> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:13 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Checking to see if I can mail
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:16 PM, John wrote
I posted on the squid-users mailing list and also CC'd
the upstream developer in case he wasn't subscribed. He replied
and updated his page on http://people.redhat.com/mnagy/squid/
You can follow the full conversation at
http://marc.info/?t=12290847625&r=1&w=2
Are there any plans for any oth
Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:32:51 -0800:
> #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/$basearch
> mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5&arch=$basearch
Hm, not hardcoded then. I looked again at ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/
The epel mirror is to
Ross Walker wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:35:48 -0500:
I think I would do it the same or very similar.
> 4) created a degraded raid1 called md2 out of new sdb2, use --force
> with mdadm
Why force?
> 7) removed sda1 from md0 and sda2 from md1 killing md1 off, I don't
> remember if I did a mki
Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Davide Cittaro wrote:
> > Ok, another one: the process I would like to start is not a daemon
> > itself. If I start it with "daemon" function it remains in foreground.
> > Ok, I can play with '&' but is there a init function to start in
> > background a process?
>
> Y
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 12:57:05PM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Won't I have an issue, though, were the new kernel might be available before
>> the ATrpms module is updated? I was hoping
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:12:01AM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> No, the binary is for CentOS-5 only. I mentioned this somewhere but
> if you did not see it, I apologize for not making i
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:43:46 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> On my Centos 5 server, the secure file has not updated since Dec 10.
>> This despite the fact that I run an sshd server that I access many
>> times per day. Most peculiar is the fact that a swatch monitor that I
>> run on the secure file
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:32:35AM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> "The C-4 kABI tracking kmod rpm packages (i586, i686 & x86_64 -- or,
> more correctly, 32- & 64-bit) containing the sk98lin driver are now
> available for public download from:
>
> http://centos.toracat.org/ajb/CentOS-4/sk98lin/ "
Th
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 18:28, Art Age Software wrote:
> IPTABLES -A INPUT -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
> 192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
>
> s1 kernel: DROP -- Catch All: IN=bond0 OUT= SRC=192.168.1.2
> DST=192.168.1.1 LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x0
>>> On my Centos 5 server, the secure file has not updated since Dec 10.
>>> This despite the fact that I run an sshd server that I access many
>>> times per day. Most peculiar is the fact that a swatch monitor that I
>>> run on the secure file catches plenty of lines. It is as if when
>>> swatch
Hello
I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer
does.
VMware host (Vista) is connected to the internet via a DSL router.
CentOS VMware network is brided, DHCP is activated, no firewall is acive.
Perhaps somebody can help me.
Thank you in advance
Josef
___
I do have such a rule at the top of the rule set. Sorry I did not
provide more context. The basic structure of my rule set is:
1. Deny some known bad packet types.
2. Accept ESTABLISHED, RELATED traffic.
3. Accept rules of various sorts (such as the memcached rules).
4. Deny all (catch all rule).
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:59 AM, John wrote:
>> >> Loud and clear. Q5 S9
>> > Thought it was 599
>> for CW, yes.
> RTTY, PSK31
That too. I think I blew the Final in my HF Transceiver, when I forgot
to reduce the power, before I started using PSK31. Probably about 30
seconds of that did it and no
Earlier, I was using GNOME and Firefox and the Mouse died. I had to
kill the power, to get the box going again, because it doesn't have a
reset switch; which is *not* an elegant way to get going. What key
combination would get me going or to a shell? CentOS 5, fully updated,
32 bit. TIA!
___
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:33:06 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
On my Centos 5 server, the secure file has not updated since Dec 10.
This despite the fact that I run an sshd server that I access many
times per day. Most peculiar is the fact that a swatch monitor that
I run on the secu
Hi guys,
i am really sorry for making offtopic, hope you will not kill me, but
this is for me life important problem which needs to be solved within
next 12 hours..
I have to create stable algorithm for sorting n numbers from interval
[1,n^2] with time complexity O(n) .
Can someone please give m
Josef Temminghoff wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:47:41 +0100:
> I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer
> does.
Does it jump or what? One might assume from the rest that you want to say
you can't make it display websites or so, but this is just a guess.
Provide det
Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:03:42 -0500:
> What key
> combination would get me going or to a shell?
Probably none. If it doesn't react to CTRL-ALT-DEL it's frozen to death.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Lanny,
You might want to look at this, for future reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_SysRq_key
-Gordon
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Earlier, I was using GNOME and Firefox and the Mouse died. I had to
> kill the power, to get the box going again, because it
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 19:24 +0100, David Hláčik wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> i am really sorry for making offtopic, hope you will not kill me, but
> this is for me life important problem which needs to be solved within
> next 12 hours..
>
> I have to create stable algorithm for sorting n numbers from in
Well, something with linear complexity O(n) which i have to prove,
Merge sort, Insertion sort or selection sort does not have O(n) complexity.
I believe that something like RadixSort, CountingSort, BucketSort
altought i am not sure
Thanks!
D.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Ab
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:03:42 -0500:
>> What key
>> combination would get me going or to a shell?
>
> Probably none. If it doesn't react to CTRL-ALT-DEL it's frozen to death.
Kai: I tried that and I tried CTRL-F2, when it ha
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote:
> You might want to look at this, for future reference:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_SysRq_key
Gordon: Thank you! I bookmarked that URL and I will read it, slowly.
Hoping not to need to kill the power to get out of that situation, th
David Hláčik wrote:
> Well, something with linear complexity O(n) which i have to prove,
>
> Merge sort, Insertion sort or selection sort does not have O(n) complexity.
>
> I believe that something like RadixSort, CountingSort, BucketSort
> altought i am not sure
I'm not especially inclined to
Under CentOS 5.2, is it possible to mount an iscsi filesystem/partition as
rw for root, but ro for users?
If so, what would be the proper syntax?
Thanks.
Scott
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'm a little confused about what you are supposed to do when you
discover a bug with CentOS (and by implication RHEL).
Is there some policy as to what to do and where to report the bug?
It doesn't seem appropriate to report it to http://bugs.centos.org
because CentOS is kept in-sync with the up
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
> Under CentOS 5.2, is it possible to mount an iscsi filesystem/partition as
> rw for root, but ro for users?
>
> If so, what would be the proper syntax?
>
>
I think it will have to be group/user permissions just like a normal
SCSI drive
-
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 14:06 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:03:42 -0500:
> >> What key
> >> combination would get me going or to a shell?
> >
> > Probably none. If it doesn't react to CTRL-ALT-DEL it's
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 3:50 PM, William L. Maltby
wrote:
> Did you try switching to a virtual terminal, e.g. --?
Bill: I tried CTL-ALT-F2 and I tried CTL-ALT-DEL
>
> If the box is not totally frozen
It was 100% frozen.
> this should let you work at a command
> line. Then you might be able to
Hywel Richards wrote:
> I'm a little confused about what you are supposed to do when you
> discover a bug with CentOS (and by implication RHEL).
>
> Is there some policy as to what to do and where to report the bug?
>
> It doesn't seem appropriate to report it to http://bugs.centos.org
> becaus
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> i am really sorry for making offtopic, hope you will not kill me, but
> >> this is for me life important problem which needs to be solved within
> >> next 12 hours..
> >>
> >> I have to create stable algorithm for sorting n numbers from interval
> >> [1,n^2] with time compl
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Josef Temminghoff wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:47:41 +0100:
>
>> I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer
>> does.
>
> Does it jump or what? One might assume from the rest that you want to say
> you can't make it
Further examination shows numerous log lines that were detected on
Dec 12 by swatch using tail on the secure file but do not presently
appear in the secure file. However, they do appear in the messages
file.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
[...]
> Basically, count the number of appearances of every number in your set. If
> you
> have a set a priori bounded from above and below --- which you do,
> [1, n^2] --- you first allocate an array of integers of length n^2.
By definition, your proposed algorithm is
>Under CentOS 5.2, is it possible to mount an iscsi filesystem/partition as
>rw for root, but ro for users?
Possibly, but iSCSI is not a file sharing protocol. You can only mount cluster
FS's with multiple ini's or when root changes the FS while another client has
it mounted funny stuff happens s
36 matches
Mail list logo
