Hi All,
I am using Caching DNS server with Bind 9
bind-utils-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.1
bind-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.1
bind-chroot-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.1
system-config-bind-4.0.3-2.el5.centos
bind-libs-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.1
I am getting
Error :
named[22851]: mem.c:1061: REQUIREctx) != ((void *)0)) && (((con
> I had similar problem in the past. I used 586 kernel and it didn't work.
> Do you have 686 kernel? If yes, can you send us the output of the
> following commands:
>
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
>
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_av
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:49 PM, nate wrote:
> Ian jonhson wrote:
>
>> # modprobe acpi-cpufreq
>> FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq
>> (/lib/modules/2.6.29.3/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko):
>> No such device
>
> That error tells me most likely your hardware is not
> compatibl
> ---
> No i do not think it is a typo because I get the same exact error that
> it is missing where as it was available 2 kernels ago?
>
Do you mean modprobe can not find the proper module file when
it faces two and more kernels in same machine? I think this would
not happen.
> File Bug Report?>
Drew wrote:
>> It's a bit of bad form to use NAT and private addresses at all because the
>> internet really wasn't designed to be segmented, but everyone does it.
>
> Why is NAT bad form?
I don't mean to imply it shouldn't be used - it is pretty much a necessary evil
now, but it doesn't fit the
> It's a bit of bad form to use NAT and private addresses at all because the
> internet really wasn't designed to be segmented, but everyone does it.
Why is NAT bad form?
>From my standpoint as an admin, private IP's & NAT are another tool to
help secure my network. You can't attack what you can'
On 07/31/2009 10:01 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> I suggest you go ahead and burn the LiveCD image you downloaded to a
> CD and see if this OS will run, properly, on your HW, before you
> install it. If so, then download the CD's or DVD for a regular
> install. Hang onto the LiveCD, in case you need to
On 08/03/2009 12:51 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Does anyone have experience with PDNS?
part of the centos infra runs off pdns... plus, I've used it in anger to
frontend a 10k + record dns setup.
> The reason I ask is that I have never heard of it before today, but it looks
> like we might want to
Does anyone have experience with PDNS?
The reason I ask is that I have never heard of it before today, but it looks
like we might want to leverage its sql backend capabilites.
My (useless) searches lead me to:
* http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-es/2009-February/004499.html
* http://lists.
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 18:20
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> >> You could just firewall por
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:55:21 +0100
"Marcelo M. Garcia" wrote:
> CentOS and Scientific Linux together would be like dream come true.
Everyone has different dreams. :)
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz
signature.asc
Descrip
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> You could just firewall port 25 on the spam-checking MX
>
> They are outsourced to google, we cannot control that.
You must have a firewall that you control on your side where these connections
have to pass.
>> relays from the trusted networks and add a high-number
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 17:38
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
>
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From:
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
>> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 16:21
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
>>
>> Christoph Maser wrote:
>>> Am Sonnt
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 16:21
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
>
> Christoph Maser wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 02.08.2009, 21:16
Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 02.08.2009, 21:16 +0200 schrieb Jason Pyeron:
>> We have internal DNS servers that will override the A record for selected
>> hosts.
>> Example mail.pdinc.us will have a different internal ip than external. This
>> has
>> always been a fine way to handle i
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Maser
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 16:02
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
>
> Am Sonntag, den 02.08.2009, 21:16 +0200 schrieb Jason Py
Am Sonntag, den 02.08.2009, 21:16 +0200 schrieb Jason Pyeron:
> We have internal DNS servers that will override the A record for selected
> hosts.
> Example mail.pdinc.us will have a different internal ip than external. This
> has
> always been a fine way to handle it as the zone files are for th
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 15:52
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun.
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Bill Campbell
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 15:20
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
>
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2009, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >We have interna
Madunix wrote on Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:41:29 +0200:
> I have the following issues on a website, would like to know how would
> you resolve these issue?
Why? This questions is really not appropriate for this list. This list
tolerates off-topic questions, up to a limit, I consider this question way
fred smith wrote:
> Some things are just plain different between the two installations, and
> it's stumping me why that would be. Example:
>
> on the old box, the shutdown dialog offers restart, cancel, shutdown,
> and also standby and hibernate. and the standby and hibernate options
> work, too.
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>We have internal DNS servers that will override the A record for selected
>hosts.
>Example mail.pdinc.us will have a different internal ip than external. This has
>always been a fine way to handle it as the zone files are for that specific
>host, and ther
We have internal DNS servers that will override the A record for selected hosts.
Example mail.pdinc.us will have a different internal ip than external. This has
always been a fine way to handle it as the zone files are for that specific
host, and there have never been subdomains before.
Now we wan
Ian jonhson wrote:
>> You have to write:
>>
>> # modprobe p4-clockmod
>>
>> It means no "ko" extension.
>>
>>
>
> Same result.
>
> The p4-clockmod is not in
> /lib/modules/2.6.29.3/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/.
>
> But I tried the acpi-cpufreq.ko and got the same result.
>
>
> -
You need to hire someone that knows web development.
This has nothing to do with CentOS.
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Will your e-commerce site go offline if you have
a DB server failure, fiber cut, flood, fire, or other disaster?
If so, ask about our geographically red
sorry for posting not in the right maillist.
thx
-mu
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, den 02.08.2009, 18:23 +0200 schrieb madunix:
>>> yesterday, I have checked my site in W3 validation and it has shown me
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 02.08.2009, 18:23 +0200 schrieb madunix:
>> yesterday, I have checked my site in W3 validation and it has shown me
>> some 150 errors and 55 warnings. I want to know how these errors
>> affect my site, is there big impact on
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:41 AM, madunix wrote:
> I have the following issues on a website, would like to know how would
> you resolve these issue?
In a later post, I think you said you had about 150 errors, when you
ran it through an HTML validation check. Sounds like it was produced
with somethin
Am Sonntag, den 02.08.2009, 18:23 +0200 schrieb madunix:
> yesterday, I have checked my site in W3 validation and it has shown me
> some 150 errors and 55 warnings. I want to know how these errors
> affect my site, is there big impact on the system? how to read them,
> And how to fix those errors?
yesterday, I have checked my site in W3 validation and it has shown me
some 150 errors and 55 warnings. I want to know how these errors
affect my site, is there big impact on the system? how to read them,
And how to fix those errors?
I used http://validator.w3.org/ and http://validator.aborla.net/
madunix wrote:
> I have the following issues on a website, would like to know how would
> you resolve these issue?
hire someone who knows what they are doing to fix it for
me. Or go to the person who wrote it originally and have them
fix it.
I'm not a web developer, so that's why I'd hire someone
Ian jonhson wrote:
> # modprobe acpi-cpufreq
> FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq
> (/lib/modules/2.6.29.3/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko):
> No such device
That error tells me most likely your hardware is not
compatible with the driver, check 'dmesg' for any messages
the dri
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 23:43 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Ian jonhson wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> >
> > The cpufreq modules have been distributed in Centos. But recently,
> > I met a problem when I tried to test the power-related applications.
> > The module can not be modprobed in kernel notwithst
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:27 AM, madunix wrote:
> yes, it works,,,
> Edit the httpd.conf file:
> Options All Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews
> To disable directory browsing carefully I removed the line that says: Indexes
> Options All FollowSymLinks MultiViews
> Restart apache web server and th
yes, it works,,,
Edit the httpd.conf file:
Options All Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews
To disable directory browsing carefully I removed the line that says: Indexes
Options All FollowSymLinks MultiViews
Restart apache web server and that's it
What about other points?
-mu
On Sun, Aug 2, 2
On 02/08/09 14:41, madunix wrote:
> I have the following issues on a website, would like to know how would
> you resolve these issue?
>
> 1- CSS is not used efficient.
> 2- Search engine need to be optimized.
> 3- Java Scripts are placed between HTML tags.
> 4- Redirecting homepage through JS code,
I have the following issues on a website, would like to know how would
you resolve these issue?
1- CSS is not used efficient.
2- Search engine need to be optimized.
3- Java Scripts are placed between HTML tags.
4- Redirecting homepage through JS code, using client side
5- Web page delay, a lot of
> You have to write:
>
> # modprobe p4-clockmod
>
> It means no "ko" extension.
>
Same result.
The p4-clockmod is not in
/lib/modules/2.6.29.3/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/.
But I tried the acpi-cpufreq.ko and got the same result.
-- dump of screen
# ls /li
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:47:34PM -0400, fred smith wrote:
>
> I've just built a new system and installed latest Centos 5.3 on it. My old
> box also has an up to date Centos 5 on it.
>
> Some things are just plain different between the two installations, and
> it's stumping me why that would be.
Ian jonhson wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
> The cpufreq modules have been distributed in Centos. But recently,
> I met a problem when I tried to test the power-related applications.
> The module can not be modprobed in kernel notwithstanding releated
> with Centos distribution.
>
> The messgae thrown out
>> - dump of screen
>>
>> # modprobe p4-clockmod.ko
>> FATAL: Module p4_clockmod.ko not found
>>
>
> odd that you modprobe'd p4-clockmod but it complained that p4_clockmod
> is missing...
>
> or is this a typo in your post?
>
>
oh...typo (copy wrong messgae). I already t
42 matches
Mail list logo
