> Feb 22 09:14:52 kmdns1 named[2087]: client 62.109.4.89#59870: query
> (cache) './NS/IN' denied
>
> now in my firewall i tryied to block this ip but the messages
> dont stop
>
> i also upgraded bind to version bind-9.3.4-6.0.3.P1.el5_2 but
> no avail the problem still there
>
>
> i jus like
Dear All,
I am sorry for posting this query here but hope someone can help me out
i have been running Centos 5 as my prinamry DNS n Mail server with bind 9.2
every thing works fine but in my/var/messages log i see continuosly the
below meesages
Feb 22 09:14:46 kmdns1 named[2087]: client 62.109.
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 17:23 -0800, listmail wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:07:14 +, Ned Slider wrote
> > listmail wrote:
> > > Is anyone else noticing a problem updating Firefox and its dependencies?
> > >
> > > It appears that xulrunner-devel 1.9.0.6-1.el5 wants xulrunner
> > > 1.9.0.5-1.el
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:07:14 +, Ned Slider wrote
> listmail wrote:
> > Is anyone else noticing a problem updating Firefox and its dependencies?
> >
> > It appears that xulrunner-devel 1.9.0.6-1.el5 wants xulrunner 1.9.0.5-1.el5,
> > but "this is not available". Following is the output from Yum
listmail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone else noticing a problem updating Firefox and its dependencies?
>
> It appears that xulrunner-devel 1.9.0.6-1.el5 wants xulrunner 1.9.0.5-1.el5,
> but "this is not available". Following is the output from Yum when I attempt
> to update Firefox on CentOS 5.2 X86_
Hi,
Is anyone else noticing a problem updating Firefox and its dependencies?
It appears that xulrunner-devel 1.9.0.6-1.el5 wants xulrunner 1.9.0.5-1.el5,
but "this is not available". Following is the output from Yum when I attempt
to update Firefox on CentOS 5.2 X86_64:
Resolving De
Ian Forde wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 17:24 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Ian Forde wrote:
>>> Might not be a bad idea to see how they're able to use
>>> mdadm to detect and autosync drives. I don't *ever* want to go through
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> http://kev.coolcavemen.com/2008/07/heroic-
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 17:24 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ian Forde wrote:
> > Might not be a bad idea to see how they're able to use
> > mdadm to detect and autosync drives. I don't *ever* want to go through
> > something like:
> >
> > http://kev.coolcavemen.com/2008/07/heroic-journey-to-raid-5-d
Ian Forde wrote:
> Might not be a bad idea to see how they're able to use
> mdadm to detect and autosync drives. I don't *ever* want to go through
> something like:
>
> http://kev.coolcavemen.com/2008/07/heroic-journey-to-raid-5-data-recovery/
>
> Not when a little planning can help me skip it..
A good place to start comparing benchmark numbers for different RAID
levels is
http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Performance
in particular the links given in section "Other benchmarks from 2007-2008"
HTH,
Kay
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 08:40 +0800, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> Ian Forde wrote:
> > I'd have to say no on the processing power for RAID 5. Moore's law has
> > grown CPU capabilities over the last 15 or so years. HW RAID
> > controllers haven't gotten that much faster because they haven't
> Stephen Leonard Character wrote:
>> So, to change my swap to raid1, I would need to unmount it, delete
>> the
>> md2 device, and rebuild it as a raid1 md2 device?
>>
>
> swapoff /dev/md2
> # now delete the raid0 and build a raid1
> mkswap /dev/md2
> swapon /dev/md2
>
>
>
> and you probably d
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>
>> We were talking about RAID1; RAID5/6 is a different area. Linux software
>> RAID1 is a safeguard against disk failure; it's not designed for speed
>> increase. There is a number of things that could be improved in Linux
>> software RAID; read performan
At Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:01:58 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
> Do the repositories have decoders and such?
Adobe has a repository for Linux RPMs (acrobat reader, flash player,
etc.).
mplayer is in the RPMForge reposi
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Michael Klinosky wrote:
> What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
> Do the repositories have decoders and such?
Follow on: You can get Google's Picasa for Linux. My wife uses it on
M$ Windows. I had her help me with it one day and s
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 09:02 +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
> >Of Dick Holland
> >Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:45 AM
> >To: CentOS mailing list
> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Michael Klinosky wrote:
> What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
> Do the repositories have decoders and such?
Hmmm. I answered your question about Multimedia, before I read it.
:-) I am listening on Streamaudio.com to KEAG-FM in
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher <
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> wrote:
>
> Would running two CP command to copy 2 different set of files to two
>> different targets suffice as a basic two thread test?
>>
>>
> So long as you generate disk access through a file sys
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Michael Klinosky wrote:
> I've been using Fedora since about the FC6 era, for home use. I don't
> like the 6 month upgrade (or re-install) concept, and I don't need the
> latest & greatest versions of apps. So, CentOS sounds enticing.
I want to add several things
What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
Do the repositories have decoders and such?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Kay Diederichs wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher schrieb:
>
>>> "md1 will read from both disk" is not true in general.
>>> RAID1 md reads from one disk only; it uses the other one in case the
>>> first one fails. No performance gain from multiple copies.
>>>
>>>
>> I beg to differ.
Would running two CP command to copy 2 different set of files to two
different targets suffice as a basic two thread test?
So long as you generate disk access through a file system and not hdparm.
Is there a way to monitor actual disk transfers from command line without
having to do manual
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:04 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Kay Diederichs wrote:
> > hdparm -tT tests one type of disk access, other tools test other
> > aspects. I gave the hdparm numbers because everyone can reproduce them.
> > For RAID0 with two disks you do see - using e.g. hdparm - the doubling
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 07:02 -0500, Michael Klinosky wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > 5.2 has FireFox 3.0.5 (maybe has 3.0.6, I haven't done a yum update in
> > awhile) and started with Firefox 1.5 in CentOS 5.0
>
> http://centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Package_Manifest/ar01s03.html
> states 'fi
jk...@kinz.org wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> CentOS 5.2 64-bit
>>
>> I needed some space.
>>
>> I have a hard drive that had an old Linux install I don't use anymore.
>
> Lets call this your auxiliary drive.
>
>> So I edited /etc/fstab and removed
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> CentOS 5.2 64-bit
>
> I needed some space.
>
> I have a hard drive that had an old Linux install I don't use anymore.
Lets call this your auxiliary drive.
> So I edited /etc/fstab and removed the entries for it (entries I onl
Edited for brevity
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:08:07AM -0800, bruce wrote:
> goat a bunch of files in different dirs.. the files might have spaces
> 1foo_ aa_bb_cc.dog
> 2foo_aa__cc.dog
> 3foo_aa_bb _ccc.dog
> 4foo_aa_bb_cc.dog
> 5foo_aa_bb_cc.dog
> 6foo_aa_bb_cc.dog
>
> ...how i can do a
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> 5.2 has FireFox 3.0.5 (maybe has 3.0.6, I haven't done a yum update in
> awhile) and started with Firefox 1.5 in CentOS 5.0
http://centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Package_Manifest/ar01s03.html
states 'firefox-3.0-0.beta5.6.el5'.
Are you saying that yum will bump it to at lea
Kay Diederichs wrote:
> hdparm -tT tests one type of disk access, other tools test other
> aspects. I gave the hdparm numbers because everyone can reproduce them.
> For RAID0 with two disks you do see - using e.g. hdparm - the doubling
> of performance from two disks.
> If you take the time to r
Chan Chung Hang Christopher schrieb:
>> "md1 will read from both disk" is not true in general.
>> RAID1 md reads from one disk only; it uses the other one in case the
>> first one fails. No performance gain from multiple copies.
>>
> I beg to differ. I have disks in a raid1 md array and iostat
Michael Klinosky wrote:
> Hello.
> I've been using Fedora since about the FC6 era, for home use. I don't
> like the 6 month upgrade (or re-install) concept, and I don't need the
> latest & greatest versions of apps. So, CentOS sounds enticing.
>
A lot of desktop users come to CentOS for exactly t
31 matches
Mail list logo
