Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Amos Shapira
2009/1/8 R P Herrold : > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Amos Shapira wrote: > >> I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with >> ";", not "#". > > and > | sed -e 's...@^#@;@g' > cannot cure that bad habit on generated files or an input > stream? Possibly, but then I'll get p

[CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Amos Shapira wrote: > I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with > ";", not "#". and | sed -e 's...@^#@;@g' cannot cure that bad habit on generated files or an input stream? [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ cat - << END | sed -e 's...@^#@;@g' > one

Re: [CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Thomas Iverson
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 09:57 +0800, Xiaobo Zhu wrote: >> Will anyone please tell me how to select text in block instead of >> line, so that I can get the IP address on all interface, in >> gnome-terminal as well as in vim. > > Hold d

Re: [CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 09:57 +0800, Xiaobo Zhu wrote: > Will anyone please tell me how to select text in block instead of > line, so that I can get the IP address on all interface, in > gnome-terminal as well as in vim. Hold down Ctrl to select a block in gnome-terminal. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abram

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Amos Shapira
2009/1/8 Filipe Brandenburger : > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 19:11, Amos Shapira wrote: >> I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with >> ";", not "#". > > Why don't you use Python's ConfigParser? That's what yum itself > actually uses (AFAIK). > http://docs.python.org/libra

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Max Hetrick
René Standfest wrote: > We have running at the moment eGroupWare, but we plan to migrate to SOGo > (http://sogo.opengroupware.org) in the next two months (we had some annoying > problems with eGW in the past). It has a really cool Webfrontend (looks like > Thunderbird with Lightning) and has a rea

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Max Hetrick
Rainer Duffner wrote: > For Zimbra, yes. > But honestly: how on earth would they be able to guarantee that it's > working correctly in any other meaningful way? > Would you like to do support for your product that relies on a dozen > or more external other products (that aren't maintained in m

Re: [CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Xiaobo Zhu
Many thanks and it works fine. Cheers, Xiaobo On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:57:51AM +0800, Xiaobo Zhu wrote: > > Hi, > > When I connect to a Cisco router and issue the show ip interface command, > the > > output is similar as follows: > > > >

Re: [CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:57:51AM +0800, Xiaobo Zhu wrote: > Hi, > When I connect to a Cisco router and issue the show ip interface command, the > output is similar as follows: > > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status > Protocol > Ethernet0/0 1

[CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Xiaobo Zhu
Hi, When I connect to a Cisco router and issue the show ip interface command, the output is similar as follows: Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Ethernet0/0 192.168.12.1 YES NVRAM up up Serial0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM a

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> otherwise, um, if you really do want self hosting... pick your > favorite email server (postfix, sendmail, etc), use cyrus imap, let your > clients use any imap email app they prefer (Mozilla Thunderbird, > Microsoft Outlook or Live Mail, etc) Agree strongly with PostFix+Cyrus. It is a

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 19:11, Amos Shapira wrote: > I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with > ";", not "#". Why don't you use Python's ConfigParser? That's what yum itself actually uses (AFAIK). http://docs.python.org/library/configparser.html With that module, you

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Spiro Harvey
> > Actually you only get 25 users for free. After that you have to pay > > for it. I'm using it on one of my domains and it's very very good, > > but too low a limit for any decent sized business. > does that apply to nonprofits like k12/edus ? Can't answer that without making stuff up. :) Mine'

Re: [CentOS] Obtaining a newer Broadcomm (bcm43xx) driver for CentOS 5

2009-01-07 Thread Ned Slider
Bart Schaefer wrote: > I'm using CentOS 5 (w/all latest updates as of 2008-01-06) on an HP > laptop -- in fact, the exact laptop described here: >http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/HP/Pavilion-ze5300_Series > > Ever since I switched from SHARED to OPEN authentication (and hence > from using

Re: [CentOS] Obtaining a newer Broadcomm (bcm43xx) driver for CentOS 5

2009-01-07 Thread Barry Brimer
> I'm using CentOS 5 (w/all latest updates as of 2008-01-06) on an HP > laptop -- in fact, the exact laptop described here: > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/HP/Pavilion-ze5300_Series > > Ever since I switched from SHARED to OPEN authentication (and hence > from using ndiswrapper to the bcm

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread John R Pierce
Spiro Harvey wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > > [using google mail+calendar+etc] > > >> The advantages of doing it this way are no costs at all, >> > > Actually you only get 25 users for free. After that you have to pay for > it. I'm using it on one of my domains and it's very very good, bu

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Amos Shapira
2009/1/8 Karanbir Singh : > Amos Shapira wrote: >> Is there a standard programmatic way to manipulate yum configuration >> files, particularly the .repo files? > > Puppet has a yum module, which is quite capable and what I use. Thanks to both of you. We don't use Puppet for all our hosts and addin

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread John R Pierce
r...@vshift.com wrote: > Cc$ > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > Huh??? and why did you send this, quoting 200 something lines of previous peoples quotes without a clue what you're referring to?? folks, your cellphones make LOUSY email list communications device. please sti

Re: [CentOS] Obtaining a newer Broadcomm (bcm43xx) driver for CentOS 5

2009-01-07 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > I'm using CentOS 5 (w/all latest updates as of 2008-01-06) on an HP Err, typo, that should say 2009-01-06. D'oh. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c

[CentOS] Obtaining a newer Broadcomm (bcm43xx) driver for CentOS 5

2009-01-07 Thread Bart Schaefer
I'm using CentOS 5 (w/all latest updates as of 2008-01-06) on an HP laptop -- in fact, the exact laptop described here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/HP/Pavilion-ze5300_Series Ever since I switched from SHARED to OPEN authentication (and hence from using ndiswrapper to the bcm43xx modul

[CentOS] Working - Re: Checking fan state

2009-01-07 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:39:19 -0500: > > >> Now with the new fan in, it is not turning at all, >> > > You can usually set in the BIOS if you want to use "smart fan control" (or > what they call it) and which method (three-pin connector fans are >

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Spiro Harvey
John R Pierce wrote: [using google mail+calendar+etc] > The advantages of doing it this way are no costs at all, Actually you only get 25 users for free. After that you have to pay for it. I'm using it on one of my domains and it's very very good, but too low a limit for any decent sized busin

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Karanbir Singh
Amos Shapira wrote: > Is there a standard programmatic way to manipulate yum configuration > files, particularly the .repo files? Puppet has a yum module, which is quite capable and what I use. -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Dnk
On 7-Jan-09, at 3:57 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > otherwise, um, if you really do want self hosting... pick your > favorite email server (postfix, sendmail, etc), use cyrus imap, let > your > clients use any imap email app they prefer (Mozilla Thunderbird, > Microsoft Outlook or Live Mail

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 08.01.2009 um 00:54 schrieb Bo Lynch: > > So are you required to run zimbras release of these packages? > For Zimbra, yes. But honestly: how on earth would they be able to guarantee that it's working correctly in any other meaningful way? Would you like to do support for your product that

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 18:54 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote: > > So are you required to run zimbras release of these packages? > > If you are forced to use them then how delayed are the releases. > Are you able to use something other than amavis and clam for scanning?? We > use a product called VAMS relea

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread russ
Cc$ Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: "Bo Lynch" Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:45:22 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite On Wed, January 7, 2009 6:06 pm, Andrew Cotter wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: cen

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:11:53AM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a standard programmatic way to manipulate yum configuration > files, particularly the .repo files? > > I want to add things like "priority=..." per repo, or > "check_obsoletes=1" to the priorities plugin config. >

[CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Amos Shapira
Hello, Is there a standard programmatic way to manipulate yum configuration files, particularly the .repo files? I want to add things like "priority=..." per repo, or "check_obsoletes=1" to the priorities plugin config. I can cook specific search/append using perl or sed but was wondering whethe

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:59 pm, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009, Bo Lynch wrote: >> >>On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:38 pm, Tim Nelson wrote: > ... >>I would have thought that this was a small install:) We probably have at >>the most around 200-250. I was just guessing for growth. We too op

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread John R Pierce
For a completely /different/ idea... I know several nonprofit and not-for-profit groups who coordinate their email and activities using a combination of GMail, google calendar(s) for scheduling, google apps for shared documents, and google group(s) for message board functionality. You can pull

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 6:06 pm, Andrew Cotter wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner >> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 5:32 PM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupW

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Les Mikesell
Andrew Cotter wrote: > > My problem would be that a single machine is a single point of failure. We > are looking at zimbra and using at least two machines utilizing GFS and our > SAN so we can withstand a failure. Wouldn't drbl/heartbeat be less complicated for 2 machines? -- Les Mikese

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Andrew Cotter
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 5:32 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite > > > Am 07.01.2009 um 22:24 schrieb Adam Tauno W

Re: [CentOS] monitor invidiual client (PC) network traffic to server?

2009-01-07 Thread Adrian Joian
Hello, Setup iptables rules on the server side for each client and extract the data from there, draw graphics with rrdtool. Another software that you can use is ntop. For bandwidthd grab the src rpm from a fedora 10 repo and recompile it. Best regards, Adrian Tim Nelson wrote: > - "mcclnx mc

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 07.01.2009 um 22:24 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams: >>> You'll definitely want to look at a multi-server setup for that. >>> Put your >>> mail/web services on one box and database/LDAP on another. Also, >>> for such >>> a large installation you may even want to look at their commercially >>>

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Tim Nelson
- "Bo Lynch" wrote: > I would have thought that this was a small install:) We probably have > at > the most around 200-250. I was just guessing for growth. We too opt > open > source. Is zimbra a resource hog? Meaning do you think it would work > with > maybe a xeon quadcore with 4gb RAM? RAM

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> > You'll definitely want to look at a multi-server setup for that. Put your > > mail/web services on one box and database/LDAP on another. Also, for such > > a large installation you may even want to look at their commercially > > supported editions. Last time I checked (admittedly quite a while

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Guy Boisvert
> On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:23 pm, Ed Westphal wrote: >> I may start a war here, but I'm going to recommend Lotus Notes / Domino >> as the collaborative software for you. I've had quite a bit of >> experience with it in a large multi-national company. It can definitely >> handle all that you may wa

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> >> I may start a war here, but I'm going to recommend Lotus Notes / Domino > >> as the collaborative software for you. I've had quite a bit of > >> experience with it in a large multi-national company. It can definitely > > Has anyone used PHPGroupware? > > I've been looking at some comparisons w

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-7-2009 12:15 PM Bo Lynch spake the following: > On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:23 pm, Ed Westphal wrote: >> Bo Lynch wrote: >>> Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. >>> >>> We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware >>> style system for out staff to collabo

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009, Bo Lynch wrote: > >On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:38 pm, Tim Nelson wrote: ... >I would have thought that this was a small install:) We probably have at >the most around 200-250. I was just guessing for growth. We too opt open >source. Is zimbra a resource hog? Meaning do you think

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:38 pm, Tim Nelson wrote: > - "Bo Lynch" wrote: >> I would say that we have around 300 users. >> >> Bo Lynch > > You'll definitely want to look at a multi-server setup for that. Put your > mail/web services on one box and database/LDAP on another. Also, for such > a l

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread René Standfest
Bo Lynch schrieb am 07.01.2009 20:56: > Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. > > We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware > style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using > Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any >

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Tim Nelson
- "Bo Lynch" wrote: > I would say that we have around 300 users. > > Bo Lynch You'll definitely want to look at a multi-server setup for that. Put your mail/web services on one box and database/LDAP on another. Also, for such a large installation you may even want to look at their commerci

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:28 pm, Tim Nelson wrote: > - "Bo Lynch" wrote: >> Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. >> >> We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware >> style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are >> using >> Squirre

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Scott Silva wrote on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:48:03 -0800: > Yes, but yum needs a little coercion to ignore that update. > You would have to exclude that package after you got the older one installed > so it didn't update. Of course, but this wasn't the point of V. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germa

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Tim Nelson
- "Bo Lynch" wrote: > Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. > > We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware > style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are > using > Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any > recommendat

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:23 pm, Ed Westphal wrote: > Bo Lynch wrote: >> Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. >> >> We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware >> style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using >> Squirrelmail/postfi

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Ed Westphal
Bo Lynch wrote: > Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. > > We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware > style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using > Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any > recommendations/opinion

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Andrew Cotter
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Bo Lynch > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 2:56 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite > > Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. > > We a

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Max Hetrick
Bo Lynch wrote: > Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. > > We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware > style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using > Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any > recommendations/opinio

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 14:56 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote: > Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. > > We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware > style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using > Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyon

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Tim Nelson
- "Scott Silva" wrote: > on 1-7-2009 10:00 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: > > Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 + (GMT): > > > >> Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions > >> unless one could be an update/bugfix? > > > > So, what? Isn't he entitled to

[CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any recommendations/opinions. Any input would be great

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-7-2009 10:00 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: > Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 + (GMT): > >> Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions >> unless one could be an update/bugfix? > > So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there is

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Les Mikesell
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 + (GMT): > >> Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions >> unless one could be an update/bugfix? > > So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there is a > problem on his setup with it?

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 + (GMT): > Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions > unless one could be an update/bugfix? So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there is a problem on his setup with it? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, G

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Vandaman
Tim Nelson wrote: > Hello fellow CentOS'ers- > > I'm trying to install a package from a not-to-be-named > repository (privately operated for some proprietary > software). They currently have a package I need but offer > multiple versions. However, if I simply 'yum install > packagename' it defaul

Re: [CentOS] Video lock up

2009-01-07 Thread John
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_x86_96.43.07.html I have the exact same card in a workstation. JohnS > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Spiro Harvey > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 3:08 PM > To: centos@

Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up an RPM repository.

2009-01-07 Thread Alain PORTAL
Le mercredi 7 janvier 2009 à 16:44, William L. Maltby a écrit : > rpm --erase and run it. This rpm command erase an installed package, not a file in a directory. Regards Alain -- La version française des pages de manuel Linux http://manpagesfr.free.fr ___

Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up an RPM repository.

2009-01-07 Thread Friedrich Clausen
Hi, Thanks for the quick replies guys. On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Greg Bailey wrote: > > Hi, > > I've also faced this problem, and you're right: relying on timestamps > and/or sort order of the RPM filenames doesn't work. > > The best tool I've found is "repomanage.py" from the yum-utils p

Re: [CentOS] proftpd question

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Adrian kok wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:24:45 +0800 (CST): > After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp you mean as anonymous user ftp or you cannot login *via* ftp at all? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up an RPM repository.

2009-01-07 Thread Greg Bailey
Friedrich Clausen wrote: > Hello All, > > At my $WORK we have lots of in-house applications used to support the > services we offer to customers and we deploy these to servers as RPMS. > This works well for us except we have thousands of obsolete packages > in our Yum repository that need to be cle

Re: [CentOS] proftpd question

2009-01-07 Thread Fabrice La Farina
Hello > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of adrian kok > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:25 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] proftpd question > > > When I change the user from /home/userA to /ftp/userA

Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up an RPM repository.

2009-01-07 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 16:23 +0100, Friedrich Clausen wrote: > Hello All, > > At my $WORK we have lots of in-house applications used to support the > services we offer to customers and we deploy these to servers as RPMS. > This works well for us except we have thousands of obsolete packages > in o

[CentOS] proftpd question

2009-01-07 Thread adrian kok
Hi I am using proftpd in 5.2 When I change the user from /home/userA to /ftp/userA in this file /etc/passwd eg: userA:x:502:502::/ftp/userA:/bin/bash After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp but ssh is fine Can you help? Thank you Send instant messages to your online friends ht

[CentOS] Cleaning up an RPM repository.

2009-01-07 Thread Friedrich Clausen
Hello All, At my $WORK we have lots of in-house applications used to support the services we offer to customers and we deploy these to servers as RPMS. This works well for us except we have thousands of obsolete packages in our Yum repository that need to be cleaned up. What I would like to achiev

Re: [CentOS] Can't yum erase/install an app

2009-01-07 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:39:49 -0500: > > >> I then do a 'yum install hipl-firewall' and get that it is installed and >> there is nothing to do >> > > then a rpm -q would show that, does it? If so: rpm -e. If it's only left in > the rpm databa

Re: [CentOS] totem-xine

2009-01-07 Thread Michael A. Peters
A. Kirillov wrote: >>> Awhile ago I've tried to rebuild fc6 totem-xine in mock >>> but stopped short due to a large number of dependencies >>> as I wasn't sure of the result. >> livna for FC6 is the totem-xine I'm using, I built all the dependencies >> from Fedora/livna that were not in the centos

Re: [CentOS] Bash cgi upload form

2009-01-07 Thread John Doe
> > > From: Sean Carolan > > > Anyone have a function or script for uploading files from a web > > > browser with a bash script? I know this is possible to do with Perl, > > > I'm wondering if the same is possible using only bash. > > > Just curious here, from Sean's request info, this script wo

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
b73ac94175...@mail.gmail.com> James Bensley wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:43:09 +: > I didn't think rpm packages for php exist, I am searching on google > for some to download but I can't find any? The packages for your Red Hat are on the Red Hat servers, of course. I don't know if there are

Re: [CentOS] Can't yum erase/install an app

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:39:49 -0500: > I then do a 'yum install hipl-firewall' and get that it is installed and > there is nothing to do then a rpm -q would show that, does it? If so: rpm -e. If it's only left in the rpm database you can remove it from the database only

Re: [CentOS] totem-xine

2009-01-07 Thread A. Kirillov
> >> For video - I use the totem plugin with xine backend totem. I > >> compiled > >> my own but I suspect that rpmforge has it. I found gstreamer backend > >> totem to be most unsatisfactory. > > > > Could you please share some details on > > how to get totem-xine running on CentOS? > > > > I beli

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
David Hrbác( wrote on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:42:44 +0100: > I'd get rid of PHP from source and install php-* packages. Then he goes back to PHP 4.3.2. You *have* to use the source for xcache. I'd recommend to go the php newsgroup and ask about the phpize problem. And provide all the information yo

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread James Bensley
Hey David, Kai; Thanks for the replys. > I'd get rid of PHP from source and install php-* packages. > David I didn't think rpm packages for php exist, I am searching on google for some to download but I can't find any? -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GIT/MU/U dpu s: a--> C++>$ U+

Re: [CentOS] totem-xine

2009-01-07 Thread A. Kirillov
> > Awhile ago I've tried to rebuild fc6 totem-xine in mock > > but stopped short due to a large number of dependencies > > as I wasn't sure of the result. > > livna for FC6 is the totem-xine I'm using, I built all the dependencies > from Fedora/livna that were not in the centos/epel repos. > >

[CentOS] Can't yum erase/install an app

2009-01-07 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I am switching the box that I did the HIPL rpm builds over to running from rpms built directly by the HIPL team (http://infrahip.hiit.fi/hipl/release/1.0.4/). I did the 'make uninstall' and then 'yum install hipl-all', but the hipl-firewall rpm did not install. Seems like I have a mess on my

Re: [CentOS] LDAP Authentication to Lotus Domino?

2009-01-07 Thread Fabian Arrotin
Charles Richards wrote: > Has anybody done any authentication to Lotus Domino using LDAP? > > I selected LDAP options in the "authconfig-tui" application, per the > documentation here: > > http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-ldap-pam.html > > > when I try to query the

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread
James Bensley napsal(a): > I can't understand why this is though, especially since autoconf and > autoheader are both listed by the rpm manage with; > rpm-qa | grep auto > automake-1.9.2-3 > autoconf-2.59-5 > > So they really are there and clearly visible? What is the world coming to ay? > > Than

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
James Bensley wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:30:30 +: > php is needed by php-xcache-5.2.5_1.2.1-jason.1.x86_64 what does rpm -q php say? And, as has already been said, it's not very nice to omit OS information. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread James Bensley
Hi David, Thanks for the speed reply; > So everything's installed from the source rpm knows nothing about them > >> php is needed by php-xcache-4.4.9_1.2.1-jason.1.x86_64 >> php-devel is needed by php-xcache-4.4.9_1.2.1-jason.1.x86_64 > > Try to build it with --nodeps, so it will not looup in

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread
James Bensley napsal(a): > This brings back nothing indicating that php isn't installed but it > DEFFINATLY is, however we/I/the web dev team compiled it from the > source not through rpms (as I didn't actually think it was available > this way?) so might it not show up for that reason? So everyth

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread James Bensley
Hi David, > Well, > you should mention it first you are running RHEL 3.x. Yes, my bad, sorry about that! >So you are running > php 4.3.2. Package you are trying to install is built agains Centos 4 > Plus php. I have php 4.4.9. Yeah I was hoping the CentOS 4 build might work on RHEL 3.4.5-2? >

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread
James Bensley napsal(a): > Hi David, > Thanks for the reply; > > Yeah I have everything that is required already installed that's why > I'm trying to move away from building to xCache source to using the > rpm instead. I downloaded the i386 rpm package you linked to me for > CentOS 4 (as I am actu

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread James Bensley
Hi David, Thanks for the reply; Yeah I have everything that is required already installed that's why I'm trying to move away from building to xCache source to using the rpm instead. I downloaded the i386 rpm package you linked to me for CentOS 4 (as I am actually running Red Hat 3.4.5-2!) but got

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread
James Bensley napsal(a): > Hey Kai, thanks for the response, I think I have found the problem; > > For some reason if I download the source for xCache or eAccelerator > and unpack the tar ball then change to that directory and run phpize I > still get the error: > Cannot find autoconf. Please chec