Do you want the servers on the same subnet or different
subnets?
Do you want them geographically separated?
What services will the servers run?
Httpd, database, etc.?
There is a project called Linux Virtual Server:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
that might be interesting for you to take a l
Hi,
I am thinking of setting up two servers in load balance mode. I would really
appreciate your suggestions and hints...
thnx,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> The moral of my story is to prevent issues languishing downstream
>> indefinitely, to avoid the kind of comment "this bug has been around
>> forever, why is it still a problem and not fixed?", which does no one any
>> good, esp when upstreams aren't
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Julian Thomas wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:46:06 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>
>>
>>I do not see any problem with one message either. But, if every time
>>he receives a message, his system sends an email, that will get old.
>
> Smart autoresponders keep track of w
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:48 AM, John Doe wrote:
>
> From: Ron Blizzard
>> I'm trying to run Celtx (a screenplay formatter) in CentOS 5.3 from
>> the shell. If I run celtx-bin I get the following error:
>> ./celtx-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libjemalloc.so:
>> cannot open shared obj
On 6/26/09 4:19 PM, "John R Pierce" wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> Any chance to get it built and packaged for CentOS and made available
>> on one of the 3rd party repositories? RPMforge anyone? :-)
>>
>
> probably be good to either use the Alternatives system for this, or give
> the
On 06/26/2009 09:46 AM, Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that the new dm-ioband RPM package (v1.12.0)
> has been released at:
>http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/ioband/wiki/dm-ioband
>
> dm-ioband provides disk bandwidth control on per partition, per user,
> per process and per virtu
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Any chance to get it built and packaged for CentOS and made available
> on one of the 3rd party repositories? RPMforge anyone? :-)
>
probably be good to either use the Alternatives system for this, or give
the executtable a new name, like gfdisk, so there's no con
On 06/26/2009 11:20 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> GNU fdisk has the same user interface as the 'old-school default'. The
>> project also has a front-end that is much like cfdisk as well.
>
> Any chance to get it built and packaged for CentOS and made available
> on one of the 3rd party reposit
On 6/26/09 3:20 PM, "Filipe Brandenburger" wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 17:30, Gary Greene wrote:
>> On 6/26/09 12:40 PM, "Jim Perrin" wrote:
> fdisk has a 2TB limit, not the OS. Barry's information is correct.
It's too bad RHEL hasn't moved to GNU fdisk instead of using the an
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> You are going to find this difficult to believe,
> but I did not actually understand your reference to "upstream"
> in response to my query (I was the OP).
"Upstream" is literally where the water you're seeing in the river is coming
from. For software, it means where the so
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 17:30, Gary Greene wrote:
> On 6/26/09 12:40 PM, "Jim Perrin" wrote:
fdisk has a 2TB limit, not the OS. Barry's information is correct.
>>>
>>> It's too bad RHEL hasn't moved to GNU fdisk instead of using the ancient one
>>> from the linux-utils package. The GNU fdisk
On 6/26/09 12:40 PM, "Jim Perrin" wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Gary Greene
> wrote:
>
>>> fdisk has a 2TB limit, not the OS. Barry's information is correct.
>>>
>>
>> It's too bad RHEL hasn't moved to GNU fdisk instead of using the ancient one
>> from the linux-utils package. The G
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:03 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
> Not sure if this applies because I've a "MS" version. But maybe this wil
> yield a clue?
>
I had a chance to poke around for reasons unrelated to this problem, and
I happened upon the keyboard configuration submenu of
System->Preferenc
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> Is there any update on the csgfs packages for CentOS 4? The current
>> rpms are 10 months old unless I'm looking at the wrong mirror.
>>
>> --
>> Bowie
>>
>
> You may want to join in / watch this CentOS bug repo
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Julian Thomas wrote:
>
>> Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded and don't send
>> more than one msg to the
>> same person. Of course, it's uncertain if it uses the "From" or "Reply-to"
>>
Julian Thomas wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:46:06 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> I do not see any problem with one message either. But, if every time
>> he receives a message, his system sends an email, that will get old.
>>
>
> Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Julian Thomas wrote:
> Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded and don't send
> more than one msg to the
> same person. Of course, it's uncertain if it uses the "From" or "Reply-to"
> for that test.
So one autoresponder message, and it gene
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:46:06 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>
>I do not see any problem with one message either. But, if every time
>he receives a message, his system sends an email, that will get old.
Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded and don't send
more than one msg to t
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Gary Greene wrote:
>> fdisk has a 2TB limit, not the OS. Barry's information is correct.
>>
>
> It's too bad RHEL hasn't moved to GNU fdisk instead of using the ancient one
> from the linux-utils package. The GNU fdisk utility uses libparted to do
> it's work.
Fi
On 6/26/09 6:37 AM, "Jim Perrin" wrote:
> 2009/6/26 mcclnx mcc :
>>
>> we have DELL server with Centos 5.3 X86_64 bits version on it. This server
>> also have couple MD1000 connect to it. We configured MD1000 as one hardware
>> Volume size 2990GB.
>>
>> I tried to use "fdisk" to partition this
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Is there any update on the csgfs packages for CentOS 4? The current
> rpms are 10 months old unless I'm looking at the wrong mirror.
>
> --
> Bowie
You may want to join in / watch this CentOS bug report:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3
Is there any update on the csgfs packages for CentOS 4? The current
rpms are 10 months old unless I'm looking at the wrong mirror.
--
Bowie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 6-26-2009 12:27 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
>> Of Les Mikesell
>> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:55 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery opt
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Hopefully, the owner of the mailing list will see Ted's email and
>> delete Ted from the list, or stop sending the list to him and he can
>> reactivate when he returns to the office. People should not subscribe
>> to
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:38 -0400, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> Hi all,
> Finally got around to making sendmail and dovecot use a secure log in
> procedure on my server.
> Now when I open up outlook it goes through a secure log in.
> Unfortunately, I am using my own self signed cert on the server for this
On 6/25/2009 5:35 PM, S.Tindall wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 23:00 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
Bob Hoffman wrote:
Hi all,
Finally got around to making sendmail and dovecot use a secure log in
procedure on my server.
Now when I open up outlook it goes through a secure log in.
Unfortunatel
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Michael Klinosky wrote:
> You can check to see if the driver works for your hardware. Run the
> lspci command (hint: -n option) and find the device ID. Compare it
> against the following info provided by Alan:
2009/6/26 mcclnx mcc :
>
> we have DELL server with Centos 5.3 X86_64 bits version on it. This server
> also have couple MD1000 connect to it. We configured MD1000 as one hardware
> Volume size 2990GB.
>
> I tried to use "fdisk" to partition this 2990Gb volume and "fdisk" can only
> see 2000GB
> Does there has other tool can partition disk size large than 2TB? (I
> don't like use LVM)
Use parted with gpt disk labels.
Barry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
we have DELL server with Centos 5.3 X86_64 bits version on it. This server
also have couple MD1000 connect to it. We configured MD1000 as one hardware
Volume size 2990GB.
I tried to use "fdisk" to partition this 2990Gb volume and "fdisk" can only see
2000GB. does 64 bits O.S. still have 2TB
Rex Dieter wrote:
> The moral of my story is to prevent issues languishing downstream
> indefinitely, to avoid the kind of comment "this bug has been around
> forever, why is it still a problem and not fixed?", which does no one any
> good, esp when upstreams aren't made aware of the issues (which
Kris Buytaert wrote:
Have you already tested with GFS/GFS2 ? I remember (after having
discussed with DRBD people) that OCFS2 was more or less supported on
DRBD 7.x while they advised using GFS/GFS2 on top of DRBD > 8.x devices ..
Just my two cents though : i've only tested OCFS2 once and never
Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> Is there something funny about rpm in Fedora 11 that causes cpio errors
>> when trying to install src.rpm's in CentOS 5.3, or am I just getting
>> repeated bad downloads?
>
> rpm -ivh --nomd5 packagename.src.rpm
>
> Phil
Which i also wrote on
From: Ron Blizzard
> I'm trying to run Celtx (a screenplay formatter) in CentOS 5.3 from
> the shell. If I run celtx-bin I get the following error:
> ./celtx-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libjemalloc.so:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> If I run celtx I g
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Hopefully, the owner of the mailing list will see Ted's email and
> delete Ted from the list, or stop sending the list to him and he can
> reactivate when he returns to the office. People should not subscribe
> to mailing lists with an email account they use an auto responder
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Wahyu Darmawan
wrote:
>
> Hi experts,
> I have implemented squid for my school environment. How to testing it
> for the security? ingoing and outgoing?
> Thanks before.
>
> Regards,
Hello Wahyu Darmawan,
What kind of test will you want to carry on with your squi
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce that the new dm-ioband RPM package (v1.12.0)
has been released at:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/ioband/wiki/dm-ioband
dm-ioband provides disk bandwidth control on per partition, per user,
per process and per virtual machine (such as KVM or Xen) basis.
The RP
Hi experts,
I have implemented squid for my school environment. How to testing it
for the security? ingoing and outgoing?
Thanks before.
Regards,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:55 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>> Seems like I also did not mention it must be free, as in n
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Bart Schaefer
>Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:01 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Sorin Srbu
wrote:
>>>-
42 matches
Mail list logo
