Re: [CentOS] glibc

yes, absolute correct i386 been excluded ! Thanks On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Mad Unix wrote: >> Am having the following error: > > Run 'grep -ri exclude /etc/yum*' > > Usually when I see this error, it's because folks have excluded the

[CentOS] Unable to connect to printer; will retry in 30 seconds...: Connection timed out

Hi ALL, I recently withed from CentOS 3 X server to CentOS 4.5. It works fine other than printers. there are many printers connected to it. We have configured the commnad printconf queue type is Networked UNIX (LPD) Some times, we will be able to print , But, some times, We will NOT be able

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

El Jue, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, 1:45, MHR escribió: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:09 PM, ArcosCom Linux User > wrote: >> The same as before, instead compile I do the dd comand and see the >> /proc/cpuinfo info at the same time the cpuspeed monitor under gnome >> shows >> the same as cpuinfo: 800Mhz

Re: [CentOS] RAID 1 Post Install

Just along these lines, would it be possible for me to break RAID 1 on the two internal drives into RAID 0 and then mirror that new RAID 0 array onto a SATA drive using RAID 1 without loosing any data? I used JFS as the file system for the RAID 1 array, so that may have to be changed to XFS as you

[CentOS] OT: Ping failed

Hi, The Ping service in Nagios has "unknown" status which was previously OK, this happens after i messed up some of the files owner and accidentally change it to Apache. Although I restored most of the file permission back to Root, the problem above still appears which I suspect is due to permi

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > >>> I hope you don't follow the latest trend and blame RPMforge ;-) >> >> No he has to first blame EPEL, then he can move onto RPMforge :) > > I've never used EPEL, so it woul

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

I've seen this on my laptop also. Its an older thinkpad t20. Its always running slower by 200MHZ or something close to that. I've even swapped the cpu to a newer faster version. Ensured cpuspeed was turned off, and still the issue persisted. Havent loaded it with another os to see if the issue

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 18:03 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > Try running: > >/usr/lib/flash-plugin/setup > > and then stop and start firefox. That should fix your problem. > > > it, Sunday, and it was supposedly OK. Dell wants about

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> I hope you don't follow the latest trend and blame RPMforge ;-) > > No he has to first blame EPEL, then he can move onto RPMforge :) I've never used EPEL, so it would be correct to blame them for this problem? :-)

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > I hope you don't follow the latest trend and blame >RPMforge ;-) I hadn't thought about blaming someone else for this problem, but, thank you for the idea! :-) Actually, the box has always had a UPS with automatic voltage regulation and it i

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:21 PM, MHR wrote: > TigerDirect.com has a $99 box available, and it's >pretty >low end, but > it > might suit your purposes. > Good luck. Mark: H. If I was in the USA, I'd go for that, in a minute. But, we are down here in South America (much closer to Miami, FL tha

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: >> >>> Try running: >>>/usr/lib/flash-plugin/setup >>> and then stop and start firefox. That should fix your problem. >> >> It did on my d

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:09 PM, ArcosCom Linux User wrote: > The same as before, instead compile I do the dd comand and see the > /proc/cpuinfo info at the same time the cpuspeed monitor under gnome shows > the same as cpuinfo: 800Mhz. > > Another way to go? > Can you NOT top post here?? Let me

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: >> >>> Try running: >>>/usr/lib/flash-plugin/setup >>> and then stop and start firefox. That should fix your problem. >> >> It did on my d

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

The same as before, instead compile I do the dd comand and see the /proc/cpuinfo info at the same time the cpuspeed monitor under gnome shows the same as cpuinfo: 800Mhz. Another way to go? Thanks El Jue, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, 0:20, MHR escribió: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:00 PM, ArcosCom Li

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > >> Try running: >>/usr/lib/flash-plugin/setup >> and then stop and start firefox. That should fix your problem. > > It did on my daughter's box too. Mine died today. The reason I was > having

Re: [CentOS] suspend/resume system crash

Sergej kandyla wrote: > Max Hetrick wrote: >> Sergej Kandyla wrote: >> >> >>> I've installed CentOS 5.2 i386 (with all updates) on notebook Fujutsu >>> Siemens Esprimo U9200 >>> Suspending works normal, but after resuming my system crashes. >>> There are no messages about that in /var/log/message

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > > It did on my daughter's box too. Mine died today. The reason I was > having the mouse freeze, and other symptoms, on my Dell Dimension 2400 > box, is that the motherboard is damaged. I ran the Dell Diagnostics on > it, Sunday, and it was sup

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:00 PM, ArcosCom Linux User wrote: > Ok, but is not working fine. > > The last try: > 1) Power off the laptop along 2/3 hours. > 2) Power on and log into gnome. > 3) The cpuspeed monitor shows that all is working fine. > 4) Some minutes after, the speed goes down t

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3.0.4 and Adobe Flash (CentOS 5 (32bit))

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > Try running: >/usr/lib/flash-plugin/setup > and then stop and start firefox. That should fix your problem. It did on my daughter's box too. Mine died today. The reason I was having the mouse freeze, and other symptoms, on my Dell Dimen

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

Ok, but is not working fine. The last try: 1) Power off the laptop along 2/3 hours. 2) Power on and log into gnome. 3) The cpuspeed monitor shows that all is working fine. 4) Some minutes after, the speed goes down to 800 MHz and no more wants to grow up. I can't change to force perfor

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Karanbir Singh wrote on Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:56:34 +: > You might want to investigate a bit on how list digests work I know how they work ;-) I was under the impression that announce is digest-only as I don't have any "normal" announcements. Apparently, this isn't the case. Kai -- Kai Sch

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

> From the vi --debug output it seems obvious that vi reports the > highest > included patch in the version. So what I think happened is that Red > Hat started off from 7.0.109 and added patches upto 237. ok, well, it's convinced me I'm not going slightly mad. :) Thanks for your help, and to eve

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Karanbir Singh wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> But I guess you did not announce the kernel, but anyone pulling the >> updates locally would be getting them? >> > > How did you work out that the kernel was not announced ? Re read my last > email to you on this subject. From Kai's c

Re: [CentOS] regarding vpn server for 1500 clients

John R Pierce wrote: > NiftyClusters T Mitchell wrote >> It is possible that dedicated Cisco hardware solutions will scale >> better. At a minimum they can set a cost base line to validate the >> value of your Linux solution. >> >> Management of clients needs to be expanded. >> > > for large s

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

on 12-17-2008 9:43 AM Dag Wieers spake the following: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Spiro Harvey wrote: > >> I'm still curious about the discrepencies in the version numbers, does >> yours come up with conflicting numbers on the splash screen? > > I can only confirm that you are right on that one as wel

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

on 12-17-2008 9:31 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: > Karanbir Singh wrote on Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:53:00 +: > >> the kernel was announced about 15 hrs back, > > last digest I got is 24 hours old, Vol. 46, Issue 7, no kernel in it. > > Kai > When I went to school, 15 was less than 24, so

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote on Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:53:00 +: > >> the kernel was announced about 15 hrs back, > > last digest I got is 24 hours old, Vol. 46, Issue 7, no kernel in it. You might want to investigate a bit on how list digests work :D -- Karanbir Singh : http://w

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > But I guess you did not announce the kernel, but anyone pulling the > updates locally would be getting them? How did you work out that the kernel was not announced ? Re read my last email to you on this subject. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > I do an rsync to my local repo. I had looked at the logs just to see > what came over, and saw the new kernel. Of course I can't see what the > xml is saying is currently available... > > So then I ran yum update on some of my systems. Some picked up the new > kerne

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Spiro Harvey wrote: > I'm still curious about the discrepencies in the version numbers, does > yours come up with conflicting numbers on the splash screen? I can only confirm that you are right on that one as well :-) Also true for RHEL BTW. >From the vi --debug output it se

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Karanbir Singh wrote on Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:53:00 +: > the kernel was announced about 15 hrs back, last digest I got is 24 hours old, Vol. 46, Issue 7, no kernel in it. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >>> I do an rsync to my local repo. I had looked at the logs just to see >>> what came over, and saw the new kernel. Of course I can't see what the >>> xml is saying is currently available... >>> >>> So

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 46, Issue 8

was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20081217/b1bf1e54/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:29:43 +0100 F

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Karanbir Singh wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> I do an rsync to my local repo. I had looked at the logs just to see >> what came over, and saw the new kernel. Of course I can't see what the >> xml is saying is currently available... >> >> So then I ran yum update on some of my systems. S

Re: [CentOS] RPM rollback/repackage with CentOS 4

santis...@woop.es wrote: > Is there any way to list availabe RPM rollback's and timestamps in CentOS 4? > you might want to read up on what rpm repackage is and how it works. beside that, you need to run the transactions manually to get anything like that working. at best, its basic and not need

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I do an rsync to my local repo. I had looked at the logs just to see > what came over, and saw the new kernel. Of course I can't see what the > xml is saying is currently available... > > So then I ran yum update on some of my systems. Some picked up the new > kernel o

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Karanbir Singh wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote: > >>> kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.i686.rpm >>> >> This kernel hasn't been even announced yet, so what's the problem? >> > > the kernel was announced about 15 hrs back, where are you looking and > how are you failing to notice ? I do an rsyn

Re: [CentOS] Capture NX 1 vs 2

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:18:37 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > I have Capture NX 1. Is it worth spending money to get Capture NX 2? > Why? > > Thanks, > Mike. Sorry, wrong group. Please ignore. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org ht

[CentOS] Capture NX 1 vs 2

I have Capture NX 1. Is it worth spending money to get Capture NX 2? Why? Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.i686.rpm > This kernel hasn't been even announced yet, so what's the problem? the kernel was announced about 15 hrs back, where are you looking and how are you failing to notice ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq

Re: [CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:42:01 -0500: > kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.i686.rpm This kernel hasn't been even announced yet, so what's the problem? > So far the only difference the difference is the mirrors they use I think you should now that :-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin,

[CentOS] yum udpate not getting new kernel

On one notebook (so far), I have not picked up the new kernel: kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.i686.rpm I have gotten it on some notebooks. So far the only difference I can see between the systems that MIGHT matter is those that got the update were new installs and had not reached 3 installed kernel

Re: [CentOS] glibc

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Mad Unix wrote: > Am having the following error: Run 'grep -ri exclude /etc/yum*' Usually when I see this error, it's because folks have excluded the i386/i686 packages, but still have 1 or 2 installed. It's either that or a stale mirror as another already pointe

Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernel revision

ArcosCom Linux User wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:33:36 +0100 (CET): > GNOME will have any problem if I "chkconfig --level 345 cpuspeed off"? why? "chkconfig cpuspeed off" suffices Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] glibc

Hi, On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:45, Mad Unix wrote: > [r...@intra.sdc:rescue]$yum update glibc > ... > Error: No Package Matching glibc.i686 I would say it's either a problem with your mirror, or with your local cache. Try "yum clean all" followed by the same update again. I tried it here (diff

[CentOS] RPM rollback/repackage with CentOS 4

Hi, Is there any way to list availabe RPM rollback's and timestamps in CentOS 4? It's possible to get RPM rollbacks with up2date, but appears that's deprecated ;-( # up2date --list-rollbacks This feature is deprecated and no longer functional I want a method to list current available rollbac

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Works fine here. > > "usr_01.txt.gz" [readonly][noeol] 11L, 2903C > > vim-common-7.0.109-5.el5.br.3.x86_64 Should have read more carefully. Only works in vim, not vi. Ralph pgpN9lzGPCRnu.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [CentOS] Bug - Error: Missing Dependency: libgaim.so.0 is needed by package nautilus-sendto

Kenneth Burgener wrote: > Error: Missing Dependency: libgaim.so.0 is needed by package > nautilus-sendto > > I assume this is a bug with the GNOME packages (required dependency not > found). Is this a CentOS issue, or an "upstream" issue? Upstream issue since 5.0 -

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

Spiro Harvey wrote: > and if I enter the binary just by typing "vim" or "vi" the splash > screen tells me: version 7.0.237 Yepp, correct. How very strange ... Ralph pgpVq0yEwR5JT.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] vim helpfile tag issues

Dag Wieers wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Dag Wieers wrote: >>> On CentOS 5.2, using vim 7.0.237, I'm having a consistent issue across >>> all my centos boxen. > > > > Is it me, or do you have a newer vim than CentOS is shipping ? > > > > [r...@rhun ~]# rpm -q vim-common > > vim-common-7.0.1

Re: [CentOS] regarding vpn server for 1500 clients

NiftyClusters T Mitchell wrote > It is possible that dedicated Cisco hardware solutions will scale > better. At a minimum they can set a cost base line to validate the > value of your Linux solution. > > Management of clients needs to be expanded. > for large scale VPN networks like that, I'd

Re: [CentOS] regarding vpn server for 1500 clients

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:20 AM, wrote: > Hi list, > > > I have to build vpn server for 1500 clients. No encryption necessary. > can anyone please recommend me vpn server. > > I do not have experience on vpn. > > I have tested openvpn on my test setup, & its working fine. > > I want to check if t

Re: [CentOS] [OT] stable algorithm with complexity O(n)

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM, David Hláčik wrote: > Hi guys, > > i am really sorry for making offtopic, hope you will not kill me, but > this is for me life important problem which needs to be solved within > next 12 hours.. > > I have to create stable algorithm for sorting n numbers from inte