RE: [CentOS] enterprise backup solution (probably amanda?)

>I'm an Amanda user since 9+ years now. >Done several restores, even bare metal ones. >Amanda never failed on me. Paul, I bought the Enterprise version of Amanda and was blown away to find it cant do a verify of a backup once completed. You can verify the contents of a single tape manually, but I

Re: [CentOS] Updated bind marked as vulnerable

Thanks all. It solved. On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 02:08 PM 7/30/2008, you wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a Centos 4.6 machine that even tough has been updated with the > latest bind 9.2.4-28.0.1.el4 is marked as vulnerable by > https://www.dns-oarc.net/oar

Re: [CentOS] enterprise backup solution (probably amanda?)

> > If a disk based archive will work, backuppc ( > http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/) is fairly painless and it's scheme of > compression and hardlinking duplicates lets you keep about 10x the history > you'd expect. If you need offsite copies you'll have to run an independent > instance elsewhere

[CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

I have been trying to mount a windows file share so I can use it for remote storage particularly for my Deki Wiki attachments. Anyway, I seem to have a mount established by doing the following. 1. Added following line to /etc/fstab //fs01/wikidata /var/www/dekiwiki/attachments cifs user,uid=500,

[CentOS] usb to usb comm ports - possible? how?

I have an i686 mono core system configured as a CentOS-5.2 server. It has one DB9P RS-232 serial connector and six USB connectors. The DB9p is configuered as STTY0 for the attached MultiTec MT5638ZBA fax modem. I would very much like to connect my MS WindowsXPpro laptop, which only has USB conne

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:14 PM, TechGuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been trying to mount a windows file share so I can use it for > remote storage particularly for my Deki Wiki attachments. > > Anyway, I seem to have a mount established by doing the following. > > 1. Added following line

Re: [CentOS] Wiki updates needed for rpmrepo.org when it's up & running

Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:08:54 -0500: > which includes this: You will find I already quoted this link. And remove the s! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com __

Re: [CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: Hi All, The subject says it all. I'm asking because I've found Fedora 9 to be buggy as hell - it is one of the worst Fedora releases I've ever used (and I've been using it since Fedora Core 1). I'm putting up with it for my work laptop, but it's not fun. :( My main

[CentOS] Re: usb to usb comm ports - possible? how?

on 7-30-2008 12:14 PM James B. Byrne spake the following: I have an i686 mono core system configured as a CentOS-5.2 server. It has one DB9P RS-232 serial connector and six USB connectors. The DB9p is configuered as STTY0 for the attached MultiTec MT5638ZBA fax modem. I would very much like to

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

Akemi, I know with most mailing lists its common practice to flame every newbie with "read" something emails. But in this case I have been reading, and I think maybe if you had read my email below and my post you pointed out you would have realized that I have been reading and trying. As for the

[CentOS] Missing dependencies

Hi! I have a new shiny CentOS 5.2 server freshly installed. I wanted to install VMWare Server but the installer wants to compile a module. I thought, no problem: Let's install compiler and libraries. So i did: yum groupinstall "Development Libraries" "Development Tools" But i end

Re: [CentOS] usb to usb comm ports - possible? how?

James B. Byrne wrote: I have an i686 mono core system configured as a CentOS-5.2 server. It has one DB9P RS-232 serial connector and six USB connectors. The DB9p is configuered as STTY0 for the attached MultiTec MT5638ZBA fax modem. I would very much like to connect my MS WindowsXPpro laptop,

Re: [CentOS] Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_RING crashed the CentOS5 - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7

Scott Silva wrote: It seems that you tried to patch the CentOS kernel and it didn't work. A patch for a newer kernel probably wouldn't apply clean, and the CentOS kernels coming from RHEL are heavily patched already. The last time I played in the kernel there were at least a hundred patches. Pr

Re: [CentOS] Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_RING crashed the CentOS5 - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7

Johnny Hughes wrote: Scott Silva wrote: It seems that you tried to patch the CentOS kernel and it didn't work. A patch for a newer kernel probably wouldn't apply clean, and the CentOS kernels coming from RHEL are heavily patched already. The last time I played in the kernel there were at least

Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you have KDE installed too? Does it do the same under KDE? Do you > have a Live CD for Knoppix or something, that you could boot and see > what happens? Don't have kde, but I do have a live cd and I got a response on

Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:37 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You had mentioned earlier that it not only changed resolution, but > revereted to analog monitor. I don't know if this will help, but have > you run kudzu? Actually, I did try that, and a reboot. No help there. T

Re: [CentOS] Missing dependencies

Guy Boisvert wrote: Hi! I have a new shiny CentOS 5.2 server freshly installed. I wanted to install VMWare Server but the installer wants to compile a module. I thought, no problem: Let's install compiler and libraries. So i did: yum groupinstall "Development Libraries" "Developmen

Re: [CentOS] slow NFS speed

On Wednesday 30 July 2008 20:52:07 John R Pierce wrote: > Mag Gam wrote: > >> 70-80Mb/sec. > > > > MB, sorry :-) > > thats on the order of 700-800Mbit/sec, which is quite good for a single > session on GigE. as others have said, the sort of bonding you're doing > doesn't speed up single transfers

Re: [CentOS] Unable to write video dvd using k3b

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:17 AM, lingu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I download dvd movie files from torrent.It is like below > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1048614912 2008-07-24 16:49 VTS_01_1.VOB > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 538210304 2008-07-24 16:52 VTS_01_2.VOB > > File command on above gi

[CentOS] Re: Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

on 7-30-2008 1:04 PM TechGuy spake the following: Akemi, I know with most mailing lists its common practice to flame every newbie with "read" something emails. But in this case I have been reading, and I think maybe if you had read my email below and my post you pointed out you would have reali

Re: [CentOS] Wiki updates needed for rpmrepo.org when it's up & running

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:08:54 -0500: >> which includes this: > You will find I already quoted this link. And remove the s! SOLVED: I have the RPMForge and Adobe reposit

[CentOS] Re: usb to usb comm ports - possible? how?

On Wed, July 30, 2008 15:14, James B. Byrne wrote: >> I have an i686 mono core system configured as a CentOS-5.2 server. >> It has one DB9P RS-232 serial connector and six USB connectors. >> The DB9p is configured as STTY0 for the attached MultiTec MT5638ZBA >> fax modem. I would very much like t

Re: [CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 14:42 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > It should have been based on fedora9, however that did not happen. I > heard that it should be based on fedora11, though 12 will be the next > release that is a "3rd" (rh9/fc1 was el3, fc3 was for el4, fc6 was for > el5 ... so f9 should

RE: [CentOS] slow NFS speed

Marc Grimme wrote: > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 20:52:07 John R Pierce wrote: > > Mag Gam wrote: > > >> 70-80Mb/sec. > > > > > > MB, sorry :-) > > > > thats on the order of 700-800Mbit/sec, which is quite good for a single > > session on GigE. as others have said, the sort of bonding you're doing

Re: [CentOS] Missing dependencies : SOLVED

Johnny Hughes wrote: Guy Boisvert wrote: Hi! I have a new shiny CentOS 5.2 server freshly installed. I wanted to install VMWare Server but the installer wants to compile a module. I thought, no problem: Let's install compiler and libraries. So i did: yum groupinstall "Developmen

Re: [CentOS] Unable to write video dvd using k3b

MHR wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:17 AM, lingu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I download dvd movie files from torrent.It is like below -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1048614912 2008-07-24 16:49 VTS_01_1.VOB -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 538210304 2008-07-24 16:52 VTS_01_2.VOB File command on ab

Re: [CentOS] Unable to write video dvd using k3b

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On occasion, I have removed languages and extras (outtakes, etc.) but it > takes more patience than I have to build a DVD from scratch. For backing up > commercial DVDs, I like DVDShrink (using no shrinking) to rip and > reas

Re: [CentOS] enterprise backup solution (probably amanda?)

Sean Carolan wrote: If a disk based archive will work, backuppc ( http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/) is fairly painless and it's scheme of compression and hardlinking duplicates lets you keep about 10x the history you'd expect. If you need offsite copies you'll have to run an independent instance

Re: [CentOS] Re: usb to usb comm ports - possible? how?

James B. Byrne wrote: On Wed, July 30, 2008 15:14, James B. Byrne wrote: I have an i686 mono core system configured as a CentOS-5.2 server. It has one DB9P RS-232 serial connector and six USB connectors. The DB9p is configured as STTY0 for the attached MultiTec MT5638ZBA fax modem. I would very

Re: [CentOS] Re: usb to usb comm ports - possible? how?

James B. Byrne wrote: ... The purpose of the serial connection is to permit a laptop to substitute for a monitor/kb/mouse on site in that eventuality. If it proves too cumbersome to enable direct host to host communications via usb then we will simply ship a 15" flat screen, kb and mouse with t

Re: [CentOS] enterprise backup solution (probably amanda?)

Joseph L. Casale wrote: I'm an Amanda user since 9+ years now. Done several restores, even bare metal ones. Amanda never failed on me. Paul, I bought the Enterprise version of Amanda and was blown away to find it cant do a verify of a backup once completed. You can verify the contents of a sin

[CentOS] ISC dhcpd and Vista clients

Has anyone had good luck serving dhcp addresses to Vista clients that work reliably? I have a test system and I can't seem to find out how to properly get dhcpd to always respond with broadcast instead of unicast since Vista won't honor unicast dhcp packets. -- MailScanner is like deodorant..

Re: [CentOS] ISC dhcpd and Vista clients

Scott Silva wrote: Has anyone had good luck serving dhcp addresses to Vista clients that work reliably? I have a test system and I can't seem to find out how to properly get dhcpd to always respond with broadcast instead of unicast since Vista won't honor unicast dhcp packets. My Vista (my

Re: [CentOS] Wiki updates needed for rpmrepo.org when it's up & running

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:08:54 -0500: >>>

[CentOS] Re: ISC dhcpd and Vista clients

on 7-30-2008 2:53 PM Paul Bijnens spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: Has anyone had good luck serving dhcp addresses to Vista clients that work reliably? I have a test system and I can't seem to find out how to properly get dhcpd to always respond with broadcast instead of unicast since

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:04 PM, TechGuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi, > > I know with most mailing lists its common practice to flame every > newbie with "read" something emails. But in this case I have been > reading, and I think maybe if you had read my email below and my post > you point

[CentOS] rpm dependency question

I have an rpm I've created that has a dependency on a library provided by a third party. This dependency is not specified anywhere in my spec file yet the package seems to know about when I run: # rpm -qip --requires MyPackage.rpm The third party rpm is installed and uninstalled via a vendor-su

Re: [CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: The subject says it all. I'm asking because I've found Fedora 9 to be buggy as hell - it is one of the worst Fedora releases I've ever used (and I've been using it since Fedora Core 1). I'm putting up with it for my work laptop, but it's not fun

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

TechGuy wrote on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:04:27 -0500: > I know with most mailing lists its common practice to flame every > newbie with "read" something emails. this was not a flame at all. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

I have always wanted a distro in-between long term support and cutting edge. Say one that uses the kernel/command line part of a long term distro and the gui and gui apps of a cutting edge distro (maybe 1 back from the cutting edge). An kernel upgrade cycle of say 3 years, but a GUI that stays

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > TechGuy wrote on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:04:27 -0500: > >> I know with most mailing lists its common practice to flame every >> newbie with "read" something emails. > > this was not a flame at all. > Not only that, but the OP's

[CentOS] Re: Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

on 7-30-2008 3:39 PM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: I have always wanted a distro in-between long term support and cutting edge. Say one that uses the kernel/command line part of a long term distro and the gui and gui apps of a cutting edge distro (maybe 1 back from the cutting edge).

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:04 PM, TechGuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Akemi, >> >> I know with most mailing lists its common practice to flame every >> newbie with "read" something emails. But in this case I have been >> r

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:53 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> TechGuy wrote on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:04:27 -0500: >> >>> I know with most mailing lists its common practice to flame every >>> newbie with "read" something e

Re: [CentOS] Re: Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

Scott Silva wrote: I have always wanted a distro in-between long term support and cutting edge. Say one that uses the kernel/command line part of a long term distro and the gui and gui apps of a cutting edge distro (maybe 1 back from the cutting edge). An kernel upgrade cycle of say 3 yea

Re: [CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > I have always wanted a distro in-between long term support and cutting edge I think Debian's testing branch aims to be this sort of thing, I haven't had a need to run testing in years myself. Stable is good enough for me http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/ [..]Th

Re: [CentOS] Re: Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

Les Mikesell wrote: > Couldn't it be mostly-automated to build a just slightly outdated fedora > desktop (everything that depends on the KDE or GNOME libs) on top of an > otherwise stock Centos? I think you may be vastly underestimating the number of packages that would touch, and the amount of i

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:26 PM, TechGuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please point out what shortcut that I tried to take? From my email, > with the information I provided which I did get from various sources > including the wiki tips and tricks, and other sites... If you read my > questions you

[CentOS] Re: Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

on 7-30-2008 4:29 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: I have always wanted a distro in-between long term support and cutting edge. Say one that uses the kernel/command line part of a long term distro and the gui and gui apps of a cutting edge distro (maybe 1 back from t

Re: [CentOS] xfs on 5.2 (live cd + dvd)

Ralph Angenendt wrote: EXTRAS. CentOS EXTRAS for xfs. No need to enable centosplus for it. Alright, sorry. I got that now. No objections to using the centosplus kernel in production environments? Use CentOS extras *and* the "normal" kernel. Hmmm, yummm, this even sounds bet

Re: [CentOS] xfs on 5.2 (live cd + dvd)

Brent L. Bates wrote: As far as I'm concerned, XFS is the ONLY file system to use, period. If you care about not only performance, but also reliability, use XFS. I can confirm this, I had quite a few power line cuts and xfs always had mercy upon me. XFS compiled into kernel support

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:51 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:26 PM, TechGuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Please point out what shortcut that I tried to take? From my email, >> with the information I provided which I did get from various sources >> including the w

[CentOS] out of memory

just had a server hang on me...seems pretty clearly that some process stole all the RAM (clamd?) Jul 30 16:26:04 srv1 kernel: auditd invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0, oomkilladj=-17 Jul 30 16:26:08 srv1 kernel: [] out_of_memory+0x72/0x1a4 Jul 30 16:26:08 srv1 kernel: [] __alloc_page

Re: [CentOS] Unable to write video dvd using k3b

MHR wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On occasion, I have removed languages and extras (outtakes, etc.) but it takes more patience than I have to build a DVD from scratch. For backing up commercial DVDs, I like DVDShrink (using no shrinking) to rip a

Re: [CentOS] Unable to write video dvd using k3b

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Blush! I should have said "DVDShrink in Windows". I haven't found a good > Linux substitute either, so on those rare occasions that I want to backup a > DVD, I borrow the Windows machine I have set up for the great-grandkids. >

Re: [CentOS] Unable to write video dvd using k3b

Robert wrote: > Blush! I should have said "DVDShrink in Windows". I haven't found a > good Linux substitute either, so on those rare occasions that I want to > backup a DVD, I borrow the Windows machine I have set up for the > great-grandkids. Have you tried dvd::rip? http://exit1.org/dvdrip/in

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:28 PM, TechGuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems my mistake has been in focusing on mount.cifs and not just mount > itself. After reading what you posted I checked man mount which is > much more informative then mount.cifs. > Ah - I suppose I could have said that bett

Re: [CentOS] Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:51 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:26 PM, TechGuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sorry this has transpired, truly am because I was hoping for more both >> from CentOS and from the community that supports it and is always >> touting the values

Re: [CentOS] rpm dependency question

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 18:22, Mark Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Problem is, the vendor supplied > un-install script fails to un-install because of the > dependency MyPackage has on one of it's libraries. Well, that's the correct behaviour, that's what RPM is for after all. If you uninsta

Re: [CentOS] out of memory

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 20:31, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how does one determine who the culprit was? Very hard... the kernel tries to "guess" which process is causing the issue, but from what I've seen (and I see OOMs every week) it guesses wrong most of the time. In my case, the vi

Re: [CentOS] X-Windows Login

Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:41:57 -0700 (PDT) > Al Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: > >> I have a server with all the x-windows stuff installed. But it's >> giving me a text based login prompt on the console. >> >> I can log onto the cons

Re: [CentOS] out of memory

On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 22:19 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 20:31, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > how does one determine who the culprit was? > > Very hard... the kernel tries to "guess" which process is causing the > issue, but from what I've seen (and I s

[CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen - SOLVED

Thanks to Ritesh Khadgaray: > Is there anything I'm missing? Some other configuration file or > record somewhere I need to tweak? with gconf-editor, check "/desktop/gnome/screen/default/0/resolution" . -- Ritesh Khadgaray Ph: +919970164885 Desktop LinuX N Stuff, RHCE Software Maintenance Engin

[CentOS] FreeNX and FF3

Anybody else notice how poorly Firefox 3 update on CentOS-5 works via NX connection? Any suggestions on fixing the visual artifacts/bad redraws? Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] FreeNX and FF3

Craig White wrote: Anybody else notice how poorly Firefox 3 update on CentOS-5 works via NX connection? Any suggestions on fixing the visual artifacts/bad redraws? hmm ... it doesn't seem any worse to me than before. I am running a remote desktop, but currently I my client on the same LAN as

Re: [CentOS] FreeNX and FF3

On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 22:27 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > Anybody else notice how poorly Firefox 3 update on CentOS-5 works via NX > > connection? Any suggestions on fixing the visual artifacts/bad redraws? > > > > hmm ... it doesn't seem any worse to me than before. I am

[CentOS] stale NFS locks

Because my primary server went down today, I have a couple of servers that have 'stale NFS mounts' which I can't unmount... # umount /home/storage/users umount: /home/storage/users: device is busy umount: /home/storage/users: device is busy short of restarting...is there a trick that I can do to

Re: [CentOS] stale NFS locks

Craig White wrote: > short of restarting...is there a trick that I can do to umount/remount? try umount /home/storage/users -l -f nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] stale NFS locks

On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 21:36 -0700, nate wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > > short of restarting...is there a trick that I can do to umount/remount? > > try umount /home/storage/users -l -f perfect - thanks Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cento

Re: [CentOS] Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_RING crashed the CentOS5 - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7

> It seems that you tried to patch the CentOS kernel and it didn't work. I am doing this experiment. And, I don't know what would happen. Different from previous work, I don't patch the kernel from www.kernel.org but patch the one download from www.centos.org. I would use the same version (kernel

Re: [CentOS] FreeNX and FF3

Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 22:27 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Craig White wrote: Anybody else notice how poorly Firefox 3 update on CentOS-5 works via NX connection? Any suggestions on fixing the visual artifacts/bad redraws? hmm ... it doesn't seem any worse to me than before. I

Re: [CentOS] Re: ISC dhcpd and Vista clients

Scott Silva wrote: on 7-30-2008 2:53 PM Paul Bijnens spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: Has anyone had good luck serving dhcp addresses to Vista clients that work reliably? I have a test system and I can't seem to find out how to properly get dhcpd to always respond with broadcast inste

<    1   2