Re: [CentOS] Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-29 Thread nate
Ian Masters wrote: > Just want to double-check before I dive in. > yep your right.. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] cmirror - CentOS

2008-10-29 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, I might have missed something in the list here.. But could someone point out some introductory material / docs regarding cmirror? Is there something (even beta would do) in CentOS to read and understand about this? OT- On Fossils: While I cannot claim "Fossil state" anywhere near some

RE: [CentOS] Re: [OT] Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-29 Thread Sorin Srbu
William L. Maltby <> scribbled on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:13 PM: > Geez! You guys hammer on others all the time, but then you "forget" to > "edit the subject line" when replying to "digests", as requested by TPB. "TPB"?? The Pirate Bay? /Sorin (Who would go googling to find a site with listi

Re: [CentOS] Re: install 5.2 on new dv7z hp laptop

2008-10-29 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 20:51 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 10:40 -0700, MHR wrote: > > Heck, it's bad enough I talk to myself audibly > > Well, my grandma used to say it's OK to talk to yourself, but if you > start answering yourself you're in trouble. Following this th

RE: [CentOS] Re: [OT] Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-29 Thread Sorin Srbu
William L. Maltby <> scribbled on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:45 AM: >>> Geez! You guys hammer on others all the time, but then you "forget" to >>> "edit the subject line" when replying to "digests", as requested by TPB. >> >> "TPB"?? The Pirate Bay? > > Arrrgh! I need two more cups of coffee

RE: [CentOS] Re: [OT] Contents of CentOS digest...

2008-10-29 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 09:16 +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote: > William L. Maltby <> scribbled on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:13 PM: > > > Geez! You guys hammer on others all the time, but then you "forget" to > > "edit the subject line" when replying to "digests", as requested by TPB. > > "TPB"?? The Pi

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Karanbir Singh
Dag Wieers wrote: https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/software/channel/downloads/Download.do?cid=6002 https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/software/channel/downloads/Download.do?cid=6007 Would be so much nicer if Red Hat also realised this [1] and made some of those beta isos public. - KB [1]: Some RH people

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Mikael Fridh
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:36:35AM +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Dag Wieers wrote: >> https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/software/channel/downloads/Download.do?cid=6002 >> https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/software/channel/downloads/Download.do?cid=6007 > > Would be so much nicer if Red Hat also realised this [1

Re: [CentOS] Checking if a user is 'Disabled'

2008-10-29 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Tuesday 28 October 2008, R P Herrold wrote: > On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Tom Brown wrote: > > I need to create some local users but then 'disable' that user. I know i > > can enable and disable the user by using usermod -L and -U but does > > anyone know if there is a way for me to see the current sta

Re: [CentOS] changing partition priority on install

2008-10-29 Thread Monty Shinn
Phil Schaffner wrote: On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:59 -0500, Monty Shinn wrote: Greetings. I am in the process of installing 5.1 64 bit on a server. The server has 2 3ware cards: 9550SX 12 port, and a 8006 2 port, both SATA. Any reason not to use 5.2? Will save a lot of updates, and perhaps so

[CentOS] resize LVM (ext3)

2008-10-29 Thread David Hláčik
Hello guys, my scenario is following 1. I have LVM group named "system" 2. I have a logical volumes - system/root , ext3 mounted as / (20GB) - system/swap, swap - system/home, ext3 mounted as /home (431GB) I need to shrink system/home to 80GB (currently there is 57GB use

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 44, Issue 17

2008-10-29 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] resize LVM (ext3)

2008-10-29 Thread Luciano Rocha
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:58:32PM +0100, David Hláčik wrote: >1. How can i be sure that i will shrink ext3 to exact size 80GB and that dev=/dev/system/home resize2fs $dev 80G Then, to be sure of the real size: blks=$(tune2fs -l $dev | awk -F: '/Block size/ { print $2/512 }') fssize=$(tune2f

Re: [CentOS] resize LVM (ext3)

2008-10-29 Thread David Hláčik
> > > Now, for lvresize: > lvresize -L 80G system/home Are you sure there should not be lvreduce -L 80G system/home ? Thanks! D. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] freenx 7.3?

2008-10-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Les Mikesell wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >>> Has anyone built a freenx 7.3 for Centos 5? I'd like to be able to use >>> the session shadow mode on some machines. >>> >> >> Les, >> >> You can try the version of freenx here: >> >> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/nx/ >> >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Spike Turner wrote: > R P Herrold wrote: > >> yada, yada, grumble, mumble > > You know after all this time the CentOS frontpage > is still showing out of date info. You and Ralph > could have stopped wasting time and simply edited > the link to 4.7 instead of 4.4 as is the case now. > > Is the

Re: [CentOS] Possibly OT: intermittently long response times, when connecting to host

2008-10-29 Thread David G. Miller
Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:30 -0500, David Miller wrote: > I have a CentOS 5.2 server running Apache 2.2.3 (yum installed) and > drupal 6.5 on ESX 3.5. We're using Name Based Virtual Hosting on it - > 2 hosts. The problem is that when I pull up a web page

Re: [CentOS] resize LVM (ext3)

2008-10-29 Thread Luciano Rocha
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:38:06PM +0100, David Hláčik wrote: > > > > > > Now, for lvresize: > > lvresize -L 80G system/home > > Are you sure there should not be lvreduce -L 80G system/home ? Same thing. I prefer the direction-neutral lvresize. Regards, Luciano Rocha -- lfr 0/0 pgph8d6Kf9euL

[CentOS] Re: Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-29 Thread James B. Byrne
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:29:43 -0700 From: Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: > Even though the recommended swap is 2 times system memory, I have > never made a swap partition over 2 GB. Maybe I am also flirting > with disaster, but haven't been bit yet in years. I believe that the curren

[CentOS] how to get rid of "kerberos"

2008-10-29 Thread Marcelo M. Garcia
Hi How to get rid of kerberos, or at least to prevent to go into path? Where is defined the path for users? I need to configure and use rtools (I know that I should use ssh, but I need rtools) and I think very annoying the messages from Kerberized rsh or rlogin, like this: -sh-3.2$ rsh kitt

Re: [CentOS] Minimal CentOS

2008-10-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Karanbir Singh wrote: > Puneet Goel wrote: >> I need a light version of CentOS (I am very much particular >> about OS identity and the final product will retain the parent OS >> identity and quality). Can you provide me some kickstart file or >> something else which can help me in making a final t

Re: [CentOS] Re: Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-29 Thread Stephen Harris
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:56:34AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > I believe that the current recommendation is 2 x physical memory up to 2 > GB and then 1 x physical memory thereafter. > > See: > http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.2/html/Deployment_Guide/s1-swap-what-is.ht

Re: [CentOS] Possibly OT: intermittently long response times when connecting to host

2008-10-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
David Miller wrote: > --snip-- >> >> sounds sleepy - perhaps the mysql connections drop after inactivity and >> then it takes that long to connect >> >> You might just want to set up a cron script that does a curl or wget of >> a standard page every 2 minutes or so just to keep things active.

Re: [CentOS] resize LVM (ext3)

2008-10-29 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:58, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can i be sure that i will shrink ext3 to exact size 80GB and that the > same will lvreduce do? I do not want to cut from ext3 filesystem if i will > reduce logical volume too much Reduce the filesystem to 78G or 79G

Re: [CentOS] Possibly OT: intermittently long response times when connecting to host

2008-10-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
David Miller wrote: > --snip-- >> >> sounds sleepy - perhaps the mysql connections drop after inactivity and >> then it takes that long to connect >> >> You might just want to set up a cron script that does a curl or wget of >> a standard page every 2 minutes or so just to keep things active.

Re: [CentOS] resize LVM (ext3)

2008-10-29 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 10:15 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > > Reduce the filesystem to 78G or 79G with resize2fs, then reduce the LV > to 80G, then grow the ext3 filesystem again to fill all the LV. This > should make it safer when cutting the LV. That's what I always do. It eliminates sma

Re: [CentOS] how to get rid of "kerberos"

2008-10-29 Thread Tony Schreiner
/usr/kerberos/bin gets put in your path by /etc/profile.d/krb5- workstation.sh or krb5-workstation.csh. You can move them or comment them to prevent them from working or yum remove krb-workstation to remove the package. But you do know that rsh is not safe on an open network right? Tony S

[CentOS] Centos4.7, PHP5.1.6 & MSSQL

2008-10-29 Thread Adriano dos Santos Vieira (Hapia IN)
Hi, guys! How could I install mssql module on my environment? There are any centos-4.7 binary repository for this module? Thanks in advance. -- Adriano dos Santos Vieira ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Mikael Fridh wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:36:35AM +, Karanbir Singh wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/software/channel/downloads/Download.do?cid=6002 https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/software/channel/downloads/Download.do?cid=6007 Would be so much ni

[CentOS] External ext3 USB Hard drive and selinux

2008-10-29 Thread Al Freundorfer
I was directed to post this on the mailing list. See the following forum post as a reference. http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=16710&forum=42 I formatted my external ext3 372GB USB hard drive in ubuntu and now want to use it in Centos. I made sure that my group/user n

[CentOS] A few general questions

2008-10-29 Thread kevin kempter
Hi All; I ran Linux as my main laptop OS for several years, then I got into a mac shop and bought a macbook. The macbook is ok but it just doesn't cut it per productivity so I've ordered another laptop (a 64bit laptop with 8G of memory expandable to 16G and 2 internal 320G 7200rpm drives)

[CentOS] Can one invoke multiple INSTANCEs of Firefox on CentOS

2008-10-29 Thread James B. Byrne
I am doing some testing with XForms and I really need a separate instance of Firefox, one that shares nothing with my primary instance that has various reference works and web sites open, to test forms. Is this even possible? I have a sense from the small bit of testing that I have done that even

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Michael Simpson
On 10/29/08, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Mikael Fridh wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:36:35AM +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > > > Dag Wieers wrote: > > > > > > > > https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/software/channel/downloads/Download.do?cid=6002 > > > > > https:

Re: [CentOS] "core" installs of 5.2 missing crucial packages like yum, selinux-policy-targeted, vim-minimal, etc.

2008-10-29 Thread Johnny Tan
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Johnny Tan wrote on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:34:29 -0400: I had a 5.0 kickstart server which did "core" installs of CentOS (i.e.: "%packages --nobase"). And you have a @core in there as well? No, but adding that seems to work. In our 5.0 kickstart setup, we didn't need to pu

Re: [CentOS] Can one invoke multiple INSTANCEs of Firefox on CentOS

2008-10-29 Thread Barry Brimer
Quoting "James B. Byrne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am doing some testing with XForms and I really need a separate instance > of Firefox, one that shares nothing with my primary instance that has > various reference works and web sites open, to test forms. Is this even > possible? I have a sense f

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Spike Turner wrote: >> R P Herrold wrote: >> >>> yada, yada, grumble, mumble >> >> You know after all this time the CentOS frontpage >> is still showing out of date info. You and Ralph >> could have stopped wasting time an

Re: [CentOS] Possibly OT: intermittently long response times when connecting to host

2008-10-29 Thread David Miller
--snip-- > > Also, take a good look at the logs /var/log/messages and dmesg for hard > drive errors. Lots of times a bad drive will cause controller bus > resets that happen intermittently ... that can cause a 5-10 second delay > and then things seem to work fine till the next time. > > >

Re: [CentOS] Possibly OT: intermittently long response times when connecting to host

2008-10-29 Thread David Miller
>> --snip-- > > Also, make sure that this is not set in apache (the default is Off ... > but things like that can take massive amounts of time): > > HostnameLookups On > > Yup - HostnameLookups is off. Other than adding the virtual hosts I haven't altered the httpd.conf file. _

Re: [CentOS] boot problems

2008-10-29 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 at 9:35pm, Phil Schaffner wrote At the risk of sounding even MORE pedantic, many would appreciate it if you ran a spell-checker as well. (Grammar checkers seem to be beyond the state-of-the-art in email clients.) :D The GRUB shell is quiet powerful and can help in debugging

Re: [CentOS] A few general questions

2008-10-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:25 AM, kevin kempter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The macbook is ok but it just doesn't cut it per productivity so I've > ordered another laptop > (a 64bit laptop with 8G of memory expandable to 16G and 2 internal 320G > 7200rpm drives) > > I'll be loading Linux as soon

Re: [CentOS] replace

2008-10-29 Thread Marcelo Roccasalva
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Phil Schaffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mad Unix wrote: >> >> i need your feedback about this command, it should find a string in >> multiple html files in a directory and replace it with a different >> string... >> >> find /dir -name "*.html" -exec sed -i 's/"o

Re: [CentOS] Checking if a user is 'Disabled'

2008-10-29 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: >On Tuesday 28 October 2008, R P Herrold wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Tom Brown wrote: >> > I need to create some local users but then 'disable' that user. I know i >> > can enable and disable the user by using usermod -L and -U but does >> > anyone k

Re: [CentOS] cmirror - CentOS

2008-10-29 Thread MHR
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > : > OT- On Fossils: > While I cannot claim "Fossil state" anywhere near some of the people who > were doing cards -- I knew about them though -- when I was born, I have had > my spell flicking switches

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Spike Turner
Lanny Marcus wrote: > I believe Johnny's words were very well chosen, > accurate, excellent > and to the point. He and the other CentOS Developers should > know how > much 99% of the CentOS user base appreciate their hard > work, time and > dedication to this project. Very rare for us to see Johnn

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Spike Turner
Johnny Hughes wrote: > It is not about you ... please stop bring a complete ass. > > I edit the CentOS main page ... and you know what, there > are only so > many hours in a day, where I have to do $work so I can eat > and pay for > my house, as well as spend 40-60 hours a week on a free > proje

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Tru Huynh
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:26:12AM -0700, Spike Turner wrote: ... welcome to my kill file -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpiveBVIfFYp.pgp Description: PGP signature __

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Michael Holmes
Guys, this is getting really silly now. People are starting flame wars because a small team of contributors, who spend their free time they could be enjoying themselves doing more fun things, didn't update their website with a releas?. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this ML is for CentOS users to ass

Re: [CentOS] Possibly OT: intermittently long response times when connecting to host

2008-10-29 Thread David Miller
--snip-- > sounds sleepy - perhaps the mysql connections drop after inactivity and > then it takes that long to connect > > You might just want to set up a cron script that does a curl or wget of > a standard page every 2 minutes or so just to keep things active. > > Craig > > _

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread John Hinton
Spike Turner wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: It is not about you ... please stop bring a complete ass. I edit the CentOS main page ... and you know what, there are only so many hours in a day, where I have to do $work so I can eat and pay for my house, as well as spend 40-60 hours a week on a

[CentOS] OT - Please don't feed the Troll(s)

2008-10-29 Thread William L. Maltby
Folks, I fully understand the emotional need to respond to one who throws around terms like "Communist", "Tyrannical", etc. even if ostensibly framed as a rhetorical question. Certain terms and phrases are by nature pejorative and I;m sure the OP knew this when he entered his post. My feeling was

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Spike Turner
Tru Huynh wrote: > welcome to my kill file, I have not taken my > medication so i may be unstable Tru you need to find your tru calling. Meanwhile take your medication and try this dd if=/dev/zero of=/killfile bs=1024 count=1048576 Spike. __

Re: [CentOS] OT - Please don't feed the Troll(s)

2008-10-29 Thread Spike Turner
William L. Maltby wrote: > Folks, > > I fully understand the emotional need to respond to one who > throws > around terms like "Communist", > "Tyrannical", etc. even if ostensibly > framed as a rhetorical question. Certain terms and phrases > are by nature > pejorative and I;m sure the OP knew t

[CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread R P Herrold
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Spike Turner wrote: I believe it was a rhetorical question if the C is for the non-existent "Community participation" or if the C is for "Communism". Nowhere were people called "Communists". naw, performance artists can pretend to not understand their own work to heighten

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Tru Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:26:12AM -0700, Spike Turner wrote: > welcome to my kill file Mine too. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Spike Turner
Dag Wieers wrote: > So if we can improve the testing during the RHEL Beta > program, everyone in the CentOS community directly benefits > from that as well. Therefor it makes a lot of sense to > encourage the large CentOS community to take part in the > RHEL Beta program and help with improving t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread MHR
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Spike Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Calm down Johnny, don't lose it. Some constructive criticism > should be welcomed. I thought the withholding of kernel updates > for two weeks and the non-update of the CentOS webpage were a > deliberate action by the sam

[CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread R P Herrold
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Michael Holmes wrote: assist each other, not to post death threats and vague accusations. Keep on Michael, please google: killfile -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf

[CentOS] Re: RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Scott Silva
on 10-29-2008 11:54 AM Spike Turner spake the following: > Dag Wieers wrote: > >> So if we can improve the testing during the RHEL Beta >> program, everyone in the CentOS community directly benefits >> from that as well. Therefor it makes a lot of sense to >> encourage the large CentOS community

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Toby Bluhm
MHR wrote: As some will attest, the cost of said contributions may have now exceeded their value. -- tkb ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Michael Simpson wrote: On 10/29/08, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Mikael Fridh wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:36:35AM +, Karanbir Singh wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/software/channel/downloads/Download.do?cid=6002

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Spike Turner wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: So if we can improve the testing during the RHEL Beta program, everyone in the CentOS community directly benefits from that as well. Therefor it makes a lot of sense to encourage the large CentOS community to take part in the RHEL Beta

Re: [CentOS] Re: RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Scott Silva wrote: on 10-29-2008 11:54 AM Spike Turner spake the following: Dag Wieers wrote: So if we can improve the testing during the RHEL Beta program, everyone in the CentOS community directly benefits from that as well. Therefor it makes a lot of sense to encourage

[CentOS] Problem with svn/apache

2008-10-29 Thread Joe Tseng
I hope someone can help me with this b/c I'm stumped... I had set up an svn repository a while ago with an apache/webdav front end using the default centos packages. For some reason this morning it stopped working for me - it would give me a 403 error. I suppose the problem is with Apache and

Re: [CentOS] Can one invoke multiple INSTANCEs of Firefox on CentOS

2008-10-29 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:26 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > I am doing some testing with XForms and I really need a separate instance > of Firefox, one that shares nothing with my primary instance that has > various reference works and web sites open, to test forms. Is this even > possible? I have

Re: [CentOS] Problem with svn/apache

2008-10-29 Thread A. Kirillov
> I hope someone can help me with this b/c I'm stumped... I had set up > an svn repository a while ago with an apache/webdav front end using > the default centos packages. For some reason this morning it stopped > working for me - it would give me a 403 error. I suppose the problem > is with Ap

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Spiro Harvey
Spike Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is the "C" in CentOS supposed to be "Community" or > "Communist"? Maybe "T" from "Totalitarian" would be more > appropriate? > Calm down Johnny, don't lose it. Some constructive criticism > should be welcomed. Your comments were not constructive critici

[CentOS] Installer stopped short

2008-10-29 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hi, I just tried to install a CentOS 5 desktop on very recent hardware, an Acer desktop machine. The installer stopped short very early. I gave Ubuntu 8.04 a shot, and it installed without a problem. Now what can I do about this? Is there a way to use some "enhanced" kernel (like the centos.

Re: [CentOS] changing partition priority on install

2008-10-29 Thread Phil Schaffner
Monty Shinn wrote: Phil Schaffner wrote: On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:59 -0500, Monty Shinn wrote: Greetings. I am in the process of installing 5.1 64 bit on a server. The server has 2 3ware cards: 9550SX 12 port, and a 8006 2 port, both SATA. Any reason not to use 5.2? Will save a lot of upd

[CentOS] Re: Installer stopped short

2008-10-29 Thread Scott Silva
on 10-29-2008 2:54 PM Niki Kovacs spake the following: > Hi, > > I just tried to install a CentOS 5 desktop on very recent hardware, an > Acer desktop machine. The installer stopped short very early. I gave > Ubuntu 8.04 a shot, and it installed without a problem. Now what can I > do about this? >

Re: [CentOS] Installer stopped short

2008-10-29 Thread Spiro Harvey
> I just tried to install a CentOS 5 desktop on very recent hardware, > an Acer desktop machine. The installer stopped short very early. I How early is very early? Did it stop before the first Welcome to Centos screen, or did you get to disk partitioning? Knowing exactly where it dies can be usefu

Re: [CentOS] Installer stopped short

2008-10-29 Thread Spike Turner
Niki Kovacs wrote: > I just tried to install a CentOS 5 desktop on very recent > hardware, an Acer desktop machine. The installer stopped > short very early. I gave Ubuntu 8.04 a shot, and it > installed without a problem. Now what can I do about this? > > Is there a way to use some "enhanced" ke

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 Server CD - update frontpage

2008-10-29 Thread Spiro Harvey
I know it's going farther off the beaten topic here, but just received this email of warm wishes from our friend Spike Turner that I thought I'd share. It's not even necessary to insult him, he's done it all for himself. On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Spike Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[CentOS] Question re RHEL 5.3

2008-10-29 Thread MHR
I've heard now from more than one source about problems with CentOS (and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive handling, and I've even reported on this myself in this list before. My question is, do we have any idea if 5.3 has any improvements in this area? One of my cohorts here, who hap

Re: [CentOS] Question re RHEL 5.3

2008-10-29 Thread Karanbir Singh
MHR wrote: I've heard now from more than one source about problems with CentOS (and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive handling, and I've even reported on this myself in this list before. My question is, do we have any idea if 5.3 has any improvements in this area? do you have any

Re: [CentOS] Question re RHEL 5.3

2008-10-29 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:01 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've heard now from more than one source about problems with CentOS > (and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive handling, and I've > even reported on this myself in this list before. > > My question is, do we have any idea i

Re: [CentOS] Re: Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-29 Thread Christopher Chan
Stephen Harris wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:56:34AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: I believe that the current recommendation is 2 x physical memory up to 2 GB and then 1 x physical memory thereafter. See: http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.2/html/Deployment_Guide/s1-

Re: [CentOS] Question re RHEL 5.3

2008-10-29 Thread MHR
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > do you have any bug report numbers for these issues ? > No, and from what I saw on the RH bugzilla list of SATA disk related bugs, none of them seem to be that serious except w.r.t. specific controllers. I will go back

Re: [CentOS] changing partition priority on install

2008-10-29 Thread Monty Shinn
Phil Schaffner wrote: A GRUB boot CD (or floppy) will allay the above concerns. Do an "info grub" to find out how to create one. Can also boot from install media to recover a lost GRUB. I did not find an option during the install prep to re-locate grub to the MBR of /dev/sdb. I probably

Re: [CentOS] Question re RHEL 5.3

2008-10-29 Thread MHR
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The only issue I've ever seen has been with the onboard fakeraid stuff > more and more vendors seem to be adding. I've been using SATA disks > with centos since the early 4.x days without issue, so you have me at > a bit of

Re: [CentOS] Question re RHEL 5.3

2008-10-29 Thread Ben Mills
Jim Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:01 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've heard now from more than one source about problems with CentOS >> (and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive handling, and I've >> even reported on this myself in this list before. >> >> My question

[CentOS] RHEL 5.3 Beta released, beta-testers needed

2008-10-29 Thread Eugene Fong
I don't think a login can be registered unless you buy and activate a subscription ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-29 Thread John R Pierce
Stephen Harris wrote: In older BSD systems (eg around SunOS 4 times or before) swap space was utilised oddly; all memory was allocated from swap, so you needed _at least_ of swap just to use all your real memory! So if you added of swap then your total virtual memory size was still only . No

Re: [CentOS] Re: Apparently no swap configured

2008-10-29 Thread Stephen Harris
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:07:03PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > >In older BSD systems (eg around SunOS 4 times or before) swap space was > >utilised oddly; all memory was allocated from swap, so you needed _at > >least_ of swap just to use all your real memory! So if you