> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 18:52
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Hardware compatibility IM-945GC Intel
> Atom Mini-ITX
>
> >I don't think
> I have nfs version 4 running on a CentOS 5.2 server to export /home.
> That works great so for, but clients can mount /home with nfs version 3
> too. How can I disable nfs v3 on the server?
Check out /etc/sysconfig/nfs .. make your changes and restart nfs
Hello,
I have nfs version 4 running on a CentOS 5.2 server to export /home.
That works great so for, but clients can mount /home with nfs version 3
too. How can I disable nfs v3 on the server?
Thank you
Olaf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>I don't think we can use this new MB since the Realtek 8111C does not seem to
>>be
>>supported (well)
>
> You can make that work, someone just posted a link to an alternative sk98lin
> module
> to the atrpms one a few weeks ago.
>
> Realt
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Bart Schaefer wrote:
>> I've found an old IBM OmniBook 800
Sorry, thinko. I did of course mean HP.
> What are you planning to do with it?
Give it to a child.
(I still think the pop-out mouse on that Omnibook is far superior to
any touchpa
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Hinton
> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 9:05 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Fail2Ban
>
> Agile Aspect wrote:
> > John Hinton wrote:
> >
> >> Agile Aspect
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:36 -0600, Kevin Krieser wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2009, at 2:34 AM, Kay Diederichs wrote:
>
> > Joseph L. Casale schrieb:
> >> I have an issue with a busy CentOS server exporting iSCSI and NFS/
> >> SMB shares.
> >> Some of the files are very large, and when they get deleted IO
>Try the data=writeback option which emulates the way XFS handles log
>operations. With UPS and/or battery backed caching controller the risk
>should be minimum.
>
>That will help, but ext3 is not good at handling large files at all,
>so if you can switch to XFS that will make a bigger improv
>I don't think we can use this new MB since the Realtek 8111C does not seem to
>be
>supported (well)
You can make that work, someone just posted a link to an alternative sk98lin
module
to the atrpms one a few weeks ago.
Realtek nics are crap anyway, but given the mobo, I don't think critical
a
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 02 March 2009 19:39:00 Robert Nichols wrote:
>> Anne Wilson wrote:
>>> It sounds to me as though this is an hplip problem. The version in
>>> CentOS is not the latest, and doesn't support recent printers
>>> out-of-the-box. ISTR that I had to grab the relevant ppd f
On Mar 2, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:06 AM, "Joseph L. Casale" > wrote:
>
>>> Have you tried to delete locally, instead of over NFS?
>>
>> As I said, the deletes are done locally via ssh.
>>
>>> Have you tried the "unlink" command instead of "rm" ?
>>
>> Nope,
On Mar 2, 2009, at 2:34 AM, Kay Diederichs wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale schrieb:
>> I have an issue with a busy CentOS server exporting iSCSI and NFS/
>> SMB shares.
>> Some of the files are very large, and when they get deleted IO
>> climbs to an
>> unacceptable rate. Is there a way to purge a f
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Can this MB be used with Centos 4 (or 5)?
> For reference:
> http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9832
On that URL it says:
'Availability: Expected 03/28/2009
Please choose “Mainboard Test” to ensure that the board is free from
manufactu
Can this MB be used with Centos 4 (or 5)?
For reference:
http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9832
I don't think we can use this new MB since the Realtek 8111C does not seem to be
supported (well)
http://forums.tweaktown.com/f69/8111c-nic-revision-ep45-27089/
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:15 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:58 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:44 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:23 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:46 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:37 PM, nate wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Either the WinPower SW will not shut down the box after 2 minutes or
>> there is something unclear to me about the settings. I read their
>> documentation again and everything is set to their default settings,
>> which looks lik
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:58 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:44 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:23 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:46 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think the first problem is we have somehow merged two threads.
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:44 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:23 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:46 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> >
> > > I think the first problem is we have somehow merged two threads. The
> > > first was Mr. Wells issue which is different fr
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:23 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:46 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
>
> > I think the first problem is we have somehow merged two threads. The
> > first was Mr. Wells issue which is different from mine. His port 631 is
> > "open" when nmap is run from localh
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:00 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:31 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:13 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:14 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> > > > on 3-2-2009 8:20 AM b.j. mcclure spake the following:
> > > > > I
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:46 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> I think the first problem is we have somehow merged two threads. The
> first was Mr. Wells issue which is different from mine. His port 631 is
> "open" when nmap is run from localhost but not when run against the IP.
> My port 631 is clos
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:31 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:13 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:14 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> > > on 3-2-2009 8:20 AM b.j. mcclure spake the following:
> > > > I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machine
I just ran into a most interesting situation. I am running CentOS 5.2
(2.6.18-92.1.22.el5) x86_64 with all the latest updates.
I recently converted a TIF to a PDF using tiff2pdf, and then tried to
print the file. Now, this has worked for me many times in the past,
so I wasn't expecting any troub
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 14:22 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:14 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> > on 3-2-2009 8:20 AM b.j. mcclure spake the following:
> > > I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> > > CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a f
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:56 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 3-2-2009 11:22 AM JohnS spake the following:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:14 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> >> on 3-2-2009 8:20 AM b.j. mcclure spake the following:
> >>> I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines ar
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:13 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:14 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> > on 3-2-2009 8:20 AM b.j. mcclure spake the following:
> > > I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> > > CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:14 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 3-2-2009 8:20 AM b.j. mcclure spake the following:
> > I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> > CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box
> > it is replacing worked fine for
on 3-2-2009 11:22 AM JohnS spake the following:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:14 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 3-2-2009 8:20 AM b.j. mcclure spake the following:
>>> I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
>>> CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh b
On Monday 02 March 2009 19:39:00 Robert Nichols wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Monday 02 March 2009 16:12:04 Roger Wells wrote:
> >> Thanks for responding.
> >> I guess I would be a little surprised to expect a regression like that.
> >> After all both CUPS and hp-toolbox are installed in Cent
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 02 March 2009 16:12:04 Roger Wells wrote:
>
>> Thanks for responding.
>> I guess I would be a little surprised to expect a regression like that.
>> After all both CUPS and hp-toolbox are installed in CentOS 5.2 right out
>> of the box.
>> I also have an HP C6180
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 02 March 2009 16:12:04 Roger Wells wrote:
>> Thanks for responding.
>> I guess I would be a little surprised to expect a regression like that.
>> After all both CUPS and hp-toolbox are installed in CentOS 5.2 right out
>> of the box.
>> I also have an HP C6180 and I
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:14 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 3-2-2009 8:20 AM b.j. mcclure spake the following:
> > I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> > CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box
> > it is replacing worked fine for
on 3-2-2009 8:20 AM b.j. mcclure spake the following:
> I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box
> it is replacing worked fine for many months.
> The problem appears to be a closed port 631 on
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:12:04 Roger Wells wrote:
> Thanks for responding.
> I guess I would be a little surprised to expect a regression like that.
> After all both CUPS and hp-toolbox are installed in CentOS 5.2 right out
> of the box.
> I also have an HP C6180 and I think that getting past th
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 13:21 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
http://worldforum.pardus-linux.nl/index.php?topic=1932.0
Is related to both of you.
http://www.linuxprinting.org/~till/printing-tutorial/tut.html#1_3
Cups basic config for netowrked printing.
___
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 13:21 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> >
> > Ok the version I have running is directly from the hplip website. It is
> > not the CentOS Distro version. This actually brings up something of
> > which I really believe that upstream has modified the code (backports
> > etc). What
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 13:06 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:43 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:27 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:50 -0500, Roger Wells wrote:
> > > > JohnS wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wr
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:43 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:27 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:50 -0500, Roger Wells wrote:
> > > JohnS wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I have been trying to set up prin
On 2-Mar-09, at 9:37 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> Dnk wrote:
>> Is there any real advantage to using 64 bit when I am right at the
>> 4gb
>> ram threshhold?
>
> Yes, unless you're not turning on swap. Once you add swap to a system
> with 4 GB of RAM, you need either PAE or 64-bit to actually use
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> Dnk wrote:
>> Is there any real advantage to using 64 bit when I am right at the 4gb
>> ram threshhold?
>
> Yes, unless you're not turning on swap. Once you add swap to a system
> with 4 GB of RAM, you need either PAE or 64-bit to actually us
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> Most of the time, I find that the batteries are going
True, but a laptop makes a good low-power server, appliance or terminal:
- Hook a Drobo to it, and suddenly it's a media server for your house.
You just saved $200 by not having to buy a Droboshare.
- Does i
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:28 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:50 -0500, Roger Wells wrote:
> > JohnS wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> > >> CentOS 5.2 fu
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:21 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:37 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > > I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> > > CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:27 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:50 -0500, Roger Wells wrote:
> > JohnS wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> > >> CentOS 5.2 fully upd
Dnk wrote:
> Is there any real advantage to using 64 bit when I am right at the 4gb
> ram threshhold?
Yes, unless you're not turning on swap. Once you add swap to a system
with 4 GB of RAM, you need either PAE or 64-bit to actually use the
swap. Since 64-bit CPUs became cheap last year, the
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Either the WinPower SW will not shut down the box after 2 minutes or
> there is something unclear to me about the settings. I read their
> documentation again and everything is set to their default settings,
> which looks like it should shut down the box after a 2 minute powe
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:50 -0500, Roger Wells wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> >
> >> I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> >> CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box
> >> it
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:50 -0500, Roger Wells wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> >
> >> I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> >> CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box
> >> it
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:37 -0500, JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> > CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box
> > it is replacing worked fine for many
On 2-Mar-09, at 9:15 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
Just for clarification, What do you mean by "32-bit support is
perfect"?
All of the x86 flavor 64-bit processors (IA64 and x86_64) will run
32-bit x86 applications. CentOS (RHEL) comes with a complete set of
32-bit
libraries.
http://lists.
> All of the x86 flavor 64-bit processors (IA64 and x86_64) will run
> 32-bit x86 applications. CentOS (RHEL) comes with a complete set of 32-bit
> libraries.
>
not to be pedantic or anything, but IA64 refers to Intel Itanium, which
isn't really x86 flavor at all, and runs 32bit x86 poorly
At Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:26:46 -0800 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
>
> On 2-Mar-09, at 8:17 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>
> >>
> >
> > These days I'd do all servers and development boxes 64-bit and only
> > deploy 32-bit for end-user workstations.
> >
> > The VM management and file system management ad
John Doe wrote:
> Only things I found are the hardcoded values in include/net/tcp.h:
I found these tunable parameters: tcp_tw_recycle & tcp_tw_reuse
> Our "issue" is on the LAN side: front servers connecting to the dbs.
> So I wonder if 60s is not too long for the delayed packets problem, when th
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:26 AM, dnk wrote:
>
> On 2-Mar-09, at 8:17 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> These days I'd do all servers and development boxes 64-bit and only
>> deploy 32-bit for end-user workstations.
>>
>> The VM management and file system management advantages are real no
>> matte
JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
>
>> I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
>> CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box
>> it is replacing worked fine for many months.
>> The problem appears t
> >> I installed a printer (HP LaserJet 4350n) via CUPS Web Interface.
> >> Following this when I run hp-toolbox a dialog claiming that "No
> >> Installed HP Devices Found" is displayed.
> >> This is true even when I am the root user.
> >> This worked as expected on RHEL4 on the same computer (T
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:20 -0500, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
> CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box
> it is replacing worked fine for many months.
> The problem appears to be a closed port 631 o
On 2-Mar-09, at 8:17 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>>
>
> These days I'd do all servers and development boxes 64-bit and only
> deploy 32-bit for end-user workstations.
>
> The VM management and file system management advantages are real no
> matter how much memory you have and the 32-bit support is per
I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are
CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box
it is replacing worked fine for many months.
The problem appears to be a closed port 631 on the new box. iptables
and ip6tables are stopped as shown by t
On Mar 2, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Dnk wrote:
> Is there any real advantage to using 64 bit when I am right at the 4gb
> ram threshhold? Nice plans to add more ram.
>
> The machine will just be a backup machie (rsync).
>
> Thanks in advance.
These days I'd do all servers and development boxes 64-bit a
Thanks for responding.
I guess I would be a little surprised to expect a regression like that.
After all both CUPS and hp-toolbox are installed in CentOS 5.2 right out
of the box.
I also have an HP C6180 and I think that getting past this is necessary
before its scanner
will be recognized. At le
Is there any real advantage to using 64 bit when I am right at the 4gb
ram threshhold? Nice plans to add more ram.
The machine will just be a backup machie (rsync).
Thanks in advance.
D
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:06 AM, "Joseph L. Casale" wrote:
>> Have you tried to delete locally, instead of over NFS?
>
> As I said, the deletes are done locally via ssh.
>
>> Have you tried the "unlink" command instead of "rm" ?
>
> Nope, but I will now!
If it's not too late you could try XFS as I be
Roger Wells
> I installed a printer (HP LaserJet 4350n) via CUPS Web Interface.
> Following this when I run hp-toolbox a dialog claiming that "No
> Installed HP Devices Found" is displayed.
> This is true even when I am the root user.
> This worked as expected on RHEL4 on the same computer (Thi
> I spent a bunch of time researching TIME_WAIT on linux and didn't
> find much useful information. There's a couple kernel parameters
> to change the settings though the only docs for them that I could
> find say don't touch them unless you REALLY know what your doing
Only things I found are the
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Agnello George
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am trying to upgrde out openldap ver 2.3 to the lastest version
>> 2.4, howevre there is no rpm avaibale for 2.4 so i decide to create my
>> own for centOS flavour 5.2
>
>
> > If I make 1 rapid connections/selects/deconnections to mysql on this
> > server, I get like 1 TW after around 3000, another TW around 6000 and
> > another TW
> > around 9000... That makes 3 TWs only. And they last 60 seconds...
> In your testing is the source IP the same for all with
Hello,
I installed a printer (HP LaserJet 4350n) via CUPS Web Interface.
Following this when I run hp-toolbox a dialog claiming that "No
Installed HP Devices Found" is displayed.
This is true even when I am the root user.
This worked as expected on RHEL4 on the same computer (Thinkpad X31)
with
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Agnello George wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to upgrde out openldap ver 2.3 to the lastest version
> 2.4, howevre there is no rpm avaibale for 2.4 so i decide to create my
> own for centOS flavour 5.2
It's probably worth mentioning that the openldap version shippe
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Lanny Marcus
>> > wrote:
>> discovered rpm.org and will do some online reading about RPM there.
>
> Long ago on a planet far away... (-: or was that near the beginning of
> this thread? :-) checkinstall
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:53 +0530, Agnello George wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:14 +0530, Agnello George wrote:
> >> here is the part look of my spec file openldap.spec
> >
> > Take what you have here, and scrap it.
> >
> > G
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:43 AM, William L. Maltby
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 18:41 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Joseph L. Casale
>> wrote:
>> >>I need to do a
>> >>simulated power failure, to verify that it will in fact shutdown the
>> >>box after 2 minutes!
>
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:14 +0530, Agnello George wrote:
>> here is the part look of my spec file openldap.spec
>
> Take what you have here, and scrap it.
>
> Grab the openldap SRPM already in CentOS, extract the spec file from it,
>
RobertH wrote on Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:04:23 -0800:
> specifically, i am trying to stop repeated access to vsftpd after more than
> x attempts from the same ip address
You can reduce the number of concurrent connections. This pretty much dumps
all brute force attempts. You could also try rateli
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:22 +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I tried installing OOo 3.x on an updated Centos 5 desktop (stock OOo
> 2.x was there), It had the following problems:
>
> 1. Installation of JRE 1.6.0 step failed citing dependency issues
> (relating to JRE 1.4 being
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:14 +0530, Agnello George wrote:
> here is the part look of my spec file openldap.spec
Take what you have here, and scrap it.
Grab the openldap SRPM already in CentOS, extract the spec file from it,
modify, and buils.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm
Hi
I am trying to upgrde out openldap ver 2.3 to the lastest version
2.4, howevre there is no rpm avaibale for 2.4 so i decide to create my
own for centOS flavour 5.2
here is the part look of my spec file openldap.spec
Summary: openldap Installer
Name: openldap
Version: 2.4
Release: 1
Vendor:
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I tried installing OOo 3.x on an updated Centos 5 desktop (stock OOo
> 2.x was there), It had the following problems:
>
> 1. Installation of JRE 1.6.0 step failed citing dependency issues
> (relating to JRE 1.4 being required by OOo 2.x and the such)
>
>Have you tried to delete locally, instead of over NFS?
As I said, the deletes are done locally via ssh.
>Have you tried the "unlink" command instead of "rm" ?
Nope, but I will now!
Thanks,
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cen
Greetings,
I tried installing OOo 3.x on an updated Centos 5 desktop (stock OOo
2.x was there), It had the following problems:
1. Installation of JRE 1.6.0 step failed citing dependency issues
(relating to JRE 1.4 being required by OOo 2.x and the such)
2. after installation, It did run as root o
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 15:06 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Lanny Marcus
> > wrote:
...
> > I would like to "roll my own" RPM for the WinPower UPS monitoring
> > software. Never done this before. I have the Win
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 18:41 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Joseph L. Casale
> wrote:
> >>I need to do a
> >>simulated power failure, to verify that it will in fact shutdown the
> >>box after 2 minutes!
> >
> > Plug the PC into a stable power source, let the same PC m
Joseph L. Casale schrieb:
> I have an issue with a busy CentOS server exporting iSCSI and NFS/SMB shares.
> Some of the files are very large, and when they get deleted IO climbs to an
> unacceptable rate. Is there a way to purge a file with little to no IO
> overhead on ext3?
>
> Thanks!
> jlc
Ha
83 matches
Mail list logo
