CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0855 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0855.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
161c953e8c1c47c09542020837e9920b
Earlier in the day today Red Hat made an announcement [1] that there had been an
intrusion into some of their computer systems last week. In the same
announcement they mention that some of the packages for OpenSSH on RHEL-4 ( i386
and x86_64 ) as well as RHEL-5 ( x86_64 ) were signed by the
Marcos, buen día, me podrias regalar el link del sitio en donde se pueden
conocer en detalles los cursos que ofrencen?.
Saludos Cordiales.
Carlos R.
2008/8/21 Marco Gordillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Esta consulta es para Ernesto Perez, sobre el curso de Adm. Linux II, deseo
saber para cuando
carlos restrepo wrote:
Marcos, buen día, me podrias regalar el link del sitio en donde se pueden
conocer en detalles los cursos que ofrencen?.
En linea:
http://cec-epn.edu.ec/index.php?producto=161categoria=8
http://cec-epn.edu.ec/index.php?producto=176categoria=8
Presenciales no comienza
Patrick Derwael wrote:
*/[Patrick Derwael] /*
The point is that Parallel supports exactly CentOS 4.4 and 5.0, Fedora
4 and 6 and RHEL 4ES and 5ES.
snip
Primary focus of this policy is to address the
specific issue you are running up against
My only issue is that I want to be able to
big snip
Do you have a link to this application's website? Maybe we could determine
why it might be stuck to a limited set of OS releases. If a software can't
keep up with a limited subset of OS updates, maybe they are concerned more
costs then security.
Scott, more info here:
But, read that table carefully. It says CentOS 5 not CentOS 5.0
CentOS 5 tracks the current point release and is now equivalent
to CentOS 5.2. Running CentOS 5.0 means you do not receive any
updates from a subsequent point release and are locked into the
package versions that were current
Patrick Derwael wrote:
My only issue is that I want to be able to get support from Parallels, and
(I know software vendors!!) it would be too easy for them to say Sorry,
your OS version is not supported...
I suggest you contact the vendor to verify whether or not CentOS 5.1
and 5.2 and
I suggest you contact the vendor to verify whether or not CentOS 5.1
and 5.2 and onwards are supported. I suspect if they support something
as generic as RHEL 5 ES and they support CentOS 5.0 then they'll
support all versions of CentOS 5.0. Since CentOS 5.2 is based off
of RHEL ES 5.2.
In
I am using RHEL 5.1 with custom kernel.
I have a LV I am trying to remove and its keep complaining its open. I
have unmounted the filesystem, lsof shows nothing, fuser shows
nothing. I am certain a reboot will fix it, but I don't know why this
occurs. Can anyone shed some light on this?
Are
Do you have a link to this application's website? Maybe we could
determine why it might be stuck to a limited set of OS releases. If a
software can't keep up with a limited subset of OS updates, maybe they
are concerned more with costs then security.
The OP is happily incorrect on the
You can place the statement in /etc/sysconfg/static-routes.
This file will be used when the network starts up.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of ABBAS KHAN
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:38 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Is there a
Are you sure this is actually processed? Do you have a working example for
CentOS 4.x or 5.x? One that works with two NICS that would use two
different gateways to the internet? I would like nothing more to get this
to work in a streamlined fashion.
i didn't have success with the
Mag Gam wrote:
I am using RHEL 5.1 with custom kernel.
I have a LV I am trying to remove and its keep complaining its open. I
have unmounted the filesystem, lsof shows nothing, fuser shows
nothing. I am certain a reboot will fix it, but I don't know why this
occurs. Can anyone shed some
Rob Townley wrote:
Are you sure this is actually processed? Do you have a working example for
CentOS 4.x or 5.x? One that works with two NICS that would use two
different gateways to the internet? I would like nothing more to get this
to work in a streamlined fashion.
Two default gateways
Rob Townley napsal(a):
Are you sure this is actually processed? Do you have a working example for
CentOS 4.x or 5.x? One that works with two NICS that would use two
different gateways to the internet? I would like nothing more to get this
to work in a streamlined fashion.
i didn't have
I have 4 disks in a RAID5 array. I want to add a 5th. So I
did
mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/sde1
This worked but, as expected, the disk isn't being used in the raid5 array.
md3 : active raid5 sde1[4] sdd4[3] sdc3[2] sdb2[1] sda1[0]
2930279808 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4]
nate wrote:
Mag Gam wrote:
I am using RHEL 5.1 with custom kernel.
Might be something about your custom kernel that affects lvm operations.
It could be you have a version mis-match in lvm components in your system.
I have a LV I am trying to remove and its keep complaining its open. I
Toby Bluhm wrote:
nate wrote:
.
.
.
Verify that it's deactivated with the lvdisplay command
Current versions of lvm/lvremove will do that automatically.
. . . but verifying is still a good idea.
--
Toby Bluhm
Alltech Medical Systems America, Inc.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Joseph L. Casale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are two times when this becomes an issue. One is on x86_64
systems where build deps can cross architectures, and the other is
when using systems like openvz/virtuozzo where the glibc is often
replaced or otherwise
John Thomas wrote:
Should postfix-2.3.3-2.el5.centos.mysql_pgsql be updated for:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0839.html
and, if so, may I humbly request it?
I will look into this today, at the moment the openssh issue takes
priority! News on that front in the next few hours. I know
When I run this command on centos 5.2 it just sets there nothing ever
happens.
Any ideas? I have ran it on two centos 5.2 machines. I can control C out.
I am running it as root and a normal user both. Same thing - just sits
there.
jerry
___
CentOS
What's the point on this for us, CentOS users ?
http://www.redhat.com/security/data/openssh-blacklist.html
Regards,
kfx
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors;
I found on this page how to identify the sectors and force a write on them to
trigger the relocation of bad sectors on the disk:
http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/BadBlockHowTo.txt
My question is:
since I'm too lazy to follow all the
Hi All,
I'm experiencing odd behaviour with various OpenGL apps I'm (trying to)
use. I have an IBM Thinkpad X60s with the Intel GMA chipset, the 945GM
to be precise. I have glxinfo/glxgears working normally, disabled
composite in xorg.conf and everything seems fine.
However, there are a few
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors;
Ideally it should be done using the manufacturer's tools,
and really any disk that has even one bad sector that the OS
can see should not be relied upon, it should be considered a
failed disk. Disks automatically
which xen rpms did you install? The ones from centos, or the ones from
xensource?
Rolled my own from the 3.2.0 srpm.
Generally when building for x86_64, it's best to remove all traces of
x86 packages on the system.
How do you do this at install? Wouldn't that be cleaner? I suppose a
rpm command
nate ha scritto:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors;
Ideally it should be done using the manufacturer's tools,
and really any disk that has even one bad sector that the OS
can see should not be relied upon, it should be considered a
failed
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 08:59 -0700, nate wrote:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors;
Ideally it should be done using the manufacturer's tools,
Second that!
and really any disk that has even one bad sector that the OS
can see should not be
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
For what I understand Offline uncorrectable means that the sector would be
relocated the next time it is accessed for writing... so it is on a wait
for
relocation status.
I don't know of any other way to force this relocation other tha actually
writing over the
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:26 AM, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
Not sure myself but the manufacturer's testing tools have
non destructive ways of detecting and re-mapping bad sectors.
Of course a downside to the manufacturer's tools is they often
only support a limited
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 18:07 +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
nate ha scritto:
snip
For what I understand Offline uncorrectable means that the sector would be
relocated the next time it is accessed for writing... so it is on a wait for
relocation status.
If my memory is still good (I don't
William L. Maltby wrote:
?? Uncertain about spares has been exhausted.
I don't recall where I read it, and I suppose it may be
misinformation, but it made sense at the time. The idea is
the disks are not made to hold EXACTLY the amount of blocks
that the specs are for. There are some extra
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 05:43:08PM +0200, kfx wrote:
What's the point on this for us, CentOS users ?
http://www.redhat.com/security/data/openssh-blacklist.html
That will only test for compiled RPMS of certain OpenSSH packages.
Those RPMS have been signed by the PGP key, so either the key
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 17:55 +0200, Rubin wrote:
Hi All,
I'm experiencing odd behaviour with various OpenGL apps I'm (trying to)
use. I have an IBM Thinkpad X60s with the Intel GMA chipset, the 945GM
to be precise. I have glxinfo/glxgears working normally, disabled
composite in xorg.conf
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Joseph L. Casale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which xen rpms did you install? The ones from centos, or the ones from
xensource?
Rolled my own from the 3.2.0 srpm.
Generally when building for x86_64, it's best to remove all traces of
x86 packages on the system.
How
on 8-22-2008 7:01 AM David Hrbáč spake the following:
Rob Townley napsal(a):
Are you sure this is actually processed? Do you have a working example for
CentOS 4.x or 5.x? One that works with two NICS that would use two
different gateways to the internet? I would like nothing more to get this
on 8-22-2008 12:10 AM Patrick Derwael spake the following:
big snip
Do you have a link to this application's website? Maybe we could determine
why it might be stuck to a limited set of OS releases. If a software can't
keep up with a limited subset of OS updates, maybe they are concerned more
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 09:33 -0700, nate wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
?? Uncertain about spares has been exhausted.
I don't recall where I read it, and I suppose it may be
misinformation, but it made sense at the time. The idea is
the disks are not made to hold EXACTLY the amount of
on 8-22-2008 9:07 AM Lorenzo Quatrini spake the following:
nate ha scritto:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors;
Ideally it should be done using the manufacturer's tools,
and really any disk that has even one bad sector that the OS
can see should
There has been a notice of a breach (see: CVE-2007-4752) as to
some binary content upstream of CentOS. I do not address that
matter here beyond stating that the CentOS team have responded
to the matter, and will continue this review process:
updated 22 Aug 2008 CentOS acknowledge
Scott Silva wrote:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
212.47.23.188 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 00
eth0
192.168.38.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00
eth1
192.168.36.0
Scott Silva wrote:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
212.47.23.188 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0
0 eth0
192.168.38.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth1
192.168.36.0192.168.38.254
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, R P Herrold wrote:
... Hopefully this attched writeup will transit the CentOS
mailing list manager intact. I also include it inline below,
but this may mangle the signature.
'attached' of course -- part of the 'orc_orc' spelling
authenticity test. ;)
Following up on
Hasn't this been hashed over several times in the past year to the same end
result?
:-)
It appeared to me the original issue (this time) was being able to do
primary and secondary dns on one box with different ip addresses because the
registrar needed two different ip addresses when registering
ABBAS KHAN wrote:
I'm adding the default gateway to the route through route add default
gw 10.10.10.10 http://10.10.10.10 which is also shown in route -n
but the problem is that as soon as I restart the network through
/etc/init.d/network restart; the route sets to default one...!
SO, my
Jerry Geis wrote:
When I run this command on centos 5.2 it just sets there nothing ever
happens.
Any ideas? I have ran it on two centos 5.2 machines. I can control C out.
I am running it as root and a normal user both. Same thing - just sits
there.
jerry
I created a new user, logged in as
So then I tried the next step:
mdadm --grow --raid-devices=5 /dev/md3
But now I have problems...
mdadm: Cannot set device size/shape for /dev/md3: Invalid argument
What happens, if you add
--size=max
?
- Jussi
--
Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot
Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki *
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:26:01PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
So then I tried the next step:
mdadm --grow --raid-devices=5 /dev/md3
But now I have problems...
mdadm: Cannot set device size/shape for /dev/md3: Invalid argument
What happens, if you add
--size=max
% mdadm --grow
Alexander Dalloz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribio (21.8.2008 16:44)
What I would do is following: change this line in the Makefile
$(CC) $(OPTS) $(DEFINES) $(EFENCE) -o milterquota milterquota.c
$(SENDMAIL_OBJ)/libmilter/libmilter.a $(SENDMAIL_OBJ)/libsm/libsm.a -pthread
replace
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 9:37am, Akemi Yagi wrote
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Joseph L. Casale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which xen rpms did you install? The ones from centos, or the ones from
xensource?
Rolled my own from the 3.2.0 srpm.
Generally when building for x86_64, it's best to
What happens, if you add
--size=max
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribio (22.8.2008 20:27)
% mdadm --grow --raid-devices=5 --size=max /dev/md3
mdadm: can change at most one of size, raiddisks, and layout
--size=max is for use when a failed disk is replaced with a bigger one.
Ok. I
Actually, both of those commands should be looking for i[36]86, otherwise
you'll miss, e.g., glibc.i686.
Joshua,
Any way to simply not install them when doing an install?
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:41:25PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
How about simply
% mdadm --grow /dev/md3
% mdadm --grow /dev/md3
mdadm: no changes to --grow
What do you get with
% mdadm --detail /dev/md3
/dev/md3:
Version : 00.90.01
Creation Time : Wed Aug 20 08:44:30 2008
What's the point on this for us, CentOS users ?
I'd like to know if CentOS has been affected by RH's compromise. Can
someone please comment? AFAIK, CentOS builds from RHEL SRPMs right? So
as Rui mentioned the script that RH provided is useless. They do give
the version info of the
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:41am, Joseph L. Casale wrote
Actually, both of those commands should be looking for i[36]86, otherwise
you'll miss, e.g., glibc.i686.
Any way to simply not install them when doing an install?
Unfortunately, not that I'm aware of.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
QB3 Shared
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:41am, Joseph L. Casale wrote
Actually, both of those commands should be looking for i[36]86, otherwise
you'll miss, e.g., glibc.i686.
Any way to simply not install them when doing an
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:41:25PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
How about simply
% mdadm --grow /dev/md3
% mdadm --grow /dev/md3
mdadm: no changes to --grow
What do you get with
% mdadm --detail /dev/md3
/dev/md3:
snip
Number Major Minor
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:22am, Akemi Yagi wrote
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:41am, Joseph L. Casale wrote
Actually, both of those commands should be looking for i[36]86, otherwise
you'll miss, e.g., glibc.i686.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:25:20PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
I don't think you can grow it without backing it up, destroying
it, rebuilding it with 5 devices, then restoring.
You _can_... but it requires a newer kernel. See, for example,
Stephen Harris wrote:
A RAID-5 set can be expanded by adding extra drives. This
requires restriping the array which means (almost) every
block must be written to a different place.
This option allows such restriping to be done while the array
is
Les Mikesell wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
It would be very nice if the init.d script would allow the sysadmin to
do something like service network saveroutes. I always thought that
would be a neat feature.
Routes only work when you can reach the next hop. That is, if you try
to add a
John R Pierce wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
A RAID-5 set can be expanded by adding extra drives. This
requires restriping the array which means (almost) every
block must be written to a different place.
This option allows such restriping to be done
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:12 PM, RobertH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hasn't this been hashed over several times in the past year to the same end
result?
:-)
It appeared to me the original issue (this time) was being able to do
primary and secondary dns on one box with different ip addresses
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:50:29PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
It would probably be faster to backup, rebuild and restore too...
The whole reason I need to extend like this is because I don't have any
easy way of backing up 1.3Tbytes of data.
While the rebuild is happening the existing
For people who are interested, yum-3.2.17-0_beta is in the *testing*
repo at this moment.
That fixed it! Its installing now...
When Joseph said when doing an install, I assumed that meant at system
install time. I know of no way of doing a pure x86_64 install via
anaconda (although I'd love
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:50:29PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
It would probably be faster to backup, rebuild and restore too...
The whole reason I need to extend like this is because I
don't have any
easy way of backing up 1.3Tbytes of data.
While the rebuild
Hi,
it is strange, I have the laptop Acer 5204 and the desktop with the same
GPU (945GM and 945G). OpenOffice and GoogleEarth work fine without any
problem.
Vaclav
Rubin wrote:
Hi All,
I'm experiencing odd behaviour with various OpenGL apps I'm (trying
to) use. I have an IBM Thinkpad X60s
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 at 11:22am, Akemi Yagi wrote
Any way to simply not install them when doing an install?
Unfortunately, not that I'm aware of.
There is a known issue with yum. See, for example,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
ABBAS KHAN wrote:
I'm adding the default gateway to the route through route add default gw
10.10.10.10 http://10.10.10.10 which is also shown in route -n but
the problem is that as soon as I restart
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:05:30PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Or you could just boot from a LiveCD of a distro that was this and
run a conversion there, it would make it unavailable during the
conversion though.
*grin* My first email on this subject...
I
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Scott Beardsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the point on this for us, CentOS users ?
I'd like to know if CentOS has been affected by RH's compromise. Can someone
please comment? AFAIK, CentOS builds from RHEL SRPMs right? So as Rui
mentioned the script
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:05:30PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Or you could just boot from a LiveCD of a distro that was this and
run a conversion there, it would make it unavailable during the
conversion though.
*grin* My first email
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:31:31PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
I wouldn't use Ubuntu or any Debian based distro cause it's EVMS just
might bugger up the LVM config...
Huh. Dunno what EVMS is, but thanks for the warning!
Instead of a second machine, how about an external disk enclosure?
on 8-22-2008 10:01 AM nate spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
212.47.23.188 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 00
eth0
192.168.38.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
Rob Townley wrote:
Routes only work when you can reach the next hop. That is, if you
try to add a route through an interface that is not up, the command
will fail and the route will not be added. If you want a route to
be added when an interface comes up, there is already a
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:31:31PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
I wouldn't use Ubuntu or any Debian based distro cause it's EVMS just
might bugger up the LVM config...
Huh. Dunno what EVMS is, but thanks for the warning!
EVMS is like a storage management
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The version of Google Earth I installed last December was working
great this morning. Then, I decided to update to the latest version
and when I tried to do that with yum, I didn't have the right name for
the package (now,
On Aug 22, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
Russ has posted some information about this to planet.centos.org, but
basically at this point it does not appear to affect the CentOS
population. Karanbir has been crawling through the build system to
verify this, and we may release an
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Paul Norton wrote:
On Aug 22, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
Russ has posted some information about this to planet.centos.org, but
basically at this point it does not appear to affect the CentOS
population. Karanbir has been crawling through the build system to
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Paul Norton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see an announcement for the packages on the announce list, but no more
informamtion anywhere from the CentOS team (Planet or ML). Are these
packages just to be safe or was there something actually found?
There's a CVE
Earlier in the day today Red Hat made an announcement [1] that there had been an
intrusion into some of their computer systems last week. In the same
announcement they mention that some of the packages for OpenSSH on RHEL-4 ( i386
and x86_64 ) as well as RHEL-5 ( x86_64 ) were signed by the
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The version of Google Earth I installed last December was working
great this morning. Then, I decided to update to the latest version
and when I tried to do
I can't even deactivate it.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Toby Bluhm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
nate wrote:
.
.
.
Verify that it's deactivated with the lvdisplay command
Current versions of lvm/lvremove will do that automatically.
. . . but verifying is still a
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The version of Google Earth I installed last December was working
great this morning.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The version of
Mag Gam wrote:
I can't even deactivate it.
Can you post output of
lvdisplay -v path to LV
vgdisplay -v
mount
Not sure what to suggest at this point I've never
had lvremove not work for me, though my lvms have
always been setup in a real basic configuration.
nate
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Question: How do I
determine whether or not the CPU in this box (I think it's an Intel
Celeron 2.6 GHz) supports SSE2 or not? I suspect the CPU does *not*
support SSE2.
this gets fun. AFAIK, there's several generations of Celerons and its
quite frustrating to tell
Hi all,
I have Dell 2950 III with RAID-5 installed and managed by hardware Raid
controller, I also use LVM when install CentOS. Now I get more 03 Hard
disk and I would like to add it in to the running system. My question is:
1) if new hard disks add in to the machine, I have to rebuild the
#1.) It should just appear as unpartitioned space to the OS. You can
then partition it and add that partition to one of your LVs, and then
use the LVM and ext filesystem tools to grow your existing LV and then
resize the filesystem to fit.
Good articles on LVM:
-
90 matches
Mail list logo
