 solutions: if disk
on 7-25-2008 6:26 AM Marcelo Roccasalva spake the following:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 at 6:42pm, Milt Mallory wrote
I have an Infortrend RAID box I'd like to see as one big 6TB partition,
but I only can get 2.2TB partit
on 7-25-2008 1:27 PM James B. Byrne spake the following:
I have already deployed a fax server and am about to deploy a backup
system for this host at our off-site facility. It struck me that I have
given no thought to securing the serial port to unauthorized access. The
modem is a Multi-Tech MT
on 7-25-2008 1:46 PM � spake the following:
Hello guys,
to describe my scenario
i have 4 VLANS on my switch, each VLAN is different subject. I have one
DHCP server for 3 VLANS + second one DHCP server for 1 VLAN - named VLAN 7 .
Problem is , this started to make problems suddenly. VLAN 7
on 7-25-2008 12:57 PM mouss spake the following:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Mountifield wrote on Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:47:04 + (UTC):
Does anyone know how a program, script or shell user can best determine
whether the machine is running on bare metal or is a VMware guest?
AFAIK, VMWare uses
on 7-25-2008 7:51 AM Paul Johnson spake the following:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want up-to-dateish versions of TexLive, R, gnumeric, emacs, but on a
more-or-less stable base
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 10:36 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
> Ian Blackwell wrote:
> > Craig White wrote:
> >> Suggest that you make sure you are fully updated, then
> >> 'touch /.autorelabel' then reboot (reboot at a time you choose because
> >> it may take a long time to relabel every file on your syste
Thanks for all the info. I have enough stuff to try to keep me busy for
a while...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Nelson
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:55 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: 6TB SCSI RAID vs. Centos
I
on 7-24-2008 5:36 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 7-24-2008 4:18 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Scott Silva
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
on 7-24-2008 2:41 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
I k
on 7-25-2008 4:06 AM Mag Gam spake the following:
I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to
ask a redhat question :-)
Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where
the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very
similar to Ce
Hello guys,
to describe my scenario
i have 4 VLANS on my switch, each VLAN is different subject. I have one DHCP
server for 3 VLANS + second one DHCP server for 1 VLAN - named VLAN 7 .
Problem is , this started to make problems suddenly. VLAN 7 is not recieving
IP adress from correct DHCP serve
Friday humor:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James B. Byrne
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 4:27 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Securing serial ports - fax modems
>
> I have already deployed a fax server and am abou
Ian Blackwell wrote:
Craig White wrote:
Suggest that you make sure you are fully updated, then
'touch /.autorelabel' then reboot (reboot at a time you choose because
it may take a long time to relabel every file on your system -
especially if you have a lot of files).
Craig
What Craig implie
I have already deployed a fax server and am about to deploy a backup
system for this host at our off-site facility. It struck me that I have
given no thought to securing the serial port to unauthorized access. The
modem is a Multi-Tech MT5634ZBA which supports data as well as fax. So
this poses
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I want up-to-dateish versions of TexLive, R, gnumeric, emacs, but on a
>> more-or-less stable base of Centos-5.2. I asked for packages in this,
>> bu
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:29 AM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mag Gam wrote:
>>
>> Not an option at my university :-(
>>
>
> you mean, your university never installs security patches and updates?!?
>
> 5.1->5.2 is as simple as `yum update`
>
Or they no longer have RHN access. At whi
I'm using a Dell PERC 5/i with the drives configured as simple volumes (aka no
hardware RAID). I beleive the PERCs are based on an LSI MegaRAID
chipset/controller...
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Original Message -
From: "Milt Mallory" <[EMAIL P
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 at 6:42pm, Milt Mallory wrote
>
>> I have an Infortrend RAID box I'd like to see as one big 6TB partition,
>> but I only can get 2.2TB partitions to work. I was trying to do this
>> with an Adaptec
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony Mountifield wrote on Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:47:04 + (UTC):
Does anyone know how a program, script or shell user can best determine
whether the machine is running on bare metal or is a VMware guest?
AFAIK, VMWare uses vmnet32 drivers for ethernet and possibly others f
Robert Spangler wrote:
On Thursday 24 July 2008 03:34, Gopinath Achari wrote:
Please suggest me a good firewall package for Cent OS 5.1 Server. This
server is going to face to internet and will be accessed by the branch
offices.
adding a late voice to this thread, I've used and enj
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not an option at my university :-(
>
Well you were planning to update the kernel.. you need to get the one from 5.2.
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in
What SCSI controller are you using?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Nelson
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:05 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: 6TB SCSI RAID vs. Centos
I'll second that... we recently put a system on
There is another way too, make the disk a raw PV (no partition table) and use
LVM.
LVM can handle PVs up to 2^64 in size.
Then when creating LVs you only have to worry about what the max file system
size is.
-Ross
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Milton Calnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tony Mountifield wrote:
> | Does anyone know how a program, script or shell user can best
> determine
> | whether the machine is running on bare metal or is a VMware guest?
> |
>
> Obviously from the responses many peopl
Mag Gam wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
you mean, your university never installs security patches and updates?!?
5.1->5.2 is as simple as `yum update`
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c
Mag Gam wrote:
> Not an option at my university :-(
Then read through the bug report you mentioned and try one of those
kernels. And update to 5.2 - as you won't get *any* security updates for
5.1 anymore except if you bought in for 5.1.z.
And don't top post and please trim your replies.
Ralph
Not an option at my university :-(
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mag Gam wrote:
>> I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to
>> ask a redhat question :-)
>>
>> Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5
Mag Gam wrote:
> I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to
> ask a redhat question :-)
>
> Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where
> the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very
> similar to CentOS' problem,
> http://b
I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to
ask a redhat question :-)
Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where
the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very
similar to CentOS' problem,
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=26
First, many thanks to Paul and Spiro for your help with this.
Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
Ideally I would like a link to a webpage entitled "How I learnt to
stop worrying and run spamass-milter as root".
We've got a few boxen running spamd as non-privileged user, but
spamassassi
nate wrote:
You can try rescanning the bus:
http://misterd77.blogspot.com/2007/12/how-to-scan-scsi-bus-with-26-kernel.html
But it sounds like despite what the qlogic app says the devices
are not exported to the host.
Thanks Nate, I've tried that solution and a whole bunch of other tools
fro
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 17:33 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:41 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Isn't that what the Anonymizer is for?
>
> I was referring to your need to save web pages, when paying bils,
> online orders, etc. That works perfectly
> for me with Fir
36 matches
Mail list logo
