> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Chan
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:31 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Making a driver disk for installer was
> Runningthe installer from working linux
>
>
>
Now, the network card is not recognized during install.
The machine is running 4.7 right now, without any "special" drivers.
I did a lsmod and found I am using forcedeth, I went and downloaded the
forcedeth driver disk from nvidia, but no luck. It complains now drivers for my
hardware.
What
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Silva
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:52 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Re: mock
>
> on 11-5-2008 12:19 PM Jason Pyeron spake the following:
> >
> >
> >> -Original M
Sean Carolan wrote:
The size of the file doesn't make much difference. What matters is the
resolution and framerate of the vide
For a back-of-the napkin calculation can we not assume that data equal
to the entire size of the file will be streamed to the client during
playback? I understand th
on 11-5-2008 2:06 PM Sean Carolan spake the following:
>> The size of the file doesn't make much difference. What matters is the
>> resolution and framerate of the vide
>
> For a back-of-the napkin calculation can we not assume that data equal
> to the entire size of the file will be streamed to
on 11-5-2008 12:19 PM Jason Pyeron spake the following:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Silva
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:15 PM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: [CentOS] Re: mock
>>
>> on 11-5-2008 11:5
> The size of the file doesn't make much difference. What matters is the
> resolution and framerate of the vide
For a back-of-the napkin calculation can we not assume that data equal
to the entire size of the file will be streamed to the client during
playback? I understand that frame rate, etc.
> Don't forget that the data speed != line speed.
> A line will only carry about 70% of the line
> speed as data because of packet overheads.
Thanks for pointing this out. I believe I have enough information to
make my case. My guesstimate before seeing the actual file sizes was
that this would
Sean Carolan wrote:
Ok this is kind of a goofy question but I want to make sure I get it
right. Suppose we have a 25 mb video, that is 117 seconds long. If we
wish for this streaming video to play smoothly with no compression,
buffering or skipping, the following bandwidth requirements must be
m
Sean Carolan wrote:
Ok this is kind of a goofy question but I want to make sure I get it
right. Suppose we have a 25 mb video, that is 117 seconds long. If we
wish for this streaming video to play smoothly with no compression,
buffering or skipping, the following bandwidth requirements must be
m
Sean:
Don't forget that the data speed != line speed.
A line will only carry about 70% of the line
speed as data because of packet overheads.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox.
Visit http://www.spammilter.com for det
Ok this is kind of a goofy question but I want to make sure I get it
right. Suppose we have a 25 mb video, that is 117 seconds long. If we
wish for this streaming video to play smoothly with no compression,
buffering or skipping, the following bandwidth requirements must be
met:
25 megabytes = 20
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William L. Maltby
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:19 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: RE: [CentOS] mock
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:57 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > > -Origina
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Silva
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:15 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Re: mock
>
> on 11-5-2008 11:59 AM Jason Pyeron spake the following:
> >> -Original Message--
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:57 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William L. Maltby
> >
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe
> > Brandenburger
> > > >
> >
on 11-5-2008 11:59 AM Jason Pyeron spake the following:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:57 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mock
>>
>> Jason Pyeron wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
I guess this should become part of the virtualization SIG. Maybe a good
listing of different virtualization projects on the SIG page would be a
good start ?
yes, that sounds good.
I don't know if Daniel is still involved, but I am sure that help from
others would be very he
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:57 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mock
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4]$ find /var/spool/mirrors/centos/4/ |
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William L. Maltby
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:45 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: RE: [CentOS] mock
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:38 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >
> > > -Orig
Jason Pyeron wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4]$ find /var/spool/mirrors/centos/4/ | wc -l
11529
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4]$ find /var/spool/mirrors/centos/4/ | grep -i mock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4]$
Good timing; I am just going to push a new mock into c4 and c5 repo's in
a few minutes. You can test it on c4 t
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:38 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes it does. You could have found that out with yum yourself.
]$ yum list available yourself\*
Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, changelog, downloadonly, fastestmirror,
: fedorakmod, kernel-module, priorities, tsflag
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:38 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Brandenburger
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:15 PM
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] mock
> >
> > H
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Brandenburger
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:15 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mock
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 13:45, Jason Pyeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> I've been a RH/Fedora guy since the RH8 days. When
> Fedora came along, I
> moved to it, but its been a bit painful beta testing
> software all the
> time. I ran Ubuntu for a while, but I found their package
> management
> to be difficult... I do a lot of technical work,
>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:13, Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future of
>> disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool.
>
> There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a longer
> shelf life
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 13:45, Jason Pyeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the centos project maintain a copy of mock to install?
Yes it does. You could have found that out with yum yourself.
HTH,
Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
check your /etc/X11/xorg.conf on the differents machines.
-> RgbPath "/usr/share/X11/rgb"
It was different between the two machines...
On the machine that worked the RgbPath was not specified.
It was specified on the machine that did not work...
I commented it out and rebooted and it started
on 11-5-2008 10:14 AM Marcelo M. Garcia spake the following:
> Hi
>
> After upgrading a machine from RHEL-4.5 to 5.2, the Gnome doesn't start
> anymore.
>
> There are strange messages when I issue the command "startx" (I'm using
> inittab=3).
>
> The message is
> nautilus: symbol lookup error: /
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:02:53PM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using centos 5.2 x86_64 on a box. and getting this error:
> wish -f pcalert.tcl
> Error in startup script: unknown color name "black"
...
>
> I take the same script on 3 other machines with centos 5.2 x86_64 and it
> r
Is the troubled box running the same version (8.4.13) of tk/tcl as the
other three? How about xorg-x11-server-utils ?
Also showrgb prints all the colors.
here is the information:
more /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep tk-
atk-1.12.2-1.fc6
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using centos 5.2 x86_64 on a box. and getting this error:
> wish -f pcalert.tcl
> Error in startup script: unknown color name "black"
(snip)
>
> I take the same script on 3 other machines with centos 5.2 x86_6
Does the centos project maintain a copy of mock to install?
If not which mock should I install?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 06:14:16PM +, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> Hi
>
...
> The message is
> nautilus: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0:
> undefined symbol: pango_language_get_default
>
> Where is the information to "nautilus" look in /usr/local/bin?
nothing from CentOS
Hi
After upgrading a machine from RHEL-4.5 to 5.2, the Gnome doesn't start
anymore.
There are strange messages when I issue the command "startx" (I'm using
inittab=3).
The message is
nautilus: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0:
undefined symbol: pango_language_get_def
Hi all,
I am using centos 5.2 x86_64 on a box. and getting this error:
wish -f pcalert.tcl
Error in startup script: unknown color name "black"
(processing "-background" option)
invoked from within
"canvas .c -height $canvas_height -width $screen_width -background black
-highlightthickness
Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future
of disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool.
There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a
longer shelf life than disks,
on 11-4-2008 11:16 PM Indunil Jayasooriya spake the following:
> Hi Robert ,
>
> First off all , thank you very much for your step by steb info.
> The below command creates a 1 GB file. there you have mentioned bs=1G count=1.
> What is count 1 there?
`bs=BYTES'
Both read and write BYTES bytes
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:07 AM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: RE: [CentOS] Running the installer from working linux
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future
of disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool.
There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a
longer shelf life than disks, and they're less susce
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:48:53AM +, Marcelo M. Garcia enlightened us:
I have 2 machines with RHEL 5.2 and I would like to use CentOS repos. I
would like to know if the document "Using CentOS Repositories on RHEL
Machines"[1] can be used in CentOS 5.2 without too much mo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:11 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Running the installer from working linux
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Christopher Chan
MHR wrote:
Good info here:
http://www.seagate.com/ww//index.jsp?locale=en-US&name=SATA_Troubleshooter_-_BIOS_Configuration&vgnextoid=83744a3cdde5c010VgnVCM10dd04090aRCRD
I got a 404 on that one.
A character 'v' got lost in translation. For posterity, the correct URL is
http://www.seagat
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Jim Perrin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (4.11.2008 15:23):
You (and your /etc/redhat-release) say 5.2, but your kernel says 5.1
(5.2 shipped with 2.6.18-92)
Hm, ok.
"yum update kernel" did not see anything to update (that's just because the
present problem: kernel was
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 12:04:04 adrian kok wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any program can check the application is using how
> much memory?
>
top, from a console.
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
Hi
Any program can check the application is using how
much memory?
Thank you
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 04:41:31 Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
> I have a harddisk with 3 primary partitions and one extended
> partitions. Under extented partions , there are 15 partions.
>
> Whole hard disk has been partitioned in a standard way, (i.e NOT LVM)
>
> It has 2GB ram. s
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 23:41:17 Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > My CentOS box is my server for data and some services, including nfs
> > shares. On my laptop I have folderviews displaying two directories
> > on the server, via nfs mounts. An fstab line mounts
Jim Perrin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (4.11.2008 15:23):
> You (and your /etc/redhat-release) say 5.2, but your kernel says 5.1
> (5.2 shipped with 2.6.18-92)
Hm, ok.
"yum update kernel" did not see anything to update (that's just because the
present problem: kernel was not listed in the rp
48 matches
Mail list logo
