[CentOS] looking for some advice to monitor network usage in office

2009-03-25 Thread Rudi Ahlers
Hi all, I've been asked by a college to setup a monitor to monitor a Windows network, but on internet usage. They want to have detailed usage, i.e. on a per IP / PC basis, and if possible to get stats for every protocol, and see over a period of time what goes on. My first though wat ntop, which

Re: [CentOS] how to access encrypted EXT3 partition from Windows

2009-03-25 Thread Rudi Ahlers
2009/3/24 John R. Dennison : > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:16:11AM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> >> So, does anyone know how to access (read & write) to EXT3 from Windows? > >Why bother? TrueCrypt is cross-platform and will work for your >needs. > > > > >

Re: [CentOS] looking for some advice to monitor network usage in office

2009-03-25 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:01:50 +0200 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > I've been asked by a college to setup a monitor to monitor a Windows > network, but on internet usage. They want to have detailed usage, i.e. > on a per IP / PC basis, and if possible to get stats for every > protocol, and see over a period o

Re: [CentOS] looking for some advice to monitor network usage in office

2009-03-25 Thread Spook ZA
Hi Rudy 2009/3/25 Rudi Ahlers : > Hi all, > > I've been asked by a college to setup a monitor to monitor a Windows > network, but on internet usage. They want to have detailed usage, i.e. > on a per IP / PC basis, and if possible to get stats for every > protocol, and see over a period of time wha

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-25 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Ross Walker wrote: > How about forming a formal non-profit organization around CentOS with > contributors. The question is "where". What counts as a non-profit in the US doesn't automatically count as one in Europe, for example - that's why there is a Fedora EMEA, too. Which really binds ressour

[CentOS] help on kerberos5

2009-03-25 Thread fabian dacunha
Dear All, this i feel is a little out of topic but really apprecite if someone can help i am tryin to authenicate my Centos 5.2 box to windows 2003 ADS server .. but am not able to do so . i get the following error when i run kinit kinit(v5): Improper format of Kerberos configuration file while

Re: [CentOS] looking for some advice to monitor network usage in office

2009-03-25 Thread Rob Townley
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Spook ZA wrote: > Hi Rudy > > 2009/3/25 Rudi Ahlers : >> Hi all, >> >> I've been asked by a college to setup a monitor to monitor a Windows >> network, but on internet usage. They want to have detailed usage, i.e. >> on a per IP / PC basis, and if possible to get s

Re: [CentOS] looking for some advice to monitor network usage in office

2009-03-25 Thread Ross Walker
On Mar 25, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been asked by a college to setup a monitor to monitor a Windows > network, but on internet usage. They want to have detailed usage, i.e. > on a per IP / PC basis, and if possible to get stats for every > protocol, and see over a p

Re: [CentOS] looking for some advice to monitor network usage in office

2009-03-25 Thread David . Mackintosh
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:52:23AM +0200, Spook ZA wrote: > Hi Rudy > > 2009/3/25 Rudi Ahlers : > > I've been asked by a college to setup a monitor to monitor a Windows > > network, but on internet usage. They want to have detailed usage, i.e. > > on a per IP / PC basis, and if possible to get st

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Network switches

2009-03-25 Thread Rob Townley
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Luke S Crawford wrote: >> >>> i would like to see real performance data via something like netperf >>> with client machines booted from a standardized LiveCD, then >>> peformance under their Linux Distribution and performance under >>> Windows

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Network switches

2009-03-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Scott McClanahan wrote: > I'm looking to acquire a few new core switches for our network which > would be a major upgrade from the cheap unmanaged things we currently > have. Basically, just users, servers, and other simple network devices > will be plugged into them but I'd like to start doing so

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-25 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/3/25 Ralph Angenendt : > Ross Walker wrote: >> How about forming a formal non-profit organization around CentOS with >> contributors. > > The question is "where". What counts as a non-profit in the US doesn't > automatically count as one in Europe, for example - that's why there is > a Fedora

[CentOS] Samba packages update

2009-03-25 Thread Veiko Kukk
I'm unable to find this http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0180.html package update in Centos 5.2 updates. Why? --- Veiko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Samba packages update

2009-03-25 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Veiko Kukk wrote: > I'm unable to find this http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0180.html > package update in Centos 5.2 updates. Why? They will come with 5.3. Ralph pgpUpl1x5Hi61.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cento

Re: [CentOS] looking for some advice to monitor network usage in office

2009-03-25 Thread Les Mikesell
Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been asked by a college to setup a monitor to monitor a Windows > network, but on internet usage. They want to have detailed usage, i.e. > on a per IP / PC basis, and if possible to get stats for every > protocol, and see over a period of time what goes on. >

[CentOS] Broken link in the documentation.

2009-03-25 Thread Marcelo M. Garcia
Hi There is a broken link in the documentation of CentOS 5.2. I was reading about e-mail and when you follow the link from POP (24.1.2.1 in Deployment guide) to IMAP, you got the following message: "Not Found The requested URL /docs/5/html/5.2/Deployment_Guide/s3-email-protocols-imap.html was

[CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Hi All, The freeradius version in CentOS 5 is ancient, so I've been considering rebuilding the Fedora 10 rpm for freeradius-2.1.3 on CentOS. That means I'll have to maintain the package, and I'm not an uber packager. Normally I wouldn't care, but in this case I do because the freeradius server is

Re: [CentOS] Samba packages update

2009-03-25 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 16:40 +0200, Veiko Kukk wrote: > I'm unable to find this http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0180.html > package update in Centos 5.2 updates. Why? > I wondered also but was going to give it a day or so then ask. JohnStanley

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:41:56AM -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Hi All, > > The freeradius version in CentOS 5 is ancient, so I've been considering > rebuilding the Fedora 10 rpm for freeradius-2.1.3 on CentOS. That means > I'll have to maintain the package, and I'm not an uber packager.

Re: [CentOS] Samba packages update

2009-03-25 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:50 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Veiko Kukk wrote: > > I'm unable to find this http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0180.html > > package update in Centos 5.2 updates. Why? > > They will come with 5.3. > > Ralph Opps,,, thanks for that Ralph. JohnStanley _

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Karanbir Singh
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > So, should I rebuild the F10 rpm, or should I just stick with the > version in CentOS 5? Based on what I'm reading, moving to a newer > release would be wise. What are these things you are reading ? Might be worth verifying some of them. - KB _

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:44 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > What about branching Fedora freeradius for EPEL? I guess I can I make a package request there (I already checked - they don't have it). Are people really deploying freeradius-1.1.3?? -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 11:41 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Hi All, > > The freeradius version in CentOS 5 is ancient, so I've been considering > rebuilding the Fedora 10 rpm for freeradius-2.1.3 on CentOS. That means > I'll have to maintain the package, and I'm not an uber packager. > Norma

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:56:30AM -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:44 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > What about branching Fedora freeradius for EPEL? > > I guess I can I make a package request there (I already checked - they > don't have it). > > Are people really

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:51 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > What are these things you are reading ? Might be worth verifying some > of them. Attribute changes, additional features, etc. freeradius devs aren't fixing bugs in the 1.1 releases anymore, though I know CentOS' upstream will backport,

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Karanbir Singh
Craig White wrote: > that's what I did...downloaded the F10 SRPM and rebuilt it on a CentOS 5 > system and installed via rpm -Uvh If there are a few people doing this already - why does one of you not step up and offer to maintain / manage this package in centosplus ? Thats what the plus repo is

Re: [CentOS] looking for some advice to monitor network usage in office

2009-03-25 Thread Ray Leventhal
Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been asked by a college to setup a monitor to monitor a Windows > network, but on internet usage. They want to have detailed usage, i.e. > on a per IP / PC basis, and if possible to get stats for every > protocol, and see over a period of time what goes on. > >

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread dave veasey
Karanbir Singh wrote: > If there are a few people doing this already - why does one of you not > step up and offer to maintain / manage this package in centosplus ? > Thats what the plus repo is there for, isnt it :) > > Maybe a few people can collaborate on this? > > - KB > That would be a goo

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 16:13 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > If there are a few people doing this already - why does one of you not > step up and offer to maintain / manage this package in centosplus ? > Thats what the plus repo is there for, isnt it :) > > Maybe a few people can collaborate on th

Re: [CentOS] help on kerberos5

2009-03-25 Thread MHR
2009/3/25 fabian dacunha : > > Dear All, > > this i feel is a little out of topic but really apprecite if someone can help > > i am tryin to authenicate my Centos 5.2 box to windows 2003 ADS server .. > but am not able to do so . This is probably a dumb question, but have you tried asking the kerb

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 12:17 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 16:13 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > If there are a few people doing this already - why does one of you not > > step up and offer to maintain / manage this package in centosplus ? > > Thats what the plus repo

Re: [CentOS] help on kerberos5

2009-03-25 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 13:15 +0300, fabian dacunha wrote: > my domain name is===> baladia.local > Windows 2003 AD server computer name is> kmun > > my /etc/krb5.conf file is > > > [logging] > default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log > kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log > admin_server = FILE:/

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 16:13 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > that's what I did...downloaded the F10 SRPM and rebuilt it on a CentOS 5 > > system and installed via rpm -Uvh > > If there are a few people doing this already - why does one of you not > step up and offer to mainta

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 11:17 -0700, Craig White wrote: > first of all, there's very good instructions which I previously linked. > > secondly, I can only build i386 at the present time. I can build x86_64 and i386. > lastly, I'm up and running and don't see much need to continually > monitor upda

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

2009-03-25 Thread Phil Schaffner
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 16:13 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> If there are a few people doing this already - why does one of you not >> step up and offer to maintain / manage this package in centosplus ? >> Thats what the plus repo is there for, isnt it :) >> >> Maybe

Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install

2009-03-25 Thread Michael Peterson
JohnS wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:21 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: > > >> I would really like to get CentOS 5.2 or 5.3 installed on the system if >> there is a work around. >> > --- > What are you using to burn the CDs? How old is the CD Drive that your > are using to install? How o

Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install [SOLVED]

2009-03-25 Thread Phil Schaffner
Michael Peterson wrote: ... > I burned the CD images on Windows using Roxio and an AOpen DVD Read/ > CDRW drive. > > The burned CD's test fine in more than one system. > I do have to test them with ide=nodma to get them to pass. > > The CD Drive and IDE Cable on the system I am trying to install

Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install

2009-03-25 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 14:15 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:21 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: > > > > > >> I would really like to get CentOS 5.2 or 5.3 installed on the system if > >> there is a work around. > >> > > --- > > What are you using to

[CentOS] Looking for a list of default services to disable in centos 5

2009-03-25 Thread Martin Suehowicz
I am looking for a list of services that you disable by default on your server. Here is what I am disabling so far. avahi-daemon bluetooth cups firstboot haldaemon hidd hplip ip6tables isdn messagebus pcscd rpcgssd rpcidmapd sendmail xfs xinetd yum-updatesd Thanks for any input

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a list of default services to disable in centos 5

2009-03-25 Thread Spiro Harvey
> I am looking for a list of services that you disable by default on > your server. what kind of server? smtp server? pop/imap server? proxy server? web server? ftp server? logging server? voip gateway? firewall? rpm build box? swipe card reader server? development/source repo server? LDAP, NFS?

Re: [CentOS] help on kerberos5

2009-03-25 Thread Rob Townley
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 13:15 +0300, fabian dacunha wrote: >> my domain name is===> baladia.local >> Windows 2003 AD server computer name is> kmun >> >> my /etc/krb5.conf file is >> >> >> [logging] >>  default = FILE:/var/log/kr

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a list of default services to disable in centos 5

2009-03-25 Thread Martin Suehowicz
My question was targeted at minimal install that I could start with bare bones. Just what you need to run the os. I would use it to build the rest of my kickstarts with adding the needed services for webservers, databases, etc. I see the usefulness it for example You can pretty much say that everyo

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a list of default services to disable in centos 5

2009-03-25 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:39:55 +1300 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > > I am looking for a list of services that you disable by default on > > your server. > > what kind of server? smtp server? pop/imap server? proxy server? web > server? ftp server? logging server? voip gateway? firewall?

[CentOS] Monitoring IP masquerading on LVS load-balancing

2009-03-25 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
I've got small numbers of connections moving through a load balancer configured in NAT mode. So I've got an iptables table called "nat", which has in it a line "-A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE" (lan connect is eth0, private lan inside the cluster is eth1). The load balancer is working; conne

[CentOS] ISPConfig & local administration

2009-03-25 Thread Sam Drinkard
Hi list, I recently installed a package for Centos5.2 called ISPConfig. This was recommended by a buddy of mine who hosts a number of websites for various clients. Although I don't host any websites except my own, there were some features in the package that I did like the looks of. Wel

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Network switches

2009-03-25 Thread Luke S Crawford
Les Mikesell writes: > If you get a service contract on any piece of Cisco equipment, you > typically get download access to all of the firmware updates. Yeah, but the problem for me is that for my frontend network, 100M is just fine. A used cisco 3548 is going to set me back around $200. Fo

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Network switches

2009-03-25 Thread nate
Luke S Crawford wrote: > Les Mikesell writes: >> If you get a service contract on any piece of Cisco equipment, you >> typically get download access to all of the firmware updates. > > Yeah, but the problem for me is that for my frontend network, 100M is just > fine. A used cisco 3548 is going to

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring IP masquerading on LVS load-balancing

2009-03-25 Thread nate
David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > > So, netstat just isn't somehow the right monitoring tool, right? So what > is the right monitoring tool? I need to know the source IP and Shot in the dark since I've never used LVS but perhaps /proc/net/ip_conntrack If that is right then there is a program called ne

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a list of default services to disable in centos 5

2009-03-25 Thread nate
Martin Suehowicz wrote: > I am looking for a list of services that you disable by default on your > server. For the packages I install on my systems this is what I disable by default on CentOS 5.2 in kickstart - cat

[CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-25 Thread Frank Cox
I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their radio signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not available at the station. If the destination was closer or their transmitter was mo

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring IP masquerading on LVS load-balancing

2009-03-25 Thread Barry Brimer
Quoting David Dyer-Bennet : > I've got small numbers of connections moving through a load balancer > configured in NAT mode. So I've got an iptables table called "nat", which > has in it a line "-A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE" (lan connect is > eth0, private lan inside the cluster is eth1).

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Network switches

2009-03-25 Thread Les Mikesell
Luke S Crawford wrote: > >> in a lot of scenarios there are several choices, each with a different >> set of bugs that you won't know about unless you open a TAC case and >> tell an engineer exactly what features have to work for you. > > Yeah, but at the used prices for 100M kit, I can buy two

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-25 Thread Ross Walker
On Mar 25, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > 2009/3/25 Ralph Angenendt : >> Ross Walker wrote: >>> How about forming a formal non-profit organization around CentOS >>> with >>> contributors. >> >> The question is "where". What counts as a non-profit in the US >> doesn't >> automatic

[CentOS] CentOS won't shutdown ... or do anything else

2009-03-25 Thread hadrian
I started to have problems similar to ones described in the past on this list but could not find any kind of resolution. I did an lsmod, a mount command, and for fun, did an strace on shutdown to see where it is hanging, and an ltrace as well. Any thoughts? Module Size Used b

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-25 Thread griz_quattro
Ross Walker wrote: > > > > To this end it would cetainly not be rude to ask these companies for > appropriately sized donations to make sure CentOS keeps going strong, > completely voluntary of course, anonymously if preferred, otherwise > they can be prominantly listed as a valued suppor

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-25 Thread Les Mikesell
Frank Cox wrote: > I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio > station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their > radio > signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not available at the > station. If the destination was closer

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-25 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:15:22 -0500 Les Mikesell wrote: > Can't you find a place that has both radio reception and internet > service to park something like shoutcast? The immediate objective is to get the signal to somewhere that has (reliable) Internet access. The ultimate objective is to stre

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-25 Thread Scott Silva
on 3-25-2009 4:21 PM Frank Cox spake the following: > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:15:22 -0500 > Les Mikesell wrote: > >> Can't you find a place that has both radio reception and internet >> service to park something like shoutcast? > > The immediate objective is to get the signal to somewhere that ha

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-25 Thread Ross Walker
On Mar 25, 2009, at 8:13 PM, griz_quattro wrote: > Ross Walker wrote: >> >> >> >> To this end it would cetainly not be rude to ask these companies for >> appropriately sized donations to make sure CentOS keeps going strong, >> completely voluntary of course, anonymously if preferred, otherwise

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-25 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:32:07 -0700 Scott Silva wrote: > If the radi station has phone lines, they should be able to get something like > a T1 or fractional part. Much more reliable and more bandwidth. I don't think it's available there. Even the next-nearest town has only dial-up Internet. The

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-25 Thread John R Pierce
Frank Cox wrote: > I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio > station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their > radio > signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not available at the > station. If the destination was closer

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-25 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:14:13 -0700 John R Pierce wrote: > FM quality radio remotes are usually done with ISDN lines and hardware > encoder boxes like aTelos Zephyr.. otherwise, its juts a voice dialup > line, analog lowfi voice. > > http://www.zephyr.com/ Interesting. I see that this one: h

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-25 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/3/25 Scott Silva : > on 3-25-2009 4:21 PM Frank Cox spake the following: >> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:15:22 -0500 >> Les Mikesell wrote: >>> Can't you find a place that has both radio reception and internet >>> service to park something like shoutcast? >> >> The immediate objective is to get the

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring IP masquerading on LVS load-balancing

2009-03-25 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Barry Brimer wrote: > Quoting David Dyer-Bennet : > > >> But I want to observe the connections on the load balancer. >> > > > ipvsadm -L -c -n should do the trick. Also, you shouldn't need that MASQ rule > unless you need to MASQ traffic originating from inside your private network. > LVS

[CentOS] Help with GSM or CDMA hardware on CentOS and SMSTools question please

2009-03-25 Thread Carel Lubbe
Hi everyone, I would realy appreciate your help and guidense with a problem I have. Im trying to set up a SMS Gateway as a alert system for my network. Although the Aircard is picked up as a usb device and has a driver in the kernel, it does not have a /dev/XXX device name. So my question is how d

Re: [CentOS] live audio feed via telephone link

2009-03-25 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 18:31 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:14:13 -0700 > John R Pierce wrote: > > > FM quality radio remotes are usually done with ISDN lines and hardware > > encoder boxes like aTelos Zephyr.. otherwise, its juts a voice dialup > > line, analog lowfi voice. >