Hi,
Is there any nautilus extension that allow us to do md5sum?
It would be nice to be able to do that from nautilus.
Thank you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> If I have to do hardware raid, I'll definitely spec in a backup
> controller. Learnt this the hard way when my raid 5 controller died
> years after I first got it and I could no longer find a replacement.
>
> For high budget projects, having the extra raid controller as
> insurance isn't a
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Ian Forde wrote:
> RAID in software, whether RAID1 or RAID5/6, always has manual steps
> involved in recovery. If one is using standardized hardware, such as HP
> DL-x80 hardware or Dell x950 boxes, HW RAID obviates the need for a
> "recovery procedure". It's ju
"fabian dacunha" wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am sorry for posting this query here but hope someone can help me out
> i have been running Centos 5 as my prinamry DNS n Mail server with bind 9.2
>
> every thing works fine but in my/var/messages log i see continuosly the
> below meesages
>
> Feb 22 09:
Dear Robert,
Really apprecite your quick reply and thanks for the same..
it worked beautifully..
the badguys acl
now jus for my information if u can help me
by the way i had send a mail to the owners of the ips and they replied to
me saying that they had a DDOS attack on thier server n its bee
Ian Forde wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 18:09 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Yes, but raid1 in software has none of those problems, since as far as
>> the boot loader is concerned, you are booting from a single drive. And
>> there is a trade-off in complexity, since sw raid works the same on
>>
Kay Diederichs wrote:
> A good place to start comparing benchmark numbers for different RAID
> levels is
> http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Performance
> in particular the links given in section "Other benchmarks from 2007-2008"
>
I like this bit of info from
http://linux-raid.osdl.org/ind
>> You will have to prove that. I have previously posted posts with links
>> to benchmarks that show that hardware raid with sufficient processing
>> power beat the pants of software raid when it comes to raid5/6
>> implementations. Hardware raid cards no longer come with crappy i960 cpus.
>
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 18:09 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Yes, but raid1 in software has none of those problems, since as far as
> the boot loader is concerned, you are booting from a single drive. And
> there is a trade-off in complexity, since sw raid works the same on
> Linux across different
9 matches
Mail list logo
