not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080815/8cb840ec/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:44:11 +0200
From: Tru Huynh <[EMAIL
Ok, I give up... I have to ask. This is CentOS 5.
I switched one of my raid1 disks, and I already thought I had succeeded. But
now it seems that something is very wrong with the first partition on the
new disk. Luckily my system is fully bootable with the other disk.
Here's some info. The new dis
I think I solved it by this simple command:
mke2fs -S /dev/sdb1
...which only rewrites the superblock.
This *wrong* command might have spoiled the partition (there should be -T
before ext3):
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] dev]# mkfs ext3 sdb1
>> mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
>> mkfs.ext2: invalid blocks co
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
I think I solved it by this simple command:
mke2fs -S /dev/sdb1
...which only rewrites the superblock.
I would have just used fdisk instead of partd. If you are adding this
to a raid, you don't need a filesystem, just a partition of the right
size. The contents are go
I am running vsftp pretty much 'out of the box', though I turned off
IPv4 and have it listening on IPv6.
I have stopped ip6tables, as the simple rule to enable port 21 is not
allowing gftp to connect (pasv mode, I think).
gftp to the IPv6 address, it connects and gets a directory listing. I
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Now the question: is there anyway to get something similar for CentOS ?
> or is there a process that someone might follow to achieve the same or
> similar result ?
replying to myself really...
While conversation from this thread has gone into various completely
nonrelated
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Now the question: is there anyway to get something similar for CentOS ?
or is there a process that someone might follow to achieve the same or
similar result ?
replying to myself really...
While conversation from this thread has gone into various completely
nonrelated i
has anyone had any luck getting nvidia to work with the latest xen kernel
under x86_64? I found an unsupported method involving IGNORE_XEN_PRESENCE
[1], but it doesn't work for me. Everything google turns up seems to be a
year old. prob nothing has changed but I just wonder.
[1] http://www.nvne
8 matches
Mail list logo