Robert Nichols wrote:
These shouldn't make any difference. The limit is on the size of the
expanded shell command line.
Really?
$ M=0; N=0; for W in `find /usr -xdev 2>/dev/null`; do M=$(($M+1));
N=$(($N+${#W}+1)); done; echo $M $N
156304 7677373
vs.
$ /bin/echo `find /usr -xdev 2>/dev/
>>Error: Missing Dependency: libhdf5.so.0 is needed by package octave
JohnStanley Writes:
yum whatprovides libhdf5.so.0
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: ftp.linux.ncsu.edu
* updates: styx.biochem.wfubmc.edu
* addons: mirror.atlantic.net
* extra
Les Mikesell wrote:
thad wrote:
it should be:
for i in `ls /var/amavis/tmp`
do
rm $i
done
These shouldn't make any difference. The limit is on the size of the
expanded shell command line.
Really?
$ M=0; N=0; for W in `find /usr -xdev 2>/dev/null`; do M=$(($M+1));
N=$(($N+${#W}+1)); do
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:21:14AM +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>
> Mark Maskery a écrit :
>>
>> We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in
>> which, in general, the customer does not have direct access to the
>> operating system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 10-16-2008 7:57 PM R P Herrold spake the following:
>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>> Godwin's law declared on the thread
>>
>> -- Russ herrold
> That's one I hadn't heard in a long time! ;-P
>
Oh, my l
thad wrote:
Satchel Paige - "Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you."
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/10/17 Jussi Hirvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how
trying to install octave from epel onto centos 5.2, and getting
dependency errors. only place I could find this RPM was in epel, which
I 'thought' ran on native rhel5/centos5 without requiring any other
repos, but I guess I'm wrong?!?
google tells me libhdf5 is some sot of 'heirarchial data f
Scott Silva (Mail Scanner) Wrote:
>TCP/IP works the same way no matter what country you are from. The terms
are
>the same, and if someone uses the wrong term, it is not the language
>difference, that person just learned the wrong term.
Yes, works the same in all Countries. Layers 1,2,3 of the OSI
Satchel Paige - "Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you."
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/17 Jussi Hirvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
>> (ls), or how large d
on 10-17-2008 3:25 PM John spake the following:
>> I wonder why I cant do that, seeing as have been doing it over 10 years.
> One
>> often misguided approach to setting them up is, facing it directly into
> the
>> open internet. Your as good as gone when someone hits up the ftp port on
>> that shin
on 10-17-2008 9:13 AM Marko Vojinovic spake the following:
> --- On Fri, 10/17/08, Spike Turner wrote:
>> A quick glance at the kbs repo http://centos.karan.org/
>> shows an rpm in testing djvulibre-3.5.19-4.el5.kb.i386.rpm
>> but you can have a glance at the repoview.
>
> Aha! Ok, I was not awar
On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 16:32, Ian Levesque
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included
with the
CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer.
From what I see, the kernel in /isolinux/vmlinuz on the Ce
> I wonder why I cant do that, seeing as have been doing it over 10 years.
One
> often misguided approach to setting them up is, facing it directly into
the
> open internet. Your as good as gone when someone hits up the ftp port on
> that shiny new PIX and tunnels right in.
I never heard anyone ca
John wrote:
> "I have no idea what you are trying to tell me - you cannot "subnet out" one
> IP address to "your PIX firewall"."
>
> I wonder why I cant do that, seeing as have been doing it over 10 years. One
> often misguided approach to setting them up is, facing it directly into the
> open int
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 16:32, Ian Levesque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included with the
> CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer.
>From what I see, the kernel in /isolinux/vmlinuz on the CentOS 5.2
x86_64 installer CD (which I'm pretty certain is
"Yes, because that up there contains exactly *one* IP address - so I'd
hardly
call that "blocks"."
Where I'm from we call it Blocks or Ipaddy. :-)
"I have no idea what you are trying to tell me - you cannot "subnet out" one
IP address to "your PIX firewall"."
I wonder why I cant do that, seeing
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Ian Levesque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included with the
CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer. I need to verify hardware compatibility
(especially ethernet and SATA) prior to making a purcha
On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Ian Levesque
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included
with the
CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer. I need to verify hardware compatibility
(especially ethernet
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Ian Levesque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included with the
> CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer. I need to verify hardware compatibility
> (especially ethernet and SATA) prior to making a purchase decision,
> > rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
> >
> > and get only "argument list too long" as feedback.
> >
> > Is there a way to go round this problem?
> >
> > I have CentOS 5.2.
> >
> It isn't a problem with the commands, it is a problem of how
> long a command
> line can be when piped to a command.
>
> rm -rf
Hello,
I'm curious where I can find the config for the kernel included with
the CentOS 5.2 x86_64 installer. I need to verify hardware
compatibility (especially ethernet and SATA) prior to making a
purchase decision, and reckon that seeing what's included with the
installer would be the m
See "man dhcpd" for the details, but I think it would be something like:
# dhcpd -cf /etc/dhcpd-subnetA.conf -lf
/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd-subnetA.leases -pf /var/run/dhcpd-subnetA.pid eth0
# dhcpd -cf /etc/dhcpd-subnetB.conf -lf
/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd-subnetB.leases -pf /var/run/dhcpd-subnetB.pid Eth1
-
John wrote:
> Yeah, but you cannot really subnet that way:
>
>
> JohnStanley Writes:
>
> So let me understand that your saying that if I am Allocated and Own the IP
> blocks 64.x.x.33 - 64.x.x.35 that I can not Subnet them Out in any way?
Yes, because that up there contains exactly *one* IP ad
--- On Fri, 10/17/08, tech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: tech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [CentOS] CGI configuration - second post
> To: centos@centos.org
> Date: Friday, October 17, 2008, 1:12 AM
> This is my second request for help with this problem. I have
> followed
> the suggestio
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 15:51, Marcus Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is definitely not what I am trying to do. I try to line out the
> setup again:
>
> Subnet A (192.168.2.x) <-> DHCP Server with 2 NICs <-> Subnet B (10.1.0.0)
>
> Clients on Subnet A should get a static IP from the
on 10-17-2008 2:30 AM Jussi Hirvi spake the following:
> Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
> (ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
> say, for example
>
> rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
>
> and get only "argument list too
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Scott Silva wrote:
This thread has got to have beaten the CentOS record for
most posts about nothing!
Or the longest off-topic thread about off-topic threads!
or a sad demonstation by people who know better ignoring
Godwin's Law
If people are unwilling to follow long
on 10-16-2008 5:15 PM Clint Dilks spake the following:
>
>>
>> I get a 404 on the url in the OP's post, but if someone has a url to
>> the driver disk in question, I can try and look at what the issue
>> might be
>>
>>
> Hi
>
> http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_103_13121.shtm
>
> Or go to http://w
My personal opinion, if you're using RFC1918 addresses for internal
> networks, you should only use 255.255.255.0 netmasks everywhere, even
> though it's a network for one machine only. Dealing with netmasks is a
> PITA, and should be avoided unless there's a real reason to use it,
> for instance w
>
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=16821&forum=18
>
> So, people who are interested, please join in and post your comments
> and thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Akemi
> (toracat, CentOS forum MODERATOR)
This thread has got to have beaten the CentOS record fo
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 14:02, ann kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to reuse command in the shell historys
> Which command I can only select "traceroute 192.168.0.5" to run?
I would type "Ctrl-R" (interactive search history starting with more
recent events), then type "trace", then typ
on 10-16-2008 7:57 PM R P Herrold spake the following:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> I'd have to suggest that the 'default' list (eg this one) should be
>> the most general and beginner oriented, and any new additional lists
>> should be the ones with the narrower focus (centos-
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, ann kok wrote:
Which command I can only select "traceroute 192.168.0.5" to run?
$ history |grep traceroute
26 traceroute 192.168.0.5
27 traceroute -n 192.168.0.5
28 traceroute 192.168.0.10
29 traceroute yahoo.com
46 traceroute 192.168.0.33
csh history
!26
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
My personal opinion, if you're using RFC1918 addresses for internal
networks, you should only use 255.255.255.0 netmasks everywhere, even
though it's a network for one machine only. Dealing with netmasks is a
PITA, and should be avoided unless there's a real reason to
ann kok wrote:
Hi all
I want to reuse command in the shell historys
Which command I can only select "traceroute 192.168.0.5" to run?
$ history |grep traceroute
26 traceroute 192.168.0.5
27 traceroute -n 192.168.0.5
28 traceroute 192.168.0.10
29 traceroute yahoo.com
46 tra
Yeah, but you cannot really subnet that way:
JohnStanley Writes:
So let me understand that your saying that if I am Allocated and Own the IP
blocks 64.x.x.33 - 64.x.x.35 that I can not Subnet them Out in any way? I
have always done that between for inbetween LAN to WAN Back to LAN or VPN.
Examp
Hi all
I want to reuse command in the shell historys
Which command I can only select "traceroute 192.168.0.5" to run?
$ history |grep traceroute
26 traceroute 192.168.0.5
27 traceroute -n 192.168.0.5
28 traceroute 192.168.0.10
29 traceroute yahoo.com
46 traceroute 192.168.0.
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 13:18, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To early in the day for all this math.
It really is! :-)
> Your right saying x.31 - x.63 for
> that particular SN, with x.63 being the broadcast addy and x.31 the network
> addy.
Actually, x.32 to x.63, with x.32 being the ne
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Jeremy Sanders
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This limitation has been removed from more recent kernels.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutil
Sean Carolan wrote:
We have several dozen production Linux servers and I would like to
have better control over what files are changed, by whom, when they
were changed, etc. Because these are all production servers that are
in use 24x7, we do not have the luxury of simply doing a clean build,
ta
Felipe,
JohnStanley Writes.
Whoops, you Hit Send A little to Soon. Only if you waited.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Isn't this wrong? If the netmask is .224, it should be either
192.168.0.0-31 or 192.168.0.32-63. 192.168.0.16 does not make sense
here.
JohnStanley Writes: Follow Up to Previous Mail!!
Filipe,
To early in the day for all this math. Your right saying x.31 - x.63 for
that particular SN, with x.6
Akemi Yagi wrote:
I can go on with my response to your personal view, but doing so would
be way off-topic here in this thread. Therefore, I started an open
discussion session in the right place for this topic - not
surprisingly - in the CentOS forum:
How can a forum possibly be the right plac
> # Here is Subnet number 2.
> subnet 192.168.0.16 netmask 255.255.255.224 { # Subnet for 29 computers
Isn't this wrong? If the netmask is .224, it should be either
192.168.0.0-31 or 192.168.0.32-63. 192.168.0.16 does not make sense
here.
Filipe
JohnStanley Writes:
On subnet 192.168.0.16 with a
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Sean Carolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have several dozen production Linux servers and I would like to
> have better control over what files are changed, by whom, when they
> were changed, etc. Because these are all production servers that are
> in use 24x7,
John wrote:
> > # Here is Subnet number 2. subnet 192.168.0.16 netmask
> > 255.255.255.224 { # Subnet for 29 computers
>
> Isn't this wrong? If the netmask is .224, it should be either
> 192.168.0.0-31 or 192.168.0.32-63. 192.168.0.16 does not make sense
> here.
>
> > On subnet 192.168.0.16 with a
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:37, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On subnet 192.168.0.16 with a mask of 255.255.255.224 will give enuff ips
> for 29 clients. One for the broadcast addy.
I think you are mistaken here, with netmask 255.255.255.224 you can
have network 192.168.0.0 (from 0 to 31)
We have several dozen production Linux servers and I would like to
have better control over what files are changed, by whom, when they
were changed, etc. Because these are all production servers that are
in use 24x7, we do not have the luxury of simply doing a clean build,
taking md5sums of each f
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Spike Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> Spike Turner wrote:
>>
>> > Who would like the mailing list to be as fragmented
>> > as the CentOS forum? Fragmentation means erosion of
>> > the userbase and is not good for the community.
>> >
>> >
--- On Fri, 10/17/08, Spike Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A quick glance at the kbs repo http://centos.karan.org/
> shows an rpm in testing djvulibre-3.5.19-4.el5.kb.i386.rpm
> but you can have a glance at the repoview.
Aha! Ok, I was not aware of the kbs repo. I see the djvulibre in testing
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:52:15AM -0400, Jerry Geis enlightened us:
>/ I am trying to increment a filename in a script example name is 01.txt
/>/ and I need to keep the leading 0's. I have no problem if the name was
/>/ 1.txt, 2.txt etc...
/>/ var=`expr $var + 1`
/>/
/>/ however how do I
Tech wrote on Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:34:02 +0800:
> I did go back and verify one thing, when the IT guy was testing and it
> worked for him, he was using www.domain.com/cgi-bin/install.cgi and not
> just www.domain.com. That also failed for him.
Of course, it does. If you have a URL http://www.exam
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:52:15AM -0400, Jerry Geis enlightened us:
> I am trying to increment a filename in a script example name is 01.txt
> and I need to keep the leading 0's. I have no problem if the name was
> 1.txt, 2.txt etc...
> var=`expr $var + 1`
>
> however how do I keep the leadi
I am trying to increment a filename in a script example name is 01.txt
and I need to keep the leading 0's. I have no problem if the name was
1.txt, 2.txt etc...
var=`expr $var + 1`
however how do I keep the leading 0's?
Thanks,
Jerry
___
CentOS
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 12:13 +0200, Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I have lots of messages like these appearing on my local CentOS 5.2
> consoles:
> > Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: printk: 1 messages suppressed.
> > Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
And next time you ask something please include *error* messages.
Ralph,
Sorry. I should have said that there is nothing in the error log. I have
entries in the access log but not the error log. I had one before but
I did a complete format and re-install and it is go
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:32, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Here is Subnet number 2.
> subnet 192.168.0.16 netmask 255.255.255.224 { # Subnet for 29 computers
Isn't this wrong? If the netmask is .224, it should be either
192.168.0.0-31 or 192.168.0.32-63. 192.168.0.16 does not make sen
Spike Turner wrote on Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT):
> - some may not view the centos forum as fragmented
> but is the participation at the same level as the
> unfragmented mailing list?
Couldn't it be that some people simply prefer email over HTML forums?
Especially those that have less
Thanks for your response Karanbir.
I will be putting this through our legal team.
Mark
Original Message
From: Karanbir Singh
Sent: 17/10/2008 13:30:
Mark Maskery wrote:
> We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in which,
> in general, the customer
Thank you for your input Les.
Mark
Original Message
From: Les Mikesell
Sent: 17/10/2008 14:02:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in
>> which, in general, the customer does not have direct access to the
>> operatin
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> So yum does not help here, or I need another repository
> which has djvulibre package for CentOS 5.2, or some other
> way to be able to view djvu files. Please give some advise
> on this.
>
A quick glance at the kbs repo http://centos.karan.org/
shows an rpm in testing
Karanbir Singh wrote:
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in
which, in general, the customer does not have direct access to the
operating system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS as the
underlying operating system and if so what licence considerations ar
Yes, you are right - my example was misleading.
Thanks for the very easy solution (cd into directory). Have to try it the
next time.
- Jussi
Paul Bijnens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (17.10.2008 13:18):
> I believe you gave a bad example!
> In the command
>
> rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
>
> the
Jeremy Sanders wrote:
piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
that in Fedora.
This limitation has been removed from more recent kernels.
http://git.ker
The two subnets are not physically connected but a Client should be
able to connect to Subnet A or to Subnet B as well.
JohnStanley Writes:
This is what is confusing. If there *NOT* Physically Connected you will
never CONNECT to them. Hope you can calculate SNs ans SNMs. You can add as
many Nested
Spike Turner wrote on Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:28:17 -0700 (PDT):
> Popular huh?
You didn't get the subtile irony?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
Mark Maskery wrote:
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in which,
in general, the customer does not have direct access to the operating
system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS as the underlying
operating system and if so what licence considerations are th
--- On Fri, 10/17/08, Spike Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> You cannot get an rpm for CentOS 4 and hope it will
> "just work"
> on CentOS 5. What repositories have you got configured as
> djvulibre-3.5.17-1.el4.rf is for el4?
I didn't get this rpm using yum, but by ma
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> Spike Turner wrote:
>
> > Who would like the mailing list to be as fragmented
> > as the CentOS forum? Fragmentation means erosion of
> > the userbase and is not good for the community.
> >
> > Spike.
>
> Once again you are referring to the CentOS forum. Are you
> saying th
adrian kok wrote:
Do you know whether snmpwalk can work in v3?
if not, how can I get the snmp v3 info
Yes.
# snmpwalk --help
Look at the following switches then.
-a PROTOCOL
-l LEVEL
-u USER
-x PROTOCOL
-X PASSPHRASE
Regards,
Max
___
CentOS ma
Hi
Do you know whether snmpwalk can work in v3?
if not, how can I get the snmp v3 info
Thank you
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Fedora I used to use djvulibre package for djvu files,
> but I cannot seem to find this in any CentOS repositores out
> there. Google also does not help, nor searching list
> archives. :-(
>
> I have found the .rpm file for RHEL 4, but when I tried to
> install it (hop
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Spike Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who would like the mailing list to be as fragmented
> as the CentOS forum? Fragmentation means erosion of
> the userbase and is not good for the community.
>
> Spike.
Once again you are referring to the CentOS forum. Are
Greetings to everyone!
On Fedora I used to use djvulibre package for djvu files, but I cannot seem to
find this in any CentOS repositores out there. Google also does not help, nor
searching list archives. :-(
I have found the .rpm file for RHEL 4, but when I tried to install it (hoping
that it
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Lawrence Guirre ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> kirjoitteli (17.10.2008 12:55):
>> piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
>
> Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
>
> A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
> that in Fedo
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Lawrence Guirre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (17.10.2008 12:55):
> > piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
>
> Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
>
> A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
> that in Fedora
tech wrote:
> If I run either of these scripts from a browser using www.domain.com it
> fails. If I run it from a browser using
> www.domain.com/cgi-bin/install.cgi or
> www.domain.com/cgi-bin/techtest.cgi it works.
Yes. Look at ScriptAlias in the config. And at the SELinux contexts in
that
>> piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
>Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
>A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
>that in Fedora.
Are you sure you are comparing apples to apples? There is nothing
particularly Centos speci
Spike Turner wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
> > > Out of curiosity which major linux distro operates
> > > a fragmented mailing list such as the one proposed?
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
> > http://lists.debian.org/completeindex.html
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> > https:
Lawrence Guirre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (17.10.2008 12:55):
> piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
Ok, thanks for ideas, Laurent and Lawrence.
A strange limitation in ls and rm, though. My friend said he hasn't seen
that in Fedora.
- Jussi
--
Jussi Hirvi * Gre
On 2008-10-17 11:30, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only "argument list too long" as feedback.
Is ther
Hi folks,
I have lots of messages like these appearing on my local CentOS 5.2
consoles:
Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: printk: 1 messages suppressed.
Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address
as source address
I have disabled console logging in syslog.conf, a
piping ls to xargs should do the trick. man xargs for details.
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only "ar
2008/10/17 Jussi Hirvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
> (ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
> say, for example
>
>rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
>
> and get only "argument list too long" as feedb
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only "argument list too long" as feedback.
Is there a way to go round this problem?
I have
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Given the popularity of this thread, I suggest creating a
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, where folks can discuss
> list-related stuff.
>
Popular huh? Let as see some stats on the
posts by user
* Karanbir Singh (15)
* Spike Turner (10)
* Spiro Harvey (8)
* Kenneth Price (5)
* Fra
Mark Maskery a écrit :
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in which,
in general, the customer does not have direct access to the operating
system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS as the underlying
operating system and if so what licence considerations a
I have not found a definitive answer
to this question on the CentOS site yet.
We develop and sell a server based application as an appliance in
which, in general, the customer does not have direct access to the
operating system. My question is, are we allowed to use CentOS as the
underlying op
This is my second request for help with this problem. I have followed
the suggestions given the first time and made some progress but I still
have one final problem/question.
I have two CGI scripts that don't work. One is the standard Set-Cookie,
examples can be found all over the net, that se
Trying to figure out how to make it work. Seems as though it should be
pretty easy.
installed package (from yum search)
avahi-compat-libdns_sd.i386 : Libraries for Apple Bonjour mDNSResponder
compatibility.
/etc/nsswitch.conf altered line so it reads,
hosts: files dns mdns mdns4
started av
91 matches
Mail list logo
