Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:23 PM, carlopmart wrote: > Victor Padro wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:05 PM, carlopmart > > wrote: > > > > RobertH wrote: > > > ive read most of the thread, yet not all. forgive me as i might > > have missed > >

[CentOS] gethostbyname clarification

I have an issue, although it's a result of sketchy code in the sip implementation in Asterisk that's been around forever, I am sure I am going to have to fix it some other way as many people have waited with no fix yet from Digium. If a name resolution fails for a remote sip peer, the entire sta

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:23 PM, carlopmart wrote: > Victor Padro wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:05 PM, carlopmart > > wrote: >> >>     RobertH wrote: >>      > ive read most of the thread, yet not all. forgive me as i might >>     have missed >>      > some

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:15:56AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:05:44PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > >> At Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700 CentOS mailing list > >> wrote: > >>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Ro

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:05:44PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: >> At Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700 CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: >>> What are the kernel versions? >>> >>> CentOS

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:05:44PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > At Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > > What are the kernel versions? > > > > CentOS kernel: > > > > 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.cen

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:21 +0200, carlopmart wrote: > - Disabling "query-source port" and "forwarders" directives: > >[r...@thranduil data]# nslookup >> www.google.com >;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached > Given that your resolv.conf only has 127.0.0.1 listed as

Re: [CentOS] System hang during shutdown (halt)

Dag Wieers wrote: > On Sat, 23 May 2009, Camron W. Fox wrote: > > > What wireless/wired network drivers are you using ? > Dag, I'm only using the Atheros wireless for now... [cw...@oprichnik ~]$ lspci | grep -i ether 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5751M

Re: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> If you are running CentOS-4, the last 2 kernels do not (yet) have >> corresponding kmod-xfs.  You need to wait for CentOS devs to build >> those kmods or to supply a kernel version in

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

At Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > What are the kernel versions? > > CentOS kernel: > > 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.centos.plus > > Fedora 10 kernel: > > 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 It could just

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > What are the kernel versions? CentOS kernel: 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.centos.plus Fedora 10 kernel: 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

Victor Padro wrote: > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:05 PM, carlopmart > wrote: > > RobertH wrote: > > ive read most of the thread, yet not all. forgive me as i might > have missed > > some of this below in helping... > > > > carlopmart, >

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

At Mon, 25 May 2009 12:53:55 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:24:03PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:05 PM, carlopmart wrote: > RobertH wrote: > > ive read most of the thread, yet not all. forgive me as i might have > missed > > some of this below in helping... > > > > carlopmart, > > > > what is in your /etc/resolv.conf > > search hpulabs.org > nameserver 127.0.0.1 > >

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

RobertH wrote: > ive read most of the thread, yet not all. forgive me as i might have missed > some of this below in helping... > > carlopmart, > > what is in your /etc/resolv.conf search hpulabs.org nameserver 127.0.0.1 > > is it configured correctly? > > are you using ipv6? no. > > if no

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

Les Mikesell wrote: > carlopmart wrote: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >>> carlopmart wrote: > Thanks lars. Correctly, firewall could be the problem, but it isn't. > Because Ubuntu and Windows 2003/2008 doesn't have problems with it ... and resolves perfectly

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:24:03PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > >> > >>> Can anyone advise me on how I can tell my system the above device is

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

On Mon, 25 May 2009, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >> >>> Can anyone advise me on how I can tell my system the above device is a >>> mass storage device? Do I need to write some udev rules? >> >> S

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >> Can anyone advise me on how I can tell my system the above device is a >> mass storage device? Do I need to write some udev rules? > > Sorry for replying to my own post, but upon furthe

Re: [CentOS] rsyslog expression based filters

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:59 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Hello All, > > Does the rsyslog version in CentOS 5 support expression based filters? > I'm asking because a filter I believe should be working, isn't and I > cannot figure out why. I think this is the likely problem: the CentOS ver

[CentOS] {SOLVED} Re: OT: SMART warning on hard drive, same warning for 2 1 /2 years

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > My wife's box has a very intermittent problem,  when booting from the > Maxtor IDE hard drive. This has been going on for about 2 1/2 > years The box is a Compaq EVO D300v for the Enterprise. When it > boots, there is a SMART advisory from

Re: [CentOS] Photo browser

>> > > Can somebody  recommend a photo browser. It needs to support >> > > CR2, NEF, PEF and DNG formats. I'm looking for something like >> > > Infranview, but for Linux. > May I ask what generates those images? Kinda reminds me of propiatery > formats for like CT-Sanners and MRI Machines. I thin

Re: [CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > Can anyone advise me on how I can tell my system the above device is a > mass storage device? Do I need to write some udev rules? Sorry for replying to my own post, but upon further investigation, it appears that perhaps the usb-st

Re: [CentOS] Photo browser

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 10:19 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009 13:00:21 -0400 > JohnS wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 09:44 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can somebody recommend a photo browser. It needs to support > > > CR2, NEF, PEF

[CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

I'm adding a couple lacie external USB drives to my CentOS 5.3 system and running into a few issues... when I connect them, I see the following in dmesg: usb 1-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 11 usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice And that's it. No device a

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:02 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > At Mon, 25 May 2009 12:35:02 -0400 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:02 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

ive read most of the thread, yet not all. forgive me as i might have missed some of this below in helping... carlopmart, what is in your /etc/resolv.conf is it configured correctly? are you using ipv6? if not, is it fully disabled / turned off? in modprobe.conf put alias net-pf-10 off alias

[CentOS] rsyslog expression based filters

Hello All, Does the rsyslog version in CentOS 5 support expression based filters? I'm asking because a filter I believe should be working, isn't and I cannot figure out why. I'm trying to get the following expression working (might wrap): if $source == 'astappsrv2' and $programname == 'asterisk'

Re: [CentOS] Photo browser

On Mon, 25 May 2009, JohnS wrote: > --- > Well I need one that supports *.raw for a Client of mine but I'm > currently "SOL" on that. > > Have you looked at GThumb, Googles Picassa and the many more. > > JohnStanley > I like Picassa if I want to do editing, or gwenview for just viewing (particula

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

carlopmart wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> carlopmart wrote: Thanks lars. Correctly, firewall could be the problem, but it isn't. Because >>> Ubuntu and Windows 2003/2008 doesn't have problems with it ... and >>> resolves >>> perfectly ... And I don't have configur

Re: [CentOS] Photo browser

On Mon, 25 May 2009 13:00:21 -0400 JohnS wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 09:44 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can somebody recommend a photo browser. It needs to support > > CR2, NEF, PEF and DNG formats. I'm looking for something like > > Infranview, but for Linux. > --

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

At Mon, 25 May 2009 12:35:02 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:02 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > >-Original Message- > > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > > Behalf > > >Of William L. Maltby > > >Sent: Monday, May 25, 20

Re: [CentOS] Photo browser

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 09:44 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > Hi, > > Can somebody recommend a photo browser. It needs to support > CR2, NEF, PEF and DNG formats. I'm looking for something like > Infranview, but for Linux. --- Well I need one that supports *.raw for a Client of mine but I'm

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:57 +0200, carlopmart wrote: > I have find a temporary solution: reduce the MTU on CentOS server (1440) ...I > need to investigate why centOS loses some packages and ubuntu doesn't --- What happens when you set the MTU for the type of Net Link you have? That goes for

[CentOS] Photo browser

Hi, Can somebody recommend a photo browser. It needs to support CR2, NEF, PEF and DNG formats. I'm looking for something like Infranview, but for Linux. -- Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cento

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:02 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of William L. Maltby > >Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:24 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing sec

Re: [CentOS] Intel Atom systems?

Tosh wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> Hi Bill, >> >> On 05/23/2009 08:37 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: >> > Any comments on CentOS 5 on Intel Atom CPUs? > >> Something I totally left out in my last email - atleast 2 people have >> reported success using C5 on Atom. I've loo

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

Les Mikesell wrote: > carlopmart wrote: >>> Thanks lars. Correctly, firewall could be the problem, but it isn't. >>> Because >> Ubuntu and Windows 2003/2008 doesn't have problems with it ... and >> resolves >> perfectly ... And I don't have configured this firewall to accept

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

carlopmart wrote: >> Thanks lars. Correctly, firewall could be the problem, but it isn't. >> Because > Ubuntu and Windows 2003/2008 doesn't have problems with it ... and > resolves > perfectly ... And I don't have configured this firewall to accept dns > queries >

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 51, Issue 11

11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/atta

Re: [CentOS] Intel Atom systems?

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:22 +0200, Peter Hopfgartner wrote: > I had some of them, too, running for years. The only problem I > incurred > was with a Flash memory that degraded after a while, so I would > really > recommend some of thoses "industrial grade" flash memories. The > hardware > is sup

[CentOS] OBM groupware on centos

Have any of you tried out the OBM groupware stuff on centos? They have RHEL5 rpm's. http://obm.org/doku.php?id=start Also curious how it is as a groupware/exchange alternative d ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

Les Mikesell wrote: > carlopmart wrote: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >>> carlopmart wrote: Lars Hecking wrote: >> options { >> directory "/var/named"; >> dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; >> statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; >>

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

carlopmart wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> carlopmart wrote: >>> Lars Hecking wrote: > options { > directory "/var/named"; > dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; > statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; > memstatistics-file "

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

Les Mikesell wrote: > carlopmart wrote: >> Lars Hecking wrote: options { directory "/var/named"; dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_s

Re: [CentOS] Gnome terminal oddity

On: Fri, 22 May 2009 16:58:26 + (UTC), Beartooth wrote: > > On Fri, 22 May 2009 12:49:43 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> I have the following gnome terminal profile settings: >> >> Backspace = ASCII DEL >> Delete Key = Escape Sequence > [] >> I am fairly confident that the

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

At Mon, 25 May 2009 15:02:28 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Content-language: sv > > > ---Executing: recode > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of William L. Maltby > >Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:24 PM > >To

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

At Mon, 25 May 2009 15:05:25 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Content-language: sv > > > ---Executing: recode > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of Robert Heller > >Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:52 PM > >To: Ce

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

carlopmart wrote: > Lars Hecking wrote: >>> options { >>> directory "/var/named"; >>> dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; >>> statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; >>> memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; >>> list

Re: [CentOS] Intel Atom systems?

I had some of them, too, running for years. The only problem I incurred was with a Flash memory that degraded after a while, so I would really recommend some of thoses "industrial grade" flash memories. The hardware is superb. Peter nate wrote: > Bill Campbell wrote: > >> Any comments on Ce

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of William L. Maltby Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:24 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates? Probably not the best

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of William L. Maltby >Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 3:27 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates? > > >> Ok, so what would you guys suggest using on a

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

Lars Hecking wrote: >> options { >> directory "/var/named"; >> dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; >> statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; >> memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; >> listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1;

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

Paul Bijnens wrote: > On 2009-05-25 13:21, carlopmart wrote: >> Paul Bijnens wrote: >>> On 2009-05-25 12:51, carlopmart wrote: I have a problem using named with different CentOS5 servers (2 servers): all they are really slow to resolv any internet address and most of time fails

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:02 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of William L. Maltby > > > > > >Not likely on this list. More likely, a "preponderance", maybe even a > >"majority", but I wouldn

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

On 2009-05-25 13:21, carlopmart wrote: > Paul Bijnens wrote: >> On 2009-05-25 12:51, carlopmart wrote: >>> I have a problem using named with different CentOS5 servers (2 servers): >>> all >>> they are really slow to resolv any internet address and most of time fails >>> to >>> resolv. This si

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Robert Heller >Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:52 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Cc: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates? > >The *Intel* WiFi-NIC (Intel

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of William L. Maltby >Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:24 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates? > >> >Probably not the best distro for Laptops, >> >b

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

At Mon, 25 May 2009 10:56:13 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Content-language: sv > > > ---Executing: recode > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of Lanny Marcus > >Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:14 PM > >To:

Re: [CentOS] Traffic Analyzer

Anoher tool is a iptraf, is a TUI and show data in real time. To connection state, you can use iptstat (like top to connection), in real time too. []s Renato de Oliveira Diogo Bacharel em Ciência da Computação UNESP - Bauru LPIC1 - Linux Professio

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 10:56 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of Lanny Marcus > >Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:14 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing secur

Re: [CentOS] OT: SMART warning on hard drive, same warning for 2 1 /2 years

On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 23:39 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: > > My wife's box has a very intermittent problem, when booting from the > > Maxtor IDE hard drive. This has been going on for about 2 1/2 > > years The box is a Compaq EVO D300v for the Enterprise. When it > > boo

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

> options { > directory "/var/named"; > dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; > statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; > memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; > listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 172.25.50.10; }; >

[CentOS] IMPORTANT: Issue with Linuxtag 2009

Hi, due to clashing issues here at work I will not be able to make it to Linuxtag 2009, as I won't be able to get free time during that week. That at the moment leaves us with Didi and Chris Geldenhuis, which isn't enough to man a booth during 4 days. Is anyone else interested to come to man the

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

Paul Bijnens wrote: > On 2009-05-25 12:51, carlopmart wrote: >> I have a problem using named with different CentOS5 servers (2 servers): >> all >> they are really slow to resolv any internet address and most of time fails >> to >> resolv. This situation differs if I use "forwarders" servers l

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

On 2009-05-25 12:51, carlopmart wrote: > I have a problem using named with different CentOS5 servers (2 servers): > all > they are really slow to resolv any internet address and most of time fails to > resolv. This situation differs if I use "forwarders" servers like opendns: > resolving name

[CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

Hi all, I have a problem using named with different CentOS5 servers (2 servers): all they are really slow to resolv any internet address and most of time fails to resolv. This situation differs if I use "forwarders" servers like opendns: resolving names it is really really quickly. And I don'

Re: [CentOS] madwifi not working for 5.2 x64

On Mon, 25 May 2009, Michael A. Peters wrote: > Michael A. Peters wrote: >> Dag Wieers wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, sumit agarwal wrote: >>> i installed madwifi on 5.2 x64 but it dosent seem to be working any clues? >>> For people with madwifi issues or looking for a better solution t

Re: [CentOS] madwifi not working for 5.2 x64

Michael A. Peters wrote: > Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, sumit agarwal wrote: >> >>> i installed madwifi on 5.2 x64 but it dosent seem to be working >>> any clues? >> For people with madwifi issues or looking for a better solution to Atheros >> support, the elrepo repository is tesing

Re: [CentOS] Send syslog to a remote server

hce wrote: > Is the CentOS 5 running only for syslog? In my case, the remote server > is running rsyslog, but that the CentOS syslog should be able to talk > to RH9 rsyslog, right? Yes, but standard syslog does not support the @@hostname directive for tcp logging, only @hostname for udp logging.

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Lanny Marcus >Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:14 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates? > >Probably not the best distro for Laptops, >but many

Re: [CentOS] Intel Atom systems?

Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On 05/23/2009 08:37 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: Any comments on CentOS 5 on Intel Atom CPUs? > > Something I totally left out in my last email - atleast 2 people have > reported success using C5 on Atom. I've looked at one of the original > intel reference pla

Re: [CentOS] Random server reboot after update to CentOS 5.3

On Friday 22 May 2009, Peter Hopfgartner wrote: ... > Would it make sense to install the kernel from CentOS 5.2? Any > contraindications? As others have said, you should still have the 5.2 kernel around. Just change the grub.conf and reboot. It makes no sense to start swapping around hardware un

Re: [CentOS] 32bit vs 64bit memory usage

On Thursday 21 May 2009, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2009 at 4:59pm, Robert Heller wrote > > > No, you are not wrong. All x86 flavered 64-bit processors will run as > > 32-bit (i686) processors and when running in 32-bit mode are > > effectively just a i686 as far as any 32-bit prog