Re: [CentOS] OT? Lost Sourceforge URL

2009-01-13 Thread Bob Taylor
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:05 -0800, Scott Silva wrote: > on 1-13-2009 11:51 AM Bob Taylor spake the following: > > Good morning/afternoon, > > > > I seem to have lost the repodata for sourceforge. I do not remember > > where I got the repodata from. Could someone give me a URL please? I gotta jus

Re: [CentOS] mp3 to wav converter

2009-01-13 Thread JohnS
>David G. Miller wrote: >It's actually a tad easier than that as long as you don't mind forcing >wxGTK to stay at 2.6.3-1. I just removed the "current" version of wxGTK >(rpm -e wxGTK-2.8.9-1.el5.rf ) and then installed >audacity-1.3.0b-1.el5.rf and wxGTK-2.6.3-1.el5.rf by doing a "yum >local

Re: [CentOS] OT? Lost Sourceforge URL

2009-01-13 Thread MHR
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Bob Taylor wrote: > Good morning/afternoon, > > I seem to have lost the repodata for sourceforge. I do not remember > where I got the repodata from. Could someone give me a URL please? > > Thanks a bunch! Perhaps you've heard of google? mhr _

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

2009-01-13 Thread MHR
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 20:25 -0800, MHR wrote: >> >> Well, there goes the neighborhood >> >> No more fun aloud here! >> >> > > This type of post is equally offensive > OMG! :-} I realize that my obviously feeble attempt at humor was

Re: [CentOS] RAID level and killing a job

2009-01-13 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, First of all: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:54, Scott R. Ehrlich wrote: > ... realize I want to kill it soon after > (logged in as root). I issue ps auwx|grep name_of_command, get the PID, and > issue kill -9 PID. ps auwx|grep name_of_command is still running. *NEVER* get used to using kill -

Re: [CentOS] time command with options

2009-01-13 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 13:24, nate wrote: > Try /usr/bin/time instead of 'time', I believe 'time' is a internal > command for bash as well. Right. However, /usr/bin/time won't accept the syntax above, this will not work: $ /usr/bin/time { date; } Of course you can: $ /usr/bin/time date O

Re: [CentOS] acroread = resource hog

2009-01-13 Thread MHR
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Ed Donahue wrote: > Any have trouble with acroread taking up massive cpu and memory? > > I exited my Firefox browser and the lil bastard was still hogging up > my resources. > > Took up 69% of 4GB, and wouldn't let go, until a kill -9 showed'em, > have to do it eve

Re: [CentOS] Installing kernel RHEL-5.3 on CentOS 5.2 (x86_64)

2009-01-13 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote: > Hi > > I tried to install the kernel Red Hat 5.3 x86_64 (2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64) > with the command: > rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64.rpm > but there is problem with dependecy: ecryptfs-util < 44. How to solve > problems with depen

Re: [CentOS] Installing kernel RHEL-5.3 on CentOS 5.2 (x86_64)

2009-01-13 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote: > Hi > > I tried to install the kernel Red Hat 5.3 x86_64 (2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64) > with the command: > rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64.rpm DO NOT use the -U option when installing the kernel. Use -ivh instead. Akemi _

Re: [CentOS] Installing kernel RHEL-5.3 on CentOS 5.2 (x86_64)

2009-01-13 Thread nate
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote: > Hi > > I tried to install the kernel Red Hat 5.3 x86_64 (2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64) > with the command: > rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64.rpm > but there is problem with dependecy: ecryptfs-util < 44. How to solve > problems with depencies when installing a beta kerne

[CentOS] Installing kernel RHEL-5.3 on CentOS 5.2 (x86_64)

2009-01-13 Thread Marcelo M. Garcia
Hi I tried to install the kernel Red Hat 5.3 x86_64 (2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64) with the command: rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64.rpm but there is problem with dependecy: ecryptfs-util < 44. How to solve problems with depencies when installing a beta kernel? I'm trying this kernel to see if

Re: [CentOS] Postfix header check help

2009-01-13 Thread mouss
Plant, Dean a écrit : > Hi list, > > I have a requirement for a mail server that only allows email to pass > with a particular word in the subject line. > > Reading the header checks docs for Postfix I thought I may be able to > add this rule: > > !/^Subject: .*dingdong/ REJECT Need to add dingd

Re: [CentOS] Postfix header check help

2009-01-13 Thread Bill Campbell
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009, Ned Slider wrote: >Plant, Dean wrote: >> >> !/^Subject: .*dingdong/ REJECT Need to add dingdong to subject line to >> send >> > >Hmm, try losing the space maybe? > >!/^Subject:.*dingdong/ REJECT Need to add dingdong to subject line Or perhaps two rules /^Subject:.*dingdong

Re: [CentOS] OT? Lost Sourceforge URL

2009-01-13 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-13-2009 11:51 AM Bob Taylor spake the following: > Good morning/afternoon, > > I seem to have lost the repodata for sourceforge. I do not remember > where I got the repodata from. Could someone give me a URL please? > > Thanks a bunch! Are you looking for sourceforge, or rpmforge? http://so

Re: [CentOS] ASUS PT6 or Intel DX58SO for CentOS?

2009-01-13 Thread nate
Chris Boyd wrote: > I'm looking at setting up a new machine to run CentOS 5 and a few > VMWare machines to test Windows XP, Vista, and 7. I'm working with a > custom PC shop and they've recommended I use either the ASUS PT6 or > Intel DX58SO. Any feedback good or bad on either of these? Neither

Re: [CentOS] ASUS PT6 or Intel DX58SO for CentOS?

2009-01-13 Thread Tosh
Chris Boyd wrote: > I'm looking at setting up a new machine to run CentOS 5 and a few > VMWare machines to test Windows XP, Vista, and 7. I'm working with a > custom PC shop and they've recommended I use either the ASUS PT6 or > Intel DX58SO. Any feedback good or bad on either of these? I run a

Re: [CentOS] gcc 4.1 and OpenMP?

2009-01-13 Thread Eduardo Grosclaude
>Is CentOS default compiler >OpenMP ready? Does this mean I don't have to compile my own compiler? AFAIK it is, I haven't had to do anything but link with the proper libraries to use OpenMP -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina

[CentOS] ASUS PT6 or Intel DX58SO for CentOS?

2009-01-13 Thread Chris Boyd
I'm looking at setting up a new machine to run CentOS 5 and a few VMWare machines to test Windows XP, Vista, and 7. I'm working with a custom PC shop and they've recommended I use either the ASUS PT6 or Intel DX58SO. Any feedback good or bad on either of these? Thanks! --Chris ___

Re: [CentOS] Postfix header check help

2009-01-13 Thread Ned Slider
Plant, Dean wrote: > > !/^Subject: .*dingdong/ REJECT Need to add dingdong to subject line to > send > Hmm, try losing the space maybe? !/^Subject:.*dingdong/ REJECT Need to add dingdong to subject line ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:

[CentOS] OT? Lost Sourceforge URL

2009-01-13 Thread Bob Taylor
Good morning/afternoon, I seem to have lost the repodata for sourceforge. I do not remember where I got the repodata from. Could someone give me a URL please? Thanks a bunch! -- Bob Taylor ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.

Re: [CentOS] RAID level and killing a job

2009-01-13 Thread Scott R. Ehrlich
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 10:04 -0800, nate wrote: >> > >>> Second question - A newly installed server consisting of CentOS 5.2, >>> straight >>> off the DVD, I invoke a command by hand, realize I want to kill it soon >>> after >>> (logged in as root)

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine from a Linux host

2009-01-13 Thread Les Mikesell
Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Monday 12 January 2009 09:01, Sorin Srbu wrote: ssh -L 3390:private-ip-of-remote-XP-machine:3389 usern...@ip-or-hostname-of-remote-nat-server >>> Well, first, private-ip-of-remote-XP-machine is dynamic, given by my ISP's >>> dhcp server, so I cannot have 10

Re: [CentOS] RAID level and killing a job

2009-01-13 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 10:04 -0800, nate wrote: > > > Second question - A newly installed server consisting of CentOS 5.2, > > straight > > off the DVD, I invoke a command by hand, realize I want to kill it soon > > after > > (logged in as root). I issue ps auwx|grep name_of_command, get the PID

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

2009-01-13 Thread Stewart Williams
John R Pierce wrote: > Stewart Williams wrote: >> John R Pierce wrote: >> >>> Stewart Williams wrote: >>> The block I/O is the thing that concerns me as mostly I am serving a 650MB file via samba to 5 clients and I think this is where I need the speed. >>> is th

Re: [CentOS] time command with options

2009-01-13 Thread nate
Jeff wrote: > Unless somebody else can shed some more light on this, I guess you are > stuck with output redirection provided by your chosen shell. Try /usr/bin/time instead of 'time', I believe 'time' is a internal command for bash as well. Threw me off for a while as well. (e.g. redirecting ti

Re: [CentOS] time command with options

2009-01-13 Thread Bill Campbell
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009, Jerry Geis wrote: >I am trying to get timing paramters from a CGI program. >date is just a command for example used here. > >when I do: time { date; } >everything is good. > >when I do: time -o file { date; } >I get > time -o file { date; } >bash: syntax error near unexpected

Re: [CentOS] acroread = resource hog

2009-01-13 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Ed Donahue wrote: > Any have trouble with acroread taking up massive cpu and memory? > > I exited my Firefox browser and the lil bastard was still hogging up > my resources. > > Took up 69% of 4GB, and wouldn't let go, until a kill -9 showed'em, > have to do it ev

Re: [CentOS] RAID level and killing a job

2009-01-13 Thread nate
Scott R. Ehrlich wrote: > First question - under CentOS 5, if I created non LVM partitions on a server > with 6 disks - 2 disks are RAID 1 (OS), how do I remind myself or inquire > the > type of RAID of the remaining 4 disks (RAID 1 or RAID 5), without having to > reboot? If they are 4 independent

[CentOS] RAID level and killing a job

2009-01-13 Thread Scott R. Ehrlich
First question - under CentOS 5, if I created non LVM partitions on a server with 6 disks - 2 disks are RAID 1 (OS), how do I remind myself or inquire the type of RAID of the remaining 4 disks (RAID 1 or RAID 5), without having to reboot? Second question - A newly installed server consisting of

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-13 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-12-2009 6:02 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following: > Filipe Brandenburger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 19:31, Robert Moskowitz >> wrote: >> >>> So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV >>> files with a control file for later burning to CD,

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine from a Linux host

2009-01-13 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 12 January 2009 04:13, Christopher Chan wrote: > > the connection must be initiated from C's side to A. This simply cannot > > work simultaneously, so I tried to make use of my public server B which > > can be used as a "bridge" between A and C. So, A connects to B, C > > connects to B, a

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine fro m a Linux host

2009-01-13 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 12 January 2009 09:01, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> ssh -L 3390:private-ip-of-remote-XP-machine:3389 > >> usern...@ip-or-hostname-of-remote-nat-server > > > >Well, first, private-ip-of-remote-XP-machine is dynamic, given by my ISP's > >dhcp server, so I cannot have 100% guarantee that it wi

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine from a Linux host

2009-01-13 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 12 January 2009 03:36, Scott Silva wrote: > on 1-9-2009 12:41 PM Marko Vojinovic spake the following: > > I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years > > (yes, I know, it sounds ridiculous, but still...). What I need is remote > > access to it to perform regula

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-13 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
I am redoing it with script, and it is working well. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] acroread = resource hog

2009-01-13 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 10:26 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 00:58 -0500, Ed Donahue wrote: > > Any have trouble with acroread taking up massive cpu and memory? > > Not here. > > > > > I exited my Firefox browser and the lil bastard was still hogging up > > my resources. >

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-13 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 10:40 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:36:03AM -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > > When you redirected stderr, with 2>&1 (btw, &> is shorthand for that) > > &> is a csh-ism and also in bash. It's not correct in other sh-like shells, > so don't use i

[CentOS] Postfix header check help

2009-01-13 Thread Plant, Dean
Hi list, I have a requirement for a mail server that only allows email to pass with a particular word in the subject line. Reading the header checks docs for Postfix I thought I may be able to add this rule: !/^Subject: .*dingdong/ REJECT Need to add dingdong to subject line to send Which shoul

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-13 Thread Stephen Harris
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:36:03AM -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > When you redirected stderr, with 2>&1 (btw, &> is shorthand for that) &> is a csh-ism and also in bash. It's not correct in other sh-like shells, so don't use it if you want to do portable programming. In particular don't use i

Re: [CentOS] time command with options

2009-01-13 Thread Jeff
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am trying to get timing paramters from a CGI program. > date is just a command for example used here. > > when I do: time { date; } > everything is good. > > when I do: time -o file { date; } > I get > time -o file { date; } > bash: syntax er

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-13 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:00 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:18:37 +, Tony Mountifield wrote: > > [...] > > > > This suggests that yum is not flushing output, possibly because it > > doesn't think it's stdio is on a tty. > > > > 1. Were you running yum update loc

Re: [CentOS] acroread = resource hog

2009-01-13 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 00:58 -0500, Ed Donahue wrote: > Any have trouble with acroread taking up massive cpu and memory? Not here. > > I exited my Firefox browser and the lil bastard was still hogging up > my resources. I don't see it here. Maybe I need to look next time even though I see no ad

[CentOS] time command with options

2009-01-13 Thread Jerry Geis
I am trying to get timing paramters from a CGI program. date is just a command for example used here. when I do: time { date; } everything is good. when I do: time -o file { date; } I get time -o file { date; } bash: syntax error near unexpected token `}' How do I correctly issue the command wi

Re: [CentOS] Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts

2009-01-13 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 20:25 -0800, MHR wrote: > > Well, there goes the neighborhood > > No more fun aloud here! What's wrong with silent fun? >;-) In fact, from my experience on this list, some fun would be much more appreciated if it were silent, but not all of course. > > > > mhr >

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-13 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:18:37 +, Tony Mountifield wrote: [...] > > This suggests that yum is not flushing output, possibly because it > doesn't think it's stdio is on a tty. > > 1. Were you running yum update locally on the console, or remotely via a > network connection of some kind, e.g. ss

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-13 Thread Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:31:20 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: [...] >> I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 > > that means exactly what? > > Kai I have a DVD image of CentOS 5.2 downloaded a few months ago. It is installed on an ftp server on a nearby machine. I booted the netinstall disk and did a comp

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

2009-01-13 Thread Scott Mazur
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:31:19 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote > Craig White wrote on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:45:22 -0700: > > > by default, BIND will ignore attempts by clients to register dynamic dns > > after getting an ip address from dhcp - that is what is being logged. > > so, the > Jan 11 16:38:00 ch

Re: [CentOS] webmail question

2009-01-13 Thread Rainer Duffner
chloe K schrieb: > Hi > > I am using squirrel webmail and the impa sometimes is timeout > > What should I increase the performance? > User an imap-proxy. Maybe: http://www.imapproxy.org/ Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:/

[CentOS] webmail question

2009-01-13 Thread chloe K
Hi I am using squirrel webmail and the impa sometimes is timeout What should I increase the performance? Thank you - Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark your f

Re: [CentOS] SOVLED Can sound be redirected from a remote computer to local computer?

2009-01-13 Thread dcw
On Sunday 11 January 2009 1:25 am, Brian McKerr wrote: > Try NX from nomachine.com. The Free version FreeNX is in the centos extras > repo. Had to do a second install on the remote computer (I probably did something wrong the first time) but everything that I needed to work, does work. I even hav

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-13 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article , Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > This is a continuation of the thread: >"yum update fails: CentOS 5.2". > > I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update. > > It ran correctly, except for these issues: > > 1. As previously mentioned, after deciding what it >is going to do

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I'm not interested in your misguided vendetta. Can you please take this to private mail? Thanks. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org htt

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-13 Thread Sam Drinkard
William L. Maltby wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 13:55 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote: > >> List, >> >> After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I started >> seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a "back" function on any >> pages or tabs. Also, I get some kind of st

Re: [CentOS] acroread = resource hog

2009-01-13 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Ed Donahue wrote: > Any use Xpdf or something else? Use evince. Acroread just isn't worth it. Ralph pgpmaX8VqOIYt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-13 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Sam Drinkard wrote: > After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I started > seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a "back" function on any > pages or tabs. Also, I get some kind of strange message > > "Assertion Failed ASSERT:***Search:_installLocation: engine

Re: [CentOS] Top and Iostat

2009-01-13 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Matt wrote: > Is there anyway to tell with top or iostat which process is hogging > all the disk I/O? No, you need systemtap for this. has examples. Remember, you'd also need the corresponding kernel-debuginfo package for your running kernel wh

Re: [CentOS] Creating an iso image of a audio CD with K3B

2009-01-13 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Robert Moskowitz wrote: I think cdrdao will do what you want. It's in the base repository, so no extra repos needed. >>> No, it cannot make an iso image. >> >> How about "mkisofs"? Part of cdrtools, IIRC. > > This is for making a file system into an iso, does not seem to sa

Re: [CentOS] (Semi-OT) Problems with Firefox

2009-01-13 Thread Sam Drinkard
William L. Maltby wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 13:55 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote: > >> List, >> >> After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I started >> seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a "back" function on any >> pages or tabs. Also, I get some kind of st

Re: [CentOS] acroread = resource hog

2009-01-13 Thread Didi Hoffmann
On 13 Jan 2009, at 05:58, Ed Donahue wrote: > Any have trouble with acroread taking up massive cpu and memory? > > I exited my Firefox browser and the lil bastard was still hogging up > my resources. > > Took up 69% of 4GB, and wouldn't let go, until a kill -9 showed'em, > have to do it every tim

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-13 Thread Vandaman
R P Herrold wrote: > > R P Herrold wrote: > >> ... you do NOT file bugs in the bug tracker to > make formal > >> your concern. > > > I made last month about security updates missing for > almost > > a month. > > no bug -> no issue. > > > Members of the CentOS community should, in a free > wor

Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update

2009-01-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
> Bugs in yum update please stop crying "bug" just because you have a problem! - you did not hit a bug AFAYK - you don't know if the problem is with yum update Your symptoms make me think that you may have some package not installed. Something unrelated to yum, but related to shell, formatting,