John wrote:
This one is for EPEL 5 on there site.
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/8177721/com/hdf5-1.6.7-1.el5.i38
6.rpm.html
I installed the hdf5 package off EPEL (via yum install hdf5) and my yum
install octave still fails with the same error.
Error: Missing Dependency: lib
Dear John,
>> Subnet A (192.168.2.x) <-> DHCP Server with 2 NICs <-> Subnet B (10.1.0.0)
>>
>> Clients on Subnet A should get a static IP from the host declaration.
>> Clients on Subnet B should obtain dynamic IP addresses from a range.
>> The two subnets are not physically connected but a CLIENT s
Hi all,I have problem on CentOS 5.2
while everything is working great,suddenly i have this error when i login my
server,
sudo su -
-bash: /bin/egrep: cannot execute binary file
-bash: /bin/egrep: cannot execute binary file
-bash: /bin/egrep: cannot execute binary file
-bash: /bin/hostname: cannot
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 23:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Robert Nichols wrote:
> >
> >> These shouldn't make any difference. The limit is on the size of the
> >> expanded shell command line.
> >
> > Really?
> >
> > $ M=0; N=0; for W in `find /usr -xdev 2>/dev/null`; do M=$(($M+1));
> > N=$((
I installed the hdf5 package off EPEL (via yum install hdf5) and my yum
install octave still fails with the same error.
Error: Missing Dependency: libhdf5.so.0 is needed by package octave
when I look at that hdf5 package, I see...
# rpm -ql hdf5
/usr/bin/gif2h5
/usr/bin/h52gif
/usr/bin/h52gifge
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 06:00 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> The longest command line in this case is "find /usr -xdev', 15
> characters. Find "sees" only 10 characters.
Uh, +1 for the \0 that terminates each parameter? Need more java here.
>
--
Bill
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 06:00 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
Ok. 3rd cup of coffee has made its way into various of my systems. A
minor correction (but important for us pedantic typers) is below.
> main(argc, *argv[]) /* could be **argv instead */
main(int argc, char *argv[]) /* co
Marcus Wrote:
I also wonder if it's really necessary to run two instances of DHCP
with separate config files as dhcpd3 is able to detect the Subnets on
which it may deploy leases, depending on the NIC configuration.
JohnStanley Writes.
The two commands I posted for you to set it up that way can be
Les Mikesell wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
These shouldn't make any difference. The limit is on the size of the
expanded shell command line.
Really?
$ M=0; N=0; for W in `find /usr -xdev 2>/dev/null`; do M=$(($M+1));
N=$(($N+${#W}+1)); done; echo $M $N
156304 7677373
vs.
$ /bin/echo `fi
On Oct 17, 2008, at 7:58 PM, thad wrote:
Satchel Paige - "Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you."
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/10/17 Jussi Hirvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listing
Dear John.
> The two commands I posted for you to set it up that way can be done in a
> Single File Configuration. The last config file I posted for you was for two
> NICS on two different Subnets.
I am not yet sure if we are talking about the same problem, so here is
my current configuration. Un
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008, Semih Gokalp wrote:
>
> Hi all,I have problem on CentOS 5.2
> while everything is working great,suddenly i have this error when i
> login my server,
This could well mean that your system has been cracked. These
programs are frequently changed in common root exploits.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Semih Gokalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sudo su -
What are you expecting this command to do? If you want to 'sudo' a
command, do that. If you want to 'su,' do that. But don't mix the
two together.
mhr
___
CentOS m
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:38 AM, ArcosCom Linux User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On new CentOS 5.2 installation (and ugradation before config the diferent
> programs I use), I'm having problems with Thunderbird 2.0.0.17.
> Problem 1:
> I configured my e-mail account (as I have in my old machine) a
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:40:26PM -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Semih Gokalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > sudo su -
>
> What are you expecting this command to do? If you want to 'sudo' a
> command, do that. If you want to 'su,' do that. But don't mix the
> two toge
John wrote:
> Correct there. Classless Inter Domain Routing, never really got into doing
> that.
Do tell.
> Largest I have dealt with was 1500 nodes and cidr is not needed there.
Ermm. Classful routing is *dead*, CIDR is needed *everywhere*.
> My main thing has always been getting a network pr
Jussi Hirvi a écrit :
> Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS can show
> (ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really annoying to
> say, for example
>
> rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
>
> and get only "argument list too long" as feedback.
I doubt this
On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:13 PM, mouss wrote:
Jussi Hirvi a écrit :
Since when is there a limit in how long directory listings CentOS
can show
(ls), or how large directories can be removed (rm). It is really
annoying to
say, for example
rm -rf /var/amavis/tmp
and get only "argument list t
> and get only "argument list too long" as feedback.
>
> Is there a way to go round this problem?
>
> I have CentOS 5.2.
>
I'm not going to repeat some of the good advice given to you by others
as to how to avoid this error, but will instead tell you this is related
to the ARG_MAX variable.
The
I guess I'm sort of surprised and I expected better performance
I have a new server set up with RAID 10 drives (6)
Repeated a number of times and though I am clumsy with stop watch
timing, these numbers appear to be close enough for government work...
Server, CentOS 5.2 and updated earlier today
20 matches
Mail list logo
