Hello all,
Automount is not working well with centos 5.2, but the same is working
nicely with
centos 5 .
--
Thanks and Regards,
Kapil Singh Kushwah
Linux System/Network Administrator
Hotwax Media Inc.
Indore,(M.P) INDIA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@c
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 22:52 -0400, Dac Chartrand wrote:
>
> On 5-Oct-08, at 10:10 PM, nate wrote:
>
> > Are there any packages installed that weren't part of the
> > *base* CentOS?
Could please you possibly do a list of all the installed RPMs on the
system in question. Just for cause do a grep t
I'm still having conceptual trouble with this one.
I have two PATA and two SATA disks in my home system. When the system
comes up, these are, espectively, /dev/hda, /dev/hdb, /dev/sda and
/dev/sdb. I have the boot order of the drives in the boot PROM set to
boot from /dev/sda (hard drive 2), the
Installed the freetds rpms from centos-extras, also tried the ones in
rpmforge
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/extras/x86_64/RPMS/freetds-0.64-11.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/extras/x86_64/RPMS/freetds-devel-0.64-11.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Compiled python-sybase-0.39 b
Dac Chartrand wrote:
>
> On 5-Oct-08, at 10:10 PM, nate wrote:
>
>> Are there any packages installed that weren't part of the
>> *base* CentOS?
>
> PS: I can't answer this question. I inherited a CentOS 5.2 VPS and
> moved forward from there.
> Accusing me of screwing something up when I pretty mu
Dac Chartrand wrote:
>
> Well. this is definitely good advice. But for the rest of us looking
> to use yum, you know, the default CentOS package management software,
> it seems a bit odd top to say "you shouldn't have used yum" when all
> the documentation I searched for led to it?
I didn't mean
On 5-Oct-08, at 10:10 PM, nate wrote:
Are there any packages installed that weren't part of the
*base* CentOS?
PS: I can't answer this question. I inherited a CentOS 5.2 VPS and
moved forward from there.
I wrote support and they looked into it. None of their other installs
exhibit the s
On 5-Oct-08, at 10:10 PM, nate wrote:
Perhaps you should use a distribution that includes all of the
packages you need rather than trying to bolt a bunch of
3rd party stuff on to CentOS.
Only a the PHP packages came from a 3rd party, Everything else as far
as I know comes from CentOS-Base.r
Dac Chartrand wrote:
> Well, here's where I disagree What's non standard in my install other
> than PHP? Furthermore, uninstalling PHP does nothing?
Are there any packages installed that weren't part of the
*base* CentOS?
Perhaps you should use a distribution that includes all of the
packages yo
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 03:02 +1100, Damian S wrote:
> Anyway, to cut a long story short, I have discovered that SELinux is
> preventing erlang from accessing its crypto libs.
> This message appears in the SELinux audit logs:
> type=AVC msg=audit(1223133076.770:102): avc: denied { execmod } for
>
He installed some software that
affects threading and it's likely other things (that he didn't
notice yet)
are also affected. It's still weird, though. If you do not
overwrite any
base files you won't hit this problem.
Woah.
Well, here's where I disagree What's non standard in my install
Hi Guys,
After some moths the server has been running in SELinux Permesive mode
... Some avc: denied messages has been recored ... I thought it was
time to go to the next step and set SELinux Enforcing mode in the
server ... it is a mail(postfix+cyrus+sasl), web, snmp with mrtg,
squid sever with
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:06 PM, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:12 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:19 PM, <
Iulian Badea wrote:
Hello all,
I have 2 x 250GB sata disks (sda and sdb).
# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id Syste
Bob Hoffman wrote:
I think you are saying not only do you want to keep the data but also keep
the whole system setup.
I tersely outlined how to do this earlier.
in more detail...
1) boot a rescue CD,
2) drop the mirrors on sdb,
3) repartition and mkfs on sdb1 to use as temporary
I think you are saying not only do you want to keep the data but also keep
the whole system setup.
Not sure how to do that...however..
If I could back the whole drive up on a third I would just start over and
then move my config files and data over after done.
Hope this tutorial helps, this is
Iulian Badea wrote:
My solution, please tell me if I'm right:
-remove the entire sdb disk from raid
-remove sda2 from raid
-resize sda1 (the rest of disk)
I dislike resizing partitions in place.
I'd far rather backup the partitions with dump (8), then repartition,
mkfs, and restore with
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:12 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vandaman just began posting in this mailing list and he
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:12 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh no not another n00b. n00bs should probably have to go to boot camp or :-
>>
>> There ar
RobertH wrote on Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:39:26 -0700:
> Why does disabling something that the centos website says is "highly
> recommended" (multiple times) fix this issue?
Because he has a non-standard setup. In case you didn't recognize:
stopping mysqld also fixes his problem! He installed some sof
My solution, please tell me if I'm right:
-remove the entire sdb disk from raid
-remove sda2 from raid
-resize sda1 (the rest of disk)
-copy partition table from sda to sdb
-make raid between sda1/sdb1 and sda3 and sdb3
Is this possible?
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:15:40 -0700, John R Pierce <[EMAIL
Iulian Badea wrote:
Hello all,
I have 2 x 250GB sata disks (sda and sdb).
# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id Syste
Hello all,
I have 2 x 250GB sata disks (sda and sdb).
# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 *
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Olaf Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
>> Can you please look at my problem ?
> In my opinion you have not give us enough information to solve this
> problem. Are you using wep, wpa, wpa2, wpa_supplicant, *-fwcutter? What
> module are y
>
> z00dax in irc made a good point, that I should mention that this is a
> VPS and i have root access. No one else is on this machine.
>
> Furthermore, disabling the fastestmirror plugin solves the problem
> for now. (thanks z00dax)
>
> If anything else weird happens i'll write back.
>
> Than
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Oh no not another n00b. n00bs should probably have to go to boot camp or :-
>
> There are some very helpful people in the UK on this list. I am sorry
> that y
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:32 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Vandaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Look at the following post and welcome to the CentOS Mailing List.
>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/065626.html
>>
>> Trim your mails,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> Note: This began in the thread "[CentOS] Probably a bad setup but
>> which one?" but I don't want to hijack that thread. "tech" began with
>> a similar problem, with the Perl "Hello World" script.
>
> Oh no not
Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Hello.
> Can you please look at my problem ?
In my opinion you have not give us enough information to solve this
problem. Are you using wep, wpa, wpa2, wpa_supplicant, *-fwcutter? What
module are you loading, anything blacklisted in /etc/modprobe.conf
or /etc/modprobe.d
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Sun, 05 Oct 2008 10:28:06 +0200:
> warning: connect to postgrey/socket: Permission denied
> problem talking to server postgrey/socket: Permission denied
SELinux enabled?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactiv
Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
Hi folks,
I have installed postgrey from the rpmforge repo, but it does not work
well with postfix from CentOS 5.2: I always get the error:
warning: connect to postgrey/socket: Permission denied
problem talking to server postgrey/socket: Permission denied
But the permis
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
Is there someone that can explain why I get incorrect results on centos
4.6 and 4.7 but not on centos 5.2??
test000:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
2008-10-26
test000:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1
Hi folks,
I have installed postgrey from the rpmforge repo, but it does not work well
with postfix from CentOS 5.2: I always get the error:
warning: connect to postgrey/socket: Permission denied
problem talking to server postgrey/socket: Permission denied
But the permissions on the socket see
Akemi,
Can you please look at my problem ?
Thanks in advance.
--
Ashish Vijaywargiya
Indore (M.P), India
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indore
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Akemi & Others,
>
> Today I reformated my laptop Dell Precision
34 matches
Mail list logo
