The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the
centos mirror:
RHSA-2008:0836-02 Moderate: libxml2 security update
Files available:
libxml2-2.4.19-9.ent.i386.rpm
libxml2-devel-2.4.19-9.ent.i386.rpm
libxml2-python-2.4.19-9.ent.i386.rpm
More details are available from the
Hi, I'm having problems with perl.
I'm receivings this e-mails from logwatch everyday and appears to be a
problem with perl.
I explain a bit before expose the errors that I received: I tried to
download all perl* packages, uninstall the repeated ones and reinstall all
packages where installed.
I
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:29:29PM +0200, ArcosCom Linux User enlightened us:
I'm having problems with perl.
I'm receivings this e-mails from logwatch everyday and appears to be a
problem with perl.
I explain a bit before expose the errors that I received: I tried to
download all perl*
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 14:05 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:46 AM, William L. Maltby
snip
Then, I did some reading on the Google site. Question: How do I
determine whether or not the CPU in this box (I think it's an Intel
Celeron 2.6 GHz) supports SSE2 or not? I
What are you trying to achieve? If your trying to get an IP
before the installation starts, you should use DHCP, or
statically assign it using kickstart.
Its for an iSCSI install with gPXE. Whats the correct syntax for getting the
dhcp client to acquire an ip? I just ended up using ifconfig...
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Its for an iSCSI install with gPXE. Whats the correct syntax for getting the
dhcp client to acquire an ip? I just ended up using ifconfig...
The installer will automatically get an address via DHCP if
a DHCP server is available. No syntax needed. You can even
statically
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Damian S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, that MS article is just marketing fluff.
Here is a less biased viewpoint:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080425-study-70-percent-say-red-hat-more-secure-than-windows.html
Its further interesting to note that at a
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:46 AM, William L. Maltby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 14:05 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:46 AM, William L. Maltby
snip
Then, I did some reading on the Google site. Question: How do I
determine whether or not the CPU in
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 12:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Damian S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, that MS article is just marketing fluff.
Here is a less biased viewpoint:
I see an announcement for the packages on the announce list, but no more
information anywhere from the CentOS team (Planet or ML). Are these
packages just to be safe or was there something actually found?
There's a CVE associated with a different (unrelated) bug in how ssh
handled forwarded
As I said in the e-mail, I reinstalled all CentOS 5.2 perl* packages that
I had installed.
I have no idea about perl and how to fight versus it. I only know:
1) This system where a FC5 some years ago with no problem.
2) I upgraded to CentOS 5 (a year ago) with no problem.
3) I upgraded
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 08:32 +1200, Tony Wicks wrote:
snip
So there are new packages anyway in spite of the other bits.
Hi all, have I missed something or is there a CentOS update for 5x but none
for 4x ? I've made sure my mirror is synced and looked around at a few
others but can't seem
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed
from a 5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --
checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of them
are corrupted and fail the GPG check.
This seems to
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Tom Lanyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksig'
test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:54:05AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksig'
test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of
On 25/08/2008, at 11:37 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
How are you sync'ing the RPM's on your internal mirror? Do you run
createrepo locally to generate the metadata yourself or just rely on
the mirror's information?
We just sync 1:1 and rely on the mirror's metadata. As far as I know,
there
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:42:14AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
On 25/08/2008, at 11:37 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
How are you sync'ing the RPM's on your internal mirror? Do you run
createrepo locally to generate the metadata yourself or just rely on
the mirror's information?
We just sync 1:1
On 25/08/2008, at 10:54 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed
from a 5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --
checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of
them are
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:10:25PM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
On 25/08/2008, at 10:54 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksig'
test,
On 25/08/2008, at 12:17 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
What's the exact error you get from yum? One thing you can do is to
check the output of sha1sum against the RPM in the Yum cache on the
client machine and compare that against the checksum value stored in
the primary.xml.gz file for one of the
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 16:42, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
vncserver: The USER environment variable is not set.
So, is it set or not?
It's usually set by /etc/profile, so if it's not set, that
last night I checked the log messages on the server Dell PE2950 6xSAS 146G I
found the smartd running , I did not request such daemon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pons]# tail -f /var/log/messages
Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Home page is
http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
Aug 25 08:27:30
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:39:39 +0200
Mad Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can i disable it
You can disable it with chkconfig or through the GUI services menu.
do i really need it on my system
It depends on your requirements. Read up a bit on what it does and make your
own decision from
Mad Unix wrote:
last night I checked the log messages on the server Dell PE2950 6xSAS
146G I found the smartd running , I did not request such daemon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pons]# tail -f /var/log/messages
Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Home page is
http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
25 matches
Mail list logo
