Les Mikesell wrote:
Well, but why do you assume people run Windows where you run your
browser? You need a Windows license to run VIC, so the price of
installing ESXi/VIC is around $100 and up.
To someone who doesn't already have a windows license?
I wouldn't have a spare one, and even if yo
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use:
>
> screen /dev/ttyS0
>
> When you're done, to kill your session, press Ctrl-A then K
> (uppercase) and answer 'y'.
>
> HTH,
> Filipe
>
>
Thank you, Filipe. It doesn't work though. The server runs the XEN
kerne
Thomas Dukes wrote:
> Any ideas?
How many entries do you have in the arp table?
"arp -a | wc -l" should show you. If you really have lots of entries in
there you should try to find out the reason for that.
Ralph
pgptXMZ7Hho95.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
Hi
I'm on 5.2 and 'have' to use tomcat 6 - I package it and can get the
default install running fine - However when i drop my app into webapps/
as i war and start tomcat i get this
INFO: Starting service Catalina
Nov 28, 2008 10:44:15 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO: Sta
Hi,
You can create the iptables rules to block the ssh connection limit rate wise.
Create a new chain named ssh_check
/sbin/iptables -N SSH_CHECK
Redirecting all request for 22 port to new chain SSH_CHECK
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -j SSH_CHECK
Then all
WARNING: A docBase /x/xxx.war inside the host appBase has been
specified, and will be ignored
resolved with the help of this
http://threebit.net/mail-archive/tomcat-users/msg03748.html
thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 16:15 +0800, wu yaling wrote:
> Dear friend,
> We are conducting a study on the motivation of the knowledge sharing
> on the CentOS community.
> The contributors’ experience to Linux is very important to the design
> and management of this knowledge platform.
> Would you ple
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ralph Angenendt
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:41 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow
Thomas Dukes wrote:
> Any ideas?
How many entries do you have in the arp table?
John R Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kirjoitteli (28.11.2008 09:49):
>> I need to delay failed ssh password authentication as an additional
>> measure against brute force ssh attacks. I understand, that shoud be
>> accomplished through pam, but googling gave me no example. I have
>> CentOS 5.2.
>
> I
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 13:57 +, Ned Slider wrote:
> Tom Brown wrote:
> >
> >> Sounds good. After I clicked "send", I reread your post and realized
> >> that you didn't want xen (which, I believe, is depreciated).
> >
> >
> > what makes you think that ?
>
> Some are interpreting this:
>
>
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:04:16 +0200:
> There are many options.
Yeah. The point behind my asking was if one would be able to run
RHEL/CentOS 6 as a dom0 - as it is derived from Fedora and reflects the
available bits at the time of the OS freeze. In other words, if there is a
Ryan J M wrote on Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:50:39 +0800:
> PS: I think, you know, root should be loginable in any condition
> unless the system is down. Shouldn't it?
Anyxone is able to loghin anytime, if youw ant to see it that way ;-) But
the system needs the ressources to make this happen before th
>
> I filled it out, but to be blunt - this survey complete stinks. Questions
> like:
>
> "The Linux platform can perform complex tasks using various knowledge."
>
> What the !(*&$*(!(* does that even mean? Please don't publish, or use,
> any results from this survey as they will be complete jun
Santi Saez escribió:
What's the correct way to change configuration parameters for an iSCSI
device? For example I/O scheduler, max_sectors_kb, etc...
I could add commands to the S99local script:
echo noop > /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler
echo 64 > /sys/block/sdb/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb
Unf
Thomas Dukes wrote:
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *chloe K
*Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
*To:* CentOS mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow
what is your netmask?
eth0 = 255.255.240.0
Why do you have such a large
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Dukes wrote:
> >
> >
> > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *On Behalf Of *chloe K
> > *Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
> > *To:* CentOS mailing list
> > *Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rudi Ahlers
> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:41 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] how to connect to a switch with a
> serial cable? - whatcommand(s) to use?
>
> On Fri, Nov 28,
Hi
You could install a new pam module
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~pjb1008/project/pam_delay/
Although I have not tested it.
Regards
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Veiko Kukk
> Sent: 28 November 2008 07:06
> To: centos@centos.o
Veiko Kukk wrote:
I need to delay failed ssh password authentication as an additional
measure against brute force ssh attacks. I understand, that shoud be
accomplished through pam, but googling gave me no example. I have CentOS
5.2.
pam_sheild and pam_delay are both modules you can use for st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas Dukes wrote:
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *chloe K
*Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
*To:* CentOS mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table over
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas Dukes wrote:
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *chloe K
*Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
*To:* CentOS mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table ov
you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow
you should subnet it
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> Thomas Dukes wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> *
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:20, Thomas Dukes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I ran the above, I'm not sure I'm getting a correct response. It takes
> serval miuntes then returns:
> Printk: 100 messages suppressed
> Neighbour table overflow
> Printk: 15 messages suppressed
> 3
It looks like
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:35 AM, chloe K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow
> you should subnet it
>
>
> Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
To EVERYONE who is top-posting on this list:
Stop it.
Than
Hi all, I've installed CentOS 5.2 on a sun x2250.
The installer goes fine and I can setup my root with lvm on /dev/
mapper/isw__Volume0, that is the hardware RAID1 for two disks
available.
As the system boots lvm complains of a duplicate PV and decides to
use /dev/sda, so the physical
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 12:20 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 12:28 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of chloe K
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 12:36 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow
you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow
you should subnet it
Hi Chole,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Filipe Brandenburger
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 12:44 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:20, Thomas Dukes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Hi,
I have Sendmail configured to use STARTTLS for authentication. On all
internet connections and computers (that I have tested) works
connection over encrypted SMTP flawlessly. Today I was setting up mail
client on PC of my customer and standardily checked boxes, that I want
to use SSL for POP3
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I filled it out...
I didn't even click on it. the initial posting smelled far too spammy
to me.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:57 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>
>> I filled it out...
>
> I didn't even click on it. the initial posting smelled far too spammy to
> me.
I agree. But some "investigation" has been done. It looks legit.
Please see the Ned'
chloe K wrote:
you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow
you should subnet it
no, no, NO. his eth1 connection is from his ISP. He /has/ to use
the supplied netmask, he can't reconfigure their network segment.
now, why is ARP table is overflowing is another issue
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:57 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I filled it out...
I didn't even click on it. the initial posting smelled far too spammy to
me.
I agree. But some "investigation" has been done. It looks legit.
Please se
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 5:14 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow
chloe K wrote:
> you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow
Thomas Dukes wrote:
># tcpdump -i eth1 -n ip host 65.188.xxx.xxx and not ether host
00:17:CB:4F:97:81
> ...
OK, I think you lost me on that last part. I ran tcpdump -i eth1 -n ip host
65.188.0.1 and got:
no, no. I said...
# tcpdump -i eth0 -n ip host 65.188.xxx.xxx and not ether host
Does anyone here have a good working knowledge of the command line
interface to Bugzilla?
If so, please contact me off-list as this is OT here, but my inquiry
on the bugzilla list met with silence
Thanks.
Mark Hull-Richter
Linux/C Developer
___
Cen
> Hi all, I've installed CentOS 5.2 on a sun x2250.
> The installer goes fine and I can setup my root with lvm on /dev/
> mapper/isw__Volume0, that is the hardware RAID1 for two disks
> available.
> As the system boots lvm complains of a duplicate PV and decides to
> use /dev/sda, so t
39 matches
Mail list logo