Si funciona... ¿para qué tocarlo?
Salu2
El Jue, 4 de Septiembre de 2008, 21:26, Enrique Rosario escribió:
Saludos.
Conrespecto al ftp.proxy y el
Frox las ultimas actualizaciones son del 2005. No se me parece como
desatendido. No existe otro que este mas actual.
-Original Message-
Akemi Yagi a écrit :
If I remember, you are using the ipw3945 module. This is being
deprecated and replaced by iwl3945. While the new one might not fix
your problem, it wouldn't hurt to try it. In my case, ipw3945 did not
work but iwl3945 did.
Trouble is that the iwl3945 module is disabled
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 14:57 +0900, Keith Wilkinson wrote:
First, congratulations on the fabulous CentOS Wiki.
About the only information that I haven't found on it
is how to create a custome install DVD with
added kernel modules -- e.g. when the standard
install DVD does not support the
Lanny Marcus ha scritto:
I now have the mbox files on my hard drive. I think that is the default
with Evolution. I assume google backs up their gmail servers, but
having a local copy, my own backup, is a plus.
Lanny, if you are concerned about data loss, you could install a local imap
Lanny Marcus scribbled on Friday, September 05, 2008 12:18 AM:
You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One
Million Great British Pounds)
Like everyone else on the list, we could use the $
Great British Pound? I didn't know UK stopped using Pounds Sterling... ;-)
Mag Gam wrote:
Has anyone been able to compile libarchive and archivemount? I want to
use this with fuse.
The compile is very tough for libarchive, I keep getting
tar/write.c:730: error: `EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS' undeclared (first use in
this function)
e2fsprogs-devel is missing on your machine.
On Friday 05 September 2008 09:45:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny Marcus scribbled on Friday, September 05, 2008 12:18 AM:
You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One
Million Great British Pounds)
Like everyone else on the list, we could use the $
Great
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote / napísal(a):
Lanny Marcus scribbled on Friday, September 05, 2008 12:18 AM:
You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One
Million Great British Pounds)
Like everyone else on the list, we could use the $
Great British Pound?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anne Wilson
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:16 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list
On Friday 05 September 2008 09:45:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Romeo Ninov
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:24 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list
You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One
Sorin Srbu wrote / napísal(a):
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Romeo Ninov
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:24 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list
You have been approved for
On Friday 05 September 2008 13:24:52 Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anne Wilson
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:16 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list
On
On Friday 05 September 2008 13:42:35 Romeo Ninov wrote:
I did. Just forgot to paste in the wiki-link. To fast fingers. 8-) Does
anybody actually ever use the formal long name?
According to my personal experience not so often, but at the end that's
official form, ISO standard like
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anne Wilson
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 2:49 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list
You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One
Thanks Ralph.
Got libarchive compiled fine, now trying to compile archivemount I
keep getting this error now:
gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wall -W -MM archivemount.c dep
gcc -larchive -lfuse -o archivemount archivemount.o
archivemount.o(.text+0x1474): In function `save':
: undefined
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I am looking for something that I can hack away like a NSLU2 but that thing
only has one disc
and worst of all its 100m interface. Anyone know of a device you can load Linux
on that has
maybe 2 discs like a NAS200 with a gig nic? I need a quiet device to act as a
Rob Townley wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need vtun working over IPv6. The version from rpmforge does not
seem to support IPv6 (binds to 0.0.0.0:5000 http://0.0.0.0:5000/
if I specify binding to the
On Friday 05 September 2008, Mag Gam wrote:
Got libarchive compiled fine, now trying to compile archivemount I
keep getting this error now:
gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wall -W -MM archivemount.c dep
gcc -larchive -lfuse -o archivemount archivemount.o
Unless I'm mistaken, order
Does anyone know where I can get the filezilla package for CentOS 5.2.
Thank you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I found the following bug report that matches what I am seeing with the
gFTP we have in Centos:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350813
This is an old bug that they claim has been fixed in CVS. Has that been
applied to what we are running? Becuase gFTP crashes for me on IPv6
using
Toby Bluhm ha scritto:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I am looking for something that I can hack away like a NSLU2 but that
thing only has one disc
and worst of all its 100m interface. Anyone know of a device you can
load Linux on that has
maybe 2 discs like a NAS200 with a gig nic? I need a quiet
Juan C. Valido a écrit :
Does anyone know where I can get the filezilla package for CentOS 5.2.
Thank you.
My best bet would be to use the FC8 SRPM on rpm.pbone.net and try to
build that.
Niki Kovacs
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Marcelo Roccasalva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flash support under qemu seems to be about the same as CD-ROM support. That
is, you can access a device present at start up but it's not swappable.
You can swap cdrom from qemu monitor. I haven't tried, but I think the
same thing can be
The Dlink DNS-323 looks exactly what you are asking of
What a procedure to hack that thing!
The problem I see with going the all-in-one NAS route is that down the
road, there's always some function you'd like to add - but you can't.
You've hit the limitations of the box.
That's why I want to
I got it to work. Thanks all!
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Peter Kjellstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2008, Mag Gam wrote:
Got libarchive compiled fine, now trying to compile archivemount I
keep getting this error now:
gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wall
I have a couple of oddities that I hope someone here can clarify for me.
OS = CentOS-5.2 all updates applied to date.
1. On the gnome desktop in the top panel (or menu bar) I have an icon for
System Monitor which runs the application gnome-system-monitor. On my
other desktop CentOS-5.2 system I
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Niki Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akemi Yagi a écrit :
Trouble is that the iwl3945 module is disabled in the distro kernel.
However, it is enabled in the centosplus kernel. So, the quickest way
to test it is to install the cplus kernel.
I figured that
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What's involved in building an embedded version of CentOS for a Soekris or
similar
small mobo? Is that a feat worth considering or is the work involved huge?
Centos 5 supports 686 or better. I *think* the geode is a 586 type cpu.
Something like Puppy or DSL would
Jerry Geis wrote:
/ How do you go about debugging the kickstart file?
/
By trying stuff, reading documentation or doing research. You know, community
is about give and take and not only taking. I've yet to see *ONE* answer from
you, it's always just ask, ask, ask, even with stuff which can
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 12:38 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
How do you go about debugging the kickstart file?
By trying stuff, reading documentation or doing research. You know,
community
is about give and take and not only taking. I've yet to see *ONE* answer
from
Hello all,
Anyone of you success to install virtual email with Postfix, MySQL and
Dovecot on CentOS 5.2 ? I am running: mysql-server-5.0.45-7.el5,
postfix-2.3.3-2.el5.centos.mysql_pgsql and dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 on CentOS
5.2 box and can not make it work.
All deamons (mysqld, postfix master,
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Both of those appear to indicate that the server in the colo facility is
receiving the SYN packets. What possible reasons are there that it
would not reply with SYN+ACK?
Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a
multi-homed system? Bonded
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
The Dlink DNS-323 looks exactly what you are asking of
What a procedure to hack that thing!
The problem I see with going the all-in-one NAS route is that down the
road, there's always some function you'd like to add - but you can't.
You've hit the limitations of the
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
Lanny Marcus ha scritto:
I now have the mbox files on my hard drive. I think that is the default
with Evolution. I assume google backs up their gmail servers, but
having a local copy, my own backup, is a plus.
Lanny, if you are concerned about data loss, you could
James B. Byrne wrote:
I have a couple of oddities that I hope someone here can clarify for me.
OS = CentOS-5.2 all updates applied to date.
1. On the gnome desktop in the top panel (or menu bar) I have an icon for
System Monitor which runs the application gnome-system-monitor. On my
other
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:41 AM, James B. Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of oddities that I hope someone here can clarify for me.
OS = CentOS-5.2 all updates applied to date.
1. On the gnome desktop in the top panel (or menu bar) I have an icon for
System Monitor which runs
Florin Andrei wrote:
Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a
multi-homed system? Bonded interfaces?
There's only one interface with an IP address, and only one route back
to the office.
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:54:53 -0600
Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having given this more thought, I'm wondering if the problem may be that the
reader isn't reporting the presence of the card. Since nothing appears to
happen when a card is inserted into the reader, Centos has no way of
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a
multi-homed system? Bonded interfaces?
There's only one interface with an IP address, and only one route back
to the office.
If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, re-run
Frank Cox a écrit :
I've just got a card reader and it doesn't automount. I can mount it
manually with mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/temp and that works fine.
I would prefer to have it automount and give me the desktop icon.
Unfortunately, I don't yet know enough about the automounting mechanism to
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The person who owns the computer in question just sent me an email to say that
the card reader is now working. She plugged in her flash drive and that
didn't
work either, so she rebooted the machine and now the flash drive
Florin Andrei wrote:
If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, re-run the tests with
it non-promiscuous. Just to make sure the SYN is actually received by
that system.
I ran the test again with tcpdump -i eth0 -p and then thinking better
of it, with tcpdump -i any. In both cases I
On Sep 5, 2008, at 11:41, James B. Byrne wrote:
Can somebody tell me how to get these minor, but for me very
desirable,
changes made to the second system? The only difference between the
two
systems that I can recall is that one (the first) was upgraded from
4.6
while the second (the
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
If you were running tcpdump in promiscuous mode, re-run the tests with
it non-promiscuous. Just to make sure the SYN is actually received by
that system.
I ran the test again with tcpdump -i eth0 -p and then thinking better
of it, with tcpdump -i
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 12:07 -0700, MHR wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:07 AM, William L. Maltby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HTH (?)
Jeeze, Bill, do you have to be such an a$$-kisser?
(KIDDING! RBFG and all that)
*chuckling and all that*
It's a hangover from my professional
Lunix1618 wrote:
Hello all,
Anyone of you success to install virtual email with Postfix, MySQL and
Dovecot on CentOS 5.2 ? I am running: mysql-server-5.0.45-7.el5,
postfix-2.3.3-2.el5.centos.mysql_pgsql and dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 on CentOS
5.2 box and can not make it work.
All deamons
Is this available for Centos?
If so where?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:18 PM, William L. Maltby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The hoomon brain is a wonderful associative processor. Sometimes I think
mine is a little warped.
From one warped hoomon to another - it ain't just sometimes, friend!
;^)
mhr
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 05:01:54PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Is this available for Centos?
If so where?
Search for qmailtoaster. They used to maintain src RPM's back before
qmail was released to the public domain.
There might be some binaries out there either maintained by them or
other
I'm not going to speak on the Intel vs. AMD issue.
However, I've bought 10 workstations and 5 servers from Thinkmate over
the last year. I've been pretty happy with them.
They use quality components, we have direct numbers for people there.
I like their website, when we've had to RMA something,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:29:22AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Maybe it does reply, just on a different interface? Is this a
multi-homed system? Bonded interfaces?
There's only one interface with an IP address, and only one route back
to the office.
Sounds like
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Is this available for Centos?
If so where?
Possibly start at the below URL and then Google
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=11988
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 9-2-2008 1:44 PM MHR spake the following:
I still have a pair of 40 MB MFM half-height 5.25 drives in the garage
somewhere. I don't think I have an interface card even if I cared what was
on them. Probably DOS 3.3 and
Florin Andrei wrote:
And you do capture *all* traffic, right? Don't filter out anything.
Well, I'm filtering out the ports that are busy (http and https, imap
and imaps, and smtp), but I'm testing access to ssh, since the problem
appears to be independent of the port. I get the delays on
on 9-2-2008 1:44 PM MHR spake the following:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Scott Silva ssilva-m4n3GYAQT2lWk0Htik3J/[EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember when 1 GB *hard* drives didn't exist!
I still have a few - a 20MB Tulin TL225 that was HUGE when it first
came out, and a couple of
I've switched from the xen kernel to regular kernel and trying to remove the
xen one is giving me an error:
[root@ ~]# rpm -e kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5
error: Failed dependencies:
xen-hypervisor-abi = 3.1 is needed by (installed)
xen-3.0.3-64.el5_2.1.i686
[root@ ~]# uname -r
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 20:00, Ed Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've switched from the xen kernel to regular kernel and trying to remove the
xen one is giving me an error:
[root@ ~]# rpm -e kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5
error: Failed dependencies:
xen-hypervisor-abi = 3.1 is needed
Stephen Harris wrote:
Sounds like the remote server may actually be busy and the number of
outstanding connections is reaching the listen() backlog queue, so the
remote server isn't doing an accept() and so the three way handshake
isn't completing.
That thought crossed my mind, too. However,
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 20:00, Ed Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've switched from the xen kernel to regular kernel and trying to remove the
xen one is giving me an error:
[root@ ~]# rpm -e
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
snip
Lanny, if you are concerned about data loss, you could install a local imap
server (over wich you'll can do all the backups that you like) and keep it in
sync with google with imapsync (rpmforge repository).
Looks simple and straightforward to do:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 21:38 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
snip
Lanny, if you are concerned about data loss, you could install a local imap
server (over wich you'll can do all the backups that you like) and keep it
in
sync with google with imapsync (rpmforge
Lanny Marcus wrote:
snip
I just discovered that the mbox files are *not* the problem! Exporting
my Address book from Evolution is not intuitively obvious. I found a web
page from May 2006, that says:
Export the evolution address book with the evolution-addressbook-export
utility in csv format
Craig White wrote:
snip
I just discovered that the mbox files are *not* the problem! Exporting
my Address book from Evolution is not intuitively obvious. I found a web
page from May 2006, that says:
Export the evolution address book with the evolution-addressbook-export
utility in csv format
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
The Dlink DNS-323 looks exactly what you are asking of
What a procedure to hack that thing!
The problem I see with going the all-in-one NAS route is that down the
road, there's always some
With all due respect...
Do any of you that gave advice on finding DJB software in rpm format use any
of the software that you are giving advice on finding in rpm format or
otherwise?
If you do use it, you can do better. :-)
If not, well... then you are talking out yer' rear ends.
It is best
65 matches
Mail list logo
