Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS

2009-04-30 Thread Nifty Cluster Mitch
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 07:34:13AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its > >> only > > > > iirc, the xfs kmod's are not kernel ver dependant an

Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux

2009-04-30 Thread Dan Roberts
Thanks - this is helpful but still not quite a fix. The suggested fixes seem general for the three issues of dovecot, nmbd, and spamc - but audit2allow does at least create them. [...@trailrunner ~]$ cat dovecotsocketselinux.te module dovecotsocketselinux 1.0; require { type doveco

Re: [CentOS] Rsync/SSH automation problem?

2009-04-30 Thread Les Mikesell
Gordon Messmer wrote: > James Bensley wrote: >> I have a win2k3 server that its backing up to a CentOS 5.3 server. On >> the Win2k3 machine I plan to have rsync back up nightly to the CentOS >> server through ssh. The command I am using is as follows: >> >> rsync -vrPtz -e ssh myu...@myserver:/remo

[CentOS] esata

2009-04-30 Thread Jerry Geis
I am trying to get esata working. my lspci is below. When I plug in the disk an turn it on - dmesg reports nothing. Is it supposed to report anything like a usb disk does? Is there a module to load? My motherboard is GA-MA78GM-US2H. Jerry - 00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices

Re: [CentOS] Rsync/SSH automation problem?

2009-04-30 Thread Gordon Messmer
James Bensley wrote: > > I have a win2k3 server that its backing up to a CentOS 5.3 server. On > the Win2k3 machine I plan to have rsync back up nightly to the CentOS > server through ssh. The command I am using is as follows: > > rsync -vrPtz -e ssh myu...@myserver:/remote/backup/folder/ > /loc

Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux

2009-04-30 Thread Dan Roberts
I would like not to disable SELinux, and I have the guide from the nsa. But try as I might these three things are being difficult. Given that it was a default install for them I have no idea how or why. Some google searches and even the SELinux FAQ suggest remedy options that involve data

Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux

2009-04-30 Thread Ned Slider
Dan Roberts wrote: > Ok, but how? > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ps error

2009-04-30 Thread P.A
Bill, good point but I looked and don't think that is what happened. This box is not in production and has a private ip. I took care of the ps issue by reinstalling procps-3.2.7-11.1.el5.i386. The RPM issue was fix by reinstalling the rpm package. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@c

Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux

2009-04-30 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Dan Roberts wrote: > Following a hard drive corruption I have reinstalled the latest version of > CentOS and all current patch files. > For most applications I selected the default options.  By doing this I > expected that the packages would play nice with one anot

Re: [CentOS] ps error

2009-04-30 Thread Bill Campbell
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009, P.A wrote: > > Hi does anyone know what the problem here is > > [r...@dnstest lib]# ps > > ps: error while loading shared libraries: libproc-3.2.3.so: cannot > open shared object file: No such file or directory When programs like ps, sed, find, etc. start showing shar

Re: [CentOS] Directory and File Perms

2009-04-30 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I've handled these kind of complex samba rights problems by either using >acls or if it's particularly thorny, an inotify script - needs >inotify-tools-3.13-1.el5.rf. Nice tool! That's far more elegant than what I had planned. Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] Directory and File Perms

2009-04-30 Thread Toby Bluhm
Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I have a directory shared out via Samba for Quickbooks and seem > to have some issues with permissions. The directory being shared > is a subdirectory in an ext3 partition being mounted with the acl > option. > > It has been setup as follows: > chown root:DOMAIN\AD_G

Re: [CentOS] ps error

2009-04-30 Thread Ralph Angenendt
P.A wrote: > Hi does anyone know what the problem here is > > > > [r...@dnstest lib]# ps > > ps: error while loading shared libraries: libproc-3.2.3.so: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory rpm -qf $(which ps) rpm -V procps > [r...@dnstest lib]# ln -s libproc-3.2.7.so

Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux

2009-04-30 Thread Andrew Colin Kissa
The audit.log should contain more detail than is being provided here, if it is a unix socket you should see the path, i suspect it is the unix socket not the tcp sockets (pop3/imap) On 30 Apr 2009, at 4:50 PM, Dan Roberts wrote: Ok, but how? There appear to be a lot of different options

[CentOS] ps error

2009-04-30 Thread P.A
Hi does anyone know what the problem here is [r...@dnstest lib]# ps ps: error while loading shared libraries: libproc-3.2.3.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [r...@dnstest lib]# ln -s libproc-3.2.7.so libproc-3.2.3.so [r...@dnstest lib]# ps ps: /lib/libproc

Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux

2009-04-30 Thread Dan Roberts
Ok, but how? There appear to be a lot of different options when employing audit2allow and I am reluctant to start blazing away trying different elements. I am missing the details of what socket an dhow the execution is occuring so that I can begin to develop the proper audit2allow sequen

Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux

2009-04-30 Thread Andrew Colin Kissa
Hi Dovecot is trying to open a socket, and procmail is trying to execute spamc, You should be able to fix these issues using audit2allow. Andrew. On 30 Apr 2009, at 4:07 PM, Dan Roberts wrote: Following a hard drive corruption I have reinstalled the latest version of CentOS and all curren

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-30 Thread Ross Walker
On Apr 30, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400: > >> Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option) >> looks like something I may try for testing in VMs. > > It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to that now. > >> I

Re: [CentOS] tool for packet detection

2009-04-30 Thread nate
Agnello George wrote: > Hi > I have small query, all our server are centos based 5 and 5.2 . We are > looking ofr a tool to that measure packet loss. we have servers in two IDC's > bothin the US and we are trying to download a 2gb file from the internet. > Some server are able to download the fil

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 on an EeePC??

2009-04-30 Thread Warren Young
R P Herrold wrote: > > oh please -- move advocacy to a new thread raher than > hijacking. It's just a natural evolution of the conversation. IMO, the answer to the original question is "No," so the obvious next direction to the conversation is "okay, what instead, then?" Nate's answer was

[CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux

2009-04-30 Thread Dan Roberts
Following a hard drive corruption I have reinstalled the latest version of CentOS and all current patch files. For most applications I selected the default options. By doing this I expected that the packages would play nice with one another and I could customize as necessary. Setting SEL

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 on an EeePC??

2009-04-30 Thread Warren Young
nate wrote: >> (There are even some things the simpler Red Hattish tools can do that >> the Debian ones can't, easily. rpm -qa, for one.) > > rpm -qa typically just lists all of the packages on the system, > the equivalent in debian is dpkg -l. Not really equivalent. The output is only sort of

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-30 Thread Kai Schaetzl
JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400: > Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option) > looks like something I may try for testing in VMs. It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to that now. > Indeed also I when I installed Xen I had to manually take out pet

Re: [CentOS] tool for packet detection

2009-04-30 Thread John Doe
From: Agnello George > I have small query, all our server are centos based 5 and 5.2 . We are > looking > ofr a tool to that measure packet loss. we have servers in two IDC's bothin > the US and we are trying to download a 2gb file from the internet. Some > server are able to download the f

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 on an EeePC??

2009-04-30 Thread Michael A. Peters
Beartooth wrote: > > I try never to install Ffx anywhere without NoScript, Adblock, > and several more. I do not use Adblock because I am a member of an online community that specifically forbids blocking of advertisements, their primary revenue source. An exception is made for noscrip