David Amiel wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm running a centos 5.2 (with a centos 5.3 kernel) on a box with a
> samsung 1To green edition, and this disk looks a bit slow to me and it's
> not recognized by hdparm
>
more likely to be a problem with support for the specific SATA
controller than the dri
Hi there,
I'm running a centos 5.2 (with a centos 5.3 kernel) on a box with a
samsung 1To green edition, and this disk looks a bit slow to me and it's
not recognized by hdparm :
# hdparm -iI /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Invalid argument
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Invalid ar
Le Lun 2 mars 2009 23:39, Jason Pyeron a écrit :
> Can this MB be used with Centos 4 (or 5)?
>
> For reference:
> http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9832
>
>
> I don't think we can use this new MB since the Realtek 8111C does not seem
> to be
> supported (well)
>
> http://forums.tweaktown.com/f
Rick writes:
> Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
> to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
> run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
> froze. Is there a way to fix this so I can use the memory I bou
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 03:00:59AM +, Rick wrote:
> Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
> to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
> run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
> froze. Is there a way to
Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
froze. Is there a way to fix this so I can use the memory I bought? Do
I need a new di
Hello,
There are currently 3 kmod packages in CentOS-4 that require
re-installation upon each kernel update:
kmod-drbd
kmod-drbd82
kmod-xfs
CentOS is going to offer a kernel-independent version of these kmod
packages. With this version, you install once, and they should
survive kernel updates.
At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:44:46 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:59:02 -0600 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> R P Herrold wrote:
> >>
> >>> Here is the fallout: The poor end user 'knows' it was CentOS,
> >>> because she w
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
> Or better yet how do I completely disable the top and bottom panels
> using gconftool-2?
>
Not sure about gconftool-2, but you can delete one panels by right
clicking on the panel and selecting the delete panel option. I'm not
sure you can re
Robert Heller wrote:
At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:59:02 -0600 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
Here is the fallout: The poor end user 'knows' it was CentOS,
because she was told by the respinner that it is 'CentOS with
just one package replaced'. Who gets the black eye here?
At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:39:00 + CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Robert Heller wrote:
> > I don't want (or need) to
> > rebuild all 6 of the install CDs. I just want to *replace* one RPM on
> > the first CD.
>
> the installer supports external repo's - at install time. All you then
> need
Robert Heller wrote:
> I don't want (or need) to
> rebuild all 6 of the install CDs. I just want to *replace* one RPM on
> the first CD.
the installer supports external repo's - at install time. All you then
need is to provide a new repo, with a higher EVR for mkinitrd.
--
Karanbir Singh : ht
> $ whois obrien-pifer.com
> ...
>Domain Name: OBRIEN-PIFER.COM
>Registrar: WILD WEST DOMAINS, INC.
>Whois Server: whois.wildwestdomains.com
>Referral URL: http://www.wildwestdomains.com
>Name Server: NS1.OBRIEN-PIFER.COM
>Name Server: NS2.OBRIEN-PIFER.COM
>
>Server Nam
At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:59:02 -0600 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> R P Herrold wrote:
> >>
> > Here is the fallout: The poor end user 'knows' it was CentOS,
> > because she was told by the respinner that it is 'CentOS with
> > just one package replaced'. Who gets the black eye here?
> > Who
At Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:48:29 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Robert Heller wrote
> >
> > This seems overly complex for my needs. Â I don't want (or need) to
> > rebuild all 6 of the install CDs. Â I just want to *replace* one RPM on
> > the first CD. Â I hav
At Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:45:19 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> > At Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:31:08 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
>
> >>> I am also not sure if I need to update any of the files the installer
> >>> uses to install the sys
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> It's better, but still:
>
> - as the MX is the same as your domain name you do not need an MX
> - as all your hosts point to the same IP you can just use a wildcard
> - as I'm sure you don't change your hosts several times a day you can up
> the TTL to a more reasonable time
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> - as the MX is the same as your domain name you do not need an MX
It is good to always have an MX.
> - having four ns records all point to the same IP is just, uhm, pointless
Can make it easier to separate workloads and move them to different
servers later.
//Morten
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 17:59
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for
> CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)
>
>
R P Herrold wrote:
>>
> Here is the fallout: The poor end user 'knows' it was CentOS,
> because she was told by the respinner that it is 'CentOS with
> just one package replaced'. Who gets the black eye here?
> Who bears the support load of sorting out what happened when
> the poor hurt user
James Pifer wrote on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:07:00 -0500:
> Can you tell me if it looks better now?
It's better, but still:
- as the MX is the same as your domain name you do not need an MX
- as all your hosts point to the same IP you can just use a wildcard
- as I'm sure you don't change your hosts
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
See embedded comments. I'm not familiar with the specific package mentioned
but these are just a few standard debugging ideas.
> I have a test system: Centos 5.2 on an OQO, that has been hanging
> hard. I have to unplug it and pull the battery so I can then cold star
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have a test system: Centos 5.2 on an OQO, that has been hanging
> hard. I have to unplug it and pull the battery so I can then cold start it.
>
> This last time all I did was open a terminal window and SU to root, then
> start the lastest build of SIP Communicator (
uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/firefox-3.0.7-1.el4.centos.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Robert Heller wrote
>
> This seems overly complex for my needs. I don't want (or need) to
> rebuild all 6 of the install CDs. I just want to *replace* one RPM on
> the first CD. I have copied the CD's directory tree to a writable file
> system and replaced the r
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:31:08 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>>> I am also not sure if I need to update any of the files the installer
>>> uses to install the system -- is it enough to just drop the alternitive
>>> mkinitrd rpm? Do I need to rebuil
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 14:01 +0100, Joebstl Thomas wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> MX-records must point to A-records and not to IP adresses.
> A "dig -t AXFR obrien-pifer.com @ns1.obrien-pifer.com | grep MX" returns:
> mail.obrien-pifer.com. 38400 IN MX 1
> 70.62.90.185.obrien-pifer.com.
>
>
At Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:31:08 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Robert Heller napsal(a):
> > I need to be able to install CentOS 5.2 on a machine with software RAID
> > (and LVM) setup. I discovered (the hard way!) that there is a bug in
> > the mkinitrd package that causes it to enter an en
Hi James,
MX-records must point to A-records and not to IP adresses.
A "dig -t AXFR obrien-pifer.com @ns1.obrien-pifer.com | grep MX" returns:
mail.obrien-pifer.com. 38400 IN MX 1
70.62.90.185.obrien-pifer.com.
Whereas you list "mail.obrien-pifer.com.INMX1 70.62.90.185"
hi James
there is a MX recond for mail.obrien-pifer.com, not for
obrien-pifer.com:
bash-3.2$ dig obrien-pifer.com any
; <<>> DiG 9.5.1-P1-RedHat-9.5.1-1.P1.fc10 <<>> obrien-pifer.com any
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10894
;; flags:
James Pifer wrote:
...
> Anyone see any problems in my DNS records?
Doesn't look right to me:
$ nslookup
> set type=mx
> obrien-pifer.com
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can't find obrien-pifer.com: No answer
Authoritative answers can be fo
I'm not sure why this started, but apparently I'm having a DNS problem.
Yesterday mail started bouncing with this error:
450 Unable to find obrien-pifer.com
I think the messages eventually get delivered, but not sure. I guess
I'll see if this one makes the list.
I checked my domain using http://
32 matches
Mail list logo
