Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine from a Linux host

2009-01-12 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of >Marko Vojinovic >Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 1:36 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine from a Linux host > > >> ssh -L 3390:priva

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-12 Thread Rudi Ahlers
> > Have you looked at the SME server disto from http://www.contribs.org? > It installs as an appliance-like setup managed through a simple web > interface. The code is mostly centos and includes hoard webmail running > over dovecot with maildir storage out of the box. It doesn't have a > shared

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

2009-01-12 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Vandaman wrote: > David Mackintosh wrote: > > > > Would you like the joke explained to you in more detail? > > > > What time will your mummy come home. You should not be playing > on a mailing list like this. :-) > > We have the serious business of CentOS to talk about. Did I already tell yo

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:59:37 +0100: > You have a windows machine on the network and it gets its address by dhcp? Yeah, I knew that ;-) > If so it now tries to tell the name server that it has a new fancy shiny > address! I thought I had configured the client not to do this

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Mogens Kjaer
Robert Moskowitz wrote: ... > Oh, I remember this from the last update... So off to > /var/named/chroot/etc and do a 'chown named:named *' then named started. I see the same problem every time bind is updated. My /var/named/chroot/var/named files are writable by named because I have a DDNS setu

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Mogens Kjaer wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > ... > > Oh, I remember this from the last update... So off to > > /var/named/chroot/etc and do a 'chown named:named *' then named started. > > I see the same problem every time bind is updated. > > My /var/named/chroot/var/named files are writable

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-12 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> >> We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware > >> style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using > >> Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any > >> recommendations/opinions. Any input would be greatly appreciated. > >> Thank you >

[CentOS] Solved - Re: After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> I just applied the BIND updates. >> >> Then I fixed the one file that had a second include of named.ca >> (remembered that from last time) and did a 'service named restart', and >> it failed. >> > > Never heard about someone having

Re: [CentOS] Solved - Re: After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > And therein hangs my snafu. named.acl only had 600 for permissions so > when the group was changed to root by the update, the named process > could no longer access the file even with the owner being named. Go > figure. So I just need to fix my permissions to 644 and

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Mogens Kjaer
Ralph Angenendt wrote: ... > Which really is strange, as only rndc.key gets "chowned" by the scripts > in the bind package. Maybe it's because I have bind-chroot installed? The script calls: /usr/sbin/bind-chroot-admin --enable > /dev/null 2>&1; as part of postinstall, and /usr/sbin/bind-chroot

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > This is one of the beauties of OpenGroupware - it's just PostgreSQL and > the filesystem. Simple and clean; PostgreSQL 8.3 performance is very > good. And you just reuse whatever SMTP/IMAP architecture you have or > want, this a strong bias towards Cyrus (of course

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:19 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote on Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:59:37 +0100: > > > You have a windows machine on the network and it gets its address by dhcp? > > Yeah, I knew that ;-) > > > If so it now tries to tell the name server that it has a new fancy s

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 15:16 +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > ... > > Which really is strange, as only rndc.key gets "chowned" by the scripts > > in the bind package. > > Maybe it's because I have bind-chroot installed? > > The script calls: > > /usr/sbin/bind-chroot-admin --

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

2009-01-12 Thread David G. Miller
"John" wrote: >> > -Original Message- >> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org >> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt >> > Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 5:13 AM >> > To: centos@centos.org >> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter >> > >> > Robert Moskowi

[CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Vandaman
There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5) and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind, or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs? If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could be offere

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Mogens Kjaer wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > ... > > Which really is strange, as only rndc.key gets "chowned" by the scripts > > in the bind package. > > Maybe it's because I have bind-chroot installed? > > The script calls: > > /usr/sbin/bind-chroot-admin --enable > /dev/null 2>&1; > > as pa

Re: [CentOS] Solved - Re: After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > And therein hangs my snafu. named.acl only had 600 for permissions so > > when the group was changed to root by the update, the named process > > could no longer access the file even with the owner being named. Go > > figure. So I just need

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Craig White wrote: > > by default, BIND will ignore attempts by clients to register dynamic dns > after getting an ip address from dhcp - that is what is being logged. > > You would have to 'allow-update' within a specific zone definition to > change default behavior. > > FWIW - I think that DHCP

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

2009-01-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 08:37 -0700, David G. Miller wrote: > > audacity is ready for prime time. Anyone know of any other packages > that are dependent on wxGTK and need the most recent version? I don't use audicity or much that's not "box stock", but maybe this helps? $ rpm -q --whatrequires

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

2009-01-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:37, David G. Miller wrote: > Anyone know of any other packages > that are dependent on wxGTK and need the most recent version? IIRC, vlc needs wxGTK 2.8, that's why Dag upgraded wxGTK in his repository. Search the archives of the rpmforge mailing list and you shoul

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:05 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > > > by default, BIND will ignore attempts by clients to register dynamic dns > > after getting an ip address from dhcp - that is what is being logged. > > > > You would have to 'allow-update' within a specific zone def

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 09:35 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:05 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Craig White wrote: > > > > > > by default, BIND will ignore attempts by clients to register dynamic dns > > > after getting an ip address from dhcp - that is what is being logged. > >

Re: [CentOS] Solved - Re: After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >>> And therein hangs my snafu. named.acl only had 600 for permissions so >>> when the group was changed to root by the update, the named process >>> could no longer access the file even with the owner being

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 47, Issue 4

2009-01-12 Thread centos-announce-request
-- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090112/97909228/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Mo

[CentOS] hostapd or other AP software for Centos

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Is there a recent rpm available for hostapd? I found 0.6.0 over at atrpms.net via rpmfind. Actually a more recent ver than available for FC8,9, or 10! But http://hostap.epitest.fi/hostapd/ shows the current version is 0.6.7. And does anyone have this running on Centos? Is there a 'better' AP

[CentOS] anyone using an ATI card and fglrx with 5.2?

2009-01-12 Thread Dave Stevens
And does it work ok? any special use cases or installation issues? I'm thinking of a 64 bit installation with an RV530 chipset. Dave -- Canada must refuse to be entangled in any more wars fought to make the world safe for capitalism. -- The Regina Manifesto, 1933 _

[CentOS] Top and Iostat

2009-01-12 Thread Matt
Is there anyway to tell with top or iostat which process is hogging all the disk I/O? Matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread James B. Byrne
I have these rules in effect: ]# iptables --list --line-numbers Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) num target prot opt source destination 1RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) num target prot opt source destin

Re: [CentOS] Top and Iostat

2009-01-12 Thread John R Pierce
Matt wrote: > Is there anyway to tell with top or iostat which process is hogging > all the disk I/O? > iostat won't drill down to per process statistics `top` or `ps` shows any processes in heavy iowait... or, maybe lsof could give you some clues (as it lists all open files) ___

Re: [CentOS] Top and Iostat

2009-01-12 Thread nate
Matt wrote: > Is there anyway to tell with top or iostat which process is hogging > all the disk I/O? If it is hogging "all" of the disk I/O the "state" of the process when shown in top will frequently be "D" (others will usually be "S" or maybe "R") Same goes for viewing the process using ps. n

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Mon, January 12, 2009 1:37 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: > I have these rules in effect: > 1DROP all -- 202.14.0.0/24anywhere > 2DROP all -- 220.232.0.0/24 anywhere > > Note particularly line 2. > > Now, notwithstanding the above, I see this in my /var/log/sec

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread nate
James B. Byrne wrote: > Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references) > num target prot opt source destination > 1DROP all -- 202.14.0.0/24anywhere > 2DROP all -- 220.232.0.0/24 anywhere > Jan 12 13:36:02 inet01 sshd[16056]: Received disconnect

[CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-12 Thread Sam Drinkard
List, After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I started seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a "back" function on any pages or tabs. Also, I get some kind of strange message "Assertion Failed ASSERT:***Search:_installLocation: engine has no file! Stack Tr

Re: [CentOS] Top and Iostat

2009-01-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:43 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > Matt wrote: > > Is there anyway to tell with top or iostat which process is hogging > > all the disk I/O? IMHO, The best way is to install and use the System Activity Reporting (SAR) system. It's native, available, as detailed or general

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 13:55 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote: > List, > > After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I started > seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a "back" function on any > pages or tabs. Also, I get some kind of strange message > > > "Assertion

Re: [CentOS] anyone using an ATI card and fglrx with 5.2?

2009-01-12 Thread Mark Pryor
--- On Mon, 1/12/09, Dave Stevens wrote: > From: Dave Stevens > Subject: [CentOS] anyone using an ATI card and fglrx with 5.2? > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 10:31 AM > And does it work ok? any special use cases or installation > issues? I'm > thinking of a 64

[CentOS] non-restraint; was: CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread R P Herrold
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote: > There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5) > and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt > and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind, > or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs? > If more volunteers are

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-12 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote: >After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started > seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a >"back" function on any > pages or tabs. I am running Firefox on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit) (fully updated) and I am not seein

Re: [CentOS] non-restraint; was: CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Mon, January 12, 2009 2:32 pm, R P Herrold wrote: > How about just NOT popping off with whatever little thought > wanders into your head for two days running? Amen! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ce

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread William Warren
Vandaman wrote: > There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5) > and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt > and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind, > or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs? > > If more volunteers are needed I'm sure

[CentOS] yum update fails: CentOS 5.2

2009-01-12 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
It gets as far as telling me: Total download size: 207 M It doesn't ask if its ok. But if I type y it reports: Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages: Then it does nothing. I can't kill it with CRTL-C, but I killed the yum process with kill -9 from another window. I retried it several times

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Spiro Harvey
> If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could > be offered by the CentOS community. you are either the world's best troll, or a complete moron. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [CentOS] non-restraint; was: CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:36 -0500, Marko A. Jennings wrote: > On Mon, January 12, 2009 2:32 pm, R P Herrold wrote: > > > How about just NOT popping off with whatever little thought > > wanders into your head for two days running? > > Amen! s/!/ Brother&/ > -- Bill _

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails: CentOS 5.2

2009-01-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 19:46 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > It gets as far as telling me: > > Total download size: 207 M > > It doesn't ask if its ok. But > if I type y it reports: >Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages: > > Then it does nothing. I can't kill it > with CRTL-C, but

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails: CentOS 5.2

2009-01-12 Thread Pintér Tibor
> It doesn't ask if its ok. But > if I type y it reports: >Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages: > > Then it does nothing. I can't kill it > with CRTL-C, but I killed the yum process > with kill -9 from another window. > I retried it several times; same result. tried deleting /var/lib/rp

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread James B. Byrne
Thanks for the help. I completely missed that error. This guy is persistent. After I cut off 220.232.152.137 we had intrusion attempts from 216.107.171.10. After I cut off that one then we had attempts from 69.80.235.135. Since blocking that network we have had no more attempts recorded. When

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails: CentOS 5.2

2009-01-12 Thread Spiro Harvey
> tried deleting /var/lib/rpm/__* after killing all yum processes? Yum has command line options to do its housecleaning which I would try first. yum help clean What does deleting the __db files do that the yum clean all doesn't? (which I notice doesn't delete those specific files) -- Spiro H

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-12 Thread Robert
Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote: > >>After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started >> seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a >"back" function on any >> pages or tabs. >> > > I am running Firefox on CentOS 5.2

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread David Klann
New to the list, so please forgive unintentional netiquette transgressions... On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:24:54 -0600 "James B. Byrne" wrote: > Thanks for the help. I completely missed that error. > > > > throttle threshold of 15 seconds. I am still concerned about any > brute force attempt to dis

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:27 -0600, Robert wrote: > > My Firefox is running just fine, too, Lanny. Seems like I recall the > O.P. having problems with cross-pollinated repositories some time ago. A > Firefox update history might be helpful: > > [r...@mavis log]# grep -i firefox* /var/lo

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread Steve Huff
On Jan 12, 2009, at 3:24 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: It is evident that this attacker had more than one netblock available. It is conceivable that, instead of serially attacking us, they could just have easily attempted multiple simultaneous connections from all of their available IP address

[CentOS] gcc 4.1 and OpenMP?

2009-01-12 Thread Davide Cittaro
I was modifying a source to add OpenMP capabilities. I knew that gcc supports OpenMP since version 4.2, so I've compiled a recent (4.3.2) gcc and installed in my home directory, this because gcc shipped with CentOS 5.2 is 4.1. I've then noticed that my executable links /usr/lib64/libgomp.so,

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails: CentOS 5.2

2009-01-12 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-12-2009 12:24 PM Spiro Harvey spake the following: >> tried deleting /var/lib/rpm/__* after killing all yum processes? > > Yum has command line options to do its housecleaning which I would > try first. > > yum help clean > > > What does deleting the __db files do that the yum clean all d

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Vandaman
William Warren wrote: > how about you doing something to help instead of acting > like an > emperor..which by the way has no clothes and no throne. > I don't see why people have got their knickers in a twist over a simple question. Was it not me who noticed updates were missing for nearly a mont

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Max Hetrick
Vandaman wrote: > I'm sure there are plenty of people who run CentOS in > production and going without security updates for a month > is not ideal. Many would offer to help were any offers > for help made. Then I would suggest for those that they purchase RHEL with support. CentOS is a free co

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Vandaman
R P Herrold wrote: > You hold no @centos.org, nor role beyond mailing list > participant. A non-enumerated list is worse than useless, > as > it falsely causes concern. So near as I can tell (and I > read > ALL bug filings, centdor-sec, and a daily custom locally > produced report of all ups

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Mon, January 12, 2009 5:04 pm, Vandaman wrote: > Members of the CentOS community should, in a free world be able > to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer if that is needed. > Off course some don't live in the free world so its > unfortunate. > > Regards, > Vandaman. Vandaman, >From wh

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Spiro Harvey
> So I need a @centos.org address to ask the obvious do I? If so > I missed your response to the post I made last month about > security updates missing for almost a month. No, but the obvious link that you're not making is that you're not actually offering the help. You have blatantly said in o

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Googlemail
On Monday 12 January 2009 22:16:25 Marko A. Jennings wrote: > On Mon, January 12, 2009 5:04 pm, Vandaman wrote: > > > > Members of the CentOS community should, in a free world be able > > to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer if that is needed. > > Off course some don't live in the fre

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Craig White wrote on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:45:22 -0700: > by default, BIND will ignore attempts by clients to register dynamic dns > after getting an ip address from dhcp - that is what is being logged. so, the Jan 11 16:38:00 chacha named[11307]: client 192.168.1.228#1994: view internal: update

Re: [CentOS] Top and Iostat

2009-01-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
William L. Maltby wrote on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:08:40 -0500: > The best way is to install and use the System Activity Reporting (SAR) > system. AFAIK, it won't show any file-specific stuff. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-12-2009 2:27 PM Googlemail spake the following: > On Monday 12 January 2009 22:16:25 Marko A. Jennings > wrote: >> On Mon, January 12, 2009 5:04 pm, Vandaman wrote: >> >> >>> Members of the CentOS community should, in a free > world be able >>> to ask valid questions aand offer to volunteer

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread Ned Slider
David Klann wrote: > New to the list, so please forgive unintentional netiquette > transgressions... > Welcome :-) > > Discounting DoS or DDoS attacks, my solution to nefarious SSH attempts > is threefold: 1) run sshd on a port other than 22 (I know, obscurity > is not security...), 2) disabl

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread David Klann
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:47:08 -0600 Ned Slider wrote: > Welcome :-) > Thanks! > > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH Good guide -- thanks for pointing it out. I also like the idea of implementing denyhosts that Steve Huff pointed out. I use that on a public (virtual) server I

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Jay Leafey wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Can you do this? I have not found the options to get this to happen. >> >> So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of >> WAV files with a control file for later burning to CD, but I want an >> iso image that I can archive an

Re: [CentOS] Top and Iostat

2009-01-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 23:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:08:40 -0500: > > > The best way is to install and use the System Activity Reporting (SAR) > > system. > > AFAIK, it won't show any file-specific stuff. It's been so long, I don't remember now

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 19:48 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Jay Leafey wrote: > > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> Can you do this? I have not found the options to get this to happen. > >> > >> So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of > >> WAV files with a control file fo

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Could it be this simple? Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Can you do this? I have not found the options to get this to happen. > > So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV > files with a control file for later burning to CD, but I want an iso > image that I can archive a

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 19:31, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV > files with a control file for later burning to CD, but I want an iso > image that I can archive and burn audio CDs to use as they get used up. No. The name "iso

[CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-12 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
This is a continuation of the thread: "yum update fails: CentOS 5.2". I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update. It ran correctly, except for these issues: 1. As previously mentioned, after deciding what it is going to do, It doesn't ask if its ok. But if I type y it reports:

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-12 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > This is a continuation of the thread: > "yum update fails: CentOS 5.2". > > I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update. > > It ran correctly, except for these issues: Okay, a few things to get out of the way first What's th

[CentOS] /var/spool/lpd in exports

2009-01-12 Thread Jerry Geis
Is this line needed in /etc/exports for anything other and printing (I presume) /var/spool/lpd *(rw) I scan reported this: Vulnerability Details Date: Sun 11 Jan 2009 21:26:56 MET Vuln#: 100103 Vulnerability: successfully mounted /var/spool/lpd ToDo: *_/Restrict nfs export to dedicated h

Re: [CentOS] /var/spool/lpd in exports

2009-01-12 Thread Stephen Harris
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:29:21PM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > Is this line needed in /etc/exports for anything other and printing (I > presume) > > /var/spool/lpd *(rw) Ask the person who put it there; it's not there by default :-) Printing doesn't need it. I can't think of _anything_

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-12 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:25:06 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED > wrote: >> This is a continuation of the thread: >> "yum update fails: CentOS 5.2". >> >> I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update. >> >> It ran correctly, except for these i

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 19:31, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV >> files with a control file for later burning to CD, but I want an iso >> image that I can archive and burn audio CDs to use

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 19:31, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >>> So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV >>> files with a control file for later burning to CD, but I want an iso >>> imag

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
William L. Maltby wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 19:48 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> Jay Leafey wrote: >> >>> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> Can you do this? I have not found the options to get this to happen. So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a

[CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread R P Herrold
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote: > R P Herrold wrote: >> ... you do NOT file bugs in the bug tracker to make formal >> your concern. > I made last month about security updates missing for almost > a month. no bug -> no issue. > Members of the CentOS community should, in a free world be >

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> Filipe Brandenburger wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 19:31, Robert Moskowitz >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV files with a

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread John R Pierce
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Oh, I should add the closest I have come to this is: > > cdrdao read-cd --device /dev/hdb --datafile musicimage.bin musicimage-toc > > that is 2 files. Then I can burn a CD with: > > cdrdao write --device /dev/hdb musicimage-toc > that sounds very similar to the bin/cu

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Moskowitz
John R Pierce wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> Oh, I should add the closest I have come to this is: >> >> cdrdao read-cd --device /dev/hdb --datafile musicimage.bin musicimage-toc >> >> that is 2 files. Then I can burn a CD with: >> >> cdrdao write --device /dev/hdb musicimage-toc >> >>

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-12 Thread partha chowdhury
Sam Drinkard wrote: > List, > > After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I started > seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a "back" function on any > pages or tabs. Also, I get some kind of strange message > > > "Assertion Failed ASSERT:***Search:_installLoc

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

2009-01-12 Thread MHR
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Vandaman wrote: > David Mackintosh wrote: > >> >> Would you like the joke explained to you in more detail? >> > > What time will your mummy come home. You should not be playing > on a mailing list like this. :-) > > We have the serious business of CentOS to talk

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

2009-01-12 Thread MHR
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> What is there available for Centos? > > ffmpeg, mencoder. > ffmpeg is also handy for stripping the mp3 sound parts out of a .flv (or any other) video file. It's a nice, quick CLI tool mhr __

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

2009-01-12 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 20:25 -0800, MHR wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Vandaman > wrote: > > David Mackintosh wrote: > > > >> > >> Would you like the joke explained to you in more detail? > >> > > > > What time will your mummy come home. You should not be playing > > on a mailing list

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

2009-01-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > What is there available for Centos? Now that Audacity is no longer > available to us... > > I do have Audacity on an XP system, so I do have the option to shuffle > files between systems Sox would be the obvious choice for conversions but the Centos version has m

[CentOS] acroread = resource hog

2009-01-12 Thread Ed Donahue
Any have trouble with acroread taking up massive cpu and memory? I exited my Firefox browser and the lil bastard was still hogging up my resources. Took up 69% of 4GB, and wouldn't let go, until a kill -9 showed'em, have to do it every time I open a pdf in firefox. Any use Xpdf or something else