Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
>> Of John R Pierce
>> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 6:38 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>>
>>>
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Robert Spangler
>Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:42 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>> If your torrent has distributed
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of John R Pierce
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 6:38 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>> here is a bit more trivia for tho
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Michael A. Peters wrote:
>
>> My guess is a scriptlet is failing - quite possibly because an SELinux
>> chcon command fails in those conditions. They probably need to change
>> the chcon portion of the scriptlet to add a ||: after the command so it
>> doesn
Hi,
I am trying to install lighttpd and yum wants to install both versions.
==
PackageArch
Version Re
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> My guess is a scriptlet is failing - quite possibly because an SELinux
> chcon command fails in those conditions. They probably need to change
> the chcon portion of the scriptlet to add a ||: after the command so it
> doesn't bomb out.
Guessing is f
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Hywel Richards wrote:
> I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with the
> filesystem rpm).
>
> Should I implement the workaround suggested by Russ for each machine, or
> will a fixed rpm come along eventually? (I'm not impatient!)
Thank you for the con
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>
>> I just kicked everyone off, killed all apps with open file descriptors
>> on /home, umounted /home, upgraded the rpm, then re-mounted /home.
>> That worked just fine.
>
> I confer 42 geek points on Paul -- hope that's enough to bu
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Paul Heinlein wrote:
>
>> I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
>> filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
>> NFS filesystem.
> No problem here, /home is exported as nfs4 with sec=kerb5.
As noted later, the probl
R P Herrold wrote:
> Thank you for the confirmation, I have not had a chance to
> file in the centos tracker yet, and hope to get it filed
> tomorrow's business hours. Similarly I have not checked
> upstream's tracker yet. If needee, I'll file there as well,
> but I cannot imagine it will
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> I just kicked everyone off, killed all apps with open file descriptors
> on /home, umounted /home, upgraded the rpm, then re-mounted /home.
> That worked just fine.
I confer 42 geek points on Paul -- hope that's enough to buy
armor to protect him from t
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
>> It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted
>> /home left.
>>
> I have /home exported and ran the upgrade from this laptop over the network,
> where that directory is mounted and displayed in a folderview under KDE4. I
> had no problems what
Linux Advocate wrote:
> is there a cli option?
>
Yes, there is. /usr/bin/bittorrent-console is provided as part of the
bittorrent package, available from http://bittorrent.com/
2.6.18-128.1.1.el5[r...@www ~]# yum info bittorrent
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds f
In article ,
Luke S Crawford wrote:
>Have you tried memtest86?
No, but if that was the problem it wouldn't have failed the same
way each time.
I finally got some time to deal with this today. I tried several
more things and finally made it work by installing a BIOS update.
Sure feals nice t
>
> For a GUI, ktorrent scratches my itch. Persists indefinitely -- across
> power failures, reboots, etc.; provides many stats.
> From rpmforge: ktorrent-2.2.1-1.el5.rf
> For a curses solution, I like bittorrent-curses from the
> bittorrent-4.4.0-1.el5.rf package -- also from rpmforge.
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 4-2-2009 1:54 PM Jason Pyeron spake the following:
>
>> Can I get some recommendations:
>>
>> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>>
>> 1: SLA
>> 2: SSH access
>> 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
>>
>>
Tsai Li Ming wrote:
>
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 4-2-2009 2:00 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
>>> On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
> filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main
>> laptop).
>>
>> I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos
>> and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command.
>>
>> On
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 4-2-2009 2:00 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
>> On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /ho
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 18:41 -0400, Robert Spangler wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 April 2009 21:26, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> > If your torrent has distributed hash table capability, I suggest that
> > you also use that feature.
> >
> > Happy sharing!
>
> So what is everyone using for their torr
Spiro Harvey wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 18:41:33 -0400
> Robert Spangler wrote:
>
>> So what is everyone using for their torrent?
>> What is the best?
>>
>
> amusing. There is no such thing as the "best", only the best fit to your
> needs.
>
Absolutely true.
For a GUI, ktorrent scra
Spiro Harvey wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 18:41:33 -0400
> Robert Spangler wrote:
>> So what is everyone using for their torrent?
>> What is the best?
>
> amusing. There is no such thing as the "best", only the best fit to your
> needs.
>
> For a start, what front end do you want? gnome, kde, tcl
on 4-2-2009 1:54 PM Jason Pyeron spake the following:
> Can I get some recommendations:
>
> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>
> 1: SLA
> 2: SSH access
> 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
>
> Would like them to include http/
2009/4/2 Ron Blizzard :
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>>
>> Can I get some recommendations
Check with dreamhost.com.
--
NiftyCluster
T o m M i t c h e l l
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
Robert Spangler wrote:
> So what is everyone using for their torrent?
> What is the best?
(rtorrent) ftw!
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
In article <20090403123544.71991...@sod.off.knossos.net.nz>,
Spiro Harvey wrote:
>amusing. There is no such thing as the "best", only the best fit to your
>needs.
There's no need to be so pedantic. He's just asking for advise
about what clients are good.
--
http://yosemitenews.info/
_
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 18:41:33 -0400
Robert Spangler wrote:
> So what is everyone using for their torrent?
> What is the best?
amusing. There is no such thing as the "best", only the best fit to your
needs.
For a start, what front end do you want? gnome, kde, tcl, cli, cli with
curses, web based? D
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Can I get some recommendations:
>
> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>
> 1: SLA
> 2: SSH access
> 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
>
> Would like them to include http/https
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> Can I get some recommendations:
>> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>> 1: SLA
>> 2: SSH access
>> 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
>> Would like the
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> Greetings CentOS Team-
>
> Since the list tends to be filled with "things don't work" and "why did you
> do it this way" and "complaint X", I thought I'd make a small deviation...
>
> I have a production system running on a Dell Poweredge 2650
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 21:26, William L. Maltby wrote:
> If your torrent has distributed hash table capability, I suggest that
> you also use that feature.
>
> Happy sharing!
So what is everyone using for their torrent?
What is the best?
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
http://cou
2009/4/2 Ralph Angenendt >
>
> Why should we list rpmforge packages in the Release Notes? exclude
> subversion from base if you want to use the one from rpmforge because it
> is newer - and remove gstreamer-plugins-bad, because it shares some
> files with gstreamer-plugins-good from from the base
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:55 PM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
>
> Can I get some recommendations:
>
> We are looking fo
On Wednesday April 1 2009, Terry Polzin wrote:
> Can't connect to network even with no security. Is this possibly a
> firmware issue?
It would appear that wpa_supplicant has a new option (-u) to enable
functionality with NetworkManager. I found it in
the /etc/sysconfig/wpa_supplicant.rpmnew f
on 4-2-2009 1:36 PM Marko Vojinovic spake the following:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in
In article ,
Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>yum clean all && yum ugrade seems to fix my problem.
I had problems on two systems (both problems different) and doing
"yum clean all" fixed them. Not sure why but I'm sure glad it
worked. ;)
--
http://deepcreekhotsprings.net/
_
on 4-2-2009 2:00 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>>> I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
>>> filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
>>> NFS filesystem
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Can I get some recommendations:
>
> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>
> 1: SLA
> 2: SSH access
> 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
>
> Would like them to include http/https and email.
>
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Can I get some recommendations:
>
> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>
> 1: SLA
> 2: SSH access
> 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
>
> Would like them to include http/https and email.
>
> Any suggesti
John R Pierce wrote:
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
>> Can I get some recommendations:
>>
>> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>>
>>
>
> godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the
> latter, but seriously...
>
>
> i'd be looking for
In article <49d526bf.7020...@mavin.com>,
John Plemons wrote:
>Try network solutions...
I've never found them to be a good solution. There are plenty
around that are a lot better!
--
http://www.spinics.net/lists/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
At Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:21:39 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Plemons
> > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 16:58
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS
John R Pierce wrote:
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> Can I get some recommendations:
>>
>> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>>
>
> godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the
> latter, but seriously...
>
>
> i'd be looking for someone pr
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Can I get some recommendations:
>
> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>
> 1: SLA
> 2: SSH access
> 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
>
> Would like them to include http/https and email.
>
> Any suggestions?
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 22:19 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a
> > peer?
>
> yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting
> DC's - which normally have good connectivity. O
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Can I get some recommendations:
>
> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>
> 1: SLA
> 2: SSH access
> 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
I've been very happy with http://www.bluehost.com
They offer ssh, rsyn
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Can I get some recommendations:
>
> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>
godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the
latter, but seriously...
i'd be looking for someone providing either VPS or dedicated servers
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Hywel Richards wrote:
>>> It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
>>> left.
>>
>> Say it ain't so!
>
> It ain't so.
:-)
> I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with
> the filesystem rpm).
>
> Should I implement the workaround
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Plemons
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 16:58
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
>
> Try network solutions...
No ssh
>
> john
>
>
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a
> peer?
yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting
DC's - which normally have good connectivity. One on the East coast US,
one on the West Coast, one in Germany, one i
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early stages was running at 2
Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
>
>
>> It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
>> left.
>>
>
> Say it ain't so!
>
>
It ain't so.
I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with the
filesystem rpm).
Should I i
Paul Heinlein wrote:
> I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
> filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
> NFS filesystem.
No problem here, /home is exported as nfs4 with sec=kerb5.
regards
Olaf
___
CentOS maili
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> > I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
> > filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
> > NFS filesystem.
>
> I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an
Try network solutions...
john
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Can I get some recommendations:
>
> We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
>
> 1: SLA
> 2: SSH access
> 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
>
> Would like them to include http/htt
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
1: SLA
2: SSH access
3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
Would like them to include http/https and email.
Any suggestions?
-Jason
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
> It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
> left.
Say it ain't so!
--
Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
> filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
> NFS filesystem.
I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS mount,
and that I missed it in testing. A workaround is:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
> >> here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
> >> came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
> >> in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
> >
> > geez,
On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:50, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote:
> > So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such
> > hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not
> > a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refu
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main
>> laptop).
>>
>> I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos
>> and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command.
>>
>> On
on 4-2-2009 11:16 AM James A. Peltier spake the following:
> Hi All,
>
> For those testing EXT4 I seem to have found an issue with anaconda where
> by if you specify EXT4 fstype in your kickstart file it will not install
> and complains that if needs another 250MB of disk space. I've tried with
Hello,
Several machine cannot joint the cluster after a reboot.
Here is a example of the error :
caserta kernel: CMAN: Join request from como.dmz.lexum.pri rejected,
node ID 3 already in use by ancona.dmz.lexum.pri
All cluster.conf are the same (checked with md5sum)
I googled this but did find n
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main
> laptop).
>
> I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos
> and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command.
>
> On both laptops, the update ends with
Hi All,
i am getting a cupd-lpd dependancy problem with CentOS 5.3.
package cups-lpd is not installed
Installing cups-lpd ...
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
2 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Install Proc
on 4-2-2009 10:40 AM rra...@comcast.net spake the
following:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>>> rra...@comcast.net wrote:
>>>
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
>>> No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you.
>> L
Hi All,
For those testing EXT4 I seem to have found an issue with anaconda where
by if you specify EXT4 fstype in your kickstart file it will not install
and complains that if needs another 250MB of disk space. I've tried with
my kickstart set for 10G for root at ext3 and it works fine. 10,15
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:50:30 Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote:
> > So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such
> > hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not
> > a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a re
2009/4/2 Paul Heinlein :
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote:
>
>> So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such
>> hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not
>> a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-)
>
> I agree. I've only
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote:
> So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such
> hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not
> a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-)
I agree. I've only updated one server so far (the
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> rra...@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>> What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
>>>
>>
>> No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you.
>
> Look at today's announcement. Now I don't know if the security bugs
So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main
laptop).
I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos
and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command.
On both laptops, the update ends with a dialog panel (oh, I am using gnome)
Hello
I've configured acpid on my laptop to make the powerbutton hibernate the
laptop. I modified /etc/acpid/events/power.conf with the following content:
event=PWRF
action=/usr/bin/pm-hibernate
On the first boot it works like it should, but after the laptop has resumed,
the powerbutton does
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> rra...@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
>>
>
> No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you.
Look at today's announcement. Now I don't know if the security bugs
fixed where in the old 5.2 kernel or only in t
on 4-2-2009 6:53 AM rra...@comcast.net spake the
following:
> What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
Your hair will fall out and your ears will ring constantly.
You will gain weight that no amount of dieting and exercise will be able to
get rid of.
You will be the laughing stock of all the "co
Greetings CentOS Team-
Since the list tends to be filled with "things don't work" and "why did you do
it this way" and "complaint X", I thought I'd make a small deviation...
I have a production system running on a Dell Poweredge 2650 server. I simply
ran 'yum update' and rebooted with no proble
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
John R Pierce wrote:
>> here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
>> came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
>> in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
>>
> geez, makes me wonder if I should even bother to leave mine runnin
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway,
>> that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts
>> everyday, at least I don't.
>>
>
> here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4
Melinda Odom wrote on Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:27:55 -0500:
> I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate
> commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c?
you did never run top before?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: h
Melinda Odom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate
> commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c?
>
> Is this normal? If not, how do I fix it to make only one command show
> up?
Pretty normal for a system with two CPUs/dual core.
Ralph
Hi,
I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate
commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c?
Is this normal? If not, how do I fix it to make only one command show
up?
1 root 15 0 2064 592 512 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.40 init [3]
2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00
Frédérique Da Luene wrote:
>
>> De: Barry Brimer
>> Have you checked /etc/libuser.conf for crypt_style? pwck
>> and grpck can verify integrity of the data in /etc/passwd /etc/group
>> /etc/shadow /etc/gshadow.
>
> I have just checked, and libuser.conf has :
>
> crypt_style = md5
> modules = fil
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
> What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you.
Ralph
pgp6YxJiPFgO8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
> What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
>
It is EOLed. That is all fixes to 5.2 are 5.3.
So there is little choice unless you take on the whole management issue.
BTW, I had some systems that would simply NOT do an install with the 5.2
boot CD. I HAD to install w
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi Barry
--- En date de : Jeu 2.4.09, Barry Brimer a écrit :
> De: Barry Brimer
> Have you checked /etc/libuser.conf for crypt_style? pwck
> and grpck can verify integrity of the data in /etc/passwd /etc/group
> /etc/shadow /etc/gshadow.
I have just checked, and libuser.conf has :
crypt_styl
> I have successfully configure two machines to use heartbeat to cluster
> httpd. The two nodes are called etk-1 and etk-2. I am trying to
> configure another two machines to act as a separate cluster (on the
> same IP subnet). These two nodes are called radu-1 and radu-2.
We successfully do this
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:34 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> That's dedica
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:32 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> On a related sidetrack; is t
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> That's dedication... I decap my bt-client after work hours (from 1700hrs to
> 0700 weekdays, and full speed continuesly over the weekends). I wonder if
> the ridiculously high 40k-share ratio Azureus reports here has something to
> do with this. Hmm...
the machines seeding at t
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> On a related sidetrack; is there any difference between the proprietary
> Nvidia-drivers and the ones from eg rpmforge? Specifically, we use
> the
> proprietary Nvidia drivers on our dozen or so course computers because they
> support stereo-3D. When our former *nix-
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:07 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> According to
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Steve Huff
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:03 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
>
>
>On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> Automagi
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway,
> that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts
> everyday, at least I don't.
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each runnin
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Automagically? Care to elaborate on that? Sounds like a useful
mechanism to
me.
it's very useful.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Kernel_Module_Support
$ man dkms
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=rpmforge install nvidia-x11-drv
$ sudo reboot
...
pr
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Michael A. Peters
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:50 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
>
>>> I suppose I should move to the new way that relin
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of William L. Maltby
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:47 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>For those who are insatiably cu
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
>> Of Michael A. Peters
>> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 7:29 AM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
>>
>> I suppose I shoul
D Tucny wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but, the mirror admins aren't listed anywhere
> are they? I couldn't see any mention in the mirror list pages, in the
> mirror status pages or on the mirror itself that suggested who the admin
> of that server was... Maybe John has access to a list, but,
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
