Ray Leventhal wrote:
> Dhaval Thakar wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to implement trouble tracking system,
>> we have 250 users in one premise & 3 desktop support technicians.
>>
>> I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their
>> application / other issues. Mail will be
The waiting time is about 50s on my CentOS box now. "yum remove
openssh* "and "yum install openssh*" can't make it right. "mv
~/.ssh{,.bak}" not works either.
Here comes my tcpdump log, I am not an expert on SSH, Can anyone here
get me out of this?
Thanks
Ryan
[r...@centos5u2 ~]# tcpdump -s 152
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 20:29 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
> > need it, seemingly) and hardly anybody documents (try to find a man-
> > page for a hw-driver...)
>
> A driver without a man page is more useful than no driver at all...
And a lot more exciting and dangerous t
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Ryan J M wrote:
> The waiting time is about 50s on my CentOS box now. "yum remove
> openssh* "and "yum install openssh*" can't make it right. "mv
> ~/.ssh{,.bak}" not works either.
> Here comes my tcpdump log, I am not an expert on SSH, Can anyone here
> get me ou
Are there instructions on how to take the actual ISO install image (not
a live image),
put that iso file on a USB thumbdrive and install from that instead of DVD?
I would be interested in putting a kickstart file on the USB also. so
just plug in a USB
and everything installs just the way I want
You can disable DNS check in your ssh server.
In the /etc/ssh/sshd_config you set "UseDNS" to "no"
===
UseDNS no
===
[]s
Renato de Oliveira Diogo
Bacharel em Ciência da Computação
UNESP - Bauru
LPIC1 - Linux Professional Institute Certification -
Ryan J M wrote:
> The waiting time is about 50s on my CentOS box now. "yum remove
> openssh* "and "yum install openssh*" can't make it right. "mv
> ~/.ssh{,.bak}" not works either.
> Here comes my tcpdump log, I am not an expert on SSH, Can anyone here
> get me out of this?
>
The answering sshd
I don´t know about use 2 dns, but one dns requistion has timeout to 5000ms.
Do you test this use the dig or nslookup.
[ren...@thedark ~]$ dig -x 127.0.0.1
; <<>> DiG 9.5.1-P2-RedHat-9.5.1-2.P2.fc10 <<>> -x 127.0.0.1
;; global options: printcmd
;; Query time: 14 msec
...
The di
At Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:50:06 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I recently acquired a Fujitsu Lifebook 1610. Unfortunately, the
> machine was missing a lot of the stuff that would've come with it brand
> new, mainly the usb cdrom drive.
> Currently, I'm running Fedora on it, and I
Jimmy Bradley wrote:
> I recently acquired a Fujitsu Lifebook 1610. Unfortunately, the
> machine was missing a lot of the stuff that would've come with it brand
> new, mainly the usb cdrom drive.
> Currently, I'm running Fedora on it, and I installed it using a
> usb flash drive with t
Since many tickets have complex interdependencies, do any tracking
systems happen to integrate directly with FreeMind?
On 3/30/09, Steve Lindemann wrote:
> Dhaval Thakar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to implement trouble tracking system,
>> we have 250 users in one premise & 3 desktop support techn
My test / development host runs CentOS-5.x x86_64. There I have
successfully created an rpm for GiT-1.6.1-1 for x86_64. Now I would
like to build the same rpm package for CentOS-5.x i386, but on the
x86_64 machine.
Is this even possible? If so, are there any resources that someone
can refer me
Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup,
calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way.
[]s.
On 3/17/2009 7:30 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am 17.03.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Per Qvindesland:
>
>
>> No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock
>> so
James B. Byrne wrote:
> My test / development host runs CentOS-5.x x86_64. There I have
> successfully created an rpm for GiT-1.6.1-1 for x86_64. Now I would
> like to build the same rpm package for CentOS-5.x i386, but on the
> x86_64 machine.
>
> Is this even possible? If so, are there any re
On 03/31/09 09:44, James B. Byrne enlightened us:
> My test / development host runs CentOS-5.x x86_64. There I have
> successfully created an rpm for GiT-1.6.1-1 for x86_64. Now I would
> like to build the same rpm package for CentOS-5.x i386, but on the
> x86_64 machine.
>
> Is this even possib
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other
>> suitable internet service. What kind of place can support a radio
>> station but not an internet presence these days?
>
> the original poster indi
Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>>> It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other
>>> suitable internet service. What kind of place can support a radio
>>> station but not an internet presence these days?
>> the original poster indicated the FM station was on an American Indian
>> res
this getting ready for centos 5.4 thread...
i am not following it... yet...
did we time warp and lose 5.3, being trashcanned and now waiting on 5.4?
microsoft didnt buy out the centos faithful did they?
;->
- rh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
RobertH wrote:
> this getting ready for centos 5.4 thread...
>
> i am not following it... yet...
>
> did we time warp and lose 5.3, being trashcanned and now waiting on 5.4?
>
> microsoft didnt buy out the centos faithful did they?
>
> ;->
>
I'm tired of waiting for 5.4 and moved on to waiti
Alessandro Ren wrote:
> Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup,
> calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way.
>
I have decided to give SME a go. It provides Qmail on Centos 4.7, with
Centos 5.2 in beta.
I chose SME because I also have to replace an NT server here as well
How to stop recieving mail from CentOS forum ?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Alessandro Ren wrote:
> > Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup,
> > calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way.
> >
>
> I have decided to give SME a go. It provides Qma
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup,
>> calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way.
>>
>
> I have decided to give SME a go. It provides Qmail on Centos 4.7, with
> Centos 5.2 in beta.
>
> I chose SME because I also have to replace an NT se
Dear Robert.
> I have decided to give SME a go. It provides Qmail on Centos 4.7, with
> Centos 5.2 in beta.
>
> I chose SME because I also have to replace an NT server here as well, so
> it makes a good fit.
>
> I have a test system working and building the mailserver replacement
> system now. The
Tom wrote:
What is the subnet mask of the outside interface?
255.255.255.0 or /24
What is the subnet mask of the inside interface?
255.255.255 or /24
I'm not real good with iptables but you might need to check your source
address. Ex. 192.168.230.100/24. /24 is a full class C.
trie
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009, James B. Byrne wrote:
>My test / development host runs CentOS-5.x x86_64. There I have
>successfully created an rpm for GiT-1.6.1-1 for x86_64. Now I would
>like to build the same rpm package for CentOS-5.x i386, but on the
>x86_64 machine.
>
>Is this even possible? If so,
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>>> Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup,
>>> calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way.
>>>
>>>
>> I have decided to give SME a go. It provides Qmail on Centos 4.7, with
>> Centos 5.2 in beta.
>>
>> I chose SME
Care India wrote:
> How to stop recieving mail from CentOS forum ?
If you mean this mailing list: By unsubscribing.
Ralph
pgpjDzeI4NQ2a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 00:19 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
Hi folk,
I am trying to get iptables working on a samba server but find it is
blocking something that prevents the windoze clients from being able to
access the share.
here are the bits from iptables:
# nmb pro
Spook ZA wrote:
Hi.
2009/3/31 Rob Kampen :
Hi folk,
I am trying to get iptables working on a samba server but find it is
blocking something that prevents the windoze clients from being able to
access the share.
here are the bits from iptables:
# nmb provided netbios-ns
-A RH-Firewall
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup,
calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way.
>>> I have decided to give SME a go. It provides Qmail on Centos 4.7, with
>>> Cent
waiting for 5.5, that is funny...
:-)
heheh, no, really, what happened to 5.3?
-rh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 3-31-2009 8:34 AM Toby Bluhm spake the following:
> RobertH wrote:
>> this getting ready for centos 5.4 thread...
>>
>> i am not following it... yet...
>>
>> did we time warp and lose 5.3, being trashcanned and now waiting on 5.4?
>>
>> microsoft didnt buy out the centos faithful did they?
>>
>>
The poster suggesting a lopsided interfaces is correct. Look at
incoming vs outgoing packets via
ifconfig -a.
Use /sbin/ip to fix it. Since the subnet is the same, u need a
/sbin/ip rule.
On 3/31/09, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
>
> Craig White wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 00:19 -0400, Rob Kampen w
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:28:30 -0500
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The OP is in Saskatchewan, Canada. Hopefully, as a later poster
> suggested, the Canadian government has some $ available, to contribute
> for this project. I believe the distance is much too far for WiMax,
> even if it were line of sight,
Thanks for the pointers on cross building rpms. I have downloaded
mock from epel and will take a look at that shortly.
For the moment however, I am working on a straight x86_64 build of
ruby-1.9.1-1 and I am running into this error:
checking for nroff... /usr/bin/nroff
creating config.h
configu
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Tue, March 31, 2009 12:57, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> For the moment however, I am working on a straight x86_64 build of
> ruby-1.9.1-1 and I am running into this error:
>
I spoke too soon. I must have a system configuration problem
because when I returned to git and tried the easy cross buil
On Tue, March 31, 2009 13:00, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> So, what am I supposed to do with respect to fg and job control?
Found it. No etc/at.allow and no etc/at.deny means only root can
submit jobs.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailt
on 3-30-2009 9:19 PM Rob Kampen spake the following:
> Hi folk,
> I am trying to get iptables working on a samba server but find it is
> blocking something that prevents the windoze clients from being able to
> access the share.
> here are the bits from iptables:
>> # nmb provided netbios-ns
>> -A
Rob Townley wrote:
The poster suggesting a lopsided interfaces is correct. Look at
incoming vs outgoing packets via
ifconfig -a.
Use /sbin/ip to fix it. Since the subnet is the same, u need a
/sbin/ip rule.
Okay, I get the issue, packet arrives on one interface but server sends
it back
If you read any of the previous 90 messages, you'd know that they are
talking about ways to plan for the *future* release of 5.4 and is
asking how the community can help to try to prevent the delays that
have happened with 5.3.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:18 AM, RobertH wrote:
>
> this getting re
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>
> So, is it live yet? :-)
Almost. Another several more hours before they all sync, and then we're
good to go.
BTW, how does this work? If I want to go from 5.2 to 5.3, can I just
type "yum upgrade"? If so, what
Jimmy Bradley wrote:
>
>This is just my 2 cents worth. The reason I run Cent OS is
> because it just seems to be rock solid stable. That's something I
> haven't seen in any of the other distros, or MS Windows.
>My computers are my lifeline to my jobs. I get my assignments by
> way
On 31-Mar-09, at 10:44 AM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>>
>> So, is it live yet? :-)
>
> Almost. Another several more hours before they all sync, and then
> we're
> good to go.
>
> BTW, how does this work? If I w
thus Gilbert Sebenste spake:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>>
>> So, is it live yet? :-)
Yap. I'm seeding ISO images for four hours already.
My machine at home (this one) is 5.3 already (clean install from DVD):
[t...@dragon ~]$ uname -a
On Tue, March 31, 2009 13:03, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Found it. No etc/at.allow and no etc/at.deny means only root can
> submit jobs.
>
Well, that was not it. I still get the same errors after adding my
user id to /etc/at.allow. I tested whether job control was enabled
by moving top into the ba
on 3-31-2009 10:41 AM Florin Andrei spake the following:
> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>
> So, is it live yet? :-)
>
The announcement will tell you if it is live. Prior updates seem to have been
done like this;
Packages and ISO's are synced to mirrors. Maybe packages first, then ISO's.
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup,
> calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way.
>
>
>
I have de
> Brian Mathis wrote:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009
>
> If you read any of the previous 90 messages, you'd know that
> they are talking about ways to plan for the *future* release
> of 5.4 and is asking how the community can help to try to
> prevent the delays that have happened with 5.3.
At Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:44:00 -0500 (CDT) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
> > On one mirror that I tried, at least.
> >
> > So, is it live yet? :-)
>
> Almost. Another several more hours before they all sync, and then we're
> good to go.
>
> BTW, ho
>
> For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
>
> # yum update glibc
> # yum update
>
> You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
>
>
> d
if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that someone
already has booked?
please share
- rh
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 18:41:48 Florin Andrei wrote:
> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>
> So, is it live yet? :-)
Well It's live on my local mirror. I've just done a yum update on a test
server and everything seems OK. So it looks like the wait was worth it.
Good job to all those CentO
RobertH wrote:
>> For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
>>
>> # yum update glibc
>> # yum update
>>
>> You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
>
> if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that someone
> already has booked?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=5.3+%22yum+update+glibc+%22+s
On 31-Mar-09, at 11:46 AM, RobertH wrote:
>
>>
>> For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
>>
>> # yum update glibc
>> # yum update
>>
>> You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
>>
>>
>> d
>
> if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that
> someone
> already has booked?
>
>
On 31-Mar-09, at 12:15 PM, dnk wrote:
On 31-Mar-09, at 11:46 AM, RobertH wrote:
For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
# yum update glibc
# yum update
You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
d
if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that
someone
already has b
Jerry,
To use kickstart off usb, we just use
linux ks=hd:sde1:/ourkickstart.cfg
(Of course, the "e" will change depending on your drives, on our 10-drive
systems it is
linux ks=hd:sdk1:/ourkickstart.cfg)
And it works great. We have NOT yet had any success with putting the CD#1
ISO or the DVD on
I was wondering if anyone can recommend an advanced to enterprise
class project management package (web based) that runs with a pretty
"vanilla" centos install. I would prefer to stick within the realm of
php/mysql (as I am not too familiar with the java servers), but would
venture there if
- "dnk" wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone can recommend an advanced to enterprise
> class project management package (web based) that runs with a pretty
>
> "vanilla" centos install. I would prefer to stick within the realm of
>
> php/mysql (as I am not too familiar with the java server
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:57 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57843: line 58: fg: no job control
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57843 (%build)
I've seen this error most often when using rpm specs built for a
different system (e.g., Mandriva or Suse). It's often caused
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >
>>> Also I would NEVER consider running SMB services on a gateway/firewall
>>> and I need IPv6 support anyway on the gateway/firewall. So far I have
>>> used Astaro with roll-your-own (Astaro predates the IPv6 /48
>>> allocation), and I am getting a 'nice' box from a
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Jimmy Bradley wrote:
>>This is just my 2 cents worth. The reason I run Cent OS is
>> because it just seems to be rock solid stable. That's something I
>> haven't seen in any of the other distros, or MS Windows.
>>My computers are my lifeline to my jobs. I get
On Mar 31, 2009, at 1:55 PM, "James B. Byrne"
wrote:
>
> On Tue, March 31, 2009 13:03, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> Found it. No etc/at.allow and no etc/at.deny means only root can
>> submit jobs.
>>
>
> Well, that was not it. I still get the same errors after adding my
> user id to /etc/at.allo
Ross Walker wrote:
>
> To do that you can try issuing an 'arch i386 rpmbuild -ba --
> target=i386 ' the 'arch i386' sets up the environment
> to report the machine is i386. That doesn't work everywhere, that is
> why mock or Xen or VMware with a full i386 environment is the
> recommended ap
Anyone used authconfig to join a CentOS box to an AD Domain?
I can't for the life of me get this command to even execute without
error?
Looking at the tui which I can make work, I am trying to glean possible
settings from it but have no luck. Although krb5 auth is disabled and winbind
is enabled,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:28:30 -0500
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> The OP is in Saskatchewan, Canada. Hopefully, as a later poster
>> suggested, the Canadian government has some $ available, to contribute
>> for this project. I believe the distance
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:44:00 -0500 (CDT) CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
>> > On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>> > So, is it live yet? :-)
>> Almost. Another several more hours before they all
> Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument
> Mar 15 14:45:22 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument
> Mar 15 15:02:29 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument
i remember (or think so) i had this some time ago on one of my machines.
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
Also I would NEVER consider running SMB services on a gateway/firewall
and I need IPv6 support anyway on the gateway/firewall. So far I have
used Astaro with roll-your-own (Astaro predates the IPv6 /48
allocation), and I am g
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
You don't need to change anything. 'yum update' will update things,
within a given major release (eg 4.x or 5.x). It will happen
automagically. Going from 4.x to 5.x requires using the installer (eg
the ISOs and a reboot with the installer CD/DVD). I d
On Mar 31, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>>> You don't need to change anything. 'yum update' will update things,
>>> within a given major release (eg 4.x or 5.x). It will happen
>>> automagically. Going from 4.x to 5.x requires using the
> Yes, there are not too many surprises with CentOS. However, debian has
> also had a very good reputation for stability - and Ubuntu builds on
> that while also providing timely releases.
>
>
Please do not subscribe to the notion that ubuntu builds on Debian
stability.
Ubuntu has had rel
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> I have seen attacks and mitigations that often never make it out to the
> public, or make it out after we have worked with the vendors for weeks
> to get patches before the S* hits the fans. I am particularly paranoid
> about what may be exposed on a gateway/firewall
Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Yes, there are not too many surprises with CentOS. However, debian has
>> also had a very good reputation for stability - and Ubuntu builds on
>> that while also providing timely releases.
>>
>>
>
> Please do not subscribe to the notion that ubuntu builds on Debian
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 08:43 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> > Yes, there are not too many surprises with CentOS. However, debian has
> > also had a very good reputation for stability - and Ubuntu builds on
> > that while also providing timely releases.
> >
> >
>
> Please do not subscribe to
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>>> Yes, there are not too many surprises with CentOS. However, debian has
>>> also had a very good reputation for stability - and Ubuntu builds on
>>> that while also providing timely releases.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Please do not subscribe t
>> Ubuntu has had releases with certain key tools broken such as the GNOME
>> Network configuration tool.
>>
>
> that I believe is an upstream issue that affects all distributions who
> have updated GNOME.
>
Yeah, you are most probably right. I remember being told there was no
maint
Hello,
Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I get
this is the newest release of Centos.
The update bombed stating I need nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5. I did a rpm -q nss and
nss-3.12.2.0-4.el5 is install in Cento 5.2.
What's up with that?
TIA
__
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 09:27 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> > Ubuntu is fine - if that gives Les what he's looking for, then I say,
> > great. What's the point of this ongoing discussion anyway?
> >
>
> It looked like Les was exploring the idea of trying something else and I
> have been thro
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:48 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> And I need IPv6 so it is a mute point for me.
http://grammar.about.com/od/alightersideofwriting/a/mootmutegloss.htm
Craig
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be c
On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 09:27 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>>> Ubuntu is fine - if that gives Les what he's looking for, then I
>>> say,
>>> great. What's the point of this ongoing discussion anyway?
>>>
>>
>> It looked like Les was exploring
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> I have seen attacks and mitigations that often never make it out to the
>> public, or make it out after we have worked with the vendors for weeks
>> to get patches before the S* hits the fans. I am particularly paranoid
>> about what may be e
Thomas Dukes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I get
> this is the newest release of Centos.
>
> The update bombed stating I need nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5. I did a rpm -q nss and
> nss-3.12.2.0-4.el5 is install in Cento 5.2.
>
> What's up with that
Ross Walker wrote:
>
>> Les has been around a long time and certainly is knowledgeable about
>> many forms of UNIX, Linux, Windows and OS X. He seems to enjoy
>> fomenting
>> discussions about what it is that Red Hat does in general that doesn't
>> suit him but given CentOS philosophy to track u
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009, Craig White wrote:
>On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 09:27 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>> > Ubuntu is fine - if that gives Les what he's looking for, then I say,
>> > great. What's the point of this ongoing discussion anyway?
>> >
>>
>> It looked like Les was exploring the idea
Bill Campbell wrote:
>
>> Les has been around a long time and certainly is knowledgeable about
>> many forms of UNIX, Linux, Windows and OS X. He seems to enjoy fomenting
>> discussions about what it is that Red Hat does in general that doesn't
>> suit him but given CentOS philosophy to track upstr
Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-30-2009 9:19 PM Rob Kampen spake the following:
Hi folk,
I am trying to get iptables working on a samba server but find it is
blocking something that prevents the windoze clients from being able to
access the share.
here are the bits from iptables:
# nmb provided
On Mar 31, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
>>>
> I always thought Sun would be a better match for Apple to round out
> the
> client/server mix, but they are from somewhat different planets. Is
> OpenSolaris still closely controlled by Sun?
You know I felt the exact same way. I just d
>> Is
>> OpenSolaris still closely controlled by Sun?
>>
>
> I don't know if Sun still governs OpenSolaris, I know they are very
> tight as often new technologies are rolled from OpenSolaris to
> Solaris, but OpenSolaris might have it's own governing body now.
>
Ha! There are very
Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:48 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
>> And I need IPv6 so it is a mute point for me.
>>
>
> http://grammar.about.com/od/alightersideofwriting/a/mootmutegloss.htm
I am dyslexic. This is a trivial malaprop compared to many I have dropped.
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 23:57 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:48 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >
> >
> >> And I need IPv6 so it is a mute point for me.
> >>
> >
> > http://grammar.about.com/od/alightersideofwriting/a/mootmutegloss.htm
>
Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 23:57 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> Craig White wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:48 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
And I need IPv6 so it is a mute point for me.
>>>
>>> http://gram
Mark Porter wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> To use kickstart off usb, we just use
> linux ks=hd:sde1:/ourkickstart.cfg
> (Of course, the "e" will change depending on your drives, on our 10-drive
> systems it is
> linux ks=hd:sdk1:/ourkickstart.cfg)
>
> And it works great. We have NOT yet had any success with
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Gilbert Sebenste
>Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:44 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
>
>On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>>
94 matches
Mail list logo
